Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval
Identifieur interne : 001B67 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001B66; suivant : 001B68Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval
Auteurs : Daniel Wiswede ; Klaus Rothermund ; Christian FringsSource :
- European Journal of Neuroscience [ 0953-816X ] ; 2013-11.
Abstract
The binding of stimulus (S) and response (R) features into S‐R episodes or ‘event files’ is a basic process for the regulation of behavior. Recent studies have shown that even irrelevant information is bound into event files. Associating distractors with responses leads to more efficient behavior if irrelevant and relevant stimuli are correlated, but leads to erroneous or inadequate behavior if irrelevant stimuli do not predict relevant ones. In this study, we investigated a control mechanism that is triggered by errors resulting from distractor‐based response retrieval. We tested whether the error‐related negativity (ERN) differs depending on the error source. In particular, we compared errors due to distractor‐based response retrieval with random errors. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval elicited a stronger (more negative) ERN than did other types of errors, suggesting that the cognitive system responds in a unique way to this kind of error. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12340
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title><author><name sortKey="Wiswede, Daniel" sort="Wiswede, Daniel" uniqKey="Wiswede D" first="Daniel" last="Wiswede">Daniel Wiswede</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D‐23538, Lübeck, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dr Daniel Wiswede, as above.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: daniel.wiswede@neuro.uni-luebeck.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rothermund, Klaus" sort="Rothermund, Klaus" uniqKey="Rothermund K" first="Klaus" last="Rothermund">Klaus Rothermund</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, FSU Jena, Jena, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/ejn.12340</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B67</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B67</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title><author><name sortKey="Wiswede, Daniel" sort="Wiswede, Daniel" uniqKey="Wiswede D" first="Daniel" last="Wiswede">Daniel Wiswede</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D‐23538, Lübeck, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dr Daniel Wiswede, as above.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: daniel.wiswede@neuro.uni-luebeck.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rothermund, Klaus" sort="Rothermund, Klaus" uniqKey="Rothermund K" first="Klaus" last="Rothermund">Klaus Rothermund</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, FSU Jena, Jena, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Frings, Christian" sort="Frings, Christian" uniqKey="Frings C" first="Christian" last="Frings">Christian Frings</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">European Journal of Neuroscience</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur J Neurosci</title><idno type="ISSN">0953-816X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1460-9568</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-11">2013-11</date><biblScope unit="volume">38</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="3496">3496</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="3506">3506</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0953-816X</idno></series><idno type="istex">6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/ejn.12340</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EJN12340</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0953-816X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The binding of stimulus (S) and response (R) features into S‐R episodes or ‘event files’ is a basic process for the regulation of behavior. Recent studies have shown that even irrelevant information is bound into event files. Associating distractors with responses leads to more efficient behavior if irrelevant and relevant stimuli are correlated, but leads to erroneous or inadequate behavior if irrelevant stimuli do not predict relevant ones. In this study, we investigated a control mechanism that is triggered by errors resulting from distractor‐based response retrieval. We tested whether the error‐related negativity (ERN) differs depending on the error source. In particular, we compared errors due to distractor‐based response retrieval with random errors. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval elicited a stronger (more negative) ERN than did other types of errors, suggesting that the cognitive system responds in a unique way to this kind of error. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Daniel Wiswede</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D‐23538, Lübeck, Germany</json:string><json:string>Dr Daniel Wiswede, as above.E‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: daniel.wiswede@neuro.uni-luebeck.de</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Klaus Rothermund</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, FSU Jena, Jena, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christian Frings</name><affiliations><json:string>Cognitive Psychology Unit, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>distractor‐based retrieval</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>error‐related negativity (ERN)</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>event files</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>S‐R binding</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>EJN12340</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>8.908</score><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 810.709 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1085</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9251</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>56403</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>159</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.M. Botvinick</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.S. Braver</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.M. Barch</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.S. Carter</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.D. Cohen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>108</volume><pages><last>652</last><first>624</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychol. Rev.</title></host><title>Conflict monitoring and cognitive control</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.M. Botvinick</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.S. Braver</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Yeung</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Ullsperger</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.S. Carter</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.D. Cohen</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>104</last><first>91</first></pages><author></author><title>The Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention</title></host><title>Conflict Monitoring: computational and Empirical Studies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.S. Colzato</name></json:item><json:item><name>N.C. van Wouwe</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Hommel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>446</last><first>440</first></pages><author></author><title>Neuropsychologia</title></host><title>Feature binding and affect: emotional modulation of visuo‐motor integration</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Debener</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Ullsperger</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Siegel</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Fiehler</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.Y. von Cramon</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.K. Engel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>11737</last><first>11730</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Neurosci.</title></host><title>Trial‐by‐trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Delorme</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Makeig</name></json:item></author><host><volume>134</volume><pages><last>21</last><first>9</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Neurosci. Meth.</title></host><title>EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single‐trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.A. Eriksen</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.W. Eriksen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>149</last><first>143</first></pages><author></author><title>Percept. Psychophys.</title></host><title>Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Falkenstein</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Hohnsbein</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Hoormann</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Blanke</name></json:item></author><host><volume>78</volume><pages><last>455</last><first>447</first></pages><author></author><title>Electroen. Clin. Neuro.</title></host><title>Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Falkenstein</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Hoormann</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Christ</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Hohnsbein</name></json:item></author><host><volume>51</volume><pages><last>107</last><first>87</first></pages><author></author><title>Biol. Psychol.</title></host><title>ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.J. Frank</name></json:item><json:item><name>B.S. Woroch</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Curran</name></json:item></author><host><volume>47</volume><pages><last>501</last><first>495</first></pages><author></author><title>Neuron</title></host><title>Error‐related negativity predicts reinforcement learning and conflict biases</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>131</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Exp. Psychol.</title></host><title>On the decay of distractor–response episodes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moeller</name></json:item></author><host><volume>72</volume><pages><last>2183</last><first>2176</first></pages><author></author><title>Atten. Percept. Psycho.</title></host><title>Binding targets' responses to distractors' locations: distractor response bindings in a location‐priming task</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moeller</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>591</last><first>582</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Cogn. Psychol.</title></host><title>The horserace between distractors and targets: retrieval‐based probe responding depends on distractor‐target asynchrony</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item></author><host><volume>37</volume><pages><last>1227</last><first>1209</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.</title></host><title>To be or not to be included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus‐response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Wentura</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>1377</last><first>1367</first></pages><author></author><title>Q. J. Exp. Psychol.</title></host><title>Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Bermeitinger</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Gibbons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1407</volume><pages><last>78</last><first>69</first></pages><author></author><title>Brain Res.</title></host><title>Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moeller</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item></author><host><volume>75</volume><pages><last>709</last><first>700</first></pages><author></author><title>Atten. Percept. Psycho.</title></host><title>Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W.R. Garner</name></json:item><json:item><name>G.L. Felfoldy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>241</last><first>225</first></pages><author></author><title>Cognitive Psychol.</title></host><title>Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W.J. Gehring</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Goss</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.G.H. Coles</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.E. Meyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Donchin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>390</last><first>385</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychol. Sci.</title></host><title>A neural system for error‐detection and compensation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Giesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>350</last><first>342</first></pages><author></author><title>Cognition Emotion</title></host><title>Affective matching moderates S‐R binding</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Giesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Q. J. Exp. Psychol.</title></host><title>You better stop! Binding “stop” tags to irrelevant stimulus features</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Giesen</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>387</last><first>373</first></pages><author></author><title>Mem. Cognition</title></host><title>Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor‐response bindings</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Hajcak</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.F. Simons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>68</volume><pages><last>21</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>Brain Cognition</title></host><title>Oops! I did it again: an ERP and behavioral study of double‐errors</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Hajcak</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.S. Moser</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Yeung</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.F. Simons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>42</volume><pages><last>160</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>On the ERN and the significance of errors</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C.B. Holroyd</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.G. Coles</name></json:item></author><host><volume>109</volume><pages><last>709</last><first>679</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychol. Rev.</title></host><title>The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error‐related negativity</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C.B. Holroyd</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Yeung</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>404</last><first>402</first></pages><author></author><title>Trends Neurosci.</title></host><title>Alcohol and error processing</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Hommel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>216</last><first>183</first></pages><author></author><title>Vis. Cogn.</title></host><title>Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus‐response episodes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Hommel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>1082</last><first>1067</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.</title></host><title>How much attention does an event file need?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Hommel</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Müsseler</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Aschersleben</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Prinz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>937</last><first>849</first></pages><author></author><title>Behav. Brain Sci.</title></host><title>The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A.J. Horner</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.N. Henson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>779</last><first>757</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.</title></host><title>Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long‐lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C.A. Joyce</name></json:item><json:item><name>I.F. Gorodnitsky</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Kutas</name></json:item></author><host><volume>41</volume><pages><last>325</last><first>313</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Kahneman</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Treisman</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>61</last><first>29</first></pages><author></author><title>Varieties of Attention</title></host><title>Changing views of attention and automaticity</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.J. Kierkels</name></json:item><json:item><name>G.J. van Boxtel</name></json:item><json:item><name>L.L. Vogten</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>253</last><first>246</first></pages><author></author><title>IEEE T. Biomed. Eng.</title></host><title>A model‐based objective evaluation of eye movement correction in EEG recordings</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>I. Koch</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Schuch</name></json:item><json:item><name>K.P. Vu</name></json:item><json:item><name>R.W. Proctor</name></json:item></author><host><volume>136</volume><pages><last>404</last><first>399</first></pages><author></author><title>Acta Psychol. (Amst)</title></host><title>Response‐repetition effects in task switching ‐ dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.D. Logan</name></json:item></author><host><volume>95</volume><pages><last>527</last><first>492</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychol. Rev.</title></host><title>Toward an instance theory of automatization</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.E. Maier</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Steinhauser</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Hübner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>2273</last><first>2263</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Cognitive Neurosci.</title></host><title>Is the error‐related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? evidence from effects of different error types</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.E. Maier</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Yeung</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Steinhauser</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>2347</last><first>2339</first></pages><author></author><title>NeuroImage</title></host><title>Error‐related brain activity and adjustments of selective attention following errors</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.E. Maier</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. di Pellegrino</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Steinhauser</name></json:item></author><host><volume>49</volume><pages><last>908</last><first>899</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>Enhanced error‐related negativity on flanker errors: error expectancy or error significance?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Mayr</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Buchner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>943</last><first>932</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.</title></host><title>Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Mayr</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Buchner</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Dentale</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>423</last><first>408</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.</title></host><title>Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Moeller</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item></author><host><volume>214</volume><pages><last>130</last><first>121</first></pages><author></author><title>Exp. Brain Res.</title></host><title>Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Moeller</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Frings</name></json:item></author><host><volume>59</volume><pages><last>264</last><first>258</first></pages><author></author><title>Exp. Psychol.</title></host><title>Integrating the irrelevant sound – grouping modulates the integration of irrelevant auditory stimuli into event files</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Nieuwenhuis</name></json:item><json:item><name>K.R. Ridderinkhof</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Blom</name></json:item><json:item><name>G.P. Band</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Kok</name></json:item></author><host><volume>38</volume><pages><last>760</last><first>752</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychophysiology</title></host><title>Error‐related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. Rothermund</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Wentura</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. De Houwer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><first>482</first></pages><author></author><title>J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.</title></host><title>Retrieval of incidental stimulus‐response associations as a source of negative priming</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Treisman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>47</volume><pages><last>875</last><first>862</first></pages><author></author><title>Am. Psychol.</title></host><title>Perceiving and re‐perceiving objects</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Waszak</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Pholulamdeth</name></json:item></author><host><volume>194</volume><pages><last>494</last><first>489</first></pages><author></author><title>Exp. Brain Res.</title></host><title>Episodic S‐R bindings and emotion: about the influence of positive and negative action effects on stimulus‐response associations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.R. Wessel</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><first>88</first></pages><author></author><title>Front. Hum. Neurosci.</title></host><title>Error awareness and the error‐related negativity: evaluating the first decade of evidence</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Yeung</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.D. Cohen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M.M. Botvinick</name></json:item></author><host><volume>111</volume><pages><last>959</last><first>931</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychol. Rev.</title></host><title>The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error‐related negativity</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>38</volume><publisherId><json:string>EJN</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>11</total><last>3506</last><first>3496</first></pages><issn><json:string>0953-816X</json:string></issn><issue>10</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Report</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1460-9568</json:string></eissn><title>European Journal of Neuroscience</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9568</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>neurosciences</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>neurology & neurosurgery</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/ejn.12340</json:string></doi><id>6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145</id><score>0.9227752</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><p>Copyright © 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</p></availability><date>2013-08-01</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Department of General Psychology</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel</forename><surname>Wiswede</surname></persName><email>daniel.wiswede@neuro.uni-luebeck.de</email><affiliation>Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D‐23538, Lübeck, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Dr Daniel Wiswede, as above.E‐mail:</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Klaus</forename><surname>Rothermund</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, FSU Jena, Jena, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Christian</forename><surname>Frings</surname></persName><affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">European Journal of Neuroscience</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur J Neurosci</title><idno type="pISSN">0953-816X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1460-9568</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9568</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-11"></date><biblScope unit="volume">38</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="3496">3496</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="3506">3506</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/ejn.12340</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EJN12340</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2013-08-01</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>The binding of stimulus (S) and response (R) features into S‐R episodes or ‘event files’ is a basic process for the regulation of behavior. Recent studies have shown that even irrelevant information is bound into event files. Associating distractors with responses leads to more efficient behavior if irrelevant and relevant stimuli are correlated, but leads to erroneous or inadequate behavior if irrelevant stimuli do not predict relevant ones. In this study, we investigated a control mechanism that is triggered by errors resulting from distractor‐based response retrieval. We tested whether the error‐related negativity (ERN) differs depending on the error source. In particular, we compared errors due to distractor‐based response retrieval with random errors. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval elicited a stronger (more negative) ERN than did other types of errors, suggesting that the cognitive system responds in a unique way to this kind of error. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines.</p></abstract><abstract style="graphical"><p>We tested whether the error‐related negativity (ERN) differs depending on the error source. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval produced a more negative ERN compared to other types of errors. The mechanism we reported here helps to detect previous Stimulus‐Response‐episodes that have led to a wrong response due to the repetition of an accompanying irrelevant stimulus. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>distractor‐based retrieval</term></item><item><term>error‐related negativity (ERN)</term></item><item><term>event files</term></item><item><term>S‐R binding</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Report</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2012-10-30">Received</change><change when="2013-07-17">Registration</change><change when="2013-08-01">Created</change><change when="2013-11">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="ejn12340" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9568</doi><issn type="print">0953-816X</issn><issn type="electronic">1460-9568</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="EJN"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE" type="main">European Journal of Neuroscience</title><title type="short">Eur J Neurosci</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="100"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ejn.2013.38.issue-10</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="38">38</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-11">November 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="110" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/ejn.12340</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="EJN12340"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="11" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Report</title><title type="tocHeading1">COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-10-30" type="manuscriptReceived"></event><event date="2013-06-26" type="manuscriptRevised"></event><event date="2013-07-17" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-08-01" type="xmlCreated"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-11-18" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2014-08-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-08-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-11-18"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-08-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">3496</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">3506</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><i>Correspondence</i><b>:</b> Dr Daniel Wiswede, as above.</line><line>E‐mail: <email>daniel.wiswede@neuro.uni-luebeck.de</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:EJN.EJN12340.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Not all errors are created equally: specific <fc>ERN</fc> responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title><title type="shortAuthors">D. Wiswede <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#ejn12340-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="ejn12340-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Daniel</givenNames> <familyName>Wiswede</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#ejn12340-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="ejn12340-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Klaus</givenNames> <familyName>Rothermund</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#ejn12340-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="ejn12340-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Christian</givenNames> <familyName>Frings</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="DE" type="organization" xml:id="ejn12340-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Neurology</orgDiv> <orgName>University of Lübeck</orgName> <address><street>Ratzeburger Allee 160</street><postCode>D‐23538</postCode> <city>Lübeck</city> <country>Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="DE" type="organization" xml:id="ejn12340-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Department of Psychology</orgDiv> <orgName>FSU Jena</orgName> <address><city>Jena</city> <country>Germany</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="DE" type="organization" xml:id="ejn12340-aff-0003"><orgDiv>Cognitive Psychology Unit</orgDiv> <orgName>University of Trier</orgName> <address><city>Trier</city> <country>Germany</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="ejn12340-kwd-0001">distractor‐based retrieval</keyword><keyword xml:id="ejn12340-kwd-0002">error‐related negativity (<fc>ERN</fc>)</keyword><keyword xml:id="ejn12340-kwd-0003">event files</keyword><keyword xml:id="ejn12340-kwd-0004"><fc>S</fc>‐<fc>R</fc> binding</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Department of General Psychology</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="ejn12340-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>The binding of stimulus (<fc>S</fc>) and response (<fc>R</fc>) features into <fc>S‐R</fc> episodes or ‘event files’ is a basic process for the regulation of behavior. Recent studies have shown that even irrelevant information is bound into event files. Associating distractors with responses leads to more efficient behavior if irrelevant and relevant stimuli are correlated, but leads to erroneous or inadequate behavior if irrelevant stimuli do not predict relevant ones. In this study, we investigated a control mechanism that is triggered by errors resulting from distractor‐based response retrieval. We tested whether the error‐related negativity (<fc>ERN</fc>) differs depending on the error source. In particular, we compared errors due to distractor‐based response retrieval with random errors. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval elicited a stronger (more negative) <fc>ERN</fc> than did other types of errors, suggesting that the cognitive system responds in a unique way to this kind of error. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines.</p></abstract><abstract type="graphical" xml:id="ejn12340-abs-0002"><p>We tested whether the error‐related negativity (<fc>ERN</fc>) differs depending on the error source. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval produced a more negative <fc>ERN</fc> compared to other types of errors. The mechanism we reported here helps to detect previous Stimulus‐Response‐episodes that have led to a wrong response due to the repetition of an accompanying irrelevant stimulus. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines. <blockFixed type="graphic" xml:id="ejn12340-blkfxd-0001"><mediaResourceGroup><mediaResource alt="image" href="urn:x-wiley:0953816X:media:ejn12340:ejn12340-toc-0001"></mediaResource></mediaResourceGroup></blockFixed></p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart><namePart type="family">Wiswede</namePart><affiliation>Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D‐23538, Lübeck, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Dr Daniel Wiswede, as above.E‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: daniel.wiswede@neuro.uni-luebeck.de</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Klaus</namePart><namePart type="family">Rothermund</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, FSU Jena, Jena, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christian</namePart><namePart type="family">Frings</namePart><affiliation>Cognitive Psychology Unit, University of Trier, Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-11</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08-01</dateCreated><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10-30</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-07-17</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>The binding of stimulus (S) and response (R) features into S‐R episodes or ‘event files’ is a basic process for the regulation of behavior. Recent studies have shown that even irrelevant information is bound into event files. Associating distractors with responses leads to more efficient behavior if irrelevant and relevant stimuli are correlated, but leads to erroneous or inadequate behavior if irrelevant stimuli do not predict relevant ones. In this study, we investigated a control mechanism that is triggered by errors resulting from distractor‐based response retrieval. We tested whether the error‐related negativity (ERN) differs depending on the error source. In particular, we compared errors due to distractor‐based response retrieval with random errors. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval elicited a stronger (more negative) ERN than did other types of errors, suggesting that the cognitive system responds in a unique way to this kind of error. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines.</abstract><abstract type="graphical">We tested whether the error‐related negativity (ERN) differs depending on the error source. Errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval produced a more negative ERN compared to other types of errors. The mechanism we reported here helps to detect previous Stimulus‐Response‐episodes that have led to a wrong response due to the repetition of an accompanying irrelevant stimulus. This control mechanism is adaptive because it prevents the emergence of inadequate response routines.</abstract><note type="funding">Department of General Psychology</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>distractor‐based retrieval</topic><topic>error‐related negativity (ERN)</topic><topic>event files</topic><topic>S‐R binding</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Neuroscience</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Eur J Neurosci</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Report</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0953-816X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1460-9568</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9568</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EJN</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>38</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>3496</start><end>3506</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/ejn.12340</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">EJN12340</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B67 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B67 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6848BF981E763C94BFD2C8761161840E1018A145
|texte= Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor‐based response retrieval
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |