Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators
Identifieur interne : 001C32 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001C31; suivant : 001C33Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators
Auteurs : Daniel T. Blumstein ; Janice C. Daniel ; Andrea S. Griffin ; Christopher S. EvansSource :
- Behavioral Ecology [ 1045-2249 ] ; 2000-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
We studied the way in which a population of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii), which have been isolated from mammalian predators since the last ice age, responded to the sight and sound of historical and ontogenetically and evolutionarily novel predators. Tammars were shown a range of visual stimuli, including taxidermic mounts of two evolutionarily novel predators, a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and a cat (Felis catus), and a model of an extinct predator, the thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Controls were a conspecific, the cart on which all mounts were presented, and blank trials in which spontaneous change in behavior was measured. We played back recorded sounds to characterize responses to acoustic cues from predators and to a putative conspecific antipredator signal. Treatments included the howls of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo), an evolutionarily novel predator; calls of a wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax), a historical and current predator; and wallaby foot thumps. Controls were the song of an Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen) and a blank trial. After seeing a fox, wallabies thumped their hind feet in alarm, suppressed foraging, and increased looking. The sight of a cat similarly suppressed foraging and increased looking. The sounds of predators did not influence responsiveness, but wallabies foraged less and looked more after thump playbacks. Our results suggest that tammars respond to the sight, but not the sounds, of predators. In contrast, the response to foot thumps demonstrates that this particular sound functions as an antipredator signal. We suggest that responsiveness to visual cues has been preserved under relaxed selection because predator morphology is convergent, but vocalizations are not.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/11.5.528
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators</title><author><name sortKey="Blumstein, Daniel T" sort="Blumstein, Daniel T" uniqKey="Blumstein D" first="Daniel T." last="Blumstein">Daniel T. Blumstein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Daniel, Janice C" sort="Daniel, Janice C" uniqKey="Daniel J" first="Janice C." last="Daniel">Janice C. Daniel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Griffin, Andrea S" sort="Griffin, Andrea S" uniqKey="Griffin A" first="Andrea S." last="Griffin">Andrea S. Griffin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Evans, Christopher S" sort="Evans, Christopher S" uniqKey="Evans C" first="Christopher S." last="Evans">Christopher S. Evans</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/beheco/11.5.528</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001C32</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001C32</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators</title><author><name sortKey="Blumstein, Daniel T" sort="Blumstein, Daniel T" uniqKey="Blumstein D" first="Daniel T." last="Blumstein">Daniel T. Blumstein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Daniel, Janice C" sort="Daniel, Janice C" uniqKey="Daniel J" first="Janice C." last="Daniel">Janice C. Daniel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Griffin, Andrea S" sort="Griffin, Andrea S" uniqKey="Griffin A" first="Andrea S." last="Griffin">Andrea S. Griffin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Evans, Christopher S" sort="Evans, Christopher S" uniqKey="Evans C" first="Christopher S." last="Evans">Christopher S. Evans</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Behavioral Ecology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Behavioral Ecology</title><idno type="ISSN">1045-2249</idno><idno type="eISSN">1465-7279</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2000-09">2000-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="528">528</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="535">535</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1045-2249</idno></series><idno type="istex">A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/beheco/11.5.528</idno><idno type="PII">1465-7279</idno><idno type="local">0110528</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1045-2249</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Macropus eugenii</term><term>antipredator behavior</term><term>predator recognition</term><term>relaxed selection</term><term>tammar wallaby</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We studied the way in which a population of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii), which have been isolated from mammalian predators since the last ice age, responded to the sight and sound of historical and ontogenetically and evolutionarily novel predators. Tammars were shown a range of visual stimuli, including taxidermic mounts of two evolutionarily novel predators, a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and a cat (Felis catus), and a model of an extinct predator, the thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Controls were a conspecific, the cart on which all mounts were presented, and blank trials in which spontaneous change in behavior was measured. We played back recorded sounds to characterize responses to acoustic cues from predators and to a putative conspecific antipredator signal. Treatments included the howls of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo), an evolutionarily novel predator; calls of a wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax), a historical and current predator; and wallaby foot thumps. Controls were the song of an Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen) and a blank trial. After seeing a fox, wallabies thumped their hind feet in alarm, suppressed foraging, and increased looking. The sight of a cat similarly suppressed foraging and increased looking. The sounds of predators did not influence responsiveness, but wallabies foraged less and looked more after thump playbacks. Our results suggest that tammars respond to the sight, but not the sounds, of predators. In contrast, the response to foot thumps demonstrates that this particular sound functions as an antipredator signal. We suggest that responsiveness to visual cues has been preserved under relaxed selection because predator morphology is convergent, but vocalizations are not.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Daniel T. Blumstein</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string><json:string>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string><json:string>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Janice C. Daniel</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Andrea S. Griffin</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string><json:string>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christopher S. Evans</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>antipredator behavior</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Macropus eugenii</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>predator recognition</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>relaxed selection</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tammar wallaby</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>We studied the way in which a population of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii), which have been isolated from mammalian predators since the last ice age, responded to the sight and sound of historical and ontogenetically and evolutionarily novel predators. Tammars were shown a range of visual stimuli, including taxidermic mounts of two evolutionarily novel predators, a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and a cat (Felis catus), and a model of an extinct predator, the thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Controls were a conspecific, the cart on which all mounts were presented, and blank trials in which spontaneous change in behavior was measured. We played back recorded sounds to characterize responses to acoustic cues from predators and to a putative conspecific antipredator signal. Treatments included the howls of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo), an evolutionarily novel predator; calls of a wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax), a historical and current predator; and wallaby foot thumps. Controls were the song of an Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen) and a blank trial. After seeing a fox, wallabies thumped their hind feet in alarm, suppressed foraging, and increased looking. The sight of a cat similarly suppressed foraging and increased looking. The sounds of predators did not influence responsiveness, but wallabies foraged less and looked more after thump playbacks. Our results suggest that tammars respond to the sight, but not the sounds, of predators. In contrast, the response to foot thumps demonstrates that this particular sound functions as an antipredator signal. We suggest that responsiveness to visual cues has been preserved under relaxed selection because predator morphology is convergent, but vocalizations are not.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>10</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1742</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5763</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35656</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>261</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators</title><pii><json:string>1465-7279</json:string></pii><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Abacus Concepts, 1991. SuperAnova. Berkeley, California: Abacus Concepts</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Archer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>1488</last><first>1436</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecological biogeography of Australia</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></host><title>A review of the origins and radiations of Australian mammals The Hague: W. Junk</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Berger</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>100</last><first>80</first></pages><author></author><title>Behavioral ecology and conservation biology</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><title>Future prey: some consequences of the loss and restoration of large carnivores</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Berger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>266</volume><pages><last>2267</last><first>2261</first></pages><author></author><title>Proc R Soc Lond B</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>Anthropogenic extinction of top carnivores and interspecific animal behaviour: implications of the rapid decoupling of a web involving wolves, bears, moose and ravens</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Dt Blumstein</name></json:item><json:item><name>Kb Armitage</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>1055</last><first>1053</first></pages><author></author><title>Anim Behav</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><title>Why do yellow-bellied marmots call?</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Dt Blumstein</name></json:item><json:item><name>Cs Evans</name></json:item><json:item><name>Jc Daniel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>360</last><first>351</first></pages><author></author><title>Anim Behav</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>An experimental study of behavioural group size effects in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii )</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Olk Buchmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>Er Guiler</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>168</last><first>155</first></pages><author></author><title>The biology of marsupials</title><publicationDate>1977</publicationDate></host><title>Behaviour and ecology of the Tasmanian devil, Sarcophilus harrisii</title><publicationDate>1977</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>A Buchner</name></json:item><json:item><name>F Fawl</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Erdfelder</name></json:item></author><title>G*Power: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analysis for the Macintosh (version 2.1.1)</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R Buckingham</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Jackson</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Nunawading</title><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate></host><title>A field guide to birdsong, cassette 2: Rufous night heron to chestnut rail</title><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Ja Byers</name></json:item></author><title>American pronghorn: social adaptations and the ghosts of predators past</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Sg Carmer</name></json:item><json:item><name>Mr Swanson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>68</volume><pages><last>74</last><first>66</first></pages><author></author><title>J Am Stat Assoc</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></host><title>An evaluation of ten pairwise multiple comparison procedures by Monte Carlo methods</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Bj Coman</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>699</last><first>698</first></pages><author></author><title>The mammals of Australia</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Fox</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><pages><last>131</last><first>120</first></pages><author><json:item><name>Dw Cooper</name></json:item><json:item><name>Lm Mckenzie</name></json:item></author><title>Genetics of tammar wallabies. In: Marsupial biology: recent research, new perspectives</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>168</last><first>129</first></pages><author></author><title>Coss RG Concepts Neurosci</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></host><title>Evolutionary persistence of memory-like processes</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><pages><last>208</last><first>180</first></pages><author><json:item><name>Rg Coss</name></json:item></author><title>Effects of relaxed natural selection on the evolution of behavior. In: Geographic variation in behavior: perspectives on evolutionary mechanisms (Foster SA, Endler JA, eds)</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Rg Coss</name></json:item><json:item><name>Ro Goldthwaite</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>148</last><first>83</first></pages><author></author><title>Perspect Ethology</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>The persistence of old designs for perception</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Coulson</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>186</last><first>158</first></pages><author></author><title>Comparison of marsupial and placental behaviour</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>Anti-predator behaviour in marsupials</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Croft Dbgrigg</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Jarman</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Hume</name></json:item><json:item><name>I </name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>525</last><first>505</first></pages><author></author><title>Kangaroos , wallabies and rat-kangaroos</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Social organization of the Macropodoidea Chipping Norton</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E Curio</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>143</last><first>142</first></pages><author></author><title>Animals</title><publicationDate>1966</publicationDate></host><title>How finches react to predators</title><publicationDate>1966</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>115</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Anim Behav</title><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate></host><title>The functional organization of anti-predator behaviour in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception</title><publicationDate>1975</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>238</last><first>135</first></pages><author></author><title>Curio E Adv Study Behav</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Proximate and developmental aspects of antipredator behavior</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Rd Estes</name></json:item></author><title>The behavior guide to African mammals: including hoofed mammals, carnivores, primates</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Cs Evans</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>143</last><first>99</first></pages><author></author><title>Perspect Ethol</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host><title>Referential signalling</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Cs Evans</name></json:item><json:item><name>Jm Macedonia</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Marler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>46</volume><pages><last>11</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Anim Behav</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens (Gallus gallus) to computergenerated simulations of aerial predators</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>As Griffin</name></json:item><json:item><name>Dt Blumstein</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Evans CS Conserv Biol</title></host><title>Training animals about predators: a critical review and synthesis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O Hasson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>329</last><first>325</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends Ecol Evol</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></host><title>Pursuit-deterrent signals: communication between prey and predators</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Md Hauser</name></json:item><json:item><name>Rw Wrangham</name></json:item></author><host><volume>86</volume><pages><last>130</last><first>116</first></pages><author></author><title>Ethology</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></host><title>Recognition of predator and competitor calls in non-human primates and birds: a preliminary report</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ca Hendrie</name></json:item><json:item><name>Sm Weiss</name></json:item><json:item><name>D Eilam</name></json:item></author><host><volume>245</volume><pages><last>446</last><first>439</first></pages><author></author><title>J Zool</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><title>Behavioural response of wild rodents to the calls of an owl: a comparative study</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Sm Hirsch</name></json:item><json:item><name>Rc Bolles</name></json:item></author><host><volume>54</volume><pages><last>84</last><first>71</first></pages><author></author><title>Z Tierpsychol</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></host><title>On the ability of prey to recognize predators</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ka Johnson</name></json:item><json:item><name>Aa Burbidge</name></json:item><json:item><name>Nl Mckenzie</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>657</last><first>641</first></pages><author></author><title>Kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Australian Macropodoidea: status, causes of decline and future research and management Chipping Norton</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Jones</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>84</last><first>82</first></pages><author></author><title>The mammals of Australia</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Tasmanian devil</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Me Jones</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>41</last><first>32</first></pages><author></author><title>Aust Nat Hist</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Dining with the devil</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Me Jones</name></json:item><json:item><name>Dm Stoddard</name></json:item></author><host><volume>246</volume><pages><last>246</last><first>239</first></pages><author></author><title>J Zool</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><title>Reconstruction of the predator behaviour of the extinct marsupial thylacine (Thylacinus cynocehalus)</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Kavailers</name></json:item></author><host><volume>63</volume><pages><last>407</last><first>388</first></pages><author></author><title>Physiol Zool</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></host><title>Responsiveness of deer mice to a predator, the short-tailed weasel: population differences and neuromodulatory mechanisms</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Rj Lampert</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>89</last><first>81</first></pages><author></author><title>Natural history of Kangaroo Island</title><publicationDate>1979</publicationDate></host><title>Aborigines</title><publicationDate>1979</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Pb Levesley</name></json:item><json:item><name>Ae Magurran</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>706</last><first>699</first></pages><author></author><title>J Fish Biol</title><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></host><title>Population differences in the reaction of minnows to alarm substance</title><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Jm Macedonia</name></json:item><json:item><name>Pl Yount</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>182</last><first>169</first></pages><author></author><title>Primates</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></host><title>Auditory assessment of avian predator threat in semi-captive ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta)</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ae Magurran</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>163</last><first>139</first></pages><author></author><title>Geographic variation in behavior: perspectives on evolutionary mechanisms</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>The causes and consequences of geographic variation in antipredator behavior: perspectives from fish populations</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ig Mclean</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Hölzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>Bjs Studholme</name></json:item></author><host><volume>87</volume><pages><last>130</last><first>123</first></pages><author></author><title>Biol Cons</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>Teaching predator-recognition to a naive bird: implications for management</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ig Mclean</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Lundie-Jenkins</name></json:item><json:item><name>Pj Jarman</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>182</last><first>177</first></pages><author></author><title>Reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand fauna</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Training captive rufous hare-wallabies to recognize predators Chipping Norton</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R Noë</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Bshary</name></json:item></author><host><volume>264</volume><pages><last>259</last><first>253</first></pages><author></author><title>Proc R Soc Lond B</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host><title>The formation of red colobus-diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author></author><host><author></author><title>The Netherlands: Noldus Information Technologies</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>The observer 3</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ns Pledge</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>127</last><first>123</first></pages><author></author><title>Natural history of Kangaroo Island</title><publicationDate>1979</publicationDate></host><title>Fossil vertebrates</title><publicationDate>1979</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ph Pressley</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>295</last><first>282</first></pages><author></author><title>Evolution</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></host><title>Parental effort and the evolution of nest-guarding tactics in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Wr Rice</name></json:item></author><host><volume>43</volume><pages><last>225</last><first>223</first></pages><author></author><title>Evolution</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Analyzing tables of statistical tests</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Jd Robertshaw</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Harden Rhgrigg</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Jarman</name></json:item><json:item><name>I Hume</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>753</last><first>735</first></pages><author></author><title>Kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Predation on Macropodoidea: a review Chipping Norton</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author></author><host><author></author><title>SAS Institute</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Gb Schaller</name></json:item></author><title>The Serengeti lion: a study of predator-prey relations</title><publicationDate>1972</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Bh Seghers</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>489</last><first>486</first></pages><author></author><title>Evolution</title><publicationDate>1974</publicationDate></host><title>Schooling behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata ): an evolutionary response to predation</title><publicationDate>1974</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Mj Smith</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Hinds</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>331</last><first>329</first></pages><author></author><title>The mammals of Australia (Strahan R</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Tammar wallaby</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Rr Swaisgood</name></json:item><json:item><name>Mp Rowe</name></json:item><json:item><name>Dh Owings</name></json:item></author><host><volume>57</volume><pages><last>1310</last><first>1301</first></pages><author></author><title>Anim Behav</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>Assessment of rattlesnake dangerousness by California ground squirrels: exploitation of cues from rattling sounds</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>N Tinbergen</name></json:item></author><title>The study of instinct</title><publicationDate>1951</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R Van Damme</name></json:item><json:item><name>Am Castilla</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>22</last><first>13</first></pages><author></author><title>J Chem Ecol</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>Chemosensory predator recognition in the lizard Podarcis hispanica: effects of predation pressure relaxation</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S Wroe</name></json:item></author><host><volume>280</volume><pages><last>74</last><first>68</first></pages><issue>5</issue><author></author><title>Sci Am</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>Killer kangaroos</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K Zuberbühler</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Noë</name></json:item><json:item><name>Rm Seyfarth</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>604</last><first>589</first></pages><author></author><title>Anim Behav</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host><title>Diana monkey long-distance calls: messages for conspecifics and predators</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>11</volume><publisherId><json:string>beheco</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>535</last><first>528</first></pages><issn><json:string>1045-2249</json:string></issn><issue>5</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1465-7279</json:string></eissn><title>Behavioral Ecology</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>zoology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string><json:string>behavioral sciences</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>behavioral science & comparative psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/beheco/11.5.528</json:string></doi><id>A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2</id><score>0.019398334</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><availability><p>International Society of Behavioral Ecology</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Address correspondence to D. T. Blumstein. E-mail: dan@galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au .</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel T.</forename><surname>Blumstein</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Janice C.</forename><surname>Daniel</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Andrea S.</forename><surname>Griffin</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Christopher S.</forename><surname>Evans</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Behavioral Ecology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Behavioral Ecology</title><idno type="pISSN">1045-2249</idno><idno type="eISSN">1465-7279</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2000-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="528">528</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="535">535</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/beheco/11.5.528</idno><idno type="PII">1465-7279</idno><idno type="local">0110528</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>We studied the way in which a population of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii), which have been isolated from mammalian predators since the last ice age, responded to the sight and sound of historical and ontogenetically and evolutionarily novel predators. Tammars were shown a range of visual stimuli, including taxidermic mounts of two evolutionarily novel predators, a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and a cat (Felis catus), and a model of an extinct predator, the thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Controls were a conspecific, the cart on which all mounts were presented, and blank trials in which spontaneous change in behavior was measured. We played back recorded sounds to characterize responses to acoustic cues from predators and to a putative conspecific antipredator signal. Treatments included the howls of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo), an evolutionarily novel predator; calls of a wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax), a historical and current predator; and wallaby foot thumps. Controls were the song of an Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen) and a blank trial. After seeing a fox, wallabies thumped their hind feet in alarm, suppressed foraging, and increased looking. The sight of a cat similarly suppressed foraging and increased looking. The sounds of predators did not influence responsiveness, but wallabies foraged less and looked more after thump playbacks. Our results suggest that tammars respond to the sight, but not the sounds, of predators. In contrast, the response to foot thumps demonstrates that this particular sound functions as an antipredator signal. We suggest that responsiveness to visual cues has been preserved under relaxed selection because predator morphology is convergent, but vocalizations are not.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>KWD</head><item><term>antipredator behavior</term></item><item><term>Macropus eugenii</term></item><item><term>predator recognition</term></item><item><term>relaxed selection</term></item><item><term>tammar wallaby</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000-09">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-12-22">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">beheco</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Behav Ecol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">beheco</journal-id><journal-title>Behavioral Ecology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Behavioral Ecology</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">1045-2249</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1465-7279</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/beheco/11.5.528</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="other">0110528</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pii">1465-7279</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Insular tammar wallabies (<italic>Macropus eugenii</italic>) respond to visual
but not acoustic cues from predators</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Blumstein</surname><given-names>Daniel T.</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF1"><sup>a</sup></xref><xref rid="AFF2"><sup>b</sup></xref><xref rid="AFF3"><sup>c</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Daniel</surname><given-names>Janice C.</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF2"><sup>b</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Griffin</surname><given-names>Andrea S.</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF2"><sup>b</sup></xref><xref rid="AFF3"><sup>c</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>Christopher S.</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF2"><sup>b</sup></xref></contrib><aff id="AFF1"><label><sup>a</sup></label> Department of Biology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</aff><aff id="AFF2"><label><sup>b</sup></label> Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109,
Australia</aff><aff id="AFF3"><label><sup>c</sup></label> The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of
Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp> Address correspondence to D. T. Blumstein. E-mail:
<ext-link xlink:href="dan@galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au" ext-link-type="email">dan@galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au</ext-link>
.</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>9</month><year>2000</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>528</fpage><lpage>535</lpage><history><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>1</month><year>2000</year></date><date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>8</month><year>1999</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>11</month><year>1999</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>International Society of Behavioral
Ecology</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2000</copyright-year></permissions><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>We studied the way in which a population of tammar wallabies (<italic>Macropus
eugenii</italic>), which have been isolated from mammalian predators since the
last ice age, responded to the sight and sound of historical and
ontogenetically and evolutionarily novel predators. Tammars were shown a range
of visual stimuli, including taxidermic mounts of two evolutionarily novel
predators, a red fox (<italic>Vulpes vulpes</italic>) and a cat (<italic>Felis
catus</italic>), and a model of an extinct predator, the thylacine (<italic>Thylacinus
cynocephalus</italic>). Controls were a conspecific, the cart on which all mounts
were presented, and blank trials in which spontaneous change in behavior was
measured. We played back recorded sounds to characterize responses to acoustic
cues from predators and to a putative conspecific antipredator signal.
Treatments included the howls of dingoes (<italic>Canis lupus dingo</italic>), an
evolutionarily novel predator; calls of a wedge-tailed eagle (<italic>Aquila
audax</italic>), a historical and current predator; and wallaby foot thumps.
Controls were the song of an Australian magpie (<italic>Gymnorhina tibicen</italic>)
and a blank trial. After seeing a fox, wallabies thumped their hind feet in
alarm, suppressed foraging, and increased looking. The sight of a cat
similarly suppressed foraging and increased looking. The sounds of predators
did not influence responsiveness, but wallabies foraged less and looked more
after thump playbacks. Our results suggest that tammars respond to the sight,
but not the sounds, of predators. In contrast, the response to foot thumps
demonstrates that this particular sound functions as an antipredator signal.
We suggest that responsiveness to visual cues has been preserved under relaxed
selection because predator morphology is convergent, but vocalizations are
not.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="KWD" xml:lang="en"><kwd>antipredator behavior</kwd><kwd><italic>Macropus eugenii</italic></kwd><kwd>predator recognition</kwd><kwd>relaxed selection</kwd><kwd>tammar wallaby</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>hwp-legacy-fpage</meta-name><meta-value>528</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>hwp-legacy-dochead</meta-name><meta-value>Article</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel T.</namePart><namePart type="family">Blumstein</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Janice C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Daniel</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andrea S.</namePart><namePart type="family">Griffin</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>The Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christopher S.</namePart><namePart type="family">Evans</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">We studied the way in which a population of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii), which have been isolated from mammalian predators since the last ice age, responded to the sight and sound of historical and ontogenetically and evolutionarily novel predators. Tammars were shown a range of visual stimuli, including taxidermic mounts of two evolutionarily novel predators, a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and a cat (Felis catus), and a model of an extinct predator, the thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Controls were a conspecific, the cart on which all mounts were presented, and blank trials in which spontaneous change in behavior was measured. We played back recorded sounds to characterize responses to acoustic cues from predators and to a putative conspecific antipredator signal. Treatments included the howls of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo), an evolutionarily novel predator; calls of a wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax), a historical and current predator; and wallaby foot thumps. Controls were the song of an Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen) and a blank trial. After seeing a fox, wallabies thumped their hind feet in alarm, suppressed foraging, and increased looking. The sight of a cat similarly suppressed foraging and increased looking. The sounds of predators did not influence responsiveness, but wallabies foraged less and looked more after thump playbacks. Our results suggest that tammars respond to the sight, but not the sounds, of predators. In contrast, the response to foot thumps demonstrates that this particular sound functions as an antipredator signal. We suggest that responsiveness to visual cues has been preserved under relaxed selection because predator morphology is convergent, but vocalizations are not.</abstract><note type="author-notes">Address correspondence to D. T. Blumstein. E-mail: dan@galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au .</note><subject lang="en"><genre>KWD</genre><topic>antipredator behavior</topic><topic>Macropus eugenii</topic><topic>predator recognition</topic><topic>relaxed selection</topic><topic>tammar wallaby</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Behavioral Ecology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Behavioral Ecology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1045-2249</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1465-7279</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">beheco</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">beheco</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-nlm-ta">Behav Ecol</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>11</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>528</start><end>535</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/beheco/11.5.528</identifier><identifier type="PII">1465-7279</identifier><identifier type="local">0110528</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">International Society of Behavioral Ecology</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C32 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001C32 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A1D76AADD687260A5F31016AD7BBF1D42A8CF4D2
|texte= Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |