UnivTrevesV1, PascalFrancis, Curation, bibRecord, 000053

Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research

Identifieur interne : 000053 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000052; suivant : 000054

Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research

Auteurs : J. Rojahn [États-Unis] ; F. Gerhards [Allemagne] ; S. T. Matlock [États-Unis] ; T. L. Kroeger [États-Unis]

Source :

Psychiatry research [ 0165-1781 ] ; 2000.

RBID : Pascal:00-0430140

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Mimique, Face, Emotion émotivité, Echelle évaluation, Reconnaissance, Cognition, Validité construct, Validation test, Intervalle test retest, Analyse item, Fidélité test, Psychométrie, Exploration clinique, Homme, Facial Discrimination Task Erwin et al, Consistance interne.
Wicri :
- topic : Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Clinical investigation, Cognition, Construct validity, Emotion emotionality, Evaluation scale, Face, Facial expression, Human, Intertrial interval, Item analysis, Psychometrics, Recognition, Test reliability, Test validation.

Abstract

The Facial Discrimination Task (FDT) (Erwin, R.J., Gur, R.C., Gur, R.E., Skolnick, B., Mawhinney-Hee, M., Smailis, J., 1992. Facial emotion discrimination: I. Task construction and behavioural findings in normal participants. Psychiatry Research 42, 231-240.) consists of standardized black-and-white photographs of Caucasian actors exhibiting happy, sad, and neutral faces. Originally designed for brain-imaging research in emotion recognition in schizophrenia and major depression, it has since been successfully employed in emotion recognition studies on mental retardation and psychosomatic disorders. This article presents new basic psychometric data from three studies with a total of 401 college undergraduates. Content validity, item reliability (test-retest, item-total correlation, item difficulty) and test reliability (internal consistency) were established. Happy and sad items were easier to agree upon than neutral ones. In general, happy items had the highest validity, highest test-retest reliability, and highest item-total correlations. Recognition errors of neutral items were biased toward negative affect. Advantages and limitations of the FDT for clinical research applications are discussed.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0165-1781`
A02	`01`			`@0 PSRSDR`
A03		`1`		`@0 Psychiatry res.`
A05				`@2 95`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 ROJAHN (J.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 GERHARDS (F.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 MATLOCK (S. T.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 KROEGER (T. L.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive @2 Columbus, OH 43210 @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier @2 Trier @3 DEU @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 169-181`
A21				`@1 2000`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 18303 @5 354000091214280080`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2000 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 23 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 00-0430140`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Psychiatry research`
A66	`01`			`@0 IRL`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 The Facial Discrimination Task (FDT) (Erwin, R.J., Gur, R.C., Gur, R.E., Skolnick, B., Mawhinney-Hee, M., Smailis, J., 1992. Facial emotion discrimination: I. Task construction and behavioural findings in normal participants. Psychiatry Research 42, 231-240.) consists of standardized black-and-white photographs of Caucasian actors exhibiting happy, sad, and neutral faces. Originally designed for brain-imaging research in emotion recognition in schizophrenia and major depression, it has since been successfully employed in emotion recognition studies on mental retardation and psychosomatic disorders. This article presents new basic psychometric data from three studies with a total of 401 college undergraduates. Content validity, item reliability (test-retest, item-total correlation, item difficulty) and test reliability (internal consistency) were established. Happy and sad items were easier to agree upon than neutral ones. In general, happy items had the highest validity, highest test-retest reliability, and highest item-total correlations. Recognition errors of neutral items were biased toward negative affect. Advantages and limitations of the FDT for clinical research applications are discussed.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B18B01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mimique @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Facial expression @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mímica @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Face @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Face @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cara @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Emotion émotivité @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Emotion emotionality @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Emoción emotividad @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Echelle évaluation @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Evaluation scale @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Escala evaluación @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Reconnaissance @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Recognition @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reconocimiento @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Validité construct @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Construct validity @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Validez construct @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Validation test @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Test validation @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Validación prueba @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Intervalle test retest @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intertrial interval @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Intervalo entre pruebas @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Analyse item @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Item analysis @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Análisis item @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Fidélité test @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Test reliability @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Fidelidad pruebra @5 11`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Psychométrie @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Psychometrics @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Psicometría @5 12`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Exploration clinique @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Clinical investigation @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Exploración clínica @5 13`
C03	`14`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 17`
C03	`14`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 17`
C03	`14`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 17`
C03	`15`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Facial Discrimination Task Erwin et al @4 INC @5 86`
C03	`16`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Consistance interne @4 INC @5 90`
N21				`@1 290`

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000F16

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:00-0430140

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research</title>
<author><name sortKey="Rojahn, J" sort="Rojahn, J" uniqKey="Rojahn J" first="J." last="Rojahn">J. Rojahn</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive</s1>
<s2>Columbus, OH 43210</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gerhards, F" sort="Gerhards, F" uniqKey="Gerhards F" first="F." last="Gerhards">F. Gerhards</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier</s1>
<s2>Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Matlock, S T" sort="Matlock, S T" uniqKey="Matlock S" first="S. T." last="Matlock">S. T. Matlock</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive</s1>
<s2>Columbus, OH 43210</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kroeger, T L" sort="Kroeger, T L" uniqKey="Kroeger T" first="T. L." last="Kroeger">T. L. Kroeger</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive</s1>
<s2>Columbus, OH 43210</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">00-0430140</idno>
<date when="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 00-0430140 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:00-0430140</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000F16</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000053</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research</title>
<author><name sortKey="Rojahn, J" sort="Rojahn, J" uniqKey="Rojahn J" first="J." last="Rojahn">J. Rojahn</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive</s1>
<s2>Columbus, OH 43210</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gerhards, F" sort="Gerhards, F" uniqKey="Gerhards F" first="F." last="Gerhards">F. Gerhards</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier</s1>
<s2>Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Allemagne</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Matlock, S T" sort="Matlock, S T" uniqKey="Matlock S" first="S. T." last="Matlock">S. T. Matlock</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive</s1>
<s2>Columbus, OH 43210</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kroeger, T L" sort="Kroeger, T L" uniqKey="Kroeger T" first="T. L." last="Kroeger">T. L. Kroeger</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive</s1>
<s2>Columbus, OH 43210</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Psychiatry research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychiatry res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0165-1781</idno>
<imprint><date when="2000">2000</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Psychiatry research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychiatry res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0165-1781</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical investigation</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Construct validity</term>
<term>Emotion emotionality</term>
<term>Evaluation scale</term>
<term>Face</term>
<term>Facial expression</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intertrial interval</term>
<term>Item analysis</term>
<term>Psychometrics</term>
<term>Recognition</term>
<term>Test reliability</term>
<term>Test validation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mimique</term>
<term>Face</term>
<term>Emotion émotivité</term>
<term>Echelle évaluation</term>
<term>Reconnaissance</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Validité construct</term>
<term>Validation test</term>
<term>Intervalle test retest</term>
<term>Analyse item</term>
<term>Fidélité test</term>
<term>Psychométrie</term>
<term>Exploration clinique</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Facial Discrimination Task Erwin et al</term>
<term>Consistance interne</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The Facial Discrimination Task (FDT) (Erwin, R.J., Gur, R.C., Gur, R.E., Skolnick, B., Mawhinney-Hee, M., Smailis, J., 1992. Facial emotion discrimination: I. Task construction and behavioural findings in normal participants. Psychiatry Research 42, 231-240.) consists of standardized black-and-white photographs of Caucasian actors exhibiting happy, sad, and neutral faces. Originally designed for brain-imaging research in emotion recognition in schizophrenia and major depression, it has since been successfully employed in emotion recognition studies on mental retardation and psychosomatic disorders. This article presents new basic psychometric data from three studies with a total of 401 college undergraduates. Content validity, item reliability (test-retest, item-total correlation, item difficulty) and test reliability (internal consistency) were established. Happy and sad items were easier to agree upon than neutral ones. In general, happy items had the highest validity, highest test-retest reliability, and highest item-total correlations. Recognition errors of neutral items were biased toward negative affect. Advantages and limitations of the FDT for clinical research applications are discussed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0165-1781</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>PSRSDR</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Psychiatry res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>95</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>ROJAHN (J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>GERHARDS (F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MATLOCK (S. T.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>KROEGER (T. L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive</s1>
<s2>Columbus, OH 43210</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier</s1>
<s2>Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>169-181</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2000</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>18303</s2>
<s5>354000091214280080</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2000 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>23 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>00-0430140</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Psychiatry research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>IRL</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The Facial Discrimination Task (FDT) (Erwin, R.J., Gur, R.C., Gur, R.E., Skolnick, B., Mawhinney-Hee, M., Smailis, J., 1992. Facial emotion discrimination: I. Task construction and behavioural findings in normal participants. Psychiatry Research 42, 231-240.) consists of standardized black-and-white photographs of Caucasian actors exhibiting happy, sad, and neutral faces. Originally designed for brain-imaging research in emotion recognition in schizophrenia and major depression, it has since been successfully employed in emotion recognition studies on mental retardation and psychosomatic disorders. This article presents new basic psychometric data from three studies with a total of 401 college undergraduates. Content validity, item reliability (test-retest, item-total correlation, item difficulty) and test reliability (internal consistency) were established. Happy and sad items were easier to agree upon than neutral ones. In general, happy items had the highest validity, highest test-retest reliability, and highest item-total correlations. Recognition errors of neutral items were biased toward negative affect. Advantages and limitations of the FDT for clinical research applications are discussed.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B18B01</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mimique</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Facial expression</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mímica</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Face</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Face</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cara</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Emotion émotivité</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Emotion emotionality</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Emoción emotividad</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Echelle évaluation</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Evaluation scale</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Escala evaluación</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Reconnaissance</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Recognition</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reconocimiento</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Validité construct</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Construct validity</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Validez construct</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Validation test</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Test validation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Validación prueba</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Intervalle test retest</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intertrial interval</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Intervalo entre pruebas</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Analyse item</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Item analysis</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Análisis item</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fidélité test</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Test reliability</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fidelidad pruebra</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Psychométrie</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Psychometrics</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Psicometría</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Exploration clinique</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Clinical investigation</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Exploración clínica</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Facial Discrimination Task Erwin et al</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="16" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Consistance interne</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>90</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>290</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000053 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:00-0430140
   |texte=   Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research

Reliability and validity studies of the Facial Discrimination Task for emotion research

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri