Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model
Identifieur interne : 001768 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001767; suivant : 001769Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model
Auteurs : Geoffrey J. Syme ; Elisabeth Kals ; Blair E. Nancarrow ; Leo MontadaSource :
- Risk Analysis [ 0272-4332 ] ; 2000-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Intergenerational justice is implicit in international commitments to sustainability. If ecological, economic, and social components of sustainability are to be achieved, there is a necessity for intergenerational justice considerations to be included in decision making. The present generation's risk judgments should include consideration of the possible outcomes for their children. But intergenerational issues cannot be considered in isolation from other current risk and fairness concerns. This article reports on a community‐based integrative model that describes justice and other attitudes and motivations that determine community and individual proenvironmental behavior in two nations: Germany and Australia. This model can account for a considerable amount of the variance in political compliance as well as various proenvironmental behaviors. Group or individual self‐interests have nearly no effects on global protective behavior. It is shown that universal as well as contextual principles, including distributive (within or between generations), procedural, and interactive justice, play a crucial role in fairness judgments. Other principles are also taken into account, such as efficiency, environmental rights, and rights to economic welfare. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of complex community fairness judgments in predicting and evaluating acceptance of political decisions, and for promoting proenvironmental behavior.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.206083
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title><author><name sortKey="Syme, Geoffrey J" sort="Syme, Geoffrey J" uniqKey="Syme G" first="Geoffrey J." last="Syme">Geoffrey J. Syme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kals, Elisabeth" sort="Kals, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Kals E" first="Elisabeth" last="Kals">Elisabeth Kals</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nancarrow, Blair E" sort="Nancarrow, Blair E" uniqKey="Nancarrow B" first="Blair E." last="Nancarrow">Blair E. Nancarrow</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Montada, Leo" sort="Montada, Leo" uniqKey="Montada L" first="Leo" last="Montada">Leo Montada</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/0272-4332.206083</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001768</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001768</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title><author><name sortKey="Syme, Geoffrey J" sort="Syme, Geoffrey J" uniqKey="Syme G" first="Geoffrey J." last="Syme">Geoffrey J. Syme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kals, Elisabeth" sort="Kals, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Kals E" first="Elisabeth" last="Kals">Elisabeth Kals</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nancarrow, Blair E" sort="Nancarrow, Blair E" uniqKey="Nancarrow B" first="Blair E." last="Nancarrow">Blair E. Nancarrow</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Montada, Leo" sort="Montada, Leo" uniqKey="Montada L" first="Leo" last="Montada">Leo Montada</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Risk Analysis</title><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno><idno type="eISSN">1539-6924</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-12">2000-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="905">905</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="916">916</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno></series><idno type="istex">0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/0272-4332.206083</idno><idno type="ArticleID">RISA083</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0272-4332</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecological risks</term><term>community</term><term>equity</term><term>fairness judgments</term><term>justice</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Intergenerational justice is implicit in international commitments to sustainability. If ecological, economic, and social components of sustainability are to be achieved, there is a necessity for intergenerational justice considerations to be included in decision making. The present generation's risk judgments should include consideration of the possible outcomes for their children. But intergenerational issues cannot be considered in isolation from other current risk and fairness concerns. This article reports on a community‐based integrative model that describes justice and other attitudes and motivations that determine community and individual proenvironmental behavior in two nations: Germany and Australia. This model can account for a considerable amount of the variance in political compliance as well as various proenvironmental behaviors. Group or individual self‐interests have nearly no effects on global protective behavior. It is shown that universal as well as contextual principles, including distributive (within or between generations), procedural, and interactive justice, play a crucial role in fairness judgments. Other principles are also taken into account, such as efficiency, environmental rights, and rights to economic welfare. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of complex community fairness judgments in predicting and evaluating acceptance of political decisions, and for promoting proenvironmental behavior.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Geoffrey J. Syme</name><affiliations><json:string>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Elisabeth Kals</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Blair E. Nancarrow</name><affiliations><json:string>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Leo Montada</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Ecological risks</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>justice</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>equity</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>community</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fairness judgments</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>RISA083</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Intergenerational justice is implicit in international commitments to sustainability. If ecological, economic, and social components of sustainability are to be achieved, there is a necessity for intergenerational justice considerations to be included in decision making. The present generation's risk judgments should include consideration of the possible outcomes for their children. But intergenerational issues cannot be considered in isolation from other current risk and fairness concerns. This article reports on a community‐based integrative model that describes justice and other attitudes and motivations that determine community and individual proenvironmental behavior in two nations: Germany and Australia. This model can account for a considerable amount of the variance in political compliance as well as various proenvironmental behaviors. Group or individual self‐interests have nearly no effects on global protective behavior. It is shown that universal as well as contextual principles, including distributive (within or between generations), procedural, and interactive justice, play a crucial role in fairness judgments. Other principles are also taken into account, such as efficiency, environmental rights, and rights to economic welfare. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of complex community fairness judgments in predicting and evaluating acceptance of political decisions, and for promoting proenvironmental behavior.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.364</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>594 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1466</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7538</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>49640</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>197</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title><refBibs><json:item><author></author><host><volume>1</volume><pages><last>23</last><first>18</first></pages><author></author><title>Environmental Science & Technology. Environmental Science & Technology</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>UNEP helmsman Töpfer addresses environmental changes</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M,P Maloney</name></json:item><json:item><name>M,P Ward</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>586</last><first>583</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></host><title>Ecology: Let's hear from the people. An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Kruse</name></json:item></author><host><volume>46</volume><pages><last>92</last><first>81</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Rundschau</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Globale Umweltveränderungen: Eine Herausforderung an die Psychologie [Global changes of the environment: A challenge for psychology]</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><pages><last>209</last><first>197</first></pages><author><json:item><name>R Becker</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item></author><title>Verkehrsbezogene Entscheidungen und Urteile: Über die Vorhersage von umwelt-und gesundheitsbezogenen Verbotsforderungen und Verkehrsmittelwahlen [Traffic related decisions and judgements: About the prediction of ecological and health-related prohibitive laws and choice of transportation]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author></author><host><volume>5</volume><author></author><title>World Commission on Environment and Development</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></host><title>Our common future</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>A Ernst</name></json:item></author><title>Ökologisch-soziale Dilemmata</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G Hardin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>162</volume><pages><last>1248</last><first>1243</first></pages><author></author><title>Science</title><publicationDate>1968</publicationDate></host><title>The tragedy of the commons</title><publicationDate>1968</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J Platt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>651</last><first>641</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></host><title>Social traps</title><publicationDate>1973</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H Spada</name></json:item><json:item><name>K Opwis</name></json:item><json:item><name>J Donnen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M Schwiersch</name></json:item><json:item><name>A Ernst</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>72</last><first>49</first></pages><author></author><title>Western European Education</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></host><title>Ecological knowledge. Acquisition and use in problem solving and in decision-making</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item></author><title>Verantwortliches Umweltverhalten [Responsible environmental behavior]</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>258</last><first>231</first></pages><author></author><title>Current societal concerns about justice</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>Are proenvironmental commitments motivated by health concerns or by perceived justice?</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P,C Stern</name></json:item><json:item><name>G,T Gardener</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>239</last><first>213</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></host><title>The place of behavior change in the management of environmental problems</title><publicationDate>1981</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K Pawlik</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>563</last><first>547</first></pages><author></author><title>International Journal of Psychology</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></host><title>The psychology of global environmental change: Some basic data and an agenda for cooperative international research</title><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S Opotow</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Clayton</name></json:item></author><host><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>Journal of Social Issues</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Green justice: Conceptions of fairness and the natural world [Special issue]</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S,L Albrecht</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>72</last><first>67</first></pages><author></author><title>Society and Natural Resources</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Equity and justice in environmental decision-making: A proposed research agenda</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S Clayton</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>212</last><first>195</first></pages><author></author><title>Current societal concerns about justice</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>What is fair in the environmental debate?</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W,A Horwitz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>467</last><first>345</first></pages><author></author><title>Ethics & Behavior</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Characteristics of environmental ethics: Environmental activists' accounts</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>Y Russell</name></json:item></author><title>Verantwortungs-und Gerechtigkeitsmotive von Handlungsbereitschaften zur Risikominderung des Treibhauseffektes [Responsibility and justice motives of the willingness for continued commitments to reduce the risks of greenhouse warming]. Unpublished master's thesis</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>176</last><first>168</first></pages><issue>2</issue><author></author><title>International Journal of Psychology</title><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate></host><title>Political implications of psychological research on ecological justice and proenvironmental behavior</title><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>C,R Sunstein</name></json:item></author><title>Free markets and social justice</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P,C Stern</name></json:item><json:item><name>T Dietz</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Kalof</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>348</last><first>322</first></pages><author></author><title>Environment and Behavior</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D,M Messick</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>31</last><first>11</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological perspectives on justice</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Equality as a decision heuristic</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K,A Rasinski</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>211</last><first>201</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate></host><title>What's fair is fair—Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice</title><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>D,M Fenton</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>360</last><first>347</first></pages><author></author><title>Society and Natural Resources</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Perceptions of equity and procedural preferences for water allocation decisions</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B,D Gardner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>363</last><first>353</first></pages><author></author><title>Policy Studies Review</title><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate></host><title>Institutional impediments to efficient water allocation</title><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>I Millet</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>1204</last><first>1197</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Business Ethics</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><title>Ethical decision making using the analytic hierarchy process</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>O Renn</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>115</last><first>95</first></pages><author></author><title>Umweltgerechtes Handeln. Barrieren und Brücken [Proenvironmental behavior: Barriers and bridges]</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>Fairneß in Partizipationsvorhaben zur Umweltgestaltung [Fairness in participation plans for shaping the environment</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>327</last><first>305</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></host><title>Perceived justice of ecological policy and proenvironmental commitments</title><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><pages><last>295</last><first>271</first></pages><author><json:item><name>B Sitter</name></json:item></author><title>Wie läßt sich ökologische Gerechtigkeit denken? [How to think in terms of ecological justice?] Zeitschrift für ökologische Ethik</title><publicationDate>1987</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>B,E Nancarrow</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>1850</last><first>1843</first></pages><issue>6</issue><author></author><title>Water Resources Research</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>Planning attitudes, lay philosophies and water allocation: A preliminary analysis and research agenda</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>B,E Nancarrow</name></json:item></author><title>Defining and utilising lay ethics and equity in land and water allocation. Paper presented to the international conference Environmental Justice: Global Ethics for the 21st Century</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>P,S Wenz</name></json:item></author><title>Environmental justice</title><publicationDate>1988</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>337</last><first>326</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></host><title>Umweltschutz und die Verantwortung der Bürger [Pollution control and the responsibility of the citizen]</title><publicationDate>1994</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item><json:item><name>D Schumacher</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>202</last><first>178</first></pages><issue>2</issue><author></author><title>Environment & Behavior</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>C,E Beven</name></json:item><json:item><name>N,R Sumner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>606</last><first>586</first></pages><issue>5</issue><author></author><title>Environment & Behavior</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Motivation for reported involvement in local wetland preservation: The roles of knowledge, disposition, problem assessment and arousal</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>M Bomm</name></json:item></author><title>Wahrgenommene Gerechtigkeit von staatlichen Maßnahmen im Umweltschutz (Privater Bereich) [Perceived justice of governmental proenvironmental measures (private area)]. Unpublished master's thesis</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>H Scheuthle</name></json:item></author><title>Wahrgenommene Gerechtigkeit von staatlichen Umweltschutzmaßnahmen im wirtschaftlichen Bereich [Perceived justice of governmental proenvironmental measures in industrial area]. Unpublished master's thesis</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>B,E Nancarrow</name></json:item><json:item><name>J,A Mccreddin</name></json:item><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item></author><title>Developing fair processes for the re-allocation of groundwater for long term sustainability in the Namoi Valley (CSIRO Land and Water Consultancy Report No. 98 -40). A report to the Department of Land and Water Conservation</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><pages><last>39</last><first>21</first></pages><author><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item></author><title>Motive politischer Engagements für den globalen oder lokalen Umweltschutz am Beispiel konkurrierender städtebaulicher Interessen [Motives of political engagements for global or local pollution control exemplified by competitive interests concerning urban development] . Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R Folger</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>416</last><first>395</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><title>Distributive and procedural justice: Multifaceted meanings and interrelations</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>B,E Nancarrow</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>A report to the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation</title><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate></host><title>Perceptions of fairness and social justice in the allocation of water resources in Australia</title><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>T,R Tyler</name></json:item></author><title>Why people obey law</title><publicationDate>1990</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A Diekmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>P Preisendörfer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>134</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>Zur Anwendung der Theorie rationalen Handelns in der Umweltforschung [On the application of the rational-choice-theory in environmental research]</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>101</last><first>81</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host><title>Justice: Just a rational choice?</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>U Fuhrer</name></json:item><json:item><name>S Wölfing</name></json:item></author><title>Von den Grundlagen des Umweltbewußtseins zum verantwortlichen Umwelthandeln [From the basics of ecological awareness to responsible environmental behavior]</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>J Schahn</name></json:item></author><title>Die Erfassung und Veränderung des Umweltbewußtseins [Measurement and change of ecological awareness]</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S,J Kantola</name></json:item><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>A,R Nesdale</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>182</last><first>164</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Social Psychology</title><publicationDate>1984</publicationDate></host><title>An informational analysis approach incorporating Fishbein's model in a test of the effects of appraised severity and efficacy in promoting water conservation</title><publicationDate>1984</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>K,D Williams</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>4010</last><first>4003</first></pages><issue>12</issue><author></author><title>Water Resources Research</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></host><title>The psychology of drinking water quality: An exploratory study</title><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>B,E Nancarrow</name></json:item><json:item><name>J,A Mccreddin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>57</volume><pages><last>70</last><first>51</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Environmental Management</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></host><title>Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses</title><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Y Russell</name></json:item><json:item><name>E Kals</name></json:item><json:item><name>L Montada</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen Was ist Generationengerechtigkeit</title></host><title>Generationengerechtigkeit im allgemeinen Bewußtsein [Intergenerational justice in public awareness</title></json:item><json:item><host><author><json:item><name>B,E Nancarrow</name></json:item><json:item><name>G,J Syme</name></json:item><json:item><name>J,A Mccreddin</name></json:item></author><title>The development of stakeholder-based principles for defining environmental flows in modified rivers (CSIRO Land and Water Consultancy Report No. 98-25.) A report to the Land and Water Resources R&D Corporation</title><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>20</volume><publisherId><json:string>RISA</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>12</total><last>916</last><first>905</first></pages><issn><json:string>0272-4332</json:string></issn><issue>6</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1539-6924</json:string></eissn><title>Risk Analysis</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>social sciences, mathematical methods</json:string><json:string>public, environmental & occupational health</json:string><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>mathematics, interdisciplinary applications</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>enabling & strategic technologies</json:string><json:string>strategic, defence & security studies</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/0272-4332.206083</json:string></doi><id>0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F</id><score>0.9542502</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Geoffrey J.</forename><surname>Syme</surname></persName><affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Elisabeth</forename><surname>Kals</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Blair E.</forename><surname>Nancarrow</surname></persName><affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Leo</forename><surname>Montada</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Risk Analysis</title><idno type="pISSN">0272-4332</idno><idno type="eISSN">1539-6924</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="905">905</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="916">916</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/0272-4332.206083</idno><idno type="ArticleID">RISA083</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Intergenerational justice is implicit in international commitments to sustainability. If ecological, economic, and social components of sustainability are to be achieved, there is a necessity for intergenerational justice considerations to be included in decision making. The present generation's risk judgments should include consideration of the possible outcomes for their children. But intergenerational issues cannot be considered in isolation from other current risk and fairness concerns. This article reports on a community‐based integrative model that describes justice and other attitudes and motivations that determine community and individual proenvironmental behavior in two nations: Germany and Australia. This model can account for a considerable amount of the variance in political compliance as well as various proenvironmental behaviors. Group or individual self‐interests have nearly no effects on global protective behavior. It is shown that universal as well as contextual principles, including distributive (within or between generations), procedural, and interactive justice, play a crucial role in fairness judgments. Other principles are also taken into account, such as efficiency, environmental rights, and rights to economic welfare. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of complex community fairness judgments in predicting and evaluating acceptance of political decisions, and for promoting proenvironmental behavior.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Ecological risks</term></item><item><term>justice</term></item><item><term>equity</term></item><item><term>community</term></item><item><term>fairness judgments</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000-12">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-12-12">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-02-8">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishers Inc.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</doi><issn type="print">0272-4332</issn><issn type="electronic">1539-6924</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="RISA"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="RISK ANALYSIS">Risk Analysis</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/risk.2000.20.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="20">20</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-12">December 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0090500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/0272-4332.206083</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="RISA083"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-05-23"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-05-23"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="905">905</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="916">916</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:RISA.RISA083.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Geoffrey J.</givenNames><familyName>Syme</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Elisabeth</givenNames><familyName>Kals</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Blair E.</givenNames><familyName>Nancarrow</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Leo</givenNames><familyName>Montada</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="AU"><unparsedAffiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Ecological risks</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">justice</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">equity</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">community</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">fairness judgments</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Intergenerational justice is implicit in international commitments to sustainability. If ecological, economic, and social components of sustainability are to be achieved, there is a necessity for intergenerational justice considerations to be included in decision making. The present generation's risk judgments should include consideration of the possible outcomes for their children. But intergenerational issues cannot be considered in isolation from other current risk and fairness concerns. This article reports on a community‐based integrative model that describes justice and other attitudes and motivations that determine community and individual proenvironmental behavior in two nations: Germany and Australia. This model can account for a considerable amount of the variance in political compliance as well as various proenvironmental behaviors. Group or individual self‐interests have nearly no effects on global protective behavior. It is shown that universal as well as contextual principles, including distributive (within or between generations), procedural, and interactive justice, play a crucial role in fairness judgments. Other principles are also taken into account, such as efficiency, environmental rights, and rights to economic welfare. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of complex community fairness judgments in predicting and evaluating acceptance of political decisions, and for promoting proenvironmental behavior.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Geoffrey J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Syme</namePart><affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Elisabeth</namePart><namePart type="family">Kals</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Blair E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Nancarrow</namePart><affiliation>CSIRO, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Wembley, WA Australia.,</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Leo</namePart><namePart type="family">Montada</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Inc.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Intergenerational justice is implicit in international commitments to sustainability. If ecological, economic, and social components of sustainability are to be achieved, there is a necessity for intergenerational justice considerations to be included in decision making. The present generation's risk judgments should include consideration of the possible outcomes for their children. But intergenerational issues cannot be considered in isolation from other current risk and fairness concerns. This article reports on a community‐based integrative model that describes justice and other attitudes and motivations that determine community and individual proenvironmental behavior in two nations: Germany and Australia. This model can account for a considerable amount of the variance in political compliance as well as various proenvironmental behaviors. Group or individual self‐interests have nearly no effects on global protective behavior. It is shown that universal as well as contextual principles, including distributive (within or between generations), procedural, and interactive justice, play a crucial role in fairness judgments. Other principles are also taken into account, such as efficiency, environmental rights, and rights to economic welfare. The results are discussed in relation to the importance of complex community fairness judgments in predicting and evaluating acceptance of political decisions, and for promoting proenvironmental behavior.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Ecological risks</topic><topic>justice</topic><topic>equity</topic><topic>community</topic><topic>fairness judgments</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Risk Analysis</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0272-4332</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1539-6924</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">RISA</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>20</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>905</start><end>916</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/0272-4332.206083</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">RISA083</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishers Inc.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001768 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001768 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0F2C89522FDF17F8DEB8715516D78FE0178D677F
|texte= Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross‐Cultural Model
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |