Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Effort-reward-imbalance, overcommitment and self-reported health : Is it the interaction that matters?

Identifieur interne : 001027 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 001026; suivant : 001028

Effort-reward-imbalance, overcommitment and self-reported health : Is it the interaction that matters?

Auteurs : Daniel Preckel [Suisse] ; Michael Meinel [Suisse] ; Brigitte M. Kudielka [Allemagne] ; Hans-Joachim Haug [Suisse] ; Joachim E. Fischer [Allemagne]

Source :

RBID : Francis:770-07-27481

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

In recent years, the effort-reward-imbalance (ERI) model has become widely used as a framework for examining job characteristics and employee's health. The present study tested the predictive validity of the ERI model's components - ERI, over-commitment (OC) and their interaction - on the basis of self-reported health outcomes. In a cross-sectional study, data were obtained from 1,587 employees working in the aircraft manufacturing industry in southern Germany. Results suggested that all components of the ERI model (effort-reward-ratio, effort, reward and over-commitment) are associated with health-related quality of life, vital exhaustion, depression and quality of sleep. The separate variables effort and reward explained more of the observed variance than the effort-reward ratio. No interaction between ERI and OC in predicting measurements of self-reported health could be found. The findings suggest (I) that the ERI ratio does not provide more information than the separate use of the variables effort and reward, and (2) that there are main effects of ERI and OC but no interaction effect on employees' health. Implications for theory and applied research are discussed.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0963-1798
A03   1    @0 J. occup. organ. psychol.
A05       @2 80
A06       @3 p. 1
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Effort-reward-imbalance, overcommitment and self-reported health : Is it the interaction that matters?
A11 01  1    @1 PRECKEL (Daniel)
A11 02  1    @1 MEINEL (Michael)
A11 03  1    @1 KUDIELKA (Brigitte M.)
A11 04  1    @1 HAUG (Hans-Joachim)
A11 05  1    @1 FISCHER (Joachim E.)
A14 01      @1 Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology @2 Zurich @3 CHE @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A14 02      @1 Department of Psychology, University of Trier @3 DEU @Z 3 aut.
A14 03      @1 Psychiatric Department of the University of Zurich @3 CHE @Z 4 aut.
A14 04      @1 Institute of Public Health, Mannheim Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University @3 DEU @Z 5 aut.
A20       @1 91-107
A21       @1 2007
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 1016 @5 354000146908700060
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 4 p.
A47 01  1    @0 770-07-27481
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of occupational and organizational psychology
A66 01      @0 GBR
C01 01    ENG  @0 In recent years, the effort-reward-imbalance (ERI) model has become widely used as a framework for examining job characteristics and employee's health. The present study tested the predictive validity of the ERI model's components - ERI, over-commitment (OC) and their interaction - on the basis of self-reported health outcomes. In a cross-sectional study, data were obtained from 1,587 employees working in the aircraft manufacturing industry in southern Germany. Results suggested that all components of the ERI model (effort-reward-ratio, effort, reward and over-commitment) are associated with health-related quality of life, vital exhaustion, depression and quality of sleep. The separate variables effort and reward explained more of the observed variance than the effort-reward ratio. No interaction between ERI and OC in predicting measurements of self-reported health could be found. The findings suggest (I) that the ERI ratio does not provide more information than the separate use of the variables effort and reward, and (2) that there are main effects of ERI and OC but no interaction effect on employees' health. Implications for theory and applied research are discussed.
C02 01  X    @0 770B12E @1 II
C02 02  X    @0 770B12I @1 II
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Récompense @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Reward @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Recompensa @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Engagement personnel @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Personal commitment @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Compromiso personal @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Milieu professionnel @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Occupational environment @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Medio profesional @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Renforcement jeton @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Token reinforcement @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Reforzamiento ficha @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Qualité vie @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Quality of life @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Calidad vida @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Etat sanitaire @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Health status @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Estado sanitario @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Etude transversale @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Cross sectional study @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Estudio transversal @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Stress @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Stress @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Estrés @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Coping @5 09
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Coping @5 09
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Coronación @5 09
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Employé @5 18
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Employee @5 18
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Empleado @5 18
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 19
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 19
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 19
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Environnement social @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Social environment @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Contexto social @5 37
N21       @1 302

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Francis:770-07-27481

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effort-reward-imbalance, overcommitment and self-reported health : Is it the interaction that matters?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Preckel, Daniel" sort="Preckel, Daniel" uniqKey="Preckel D" first="Daniel" last="Preckel">Daniel Preckel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suisse</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Meinel, Michael" sort="Meinel, Michael" uniqKey="Meinel M" first="Michael" last="Meinel">Michael Meinel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suisse</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kudielka, Brigitte M" sort="Kudielka, Brigitte M" uniqKey="Kudielka B" first="Brigitte M." last="Kudielka">Brigitte M. Kudielka</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Psychology, University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haug, Hans Joachim" sort="Haug, Hans Joachim" uniqKey="Haug H" first="Hans-Joachim" last="Haug">Hans-Joachim Haug</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Psychiatric Department of the University of Zurich</s1>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suisse</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fischer, Joachim E" sort="Fischer, Joachim E" uniqKey="Fischer J" first="Joachim E." last="Fischer">Joachim E. Fischer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Institute of Public Health, Mannheim Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">770-07-27481</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 770-07-27481 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:770-07-27481</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000951</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">001027</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effort-reward-imbalance, overcommitment and self-reported health : Is it the interaction that matters?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Preckel, Daniel" sort="Preckel, Daniel" uniqKey="Preckel D" first="Daniel" last="Preckel">Daniel Preckel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suisse</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Meinel, Michael" sort="Meinel, Michael" uniqKey="Meinel M" first="Michael" last="Meinel">Michael Meinel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suisse</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kudielka, Brigitte M" sort="Kudielka, Brigitte M" uniqKey="Kudielka B" first="Brigitte M." last="Kudielka">Brigitte M. Kudielka</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Psychology, University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haug, Hans Joachim" sort="Haug, Hans Joachim" uniqKey="Haug H" first="Hans-Joachim" last="Haug">Hans-Joachim Haug</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Psychiatric Department of the University of Zurich</s1>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suisse</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fischer, Joachim E" sort="Fischer, Joachim E" uniqKey="Fischer J" first="Joachim E." last="Fischer">Joachim E. Fischer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Institute of Public Health, Mannheim Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. occup. organ. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0963-1798</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. occup. organ. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0963-1798</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Coping</term>
<term>Cross sectional study</term>
<term>Employee</term>
<term>Health status</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Occupational environment</term>
<term>Personal commitment</term>
<term>Quality of life</term>
<term>Reward</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Token reinforcement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Récompense</term>
<term>Engagement personnel</term>
<term>Milieu professionnel</term>
<term>Renforcement jeton</term>
<term>Qualité vie</term>
<term>Etat sanitaire</term>
<term>Etude transversale</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Coping</term>
<term>Employé</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Employé</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In recent years, the effort-reward-imbalance (ERI) model has become widely used as a framework for examining job characteristics and employee's health. The present study tested the predictive validity of the ERI model's components - ERI, over-commitment (OC) and their interaction - on the basis of self-reported health outcomes. In a cross-sectional study, data were obtained from 1,587 employees working in the aircraft manufacturing industry in southern Germany. Results suggested that all components of the ERI model (effort-reward-ratio, effort, reward and over-commitment) are associated with health-related quality of life, vital exhaustion, depression and quality of sleep. The separate variables effort and reward explained more of the observed variance than the effort-reward ratio. No interaction between ERI and OC in predicting measurements of self-reported health could be found. The findings suggest (I) that the ERI ratio does not provide more information than the separate use of the variables effort and reward, and (2) that there are main effects of ERI and OC but no interaction effect on employees' health. Implications for theory and applied research are discussed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0963-1798</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. occup. organ. psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>80</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s3>p. 1</s3>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Effort-reward-imbalance, overcommitment and self-reported health : Is it the interaction that matters?</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>PRECKEL (Daniel)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>MEINEL (Michael)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>KUDIELKA (Brigitte M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>HAUG (Hans-Joachim)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>FISCHER (Joachim E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Psychology, University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Psychiatric Department of the University of Zurich</s1>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Institute of Public Health, Mannheim Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>91-107</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>1016</s2>
<s5>354000146908700060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>770-07-27481</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of occupational and organizational psychology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>In recent years, the effort-reward-imbalance (ERI) model has become widely used as a framework for examining job characteristics and employee's health. The present study tested the predictive validity of the ERI model's components - ERI, over-commitment (OC) and their interaction - on the basis of self-reported health outcomes. In a cross-sectional study, data were obtained from 1,587 employees working in the aircraft manufacturing industry in southern Germany. Results suggested that all components of the ERI model (effort-reward-ratio, effort, reward and over-commitment) are associated with health-related quality of life, vital exhaustion, depression and quality of sleep. The separate variables effort and reward explained more of the observed variance than the effort-reward ratio. No interaction between ERI and OC in predicting measurements of self-reported health could be found. The findings suggest (I) that the ERI ratio does not provide more information than the separate use of the variables effort and reward, and (2) that there are main effects of ERI and OC but no interaction effect on employees' health. Implications for theory and applied research are discussed.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>770B12E</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>770B12I</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Récompense</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Reward</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Recompensa</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Engagement personnel</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Personal commitment</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Compromiso personal</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Milieu professionnel</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Occupational environment</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Medio profesional</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Renforcement jeton</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Token reinforcement</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Reforzamiento ficha</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Qualité vie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Quality of life</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Calidad vida</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etat sanitaire</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Health status</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estado sanitario</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude transversale</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cross sectional study</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio transversal</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estrés</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Coping</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Coping</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Coronación</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Employé</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Employee</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Empleado</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Environnement social</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Social environment</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Contexto social</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>302</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001027 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001027 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:770-07-27481
   |texte=   Effort-reward-imbalance, overcommitment and self-reported health : Is it the interaction that matters?
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024