Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations
Identifieur interne : 001940 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001939; suivant : 001941Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations
Auteurs : Anna Baumert ; Manfred SchmittSource :
- Australian Journal of Psychology [ 0004-9530 ] ; 2009-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The accessibility of concepts related to justice and injustice is proposed as a basic cognitive mechanism underlying the personality trait of justice sensitivity. To provide evidence for this assertion, the manner in which justice sensitivity shapes the interpretation of an ambiguous situation was investigated. It was found that, without priming, and after injustice is primed, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to perceive greater injustice in an ambiguous situation than persons low in justice sensitivity. If the restoration of justice is primed, however, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to interpret the ambiguous situation as more just when compared to persons low in justice sensitivity. Results are discussed with regard to a process‐oriented explanation of emotional and behavioural effects of justice sensitivity.
Url:
DOI: 10.1080/00049530802607597
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title><author><name sortKey="Baumert, Anna" sort="Baumert, Anna" uniqKey="Baumert A" first="Anna" last="Baumert">Anna Baumert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, 76829, Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1080/00049530802607597</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001940</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001940</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title><author><name sortKey="Baumert, Anna" sort="Baumert, Anna" uniqKey="Baumert A" first="Anna" last="Baumert">Anna Baumert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, 76829, Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Australian Journal of Psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0004-9530</idno><idno type="eISSN">1742-9536</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-05">2009-05</date><biblScope unit="volume">61</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="6">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="12">12</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0004-9530</idno></series><idno type="istex">42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1080/00049530802607597</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AJPY1748</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0004-9530</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accessibility</term><term>information uncertainty</term><term>injustice concepts</term><term>interpretation of ambiguous situations</term><term>justice concepts</term><term>justice sensitivity</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The accessibility of concepts related to justice and injustice is proposed as a basic cognitive mechanism underlying the personality trait of justice sensitivity. To provide evidence for this assertion, the manner in which justice sensitivity shapes the interpretation of an ambiguous situation was investigated. It was found that, without priming, and after injustice is primed, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to perceive greater injustice in an ambiguous situation than persons low in justice sensitivity. If the restoration of justice is primed, however, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to interpret the ambiguous situation as more just when compared to persons low in justice sensitivity. Results are discussed with regard to a process‐oriented explanation of emotional and behavioural effects of justice sensitivity.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Anna Baumert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</json:string><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, 76829, Landau, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Accessibility</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>information uncertainty</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>injustice concepts</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>interpretation of ambiguous situations</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>justice concepts</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>justice sensitivity</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>AJPY1748</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The accessibility of concepts related to justice and injustice is proposed as a basic cognitive mechanism underlying the personality trait of justice sensitivity. To provide evidence for this assertion, the manner in which justice sensitivity shapes the interpretation of an ambiguous situation was investigated. It was found that, without priming, and after injustice is primed, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to perceive greater injustice in an ambiguous situation than persons low in justice sensitivity. If the restoration of justice is primed, however, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to interpret the ambiguous situation as more just when compared to persons low in justice sensitivity. Results are discussed with regard to a process‐oriented explanation of emotional and behavioural effects of justice sensitivity.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.964</score><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>609.449 x 793.701 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>840</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5121</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>31946</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>122</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA 1991.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Anderson, J. R. Cognitive psychology and its implications Freeman New York 2004.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Baumert, A., Hangarter, M., Gollwitzer, M., Schmitt, M. Attentional processes guided by justice sensitivity: Evidence from a modified Stroop task University of Trier, Department of Psychology Trier, Germany 2007 Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 162.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Brooks, M. Life stinks Brooksfilms/Le Studio Canal Plus United States/France 1991 [Motion picture].</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. M. Collins</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. F. Loftus</name></json:item></author><host><volume>82</volume><pages><last>428</last><first>407</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>A spreading‐activation theory of semantic processing</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Cosmides</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Tooby</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>228</last><first>163</first></pages><author></author><title>The adapted mind</title></host><title>Cognitive adaptations for social exchange</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Dalbert</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>615</last><first>596</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Beiträge</title></host><title>Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen [Belief in a just world: Correlations of two scales with validation criteria]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Y. Dar</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Resh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>81</last><first>63</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Exploring the multifaceted structure of sense of deprivation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. G. Devine</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>18</last><first>5</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. A. Erdley</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. R. D'Agostino</name></json:item></author><host><volume>54</volume><pages><last>747</last><first>741</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Cognitive and affective components of automatic priming effects</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Feldman, E., Weir, P. Witness Paramount Pictures United States 1985 [Motion picture].</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Fetchenhauer</name></json:item><json:item><name>X. Huang</name></json:item></author><host><volume>36</volume><pages><last>1029</last><first>1015</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Folger</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Cropanzano</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Goldman</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>245</last><first>215</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of organizational justice</title></host><title>What is the relationship between justice and morality?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Gollwitzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Schalke</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Baer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>201</last><first>183</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. L. Hafer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>79</volume><pages><last>173</last><first>165</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. L. Hafer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>126</last><first>109</first></pages><author></author><title>The justice motive in everyday life</title></host><title>Why we reject innocent victims</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. T. Higgins</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>168</last><first>133</first></pages><author></author><title>Social psychology handbook of basic principles</title></host><title>Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. T. Higgins</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. M. Brendl</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>243</last><first>218</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</title></host><title>Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. T. Higgins</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. King</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>122</last><first>69</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality, cognition, and social interaction</title></host><title>Accessibility of social constructs: Information‐processing consequences of individual and contextual variability</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. T. Higgins</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. S. Rholes</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. R. Jones</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>154</last><first>141</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</title></host><title>Category accessibility and impression formation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. A. Ito</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. T. Larsen</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. K. Smith</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. T. Cacioppo</name></json:item></author><host><volume>75</volume><pages><last>900</last><first>887</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lerner, M. J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion Plenum New York 1980.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. J. Lerner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>399</last><first>388</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Review</title></host><title>The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Lovas</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Wolt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>131</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Studia Psychologica</title></host><title>Sensitivity to injustice in the context of some personality traits</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Maes, J., Schmitt, M., Schmal, A. Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Werthaltungen, Kontrollüberzeugungen, Freiheitsüberzeugungen, Drakonität, Soziale Einstellungen, Empathie und protestantische Arbeitsethik als Kovariate [Justice as a problem in reunified Germany. Values, locus of control, belief in freedom, strictness, social attitudes, empathy and protestant work ethics as covariates] University of Trier, Department of Psychology Trier, Germany 1995 Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 85.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Mikula</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>143</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Justice in social relations</title></host><title>The experience of injustice: Towards a better understanding of its phenomenology</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Mikula</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>203</last><first>175</first></pages><author></author><title>Entitlement and the affectionate bond</title></host><title>Perspective‐related differences in interpretations of injustice by victims and victimizers: A test with close relationships</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Mohiyeddini</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>10</volume><pages><last>352</last><first>333</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. I. Posner</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. R. R. Snyder</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>85</last><first>55</first></pages><author></author><title>Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium</title></host><title>Attention and cognitive control</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>20</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Gollwitzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Arbach</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>211</last><first>202</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Psychological Assessment</title></host><title>Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Schmitt, M., Maes, J., Schmal, A. Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Analyse der Messeigenschaften von Messinstrumenten für Einstellungen zu Verteilungsprinzipien, Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität und Glaube an eine gerechte Welt. [Justice as a problem in reunified Germany: Measures for attitudes towards distribution principles, justice sensitivity, and belief in a just world] University of Trier, Department of Psychology Trier, Germany 1997 Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 105.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Mohiyeddini</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>238</last><first>223</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. J. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Neumann</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>407</last><first>385</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. K. Srull</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. S. Wyer Jr.</name></json:item></author><host><volume>37</volume><pages><last>1672</last><first>1660</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. K. Srull</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. S. Wyer Jr.</name></json:item></author><host><volume>38</volume><pages><last>856</last><first>841</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. S. Uleman</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. S. Newman</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. B. Moskowitz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>279</last><first>211</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></host><title>People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. Van den Bos</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>498</last><first>482</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. Van den Bos</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. W. Burrows</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Umphress</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Folger</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. J. Lavelle</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Eaglestone</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>120</last><first>99</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Prior experiences as temporal frames of reference in social justice: The influence of previous fairness experiences on reactions to new and old supervisors</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. Van den Bos</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Maas</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Waldring</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. P. Semin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>168</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>61</volume><publisherId><json:string>AJPY</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>7</total><last>12</last><first>6</first></pages><issn><json:string>0004-9530</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1742-9536</json:string></eissn><title>Australian Journal of Psychology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1742-9536</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, multidisciplinary</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1080/00049530802607597</json:string></doi><id>42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C</id><score>0.05834247</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>2009 Australian Psychological Society</p></availability><date>2009</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Anna</forename><surname>Baumert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, 76829, Landau, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Manfred</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Australian Journal of Psychology</title><idno type="pISSN">0004-9530</idno><idno type="eISSN">1742-9536</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1742-9536</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-05"></date><biblScope unit="volume">61</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="6">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="12">12</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1080/00049530802607597</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AJPY1748</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2009</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The accessibility of concepts related to justice and injustice is proposed as a basic cognitive mechanism underlying the personality trait of justice sensitivity. To provide evidence for this assertion, the manner in which justice sensitivity shapes the interpretation of an ambiguous situation was investigated. It was found that, without priming, and after injustice is primed, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to perceive greater injustice in an ambiguous situation than persons low in justice sensitivity. If the restoration of justice is primed, however, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to interpret the ambiguous situation as more just when compared to persons low in justice sensitivity. Results are discussed with regard to a process‐oriented explanation of emotional and behavioural effects of justice sensitivity.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Accessibility</term></item><item><term>information uncertainty</term></item><item><term>injustice concepts</term></item><item><term>interpretation of ambiguous situations</term></item><item><term>justice concepts</term></item><item><term>justice sensitivity</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2009-05">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1742-9536</doi><issn type="print">0004-9530</issn><issn type="electronic">1742-9536</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AJPY"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY">Australian Journal of Psychology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ajpy.2009.61.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="61">61</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-05">May 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1080/00049530802607597</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AJPY1748"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>2009 Australian Psychological Society</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.3.1 mode:FullText" date="2014-05-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.3.1 mode:FullText" date="2014-05-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-02-02"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-02-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="6">6</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="12">12</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, 76829, Landau, Germany</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AJPY.AJPY1748.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="40"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Anna</givenNames><familyName>Baumert</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Manfred</givenNames><familyName>Schmitt</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Accessibility</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">information uncertainty</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">injustice concepts</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">interpretation of ambiguous situations</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">justice concepts</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">justice sensitivity</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The accessibility of concepts related to justice and injustice is proposed as a basic cognitive mechanism underlying the personality trait of justice sensitivity. To provide evidence for this assertion, the manner in which justice sensitivity shapes the interpretation of an ambiguous situation was investigated. It was found that, without priming, and after injustice is primed, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to perceive greater injustice in an ambiguous situation than persons low in justice sensitivity. If the restoration of justice is primed, however, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to interpret the ambiguous situation as more just when compared to persons low in justice sensitivity. Results are discussed with regard to a process‐oriented explanation of emotional and behavioural effects of justice sensitivity.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anna</namePart><namePart type="family">Baumert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Fortstrasse 7, 76829, Landau, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Manfred</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz‐Landau, Landau, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-05</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">40</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The accessibility of concepts related to justice and injustice is proposed as a basic cognitive mechanism underlying the personality trait of justice sensitivity. To provide evidence for this assertion, the manner in which justice sensitivity shapes the interpretation of an ambiguous situation was investigated. It was found that, without priming, and after injustice is primed, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to perceive greater injustice in an ambiguous situation than persons low in justice sensitivity. If the restoration of justice is primed, however, persons high in justice sensitivity tend to interpret the ambiguous situation as more just when compared to persons low in justice sensitivity. Results are discussed with regard to a process‐oriented explanation of emotional and behavioural effects of justice sensitivity.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>information uncertainty</topic><topic>injustice concepts</topic><topic>interpretation of ambiguous situations</topic><topic>justice concepts</topic><topic>justice sensitivity</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Australian Journal of Psychology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0004-9530</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1742-9536</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1742-9536</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AJPY</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>61</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>6</start><end>12</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1080/00049530802607597</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AJPY1748</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">2009 Australian Psychological Society</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001940 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001940 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:42787E2BCB224927D0351592971B7913146FFB9C
|texte= Justice‐sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |