Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage

Identifieur interne : 000762 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000761; suivant : 000763

Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage

Auteurs : Nicole Zillien ; Eszter Hargittai

Source :

RBID : Francis:09-0283253

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Objective. Sociologists of technology propose that not only a technological artifact, as such, but also patterns of usage should be considered when studying the social implications of technologies. Accordingly, we explore how people's online activities are influenced by users' socioeconomic status and context of use. Methods. We analyze data from the Allensbacher Computer and Technology Analysis (ACTA) 2004 survey with uniquely detailed information about people's Internet uses and context of usage to explore this relationship. Results. Findings suggest that high-status and low-status individuals cultivate different forms of "Internet-in-practice." High-status users are much more likely to engage in so-called capital-enhancing activities online than are their less privileged counterparts. Conclusion. Results suggest differential payoffs from Internet use depending on a user's socioeconomic background. Digital inequalities might be mitigated by improving people's Internet equipment and digital experience, but they do not account for all the status differential in use.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0038-4941
A03   1    @0 Soc. sci. q.
A05       @2 90
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage
A11 01  1    @1 ZILLIEN (Nicole)
A11 02  1    @1 HARGITTAI (Eszter)
A14 01      @1 University of Trier @3 DEU @Z 1 aut.
A14 02      @1 Northwestern University @3 USA @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 274-291
A21       @1 2009
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 24795 @5 354000184955320040
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.3/4
A47 01  1    @0 09-0283253
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Social science quarterly
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Objective. Sociologists of technology propose that not only a technological artifact, as such, but also patterns of usage should be considered when studying the social implications of technologies. Accordingly, we explore how people's online activities are influenced by users' socioeconomic status and context of use. Methods. We analyze data from the Allensbacher Computer and Technology Analysis (ACTA) 2004 survey with uniquely detailed information about people's Internet uses and context of usage to explore this relationship. Results. Findings suggest that high-status and low-status individuals cultivate different forms of "Internet-in-practice." High-status users are much more likely to engage in so-called capital-enhancing activities online than are their less privileged counterparts. Conclusion. Results suggest differential payoffs from Internet use depending on a user's socioeconomic background. Digital inequalities might be mitigated by improving people's Internet equipment and digital experience, but they do not account for all the status differential in use.
C02 01  S    @0 52115 @1 III
C02 02  S    @0 52161 @1 XIV
C02 03  S    @0 521
C03 01  S  FRE  @0 Internet @2 NI @5 01
C03 01  S  ENG  @0 Internet @2 NI @5 01
C03 02  S  FRE  @0 Pratique @5 02
C03 02  S  ENG  @0 Practice @5 02
C03 03  S  FRE  @0 Technologie @5 03
C03 03  S  ENG  @0 Technology @5 03
C03 04  S  FRE  @0 Etats-Unis @2 NG @5 04
C03 04  S  ENG  @0 United States Of America @2 NG @5 04
C03 05  S  FRE  @0 Statut social @5 05
C03 05  S  ENG  @0 Social status @5 05
C03 06  S  FRE  @0 Usage @4 INC @5 32
N21       @1 208

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : FRANCIS 09-0283253 INIST
ET : Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage
AU : ZILLIEN (Nicole); HARGITTAI (Eszter)
AF : University of Trier/Allemagne (1 aut.); Northwestern University/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Social science quarterly; ISSN 0038-4941; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 90; No. 2; Pp. 274-291; Bibl. 1 p.3/4
LA : Anglais
EA : Objective. Sociologists of technology propose that not only a technological artifact, as such, but also patterns of usage should be considered when studying the social implications of technologies. Accordingly, we explore how people's online activities are influenced by users' socioeconomic status and context of use. Methods. We analyze data from the Allensbacher Computer and Technology Analysis (ACTA) 2004 survey with uniquely detailed information about people's Internet uses and context of usage to explore this relationship. Results. Findings suggest that high-status and low-status individuals cultivate different forms of "Internet-in-practice." High-status users are much more likely to engage in so-called capital-enhancing activities online than are their less privileged counterparts. Conclusion. Results suggest differential payoffs from Internet use depending on a user's socioeconomic background. Digital inequalities might be mitigated by improving people's Internet equipment and digital experience, but they do not account for all the status differential in use.
CC : 52115; 52161; 521
FD : Internet; Pratique; Technologie; Etats-Unis; Statut social; Usage
ED : Internet; Practice; Technology; United States Of America; Social status
LO : INIST-24795.354000184955320040
ID : 09-0283253

Links to Exploration step

Francis:09-0283253

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zillien, Nicole" sort="Zillien, Nicole" uniqKey="Zillien N" first="Nicole" last="Zillien">Nicole Zillien</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hargittai, Eszter" sort="Hargittai, Eszter" uniqKey="Hargittai E" first="Eszter" last="Hargittai">Eszter Hargittai</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Northwestern University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0283253</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 09-0283253 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:09-0283253</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000762</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zillien, Nicole" sort="Zillien, Nicole" uniqKey="Zillien N" first="Nicole" last="Zillien">Nicole Zillien</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hargittai, Eszter" sort="Hargittai, Eszter" uniqKey="Hargittai E" first="Eszter" last="Hargittai">Eszter Hargittai</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Northwestern University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Social science quarterly</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Soc. sci. q.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0038-4941</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Social science quarterly</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Soc. sci. q.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0038-4941</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Internet</term>
<term>Practice</term>
<term>Social status</term>
<term>Technology</term>
<term>United States Of America</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Internet</term>
<term>Pratique</term>
<term>Technologie</term>
<term>Etats-Unis</term>
<term>Statut social</term>
<term>Usage</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective. Sociologists of technology propose that not only a technological artifact, as such, but also patterns of usage should be considered when studying the social implications of technologies. Accordingly, we explore how people's online activities are influenced by users' socioeconomic status and context of use. Methods. We analyze data from the Allensbacher Computer and Technology Analysis (ACTA) 2004 survey with uniquely detailed information about people's Internet uses and context of usage to explore this relationship. Results. Findings suggest that high-status and low-status individuals cultivate different forms of "Internet-in-practice." High-status users are much more likely to engage in so-called capital-enhancing activities online than are their less privileged counterparts. Conclusion. Results suggest differential payoffs from Internet use depending on a user's socioeconomic background. Digital inequalities might be mitigated by improving people's Internet equipment and digital experience, but they do not account for all the status differential in use.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0038-4941</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Soc. sci. q.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>90</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>ZILLIEN (Nicole)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>HARGITTAI (Eszter)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Northwestern University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>274-291</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>24795</s2>
<s5>354000184955320040</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.3/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>09-0283253</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Social science quarterly</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Objective. Sociologists of technology propose that not only a technological artifact, as such, but also patterns of usage should be considered when studying the social implications of technologies. Accordingly, we explore how people's online activities are influenced by users' socioeconomic status and context of use. Methods. We analyze data from the Allensbacher Computer and Technology Analysis (ACTA) 2004 survey with uniquely detailed information about people's Internet uses and context of usage to explore this relationship. Results. Findings suggest that high-status and low-status individuals cultivate different forms of "Internet-in-practice." High-status users are much more likely to engage in so-called capital-enhancing activities online than are their less privileged counterparts. Conclusion. Results suggest differential payoffs from Internet use depending on a user's socioeconomic background. Digital inequalities might be mitigated by improving people's Internet equipment and digital experience, but they do not account for all the status differential in use.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="S">
<s0>52115</s0>
<s1>III</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="S">
<s0>52161</s0>
<s1>XIV</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="S">
<s0>521</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="S" l="FRE">
<s0>Internet</s0>
<s2>NI</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="S" l="ENG">
<s0>Internet</s0>
<s2>NI</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="S" l="FRE">
<s0>Pratique</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="S" l="ENG">
<s0>Practice</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="S" l="FRE">
<s0>Technologie</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="S" l="ENG">
<s0>Technology</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="S" l="FRE">
<s0>Etats-Unis</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="S" l="ENG">
<s0>United States Of America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="S" l="FRE">
<s0>Statut social</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="S" l="ENG">
<s0>Social status</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="S" l="FRE">
<s0>Usage</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>208</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>FRANCIS 09-0283253 INIST</NO>
<ET>Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage</ET>
<AU>ZILLIEN (Nicole); HARGITTAI (Eszter)</AU>
<AF>University of Trier/Allemagne (1 aut.); Northwestern University/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Social science quarterly; ISSN 0038-4941; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 90; No. 2; Pp. 274-291; Bibl. 1 p.3/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Objective. Sociologists of technology propose that not only a technological artifact, as such, but also patterns of usage should be considered when studying the social implications of technologies. Accordingly, we explore how people's online activities are influenced by users' socioeconomic status and context of use. Methods. We analyze data from the Allensbacher Computer and Technology Analysis (ACTA) 2004 survey with uniquely detailed information about people's Internet uses and context of usage to explore this relationship. Results. Findings suggest that high-status and low-status individuals cultivate different forms of "Internet-in-practice." High-status users are much more likely to engage in so-called capital-enhancing activities online than are their less privileged counterparts. Conclusion. Results suggest differential payoffs from Internet use depending on a user's socioeconomic background. Digital inequalities might be mitigated by improving people's Internet equipment and digital experience, but they do not account for all the status differential in use.</EA>
<CC>52115; 52161; 521</CC>
<FD>Internet; Pratique; Technologie; Etats-Unis; Statut social; Usage</FD>
<ED>Internet; Practice; Technology; United States Of America; Social status</ED>
<LO>INIST-24795.354000184955320040</LO>
<ID>09-0283253</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000762 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000762 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:09-0283253
   |texte=   Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024