UnivTrevesV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000118

Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses

Identifieur interne : 000118 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000117; suivant : 000119

Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses

Auteurs : Roland Neumann ; Ljubica Lozo ; Wilfried Kunde

Source :

Journal of experimental psychology. General [ 0096-3445 ] ; 2014.

RBID : Francis:14-0111679

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Activité manuelle, Face, Evitement, Compatibilité stimulus réponse, Codage, Etude expérimentale, Comportement approche, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Approach behavior, Avoidance, Coding, Experimental study, Face, Human, Manual activity, Stimulus response compatibility.

Abstract

How does affect impact approach and avoidance responses? Whereas approaches in a Darwinian tradition have emphasized a direct affect-behavior link, recent approaches in cognitive psychology have argued that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the coding of the behavioral response. We suggest that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the kind of behavior itself. Specifically, we tested the assumption that facial approach and avoidance responses are permanently linked to affect, whereas such links are more flexible and dependent on the coding of actions with manual responses. In one experiment, the response labels sun and rain were assigned to manual approach and avoidance responses and facial contractions of the zygomaticus and the corrugator muscles. Manual responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the valence of the response labels, whereas facial responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the affect expressed by these responses. The results suggest that the links between affect and manual responses depend on how these responses are cognitively coded, whereas the links between affect and facial responses are much less affected by such coding.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0096-3445`
A02	`01`			`@0 JPGEDD`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. exp. psychol., Gen.`
A05				`@2 143`
A06				`@2 1`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 NEUMANN (Roland)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 LOZO (Ljubica)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 KUNDE (Wilfried)`
A14	`01`			`@1 University of Trier @3 DEU @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 University of Würzburg @3 DEU @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.`
A20				`@1 1-8`
A21				`@1 2014`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 3032B @5 354000503211330010`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1/2 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 14-0111679`
A60				`@1 P @3 CC`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of experimental psychology. General`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 How does affect impact approach and avoidance responses? Whereas approaches in a Darwinian tradition have emphasized a direct affect-behavior link, recent approaches in cognitive psychology have argued that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the coding of the behavioral response. We suggest that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the kind of behavior itself. Specifically, we tested the assumption that facial approach and avoidance responses are permanently linked to affect, whereas such links are more flexible and dependent on the coding of actions with manual responses. In one experiment, the response labels sun and rain were assigned to manual approach and avoidance responses and facial contractions of the zygomaticus and the corrugator muscles. Manual responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the valence of the response labels, whereas facial responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the affect expressed by these responses. The results suggest that the links between affect and manual responses depend on how these responses are cognitively coded, whereas the links between affect and facial responses are much less affected by such coding.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 770B04D @1 II`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 770B08I @1 II`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Activité manuelle @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Manual activity @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Actividad manual @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Face @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Face @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cara @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Evitement @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Avoidance @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Evitación @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Compatibilité stimulus réponse @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stimulus response compatibility @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Compatibilidad estímulo respuesta @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Codage @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Coding @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Codificación @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Comportement approche @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Approach behavior @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Conducta abordaje @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Motricité @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Motricity @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Motricidad @5 38`
N21				`@1 146`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 14-0111679 INIST
ET :	Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses
AU :	NEUMANN (Roland); LOZO (Ljubica); KUNDE (Wilfried)
AF :	University of Trier/Allemagne (1 aut.); University of Würzburg/Allemagne (2 aut., 3 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Courte communication, note brève; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of experimental psychology. General; ISSN 0096-3445; Coden JPGEDD; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 143; No. 1; Pp. 1-8; Bibl. 1/2 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	How does affect impact approach and avoidance responses? Whereas approaches in a Darwinian tradition have emphasized a direct affect-behavior link, recent approaches in cognitive psychology have argued that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the coding of the behavioral response. We suggest that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the kind of behavior itself. Specifically, we tested the assumption that facial approach and avoidance responses are permanently linked to affect, whereas such links are more flexible and dependent on the coding of actions with manual responses. In one experiment, the response labels sun and rain were assigned to manual approach and avoidance responses and facial contractions of the zygomaticus and the corrugator muscles. Manual responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the valence of the response labels, whereas facial responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the affect expressed by these responses. The results suggest that the links between affect and manual responses depend on how these responses are cognitively coded, whereas the links between affect and facial responses are much less affected by such coding.
CC :	770B04D; 770B08I
FD :	Activité manuelle; Face; Evitement; Compatibilité stimulus réponse; Codage; Etude expérimentale; Comportement approche; Homme
FG :	Cognition; Motricité
ED :	Manual activity; Face; Avoidance; Stimulus response compatibility; Coding; Experimental study; Approach behavior; Human
EG :	Cognition; Motricity
SD :	Actividad manual; Cara; Evitación; Compatibilidad estímulo respuesta; Codificación; Estudio experimental; Conducta abordaje; Hombre
LO :	INIST-3032B.354000503211330010
ID :	14-0111679

Links to Exploration step

Francis:14-0111679

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Neumann, Roland" sort="Neumann, Roland" uniqKey="Neumann R" first="Roland" last="Neumann">Roland Neumann</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lozo, Ljubica" sort="Lozo, Ljubica" uniqKey="Lozo L" first="Ljubica" last="Lozo">Ljubica Lozo</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Würzburg</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kunde, Wilfried" sort="Kunde, Wilfried" uniqKey="Kunde W" first="Wilfried" last="Kunde">Wilfried Kunde</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Würzburg</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0111679</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0111679 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0111679</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000118</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Neumann, Roland" sort="Neumann, Roland" uniqKey="Neumann R" first="Roland" last="Neumann">Roland Neumann</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lozo, Ljubica" sort="Lozo, Ljubica" uniqKey="Lozo L" first="Ljubica" last="Lozo">Ljubica Lozo</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Würzburg</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kunde, Wilfried" sort="Kunde, Wilfried" uniqKey="Kunde W" first="Wilfried" last="Kunde">Wilfried Kunde</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Würzburg</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. General</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol., Gen.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0096-3445</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. General</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol., Gen.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0096-3445</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Approach behavior</term>
<term>Avoidance</term>
<term>Coding</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Face</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Manual activity</term>
<term>Stimulus response compatibility</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Activité manuelle</term>
<term>Face</term>
<term>Evitement</term>
<term>Compatibilité stimulus réponse</term>
<term>Codage</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Comportement approche</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">How does affect impact approach and avoidance responses? Whereas approaches in a Darwinian tradition have emphasized a direct affect-behavior link, recent approaches in cognitive psychology have argued that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the coding of the behavioral response. We suggest that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the kind of behavior itself. Specifically, we tested the assumption that facial approach and avoidance responses are permanently linked to affect, whereas such links are more flexible and dependent on the coding of actions with manual responses. In one experiment, the response labels sun and rain were assigned to manual approach and avoidance responses and facial contractions of the zygomaticus and the corrugator muscles. Manual responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the valence of the response labels, whereas facial responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the affect expressed by these responses. The results suggest that the links between affect and manual responses depend on how these responses are cognitively coded, whereas the links between affect and facial responses are much less affected by such coding.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0096-3445</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JPGEDD</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. exp. psychol., Gen.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>143</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>NEUMANN (Roland)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>LOZO (Ljubica)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>KUNDE (Wilfried)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Trier</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Würzburg</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1-8</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3032B</s2>
<s5>354000503211330010</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1/2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0111679</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>CC</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of experimental psychology. General</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>How does affect impact approach and avoidance responses? Whereas approaches in a Darwinian tradition have emphasized a direct affect-behavior link, recent approaches in cognitive psychology have argued that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the coding of the behavioral response. We suggest that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the kind of behavior itself. Specifically, we tested the assumption that facial approach and avoidance responses are permanently linked to affect, whereas such links are more flexible and dependent on the coding of actions with manual responses. In one experiment, the response labels sun and rain were assigned to manual approach and avoidance responses and facial contractions of the zygomaticus and the corrugator muscles. Manual responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the valence of the response labels, whereas facial responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the affect expressed by these responses. The results suggest that the links between affect and manual responses depend on how these responses are cognitively coded, whereas the links between affect and facial responses are much less affected by such coding.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B04D</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>770B08I</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Activité manuelle</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Manual activity</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Actividad manual</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Face</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Face</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cara</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evitement</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Avoidance</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evitación</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Compatibilité stimulus réponse</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus response compatibility</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Compatibilidad estímulo respuesta</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Codage</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Coding</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Codificación</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Comportement approche</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Approach behavior</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Conducta abordaje</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Motricité</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Motricity</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Motricidad</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>146</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 14-0111679 INIST</NO>
<ET>Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses</ET>
<AU>NEUMANN (Roland); LOZO (Ljubica); KUNDE (Wilfried)</AU>
<AF>University of Trier/Allemagne (1 aut.); University of Würzburg/Allemagne (2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Courte communication, note brève; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of experimental psychology. General; ISSN 0096-3445; Coden JPGEDD; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 143; No. 1; Pp. 1-8; Bibl. 1/2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>How does affect impact approach and avoidance responses? Whereas approaches in a Darwinian tradition have emphasized a direct affect-behavior link, recent approaches in cognitive psychology have argued that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the coding of the behavioral response. We suggest that the relation of affect to approach and avoidance responses depends on the kind of behavior itself. Specifically, we tested the assumption that facial approach and avoidance responses are permanently linked to affect, whereas such links are more flexible and dependent on the coding of actions with manual responses. In one experiment, the response labels sun and rain were assigned to manual approach and avoidance responses and facial contractions of the zygomaticus and the corrugator muscles. Manual responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the valence of the response labels, whereas facial responses were facilitated when stimulus valence matched the affect expressed by these responses. The results suggest that the links between affect and manual responses depend on how these responses are cognitively coded, whereas the links between affect and facial responses are much less affected by such coding.</EA>
<CC>770B04D; 770B08I</CC>
<FD>Activité manuelle; Face; Evitement; Compatibilité stimulus réponse; Codage; Etude expérimentale; Comportement approche; Homme</FD>
<FG>Cognition; Motricité</FG>
<ED>Manual activity; Face; Avoidance; Stimulus response compatibility; Coding; Experimental study; Approach behavior; Human</ED>
<EG>Cognition; Motricity</EG>
<SD>Actividad manual; Cara; Evitación; Compatibilidad estímulo respuesta; Codificación; Estudio experimental; Conducta abordaje; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-3032B.354000503211330010</LO>
<ID>14-0111679</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000118 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000118 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:14-0111679
   |texte=   Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses

Not All Behaviors Are Controlled in the Same Way: Different Mechanisms Underlie Manual and Facial Approach and Avoidance Responses

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri