Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion
Identifieur interne : 001466 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001465; suivant : 001467Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion
Auteurs : H. Schaeben ; H. SiemesSource :
- Mathematical geology [ 0882-8121 ] ; 1996.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The probability density function of orientations of crystals generally cannot be measured directly without destruction of the specimen. Therefore it is usual practice to sample pole density functions of several crystal forms in diffraction experiments with a texture goniometer. Determining a reasonable orientation density function from experimental pole density functions is then the crucial prerequisite of quantitative texture analysis. This mathematical problem may be addressed as a tomographic inversion problem specified by the crystal and statistical specimen symmetries and the properties of the diffraction experiment. Its solution with maximum entropy preferred orientation portion and maximum uniform portion is proposed because it yields the most conservative orientation density function with systematically reduced correlation effects, thus avoiding artificial texture "ghost" components caused by the specific properties of the diffraction experiment.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 96-0201422 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion |
AU : | SCHAEBEN (H.); SIEMES (H.); HERZFELD (Ute Christina) |
AF : | Department of Mineralogy, University of Technology Aachen, Templergraben 55/52056 Aachen/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut.); FB VI Quantitative Methoden in den Geowissenschaften, Universität Trier/54286 Trier/Allemagne (1 aut.); Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder/Boulder, Colorado 80309-0450/Etats-Unis (1 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Mathematical geology; ISSN 0882-8121; Coden MATGED; Etats-Unis; Da. 1996; Vol. 28; No. 2; Pp. 169-201; Bibl. 3 p.1/2 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | The probability density function of orientations of crystals generally cannot be measured directly without destruction of the specimen. Therefore it is usual practice to sample pole density functions of several crystal forms in diffraction experiments with a texture goniometer. Determining a reasonable orientation density function from experimental pole density functions is then the crucial prerequisite of quantitative texture analysis. This mathematical problem may be addressed as a tomographic inversion problem specified by the crystal and statistical specimen symmetries and the properties of the diffraction experiment. Its solution with maximum entropy preferred orientation portion and maximum uniform portion is proposed because it yields the most conservative orientation density function with systematically reduced correlation effects, thus avoiding artificial texture "ghost" components caused by the specific properties of the diffraction experiment. |
CC : | 001E01G04; 223A04 |
FD : | Quartzite; Fabrique; Analyse texture; Orientation préférentielle; Goniométrie; Fonction densité; Méthode entropie maximum; Problème inverse; Tomographie; Analyse quantitative; Polycristal; Etude cas |
ED : | Quartzites; fabric; Texture analysis; Preferred orientation; Goniometry; Density function; Method of maximum entropy; Inverse problem; Tomography; Quantitative analysis; Polycrystal; Case study |
GD : | Bevorzugte Orientierung; Tomographie; Quantitative Analyse; Polykristall |
SD : | Cuarzita; Fábrica; Análisis textura; Orientación preferencial; Goniometría; Función densidad; Método entropía máxima; Problema inverso; Tomografía; Análisis cuantitativo; Policristal; Estudio caso |
LO : | INIST-14907.354000053329610030 |
ID : | 96-0201422 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:96-0201422Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Schaeben, H" sort="Schaeben, H" uniqKey="Schaeben H" first="H." last="Schaeben">H. Schaeben</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mineralogy, University of Technology Aachen, Templergraben 55</s1>
<s2>52056 Aachen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Siemes, H" sort="Siemes, H" uniqKey="Siemes H" first="H." last="Siemes">H. Siemes</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mineralogy, University of Technology Aachen, Templergraben 55</s1>
<s2>52056 Aachen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">96-0201422</idno>
<date when="1996">1996</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 96-0201422 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:96-0201422</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001466</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Schaeben, H" sort="Schaeben, H" uniqKey="Schaeben H" first="H." last="Schaeben">H. Schaeben</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mineralogy, University of Technology Aachen, Templergraben 55</s1>
<s2>52056 Aachen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Siemes, H" sort="Siemes, H" uniqKey="Siemes H" first="H." last="Siemes">H. Siemes</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mineralogy, University of Technology Aachen, Templergraben 55</s1>
<s2>52056 Aachen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Mathematical geology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Math. geol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0882-8121</idno>
<imprint><date when="1996">1996</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Mathematical geology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Math. geol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0882-8121</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Case study</term>
<term>Density function</term>
<term>Goniometry</term>
<term>Inverse problem</term>
<term>Method of maximum entropy</term>
<term>Polycrystal</term>
<term>Preferred orientation</term>
<term>Quantitative analysis</term>
<term>Quartzites</term>
<term>Texture analysis</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>fabric</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Quartzite</term>
<term>Fabrique</term>
<term>Analyse texture</term>
<term>Orientation préférentielle</term>
<term>Goniométrie</term>
<term>Fonction densité</term>
<term>Méthode entropie maximum</term>
<term>Problème inverse</term>
<term>Tomographie</term>
<term>Analyse quantitative</term>
<term>Polycristal</term>
<term>Etude cas</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The probability density function of orientations of crystals generally cannot be measured directly without destruction of the specimen. Therefore it is usual practice to sample pole density functions of several crystal forms in diffraction experiments with a texture goniometer. Determining a reasonable orientation density function from experimental pole density functions is then the crucial prerequisite of quantitative texture analysis. This mathematical problem may be addressed as a tomographic inversion problem specified by the crystal and statistical specimen symmetries and the properties of the diffraction experiment. Its solution with maximum entropy preferred orientation portion and maximum uniform portion is proposed because it yields the most conservative orientation density function with systematically reduced correlation effects, thus avoiding artificial texture "ghost" components caused by the specific properties of the diffraction experiment.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0882-8121</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>MATGED</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Math. geol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>28</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Inverse theory in the earth sciences</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SCHAEBEN (H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SIEMES (H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>HERZFELD (Ute Christina)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mineralogy, University of Technology Aachen, Templergraben 55</s1>
<s2>52056 Aachen</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01"><s1>FB VI Quantitative Methoden in den Geowissenschaften, Universität Trier</s1>
<s2>54286 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA15 i1="02"><s1>Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder</s1>
<s2>Boulder, Colorado 80309-0450</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20><s1>169-201</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1996</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>14907</s2>
<s5>354000053329610030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3 p.1/2</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>96-0201422</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Mathematical geology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The probability density function of orientations of crystals generally cannot be measured directly without destruction of the specimen. Therefore it is usual practice to sample pole density functions of several crystal forms in diffraction experiments with a texture goniometer. Determining a reasonable orientation density function from experimental pole density functions is then the crucial prerequisite of quantitative texture analysis. This mathematical problem may be addressed as a tomographic inversion problem specified by the crystal and statistical specimen symmetries and the properties of the diffraction experiment. Its solution with maximum entropy preferred orientation portion and maximum uniform portion is proposed because it yields the most conservative orientation density function with systematically reduced correlation effects, thus avoiding artificial texture "ghost" components caused by the specific properties of the diffraction experiment.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>001E01G04</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="2"><s0>223A04</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Quartzite</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Quartzites</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cuarzita</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="2" l="FRE"><s0>Fabrique</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="2" l="ENG"><s0>fabric</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="2" l="SPA"><s0>Fábrica</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Analyse texture</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Texture analysis</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Análisis textura</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Orientation préférentielle</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Preferred orientation</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Bevorzugte Orientierung</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Orientación preferencial</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Goniométrie</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Goniometry</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Goniometría</s0>
<s5>28</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fonction densité</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Density function</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Función densidad</s0>
<s5>29</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Méthode entropie maximum</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Method of maximum entropy</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Método entropía máxima</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Problème inverse</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Inverse problem</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Problema inverso</s0>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tomographie</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tomography</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Tomographie</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tomografía</s0>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Analyse quantitative</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Quantitative analysis</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Quantitative Analyse</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Análisis cuantitativo</s0>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Polycristal</s0>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Polycrystal</s0>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Polykristall</s0>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Policristal</s0>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude cas</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Case study</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio caso</s0>
<s5>35</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>134</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 96-0201422 INIST</NO>
<ET>Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion</ET>
<AU>SCHAEBEN (H.); SIEMES (H.); HERZFELD (Ute Christina)</AU>
<AF>Department of Mineralogy, University of Technology Aachen, Templergraben 55/52056 Aachen/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut.); FB VI Quantitative Methoden in den Geowissenschaften, Universität Trier/54286 Trier/Allemagne (1 aut.); Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder/Boulder, Colorado 80309-0450/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Mathematical geology; ISSN 0882-8121; Coden MATGED; Etats-Unis; Da. 1996; Vol. 28; No. 2; Pp. 169-201; Bibl. 3 p.1/2</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The probability density function of orientations of crystals generally cannot be measured directly without destruction of the specimen. Therefore it is usual practice to sample pole density functions of several crystal forms in diffraction experiments with a texture goniometer. Determining a reasonable orientation density function from experimental pole density functions is then the crucial prerequisite of quantitative texture analysis. This mathematical problem may be addressed as a tomographic inversion problem specified by the crystal and statistical specimen symmetries and the properties of the diffraction experiment. Its solution with maximum entropy preferred orientation portion and maximum uniform portion is proposed because it yields the most conservative orientation density function with systematically reduced correlation effects, thus avoiding artificial texture "ghost" components caused by the specific properties of the diffraction experiment.</EA>
<CC>001E01G04; 223A04</CC>
<FD>Quartzite; Fabrique; Analyse texture; Orientation préférentielle; Goniométrie; Fonction densité; Méthode entropie maximum; Problème inverse; Tomographie; Analyse quantitative; Polycristal; Etude cas</FD>
<ED>Quartzites; fabric; Texture analysis; Preferred orientation; Goniometry; Density function; Method of maximum entropy; Inverse problem; Tomography; Quantitative analysis; Polycrystal; Case study</ED>
<GD>Bevorzugte Orientierung; Tomographie; Quantitative Analyse; Polykristall</GD>
<SD>Cuarzita; Fábrica; Análisis textura; Orientación preferencial; Goniometría; Función densidad; Método entropía máxima; Problema inverso; Tomografía; Análisis cuantitativo; Policristal; Estudio caso</SD>
<LO>INIST-14907.354000053329610030</LO>
<ID>96-0201422</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001466 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001466 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie |area= UnivTrevesV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:96-0201422 |texte= Determination and interpretation of preferred orientation with texture goniometry : An application of indicators to maximum entropy pole- to orientation-density inversion }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. | ![]() |