UnivTrevesV1, PascalFrancis, Curation, bibRecord, 000444

Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample

Identifieur interne : 000444 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000443; suivant : 000445

Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample

Auteurs : Robert Langner [Allemagne] ; Andreas Maercker [Allemagne]

Source :

Journal of psychosomatic research [ 0022-3999 ] ; 2005.

RBID : Pascal:05-0369143

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Deuil, Complication, Symptomatologie, Stress, Critère, Diagnostic, Classification, Nosologie, Etude comparative, Echelle Likert, Echelle attitude, Autoévaluation, Version étrangère, Fidélité test, Validité construct, Validité convergente, Notation test, Méthode ROC, Validation test, Prédiction, Psychométrie, Homme, Complicated Grief Module Horowitz et al, Consistance interne, Deuil pathologique.
Wicri :
- topic : Classification, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Attitude scale, Classification, Comparative study, Complication, Construct validity, Convergent validity, Criterion, Diagnosis, Foreign language version, Human, Likert scale, Mourning, Nosology, Pathological bereavement, Prediction, Psychometrics, Receiver operating characteristic curves, Self evaluation, Stress, Symptomatology, Test reliability, Test scoring, Test validation.

Abstract

Background: Complicated grief has been described as a diagnosis candidate for DSM-V. On the basis of the stress response theory, Horowitz et al. [Am J Psychiatry 154 (1997) 904-10] characterized complicated grief as a combination of sustained intrusion, avoidance, and maladaptation symptoms following the loss of a close person. This study aimed at evaluating diagnostic criteria based on the stress response model of complicated grief. Methods: We administered a symptom list derived from Horowitz et al.'s operationalization to a sample of bereaved persons and evaluated the psychometric properties of the symptom criteria and symptom category subscales. Using this symptom list and other self-report measures of psychopathology and normal grief reactions, we examined a German sample consisting of 75 participants who had lost either siblings, children, parents, or spouses, on average, 5.4 years prior to the study. Results: Analyses confirmed the classification of symptoms into intrusion, avoidance, and failure-to-adapt categories with only minimal reordering (two symptom criteria). The symptom category subscales showed favourable psychometric characteristics, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated high diagnostic accuracy of the symptom criteria, and predictive validation revealed a meaningful correlational pattern to standard measures of divergent psychopathology and normal grief reactions. Conclusions: The application of a stress response operationalization of complicated grief is supported.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0022-3999`
A02	`01`			`@0 JPCRAT`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. psychosom. res.`
A05				`@2 58`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 LANGNER (Robert)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 MAERCKER (Andreas)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology @3 DEU @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Trier @2 Trier 54286 @3 DEU @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 235-242`
A21				`@1 2005`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 1382 @5 354000125581290030`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 34 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 05-0369143`
A60				`@1 P @3 CC`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of psychosomatic research`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Background: Complicated grief has been described as a diagnosis candidate for DSM-V. On the basis of the stress response theory, Horowitz et al. [Am J Psychiatry 154 (1997) 904-10] characterized complicated grief as a combination of sustained intrusion, avoidance, and maladaptation symptoms following the loss of a close person. This study aimed at evaluating diagnostic criteria based on the stress response model of complicated grief. Methods: We administered a symptom list derived from Horowitz et al.'s operationalization to a sample of bereaved persons and evaluated the psychometric properties of the symptom criteria and symptom category subscales. Using this symptom list and other self-report measures of psychopathology and normal grief reactions, we examined a German sample consisting of 75 participants who had lost either siblings, children, parents, or spouses, on average, 5.4 years prior to the study. Results: Analyses confirmed the classification of symptoms into intrusion, avoidance, and failure-to-adapt categories with only minimal reordering (two symptom criteria). The symptom category subscales showed favourable psychometric characteristics, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated high diagnostic accuracy of the symptom criteria, and predictive validation revealed a meaningful correlational pattern to standard measures of divergent psychopathology and normal grief reactions. Conclusions: The application of a stress response operationalization of complicated grief is supported.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B18B01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Deuil @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Mourning @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Duelo @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Complication @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Complication @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Complicación @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Symptomatologie @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Symptomatology @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sintomatología @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stress @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stress @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estrés @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Critère @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Criterion @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Criterio @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Diagnostic @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Diagnosis @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diagnóstico @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Classification @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Classification @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Clasificación @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Nosologie @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Nosology @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Nosología @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Echelle Likert @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Likert scale @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Escala Likert @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Echelle attitude @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Attitude scale @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Escala actitud @5 11`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Autoévaluation @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Self evaluation @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Autoevaluación @5 12`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Version étrangère @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Foreign language version @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Versión extranjera @5 13`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Fidélité test @5 17`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Test reliability @5 17`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Fidelidad pruebra @5 17`
C03	`15`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Validité construct @5 18`
C03	`15`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Construct validity @5 18`
C03	`15`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Validez construct @5 18`
C03	`16`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Validité convergente @5 19`
C03	`16`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Convergent validity @5 19`
C03	`16`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Validez convergent @5 19`
C03	`17`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Notation test @5 20`
C03	`17`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Test scoring @5 20`
C03	`17`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Notación prueba @5 20`
C03	`18`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Méthode ROC @5 21`
C03	`18`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Receiver operating characteristic curves @5 21`
C03	`18`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Método ROC @5 21`
C03	`19`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Validation test @5 22`
C03	`19`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Test validation @5 22`
C03	`19`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Validación prueba @5 22`
C03	`20`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Prédiction @5 23`
C03	`20`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Prediction @5 23`
C03	`20`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Predicción @5 23`
C03	`21`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Psychométrie @5 24`
C03	`21`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Psychometrics @5 24`
C03	`21`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Psicometría @5 24`
C03	`22`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 35`
C03	`22`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 35`
C03	`22`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 35`
C03	`23`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Complicated Grief Module Horowitz et al @4 INC @5 86`
C03	`24`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Consistance interne @4 INC @5 90`
C03	`25`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Deuil pathologique @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`25`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Pathological bereavement @4 CD @5 96`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Allemand @5 69`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 German @5 69`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Alemán @5 69`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Version revisée @5 70`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Revised drafting @5 70`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Versión revisada @5 70`
N21				`@1 255`
N44	`01`			`@1 PSI`
N82				`@1 PSI`

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A50

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:05-0369143

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample</title>
<author><name sortKey="Langner, Robert" sort="Langner, Robert" uniqKey="Langner R" first="Robert" last="Langner">Robert Langner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Maercker, Andreas" sort="Maercker, Andreas" uniqKey="Maercker A" first="Andreas" last="Maercker">Andreas Maercker</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Trier</s1>
<s2>Trier 54286</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">05-0369143</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0369143 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0369143</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000A50</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000444</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample</title>
<author><name sortKey="Langner, Robert" sort="Langner, Robert" uniqKey="Langner R" first="Robert" last="Langner">Robert Langner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Maercker, Andreas" sort="Maercker, Andreas" uniqKey="Maercker A" first="Andreas" last="Maercker">Andreas Maercker</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Trier</s1>
<s2>Trier 54286</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of psychosomatic research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. psychosom. res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3999</idno>
<imprint><date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of psychosomatic research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. psychosom. res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3999</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude scale</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Construct validity</term>
<term>Convergent validity</term>
<term>Criterion</term>
<term>Diagnosis</term>
<term>Foreign language version</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Likert scale</term>
<term>Mourning</term>
<term>Nosology</term>
<term>Pathological bereavement</term>
<term>Prediction</term>
<term>Psychometrics</term>
<term>Receiver operating characteristic curves</term>
<term>Self evaluation</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Symptomatology</term>
<term>Test reliability</term>
<term>Test scoring</term>
<term>Test validation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Deuil</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Symptomatologie</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Critère</term>
<term>Diagnostic</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Nosologie</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Echelle Likert</term>
<term>Echelle attitude</term>
<term>Autoévaluation</term>
<term>Version étrangère</term>
<term>Fidélité test</term>
<term>Validité construct</term>
<term>Validité convergente</term>
<term>Notation test</term>
<term>Méthode ROC</term>
<term>Validation test</term>
<term>Prédiction</term>
<term>Psychométrie</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Complicated Grief Module Horowitz et al</term>
<term>Consistance interne</term>
<term>Deuil pathologique</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Classification</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Complicated grief has been described as a diagnosis candidate for DSM-V. On the basis of the stress response theory, Horowitz et al. [Am J Psychiatry 154 (1997) 904-10] characterized complicated grief as a combination of sustained intrusion, avoidance, and maladaptation symptoms following the loss of a close person. This study aimed at evaluating diagnostic criteria based on the stress response model of complicated grief. Methods: We administered a symptom list derived from Horowitz et al.'s operationalization to a sample of bereaved persons and evaluated the psychometric properties of the symptom criteria and symptom category subscales. Using this symptom list and other self-report measures of psychopathology and normal grief reactions, we examined a German sample consisting of 75 participants who had lost either siblings, children, parents, or spouses, on average, 5.4 years prior to the study. Results: Analyses confirmed the classification of symptoms into intrusion, avoidance, and failure-to-adapt categories with only minimal reordering (two symptom criteria). The symptom category subscales showed favourable psychometric characteristics, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated high diagnostic accuracy of the symptom criteria, and predictive validation revealed a meaningful correlational pattern to standard measures of divergent psychopathology and normal grief reactions. Conclusions: The application of a stress response operationalization of complicated grief is supported.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3999</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JPCRAT</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. psychosom. res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>58</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LANGNER (Robert)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MAERCKER (Andreas)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Trier</s1>
<s2>Trier 54286</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>235-242</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2005</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>1382</s2>
<s5>354000125581290030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>34 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>05-0369143</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>CC</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of psychosomatic research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: Complicated grief has been described as a diagnosis candidate for DSM-V. On the basis of the stress response theory, Horowitz et al. [Am J Psychiatry 154 (1997) 904-10] characterized complicated grief as a combination of sustained intrusion, avoidance, and maladaptation symptoms following the loss of a close person. This study aimed at evaluating diagnostic criteria based on the stress response model of complicated grief. Methods: We administered a symptom list derived from Horowitz et al.'s operationalization to a sample of bereaved persons and evaluated the psychometric properties of the symptom criteria and symptom category subscales. Using this symptom list and other self-report measures of psychopathology and normal grief reactions, we examined a German sample consisting of 75 participants who had lost either siblings, children, parents, or spouses, on average, 5.4 years prior to the study. Results: Analyses confirmed the classification of symptoms into intrusion, avoidance, and failure-to-adapt categories with only minimal reordering (two symptom criteria). The symptom category subscales showed favourable psychometric characteristics, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated high diagnostic accuracy of the symptom criteria, and predictive validation revealed a meaningful correlational pattern to standard measures of divergent psychopathology and normal grief reactions. Conclusions: The application of a stress response operationalization of complicated grief is supported.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B18B01</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Deuil</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mourning</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Duelo</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Complicación</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Symptomatologie</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Symptomatology</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sintomatología</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estrés</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Critère</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Criterion</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Criterio</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Diagnostic</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Diagnosis</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diagnóstico</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Clasificación</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Nosologie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nosology</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Nosología</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Echelle Likert</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Likert scale</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Escala Likert</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Echelle attitude</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Attitude scale</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Escala actitud</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Autoévaluation</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Self evaluation</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Autoevaluación</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Version étrangère</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Foreign language version</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Versión extranjera</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fidélité test</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Test reliability</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fidelidad pruebra</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Validité construct</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Construct validity</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Validez construct</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Validité convergente</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Convergent validity</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Validez convergent</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Notation test</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Test scoring</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="17" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Notación prueba</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Méthode ROC</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Receiver operating characteristic curves</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="18" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Método ROC</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Validation test</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Test validation</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="19" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Validación prueba</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prédiction</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prediction</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="20" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Predicción</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Psychométrie</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Psychometrics</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="21" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Psicometría</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="22" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="22" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="22" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="23" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complicated Grief Module Horowitz et al</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="24" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Consistance interne</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>90</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="25" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Deuil pathologique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="25" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Pathological bereavement</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Allemand</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>German</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Alemán</s0>
<s5>69</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Version revisée</s0>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Revised drafting</s0>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Versión revisada</s0>
<s5>70</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>255</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000444 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000444 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:05-0369143
   |texte=   Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample

Complicated grief as a stress response disorder : evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri