Serveur d'exploration sur l'Université de Trèves

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation

Identifieur interne : 002C05 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002C04; suivant : 002C06

The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation

Auteurs : Herbert Bless [Allemagne] ; Fritz Strack [Allemagne] ; Norbert Schwarz [Allemagne]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:06825E003339F7D1779818E16863B214A1ED02C6

Abstract

Conversational rules of everyday communication are applied to the interaction between experimenters and subjects. According to these rules, contributions to a communication should be informative, relevant, true, and unambiguous. It is assumed that subjects determine the pragmatic meaning of instructions and questions on the basis of these rules and the provided context. In contrast to most natural settings, standardized experimental procedures rarely allow for an interactive determination of pragmatic meaning and often preclude feedback as a corrective device. As a consequence, subjects are required to rely heavily on general rules, and even subtle cues may become informationally loaded. The information extracted from context cues may often not be intended by the experimenter. Thus subjects may infer more than they are supposed to, resulting in discrepancies between the experimenter's intended and subjects' inferred meaning of the instructions. If researchers are not sensitive to the information provided by verbal and non‐verbal context cues, their interpretation of research results may be based on biased data. Evidence from different research domains is reported to support the presented assumptions and their implications for bias avoiding strategies are discussed.

Url:
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420230204


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bless, Herbert" sort="Bless, Herbert" uniqKey="Bless H" first="Herbert" last="Bless">Herbert Bless</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Strack, Fritz" sort="Strack, Fritz" uniqKey="Strack F" first="Fritz" last="Strack">Fritz Strack</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schwarz, Norbert" sort="Schwarz, Norbert" uniqKey="Schwarz N" first="Norbert" last="Schwarz">Norbert Schwarz</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:06825E003339F7D1779818E16863B214A1ED02C6</idno>
<date when="1993" year="1993">1993</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/ejsp.2420230204</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/06825E003339F7D1779818E16863B214A1ED02C6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001701</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001701</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001309</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001309</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0046-2772:1993:Bless H:the:informative:functions</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003156</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002C05</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002C05</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bless, Herbert" sort="Bless, Herbert" uniqKey="Bless H" first="Herbert" last="Bless">Herbert Bless</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Universität Mannheim, ZUMA, Mannheim</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region>
<region type="district" nuts="2">District de Karlsruhe</region>
<settlement type="city">Mannheim</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Psychologisches Institut der Universität Heidelberg, Hauptstr. 47–51, D‐6900 Heidelberg</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>D‐6900 Heidelberg</wicri:noRegion>
<wicri:noRegion>D‐6900 Heidelberg</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Strack, Fritz" sort="Strack, Fritz" uniqKey="Strack F" first="Fritz" last="Strack">Fritz Strack</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Universität Trier, ZUMA, Mannheim</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region>
<region type="district" nuts="2">District de Karlsruhe</region>
<settlement type="city">Mannheim</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schwarz, Norbert" sort="Schwarz, Norbert" uniqKey="Schwarz N" first="Norbert" last="Schwarz">Norbert Schwarz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen, ZUMA, Mannheim</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region>
<region type="district" nuts="2">District de Karlsruhe</region>
<settlement type="city">Mannheim</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">European Journal of Social Psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1099-0992</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1993-03">1993-03</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="149">149</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="165">165</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">06825E003339F7D1779818E16863B214A1ED02C6</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1002/ejsp.2420230204</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">EJSP2420230204</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Conversational rules of everyday communication are applied to the interaction between experimenters and subjects. According to these rules, contributions to a communication should be informative, relevant, true, and unambiguous. It is assumed that subjects determine the pragmatic meaning of instructions and questions on the basis of these rules and the provided context. In contrast to most natural settings, standardized experimental procedures rarely allow for an interactive determination of pragmatic meaning and often preclude feedback as a corrective device. As a consequence, subjects are required to rely heavily on general rules, and even subtle cues may become informationally loaded. The information extracted from context cues may often not be intended by the experimenter. Thus subjects may infer more than they are supposed to, resulting in discrepancies between the experimenter's intended and subjects' inferred meaning of the instructions. If researchers are not sensitive to the information provided by verbal and non‐verbal context cues, their interpretation of research results may be based on biased data. Evidence from different research domains is reported to support the presented assumptions and their implications for bias avoiding strategies are discussed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Allemagne</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Bade-Wurtemberg</li>
<li>District de Karlsruhe</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Mannheim</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Allemagne">
<region name="Bade-Wurtemberg">
<name sortKey="Bless, Herbert" sort="Bless, Herbert" uniqKey="Bless H" first="Herbert" last="Bless">Herbert Bless</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Bless, Herbert" sort="Bless, Herbert" uniqKey="Bless H" first="Herbert" last="Bless">Herbert Bless</name>
<name sortKey="Schwarz, Norbert" sort="Schwarz, Norbert" uniqKey="Schwarz N" first="Norbert" last="Schwarz">Norbert Schwarz</name>
<name sortKey="Strack, Fritz" sort="Strack, Fritz" uniqKey="Strack F" first="Fritz" last="Strack">Fritz Strack</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002C05 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002C05 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Rhénanie
   |area=    UnivTrevesV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:06825E003339F7D1779818E16863B214A1ED02C6
   |texte=   The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Jul 22 16:29:01 2017. Site generation: Wed Feb 28 14:55:37 2024