Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage
Identifieur interne : 001828 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001827; suivant : 001829Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage
Auteurs : Manfred J. Schmitt ; Changiz MohiyeddiniSource :
- Social Justice Research [ 0885-7466 ] ; 1996-09-01.
Abstract
Abstract: The study investigates the construct validity of a self-report questionnaire for dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI; Schmitt, Neumann, and Montada, 1995). The items of this questionnaire are combinations of four indicators of SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger, intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, punitivity) with 18 types of unfair situations (e.g., performing better than others without getting any appreciation or reward). At Occasion 1, SBI, trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward equality were measured. At Occasion 2, the subjects (57 advanced psychology students) took part in a lottery for distributing scarce teaching resources among students. The lottery led to objective advantages for some students and to objective disadvantages for others. Four reactions to the event were measured at Occasion 3: judgment of the lottery as injust, anger about the lottery, experiencing the lottery as demotivating, and approval of activities against the lottery. These reactions were regressed on the variables measured at Occasion 1. SBI was the only significant predictor of the justice judgment and the approval of activities. Anger about the lottery depended only on objective disadvantage/advantage. Experiencing the lottery as demotivating depended negatively on anger control and positively on the intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, a subscale of the SBI inventory.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF02197249
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</title><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred J" sort="Schmitt, Manfred J" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred J." last="Schmitt">Manfred J. Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mohiyeddini, Changiz" sort="Mohiyeddini, Changiz" uniqKey="Mohiyeddini C" first="Changiz" last="Mohiyeddini">Changiz Mohiyeddini</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: schmittm@pcmail.uni-trier.de.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF02197249</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001828</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001828</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</title><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred J" sort="Schmitt, Manfred J" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred J." last="Schmitt">Manfred J. Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mohiyeddini, Changiz" sort="Mohiyeddini, Changiz" uniqKey="Mohiyeddini C" first="Changiz" last="Mohiyeddini">Changiz Mohiyeddini</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: schmittm@pcmail.uni-trier.de.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Social Justice Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Soc Just Res</title><idno type="ISSN">0885-7466</idno><idno type="eISSN">1573-6725</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-09-01">1996-09-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="223">223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="238">238</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0885-7466</idno></series><idno type="istex">15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF02197249</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BF02197249</idno><idno type="ArticleID">Art2</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0885-7466</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The study investigates the construct validity of a self-report questionnaire for dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI; Schmitt, Neumann, and Montada, 1995). The items of this questionnaire are combinations of four indicators of SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger, intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, punitivity) with 18 types of unfair situations (e.g., performing better than others without getting any appreciation or reward). At Occasion 1, SBI, trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward equality were measured. At Occasion 2, the subjects (57 advanced psychology students) took part in a lottery for distributing scarce teaching resources among students. The lottery led to objective advantages for some students and to objective disadvantages for others. Four reactions to the event were measured at Occasion 3: judgment of the lottery as injust, anger about the lottery, experiencing the lottery as demotivating, and approval of activities against the lottery. These reactions were regressed on the variables measured at Occasion 1. SBI was the only significant predictor of the justice judgment and the approval of activities. Anger about the lottery depended only on objective disadvantage/advantage. Experiencing the lottery as demotivating depended negatively on anger control and positively on the intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, a subscale of the SBI inventory.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Manfred J. Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Changiz Mohiyeddini</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</json:string><json:string>E-mail: schmittm@pcmail.uni-trier.de.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>BF02197249</json:string><json:string>Art2</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The study investigates the construct validity of a self-report questionnaire for dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI; Schmitt, Neumann, and Montada, 1995). The items of this questionnaire are combinations of four indicators of SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger, intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, punitivity) with 18 types of unfair situations (e.g., performing better than others without getting any appreciation or reward). At Occasion 1, SBI, trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward equality were measured. At Occasion 2, the subjects (57 advanced psychology students) took part in a lottery for distributing scarce teaching resources among students. The lottery led to objective advantages for some students and to objective disadvantages for others. Four reactions to the event were measured at Occasion 3: judgment of the lottery as injust, anger about the lottery, experiencing the lottery as demotivating, and approval of activities against the lottery. These reactions were regressed on the variables measured at Occasion 1. SBI was the only significant predictor of the justice judgment and the approval of activities. Anger about the lottery depended only on objective disadvantage/advantage. Experiencing the lottery as demotivating depended negatively on anger control and positively on the intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, a subscale of the SBI inventory.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.568</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1514</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5050</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>31821</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>16</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>214</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>L,S Aiken</name></json:item><json:item><name>C,G West</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Sage</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></host><title>Multiple Regr~'ion: Testing and Interpreting Interactions</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Berkowitz</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Walster</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Advances in Experimental Social Psychology</title><publicationDate>1976</publicationDate></host><title>Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interaction</title><publicationDate>1976</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C Dalbert</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>615</last><first>596</first></pages><author></author><title>PsychoL Beit</title><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate></host><title>Glanbe an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Sklaen [Belief in a just world as a motive: Validation correlates of two scales]</title><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Y Dar</name></json:item><json:item><name>N Resh</name></json:item></author><title>F.aploring the multidimensional structure of sense of deprivation: The case of Israeli Junior High School students</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>M Deutsch</name></json:item></author><title>Distributive Justice" A Social Psychological Perspective</title><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>M D6rfel</name></json:item></author><title>Verfahren.cgere~ dispos~neUe UngerecJttigkei~ensibilitiit und Arbeitszufriedenheit im betrieblichen Kontext [Procedural justice dispositional sensitivity of befallen injustice, and job satisfaction at the work place]</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Furnham</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Procter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>384</last><first>365</first></pages><author></author><title>Br. Z So</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ic,J Gergen</name></json:item><json:item><name>S,J Morse</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Gergen</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>153</last><first>121</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></host><title>Behavior exchange in cross-coltural perspective</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><pages><first>6</first></pages><author><json:item><name>T Klauer</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.-H Filipp</name></json:item></author><title>Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewaltigung (TSK) [Trier Scales of Coping with Illness</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Maes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>90</last><first>69</first></pages><author></author><title>Just. Res</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Blaming the victimuBelief in control or belief in justice? Soc</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B Major</name></json:item><json:item><name> Deaux</name></json:item><json:item><name> If</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>76</last><first>43</first></pages><author></author><title>Equity and Justice in Social Behavior</title><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate></host><title>Individual differences in justice behavior</title><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>G Mikula</name></json:item></author><title>Justice and Social Interaction</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author></author><host><pages><last>236</last><first>222</first></pages><author></author><title>Mikula, (3</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></host><title>Concepts of distributive justice in allocation decisions: A review of research in German-speaking countries</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Mikula</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>124</last><first>103</first></pages><author></author><title>Justice in Interpersonal Relations</title><publicationDate>1986</publicationDate></host><title>The experience of injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phemenology</title><publicationDate>1986</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name> Mikula</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>203</last><first>175</first></pages><author></author><title>Entitlement and the Affeaional Bond</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Perspective-related differences in interpretations of injustice by victims and victimizers: A test with dose relationships Sensibilit~ f~r widerfahrene Ungerechtigkeit als Disposition: kognitive, emotionale sowle behaviorale Reaktionen auf angerechte Behandlang [Sens'~vity to befallen injustice as a disposition: Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to unfair treatment]</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>C Mohlyeddlnl</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Schmitt</name></json:item></author><title>Sensitiv~ to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in the laboratory</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Dalbert</name></json:item></author><title>F.xistenfiMle Schuld: Re~g der Untersuchungsstichprobe , Erhebungsinstnonente und Unte~.chungsplan [Existential guilt: Sample , measuement instruments, and design] (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe 23S Schmitt and Mohiyeddini "Verantwortung</title><publicationDate>1983</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Dalbert</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>143</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Justice in Social Relations</title><publicationDate>1986</publicationDate></host><title>Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt</title><publicationDate>1986</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Schneider</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>344</last><first>313</first></pages><author></author><title>Soc Just Res</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></host><title>Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged</title><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Rubin</name></json:item><json:item><name>L,A Peplau</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>89</last><first>65</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>J'. So~ Iss</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></host><title>Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C Sabbagh</name></json:item><json:item><name>Y Dar</name></json:item><json:item><name>N Resh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>57</volume><pages><last>261</last><first>244</first></pages><author></author><title>Soc. PsychoL Q</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>The structure of social jusdce judgments: A facet approach</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>K,R Scherer</name></json:item><json:item><name>H,G Wallbott</name></json:item><json:item><name>A,B Summerfield</name></json:item></author><title>Experiencing Emotion: ,t Cross-Cultural Study</title><publicationDate>1986</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>M Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>R,; Barbacsy</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Binz</name></json:item><json:item><name>C Buttgereit</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Heinz</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Hesse</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Kraft</name></json:item><json:item><name>N Kuhlmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Lischetzke</name></json:item><json:item><name> Nisslmfiller</name></json:item><json:item><name> Ic</name></json:item><json:item><name>U Wunsch</name></json:item></author><title>Distributive Justice Research from an Interactionist Perspective</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Neumann</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>407</last><first>385</first></pages><author></author><title>Soc. ]. Res</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>V Hodapp</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><author></author><title>Trierer PsychoL Ber</title><publicationDate>91989</publicationDate></host><title>Das State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI): Itemmetrische und faktorenanalydsche Befunde und Untersuchungen zur Konstroktvaliditat [State-Trait Expression Inventory:. Results from item analyses, factor analyses , and studies of construct validity]</title><publicationDate>91989</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>C,D Spielberger</name></json:item></author><title>State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory</title><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Ic,Y T6rnbiom</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>236</last><first>175</first></pages><author></author><title>Justice" Interdisciplinary Perspectives</title><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate></host><title>The social psychology of distributive justice</title><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>R Ullrich De Muynck</name></json:item><json:item><name>R Ullrich</name></json:item></author><title>Assertiveness-Training-Programm A TP</title><publicationDate>1976</publicationDate></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>238</last><first>223</first></pages><issn><json:string>0885-7466</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><subject><json:item><value>Philosophy</value></json:item><json:item><value>Social Policy</value></json:item><json:item><value>Anthropology/Archaeometry</value></json:item><json:item><value>Political Science</value></json:item><json:item><value>Sociology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Personality & Social Psychology</value></json:item></subject><journalId><json:string>11211</json:string></journalId><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1573-6725</json:string></eissn><title>Social Justice Research</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>sociology</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/BF02197249</json:string></doi><id>15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA</id><score>1.4496863</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><availability><p>Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1996</p></availability><date>1996</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</title><author xml:id="author-1" corresp="yes"><persName><forename type="first">Manfred</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2" corresp="yes"><persName><forename type="first">Changiz</forename><surname>Mohiyeddini</surname></persName><email>schmittm@pcmail.uni-trier.de.</email><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Social Justice Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Soc Just Res</title><idno type="journal-ID">11211</idno><idno type="pISSN">0885-7466</idno><idno type="eISSN">1573-6725</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">5</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">4</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-09-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="223">223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="238">238</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF02197249</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BF02197249</idno><idno type="ArticleID">Art2</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1996</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: The study investigates the construct validity of a self-report questionnaire for dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI; Schmitt, Neumann, and Montada, 1995). The items of this questionnaire are combinations of four indicators of SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger, intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, punitivity) with 18 types of unfair situations (e.g., performing better than others without getting any appreciation or reward). At Occasion 1, SBI, trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward equality were measured. At Occasion 2, the subjects (57 advanced psychology students) took part in a lottery for distributing scarce teaching resources among students. The lottery led to objective advantages for some students and to objective disadvantages for others. Four reactions to the event were measured at Occasion 3: judgment of the lottery as injust, anger about the lottery, experiencing the lottery as demotivating, and approval of activities against the lottery. These reactions were regressed on the variables measured at Occasion 1. SBI was the only significant predictor of the justice judgment and the approval of activities. Anger about the lottery depended only on objective disadvantage/advantage. Experiencing the lottery as demotivating depended negatively on anger control and positively on the intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, a subscale of the SBI inventory.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>Psychology</head><item><term>Philosophy</term></item><item><term>Social Policy</term></item><item><term>Anthropology/Archaeometry</term></item><item><term>Political Science</term></item><item><term>Sociology</term></item><item><term>Personality & Social Psychology</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1996-09-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-11-22">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-20">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Springer, Publisher found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>New York</PublisherLocation></PublisherInfo><Journal><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>11211</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>0885-7466</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1573-6725</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Social Justice Research</JournalTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Soc Just Res</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Psychology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Philosophy</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Social Policy</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Anthropology/Archaeometry</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Political Science</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Sociology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Personality & Social Psychology</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume><VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><VolumeIDStart>9</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>9</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>4</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular"><IssueInfo TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>3</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>3</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>5</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><CoverDate><Year>1996</Year><Month>9</Month></CoverDate></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Plenum Publishing Corporation</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1996</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="Art2"><ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No"><ArticleID>BF02197249</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF02197249</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>2</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</ArticleTitle><ArticleFirstPage>223</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>238</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>12</Day></RegistrationDate></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Plenum Publishing Corporation</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1996</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants><ArticleContext><JournalID>11211</JournalID><VolumeIDStart>9</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>9</VolumeIDEnd><IssueIDStart>3</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>3</IssueIDEnd></ArticleContext></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1" CorrespondingAffiliationID="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Manfred</GivenName><GivenName>J.</GivenName><FamilyName>Schmitt</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1" CorrespondingAffiliationID="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Changiz</GivenName><FamilyName>Mohiyeddini</FamilyName></AuthorName><Contact><Email>schmittm@pcmail.uni-trier.de.</Email></Contact></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgDivision>Department of Psychology</OrgDivision><OrgName>Trier University</OrgName><OrgAddress><Postcode>54286</Postcode><City>Trier</City><Country>Germany</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Abstract</Heading><Para>The study investigates the construct validity of a self-report questionnaire for dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI; Schmitt, Neumann, and Montada, 1995). The items of this questionnaire are combinations of four indicators of SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger, intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, punitivity) with 18 types of unfair situations (e.g., performing better than others without getting any appreciation or reward). At Occasion 1, SBI, trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward equality were measured. At Occasion 2, the subjects (57 advanced psychology students) took part in a lottery for distributing scarce teaching resources among students. The lottery led to objective advantages for some students and to objective disadvantages for others. Four reactions to the event were measured at Occasion 3: judgment of the lottery as injust, anger about the lottery, experiencing the lottery as demotivating, and approval of activities against the lottery. These reactions were regressed on the variables measured at Occasion 1. SBI was the only significant predictor of the justice judgment and the approval of activities. Anger about the lottery depended only on objective disadvantage/advantage. Experiencing the lottery as demotivating depended negatively on anger control and positively on the intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, a subscale of the SBI inventory.</Para></Abstract><KeywordGroup Language="En"><Heading>Key words</Heading><Keyword>sensitivity</Keyword><Keyword>injustice</Keyword><Keyword>questionnaire</Keyword><Keyword>lottery</Keyword><Keyword>anger</Keyword></KeywordGroup></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage</title></titleInfo><name type="personal" displayLabel="corresp"><namePart type="given">Manfred</namePart><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal" displayLabel="corresp"><namePart type="given">Changiz</namePart><namePart type="family">Mohiyeddini</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Trier University, 54286, Trier, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: schmittm@pcmail.uni-trier.de.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">New York</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-09-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Abstract: The study investigates the construct validity of a self-report questionnaire for dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI; Schmitt, Neumann, and Montada, 1995). The items of this questionnaire are combinations of four indicators of SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger, intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, punitivity) with 18 types of unfair situations (e.g., performing better than others without getting any appreciation or reward). At Occasion 1, SBI, trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward equality were measured. At Occasion 2, the subjects (57 advanced psychology students) took part in a lottery for distributing scarce teaching resources among students. The lottery led to objective advantages for some students and to objective disadvantages for others. Four reactions to the event were measured at Occasion 3: judgment of the lottery as injust, anger about the lottery, experiencing the lottery as demotivating, and approval of activities against the lottery. These reactions were regressed on the variables measured at Occasion 1. SBI was the only significant predictor of the justice judgment and the approval of activities. Anger about the lottery depended only on objective disadvantage/advantage. Experiencing the lottery as demotivating depended negatively on anger control and positively on the intrusiveness/perseverance of thoughts about the event, a subscale of the SBI inventory.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Social Justice Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Soc Just Res</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" displayLabel="Archive Journal"></genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-09-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Psychology</genre><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Anthropology/Archaeometry</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Personality & Social Psychology</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0885-7466</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1573-6725</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">11211</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">5</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">4</identifier><part><date>1996</date><detail type="volume"><number>9</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>3</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>223</start><end>238</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF02197249</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BF02197249</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">Art2</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1996</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>SPRINGER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1996</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001828 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001828 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:15FB464B597A5B650F3CBCDE359E2F579D0451CA
|texte= Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |