Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation
Identifieur interne : 001167 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001166; suivant : 001168Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation
Auteurs : J. C. Pruessner ; J. Gaab ; D. H. Hellhammer ; D. Lintz ; N. Schommer ; C. KirschbaumSource :
- Psychoneuroendocrinology [ 0306-4530 ] ; 1997.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Attempts to link personality traits and cortisol stress responses have often been inconclusive. The aim of this paper was to investigate this association by aggregating cortisol stress responses. Therefore, 20 healthy men were exposed to a task consisting of public speaking and mental arithmetics in front of an audience on five days. Six cortisol levels were measured in relation to the stressful task obtained at 10-min intervals on each day. Psychological assessment included the Questionnaire for Competence and Control (FKK) and the Giessen-Test (G-T). These questionnaires focus on assessing personality traits, i.e. locus of control and self-concept. Areas under the response curve (AUC) of the six cortisol samples were computed to obtain an index of the individual's cortisol stress response on each day. Since novelty is a random situational factor likely to mask individual differences in the stress response, the AUC cortisol stress responses of days two to five were consecutively aggregated, excluding the first day. Scales of the two questionnaires employed did not correlate with the AUC cortisol stress response of the first stress trial. The correlation pattern of the AUC cortisol measures of days two to five with the questionnaire scales was inconclusive. However, significant correlations emerged with an increasing number of cortisol stress responses aggregated. Correlations between the measure of social dominance and aggregated AUC cortisol stress responses rose from r = - .47 on day two of the experimental session to r = -.70 after aggregating days two to five. Similarly. measures of locus of control and cortisol stress responses became increasingly correlated with aggregation of several stress exposures. These data provide preliminary evidence for a relationship between questionnaire scales aiming at assessing personality traits and cortisol stress responses uncovered by repeated stress exposure and data aggregation. While novelty may mask the impact of personality on the cortisol stress response on the first exposure, differences in the ability to cope with the stressful situation may lead to different cortisol stress response patterns on subsequent stress exposures. With data aggregation, an association between the trait component of cortisol stress responses and questionnaire scales might be uncovered. For reliable investigation of correlations between personality variables and cortisol stress responses, repeated stress exposure and data aggregation is suggested.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 98-0082943 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation |
AU : | PRUESSNER (J. C.); GAAB (J.); HELLHAMMER (D. H.); LINTZ (D.); SCHOMMER (N.); KIRSCHBAUM (C.) |
AF : | Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11/54290 Trier/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Psychoneuroendocrinology; ISSN 0306-4530; Coden PSYCDE; Royaume-Uni; Da. 1997; Vol. 22; No. 8; Pp. 615-625; Bibl. 2 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Attempts to link personality traits and cortisol stress responses have often been inconclusive. The aim of this paper was to investigate this association by aggregating cortisol stress responses. Therefore, 20 healthy men were exposed to a task consisting of public speaking and mental arithmetics in front of an audience on five days. Six cortisol levels were measured in relation to the stressful task obtained at 10-min intervals on each day. Psychological assessment included the Questionnaire for Competence and Control (FKK) and the Giessen-Test (G-T). These questionnaires focus on assessing personality traits, i.e. locus of control and self-concept. Areas under the response curve (AUC) of the six cortisol samples were computed to obtain an index of the individual's cortisol stress response on each day. Since novelty is a random situational factor likely to mask individual differences in the stress response, the AUC cortisol stress responses of days two to five were consecutively aggregated, excluding the first day. Scales of the two questionnaires employed did not correlate with the AUC cortisol stress response of the first stress trial. The correlation pattern of the AUC cortisol measures of days two to five with the questionnaire scales was inconclusive. However, significant correlations emerged with an increasing number of cortisol stress responses aggregated. Correlations between the measure of social dominance and aggregated AUC cortisol stress responses rose from r = - .47 on day two of the experimental session to r = -.70 after aggregating days two to five. Similarly. measures of locus of control and cortisol stress responses became increasingly correlated with aggregation of several stress exposures. These data provide preliminary evidence for a relationship between questionnaire scales aiming at assessing personality traits and cortisol stress responses uncovered by repeated stress exposure and data aggregation. While novelty may mask the impact of personality on the cortisol stress response on the first exposure, differences in the ability to cope with the stressful situation may lead to different cortisol stress response patterns on subsequent stress exposures. With data aggregation, an association between the trait component of cortisol stress responses and questionnaire scales might be uncovered. For reliable investigation of correlations between personality variables and cortisol stress responses, repeated stress exposure and data aggregation is suggested. |
CC : | 002A26C03 |
FD : | Personnalité; Stress; Hydrocortisone; Salive; Activité mentale; Arithmétique; Production verbale; Emotion émotivité; Système hypothalamohypophysosurrénalien; Homme |
FG : | Affect affectivité; Glucocorticoïde; Hormone surrénalienne |
ED : | Personality; Stress; Hydrocortisone; Saliva; Mental activity; Arithmetics; Verbal production; Emotion emotionality; Hypothalamohypophysoadrenal axis; Human |
EG : | Affect affectivity; Glucocorticoid; Adrenal hormone |
SD : | Personalidad; Stress; Hidrocortisona; Saliva; Actividad mental; Aritmética; Producción verbal; Emoción emotividad; Sistema hipotalamohipofisosuprarrenal; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-17200.354000077971380050 |
ID : | 98-0082943 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:98-0082943Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Pruessner, J C" sort="Pruessner, J C" uniqKey="Pruessner J" first="J. C." last="Pruessner">J. C. Pruessner</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gaab, J" sort="Gaab, J" uniqKey="Gaab J" first="J." last="Gaab">J. Gaab</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hellhammer, D H" sort="Hellhammer, D H" uniqKey="Hellhammer D" first="D. H." last="Hellhammer">D. H. Hellhammer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lintz, D" sort="Lintz, D" uniqKey="Lintz D" first="D." last="Lintz">D. Lintz</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schommer, N" sort="Schommer, N" uniqKey="Schommer N" first="N." last="Schommer">N. Schommer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kirschbaum, C" sort="Kirschbaum, C" uniqKey="Kirschbaum C" first="C." last="Kirschbaum">C. Kirschbaum</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">98-0082943</idno>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 98-0082943 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:98-0082943</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001167</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation</title>
<author><name sortKey="Pruessner, J C" sort="Pruessner, J C" uniqKey="Pruessner J" first="J. C." last="Pruessner">J. C. Pruessner</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gaab, J" sort="Gaab, J" uniqKey="Gaab J" first="J." last="Gaab">J. Gaab</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hellhammer, D H" sort="Hellhammer, D H" uniqKey="Hellhammer D" first="D. H." last="Hellhammer">D. H. Hellhammer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lintz, D" sort="Lintz, D" uniqKey="Lintz D" first="D." last="Lintz">D. Lintz</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schommer, N" sort="Schommer, N" uniqKey="Schommer N" first="N." last="Schommer">N. Schommer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kirschbaum, C" sort="Kirschbaum, C" uniqKey="Kirschbaum C" first="C." last="Kirschbaum">C. Kirschbaum</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Psychoneuroendocrinology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychoneuroendocrinology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-4530</idno>
<imprint><date when="1997">1997</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Psychoneuroendocrinology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychoneuroendocrinology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-4530</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Arithmetics</term>
<term>Emotion emotionality</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Hydrocortisone</term>
<term>Hypothalamohypophysoadrenal axis</term>
<term>Mental activity</term>
<term>Personality</term>
<term>Saliva</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Verbal production</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Personnalité</term>
<term>Stress</term>
<term>Hydrocortisone</term>
<term>Salive</term>
<term>Activité mentale</term>
<term>Arithmétique</term>
<term>Production verbale</term>
<term>Emotion émotivité</term>
<term>Système hypothalamohypophysosurrénalien</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Attempts to link personality traits and cortisol stress responses have often been inconclusive. The aim of this paper was to investigate this association by aggregating cortisol stress responses. Therefore, 20 healthy men were exposed to a task consisting of public speaking and mental arithmetics in front of an audience on five days. Six cortisol levels were measured in relation to the stressful task obtained at 10-min intervals on each day. Psychological assessment included the Questionnaire for Competence and Control (FKK) and the Giessen-Test (G-T). These questionnaires focus on assessing personality traits, i.e. locus of control and self-concept. Areas under the response curve (AUC) of the six cortisol samples were computed to obtain an index of the individual's cortisol stress response on each day. Since novelty is a random situational factor likely to mask individual differences in the stress response, the AUC cortisol stress responses of days two to five were consecutively aggregated, excluding the first day. Scales of the two questionnaires employed did not correlate with the AUC cortisol stress response of the first stress trial. The correlation pattern of the AUC cortisol measures of days two to five with the questionnaire scales was inconclusive. However, significant correlations emerged with an increasing number of cortisol stress responses aggregated. Correlations between the measure of social dominance and aggregated AUC cortisol stress responses rose from r = - .47 on day two of the experimental session to r = -.70 after aggregating days two to five. Similarly. measures of locus of control and cortisol stress responses became increasingly correlated with aggregation of several stress exposures. These data provide preliminary evidence for a relationship between questionnaire scales aiming at assessing personality traits and cortisol stress responses uncovered by repeated stress exposure and data aggregation. While novelty may mask the impact of personality on the cortisol stress response on the first exposure, differences in the ability to cope with the stressful situation may lead to different cortisol stress response patterns on subsequent stress exposures. With data aggregation, an association between the trait component of cortisol stress responses and questionnaire scales might be uncovered. For reliable investigation of correlations between personality variables and cortisol stress responses, repeated stress exposure and data aggregation is suggested.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0306-4530</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>PSYCDE</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Psychoneuroendocrinology</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>22</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>8</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>PRUESSNER (J. C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>GAAB (J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>HELLHAMMER (D. H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>LINTZ (D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>SCHOMMER (N.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>KIRSCHBAUM (C.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11</s1>
<s2>54290 Trier</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>615-625</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1997</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>17200</s2>
<s5>354000077971380050</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1998 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>98-0082943</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i2="1"><s0>Psychoneuroendocrinology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Attempts to link personality traits and cortisol stress responses have often been inconclusive. The aim of this paper was to investigate this association by aggregating cortisol stress responses. Therefore, 20 healthy men were exposed to a task consisting of public speaking and mental arithmetics in front of an audience on five days. Six cortisol levels were measured in relation to the stressful task obtained at 10-min intervals on each day. Psychological assessment included the Questionnaire for Competence and Control (FKK) and the Giessen-Test (G-T). These questionnaires focus on assessing personality traits, i.e. locus of control and self-concept. Areas under the response curve (AUC) of the six cortisol samples were computed to obtain an index of the individual's cortisol stress response on each day. Since novelty is a random situational factor likely to mask individual differences in the stress response, the AUC cortisol stress responses of days two to five were consecutively aggregated, excluding the first day. Scales of the two questionnaires employed did not correlate with the AUC cortisol stress response of the first stress trial. The correlation pattern of the AUC cortisol measures of days two to five with the questionnaire scales was inconclusive. However, significant correlations emerged with an increasing number of cortisol stress responses aggregated. Correlations between the measure of social dominance and aggregated AUC cortisol stress responses rose from r = - .47 on day two of the experimental session to r = -.70 after aggregating days two to five. Similarly. measures of locus of control and cortisol stress responses became increasingly correlated with aggregation of several stress exposures. These data provide preliminary evidence for a relationship between questionnaire scales aiming at assessing personality traits and cortisol stress responses uncovered by repeated stress exposure and data aggregation. While novelty may mask the impact of personality on the cortisol stress response on the first exposure, differences in the ability to cope with the stressful situation may lead to different cortisol stress response patterns on subsequent stress exposures. With data aggregation, an association between the trait component of cortisol stress responses and questionnaire scales might be uncovered. For reliable investigation of correlations between personality variables and cortisol stress responses, repeated stress exposure and data aggregation is suggested.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26C03</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Personnalité</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Personality</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Personalidad</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Stress</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Hydrocortisone</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s2>FR</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hydrocortisone</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s2>FR</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hidrocortisona</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s2>FR</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Salive</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Saliva</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Saliva</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Activité mentale</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mental activity</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Actividad mental</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Arithmétique</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Arithmetics</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aritmética</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Production verbale</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Verbal production</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Producción verbal</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Emotion émotivité</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Emotion emotionality</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Emoción emotividad</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système hypothalamohypophysosurrénalien</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hypothalamohypophysoadrenal axis</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema hipotalamohipofisosuprarrenal</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Affect affectivité</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Affect affectivity</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Afecto afectividad</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Glucocorticoïde</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Glucocorticoid</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Glucocorticoide</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Hormone surrénalienne</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Adrenal hormone</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hormona suprarrenal</s0>
<s5>27</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>047</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 98-0082943 INIST</NO>
<ET>Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation</ET>
<AU>PRUESSNER (J. C.); GAAB (J.); HELLHAMMER (D. H.); LINTZ (D.); SCHOMMER (N.); KIRSCHBAUM (C.)</AU>
<AF>Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Dietrichstr. 10-11/54290 Trier/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Psychoneuroendocrinology; ISSN 0306-4530; Coden PSYCDE; Royaume-Uni; Da. 1997; Vol. 22; No. 8; Pp. 615-625; Bibl. 2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Attempts to link personality traits and cortisol stress responses have often been inconclusive. The aim of this paper was to investigate this association by aggregating cortisol stress responses. Therefore, 20 healthy men were exposed to a task consisting of public speaking and mental arithmetics in front of an audience on five days. Six cortisol levels were measured in relation to the stressful task obtained at 10-min intervals on each day. Psychological assessment included the Questionnaire for Competence and Control (FKK) and the Giessen-Test (G-T). These questionnaires focus on assessing personality traits, i.e. locus of control and self-concept. Areas under the response curve (AUC) of the six cortisol samples were computed to obtain an index of the individual's cortisol stress response on each day. Since novelty is a random situational factor likely to mask individual differences in the stress response, the AUC cortisol stress responses of days two to five were consecutively aggregated, excluding the first day. Scales of the two questionnaires employed did not correlate with the AUC cortisol stress response of the first stress trial. The correlation pattern of the AUC cortisol measures of days two to five with the questionnaire scales was inconclusive. However, significant correlations emerged with an increasing number of cortisol stress responses aggregated. Correlations between the measure of social dominance and aggregated AUC cortisol stress responses rose from r = - .47 on day two of the experimental session to r = -.70 after aggregating days two to five. Similarly. measures of locus of control and cortisol stress responses became increasingly correlated with aggregation of several stress exposures. These data provide preliminary evidence for a relationship between questionnaire scales aiming at assessing personality traits and cortisol stress responses uncovered by repeated stress exposure and data aggregation. While novelty may mask the impact of personality on the cortisol stress response on the first exposure, differences in the ability to cope with the stressful situation may lead to different cortisol stress response patterns on subsequent stress exposures. With data aggregation, an association between the trait component of cortisol stress responses and questionnaire scales might be uncovered. For reliable investigation of correlations between personality variables and cortisol stress responses, repeated stress exposure and data aggregation is suggested.</EA>
<CC>002A26C03</CC>
<FD>Personnalité; Stress; Hydrocortisone; Salive; Activité mentale; Arithmétique; Production verbale; Emotion émotivité; Système hypothalamohypophysosurrénalien; Homme</FD>
<FG>Affect affectivité; Glucocorticoïde; Hormone surrénalienne</FG>
<ED>Personality; Stress; Hydrocortisone; Saliva; Mental activity; Arithmetics; Verbal production; Emotion emotionality; Hypothalamohypophysoadrenal axis; Human</ED>
<EG>Affect affectivity; Glucocorticoid; Adrenal hormone</EG>
<SD>Personalidad; Stress; Hidrocortisona; Saliva; Actividad mental; Aritmética; Producción verbal; Emoción emotividad; Sistema hipotalamohipofisosuprarrenal; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-17200.354000077971380050</LO>
<ID>98-0082943</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001167 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001167 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie |area= UnivTrevesV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:98-0082943 |texte= Increasing correlations between personality traits and cortisol stress responses obtained by data aggregation }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |