Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)
Identifieur interne : 001678 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001677; suivant : 001679Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)
Auteurs : Manfred SchmittSource :
- Personality and Individual Differences [ 0191-8869 ] ; 1996.
Abstract
Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI) is proposed as a new construct. A self-report questionnaire with four indicators was developed for measuring SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger following injustice, intrusiveness of thoughts about unjust events, punitivity towards the victimizer). In Study I, structural equation modelling and the general rationale of multitrait-multimethod analysis were used to establish the convergent and discriminant validity if this questionnaire vis à vis measures for Trait Anger, Anger In, Anger Out and Frustration Tolerance as related constructs. In study II, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to unjust treatment in the laboratory several weeks after SBI was measured. In study III, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to a natural disadvantage that occurred to a person several weeks after SBI was measured. In Study IV, SBI was found to moderate the effect of perceived procedural unfairness in the workplace on self-reported sickness at work and self-reported absence from work. For justice-sensitive employees, the effect of perceived procedural unfairness had a stronger effect on this criterion than for justice-insensitive employees.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001678</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001678</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996">1996</date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="3">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="20">20</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></series><idno type="istex">534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(96)00028-1</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0191-8869</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI) is proposed as a new construct. A self-report questionnaire with four indicators was developed for measuring SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger following injustice, intrusiveness of thoughts about unjust events, punitivity towards the victimizer). In Study I, structural equation modelling and the general rationale of multitrait-multimethod analysis were used to establish the convergent and discriminant validity if this questionnaire vis à vis measures for Trait Anger, Anger In, Anger Out and Frustration Tolerance as related constructs. In study II, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to unjust treatment in the laboratory several weeks after SBI was measured. In study III, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to a natural disadvantage that occurred to a person several weeks after SBI was measured. In Study IV, SBI was found to moderate the effect of perceived procedural unfairness in the workplace on self-reported sickness at work and self-reported absence from work. For justice-sensitive employees, the effect of perceived procedural unfairness had a stronger effect on this criterion than for justice-insensitive employees.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI) is proposed as a new construct. A self-report questionnaire with four indicators was developed for measuring SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger following injustice, intrusiveness of thoughts about unjust events, punitivity towards the victimizer). In Study I, structural equation modelling and the general rationale of multitrait-multimethod analysis were used to establish the convergent and discriminant validity if this questionnaire vis à vis measures for Trait Anger, Anger In, Anger Out and Frustration Tolerance as related constructs. In study II, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to unjust treatment in the laboratory several weeks after SBI was measured. In study III, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to a natural disadvantage that occurred to a person several weeks after SBI was measured. In Study IV, SBI was found to moderate the effect of perceived procedural unfairness in the workplace on self-reported sickness at work and self-reported absence from work. For justice-sensitive employees, the effect of perceived procedural unfairness had a stronger effect on this criterion than for justice-insensitive employees.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.136</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>540 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1265</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10138</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>62756</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>18</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>178</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title><pii><json:string>0191-8869(96)00028-1</json:string></pii><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.S. Adams</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></serie><title>Inequity in social exchange</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Seelische gesundheit und Verhaltenskontrolle</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Equity theory: Toward a general theory of social interaction</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Justice in social relations</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.J. Bies</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Research in organizational behavior</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Research in organizational behavior</title></serie><title>The predicament of injustice</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Exchange and power in social life</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Bossong</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>44</last><first>32</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie</title></host><title>Gerechtigkeitsnormen und angemessenes Einkommen</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.T. Campbell</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.W. Friske</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>105</last><first>81</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Choynowski</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>187</last><first>167</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Does aggressiveness have a factorial structure?</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Cohen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>866</last><first>858</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve comoponents</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Justice: Views from the social sciences</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The measurement of moral judgment</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>NEO PI/FFI manual supplements</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Dalbert</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>615</last><first>596</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Beiträge</title></host><title>Glaube an eine gerecht Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Y. Dar</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Resh</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Paper presented at the IVth International Conference on Social Justice in Trier</title></host><title>Exploring the multi-dimensional structure of sense deprivation: The case of Israel Junior High School Students</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Verfahrensgerechtigkeit, dispositioneile Ungerechtikeitssensibilität und Arbeitszufriedenheit im betrilichen Kontext</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Verfahrensgerechtigkeit, dispositionelle Sensibilität für widerfahrene Ungerechtigkeit und Arbeitszufriedenheit im betrieblichen Kontext</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Furnham</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Procter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>384</last><first>365</first></pages><author></author><title>British Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.J. Gergen</name></json:item><json:item><name>S.J. Morse</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Gergen</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Handbook of cross-cultural psychology</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Handbook of cross-cultural psychology</title></serie><title>Behavior exchange in cross-cultural perspective</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Theories of visual perception</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Greenberg</name></json:item></author><host><volume>71</volume><pages><last>342</last><first>340</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Psychology</title></host><title>Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaulations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Greenberg</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Research in organizational behavior</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Research in organizational behavior</title></serie><title>Looking fair vs being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Equity and justice in social behavior</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Herrmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Winterhoff</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>273</last><first>259</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Sozialpsvchologie</title></host><title>Leistungsbezogenes Aufteilen als situationsspezifische Korrektur von Gerechtigkeitskonzepten—Zum Einfluβ von Personenmerkmalen auf die Gewinnaufteilung</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Social behavior: Its elementary forms</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Trierer Skalen zur Krankheitsbewältigung (TSK)</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.A. Konovsky</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Folger</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Cropanzano</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>24</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>Representative Research in Social Psychology</title></host><title>Relative effects of procedural and distributive justice on employee attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times oj scarcity and change</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M.J. Lerner</name></json:item><json:item><name>C.H. Simmons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>210</last><first>203</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The observer's reaction to the ‘innocent victim’: Compassion or rejection?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.S. Leventhal</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>55</last><first>27</first></pages><author></author><title>Social exchange</title></host><title>What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The social psychology of procedural justice</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>90</last><first>69</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Blaming the victim—belief in control or belief in justice?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Major</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Deaux</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>76</last><first>43</first></pages><author></author><title>Equity and justice in social behavior</title></host><title>Individual differences injustice behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D.B. McFarlin</name></json:item><json:item><name>P.D. Sweeney</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>637</last><first>626</first></pages><author></author><title>Academy of Management Journal</title></host><title>Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Justice and social interaction</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Mikula</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>236</last><first>222</first></pages><author></author><title>German Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Concepts of distruptive justice in allocation decisions: A review of research in German-speaking countries</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Mikula</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>124</last><first>103</first></pages><author></author><title>Justice in interpersonal relations</title></host><title>The experience of injustice: Towards a better understanding of its phenomenology</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Mikula</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>203</last><first>175</first></pages><author></author><title>Entitlement and the affectional bond</title></host><title>Perspective-related differences in interpretations of injustice by victims and victimizers: A test with close relationships</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Mikula</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Petri</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Tanzer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>149</last><first>133</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in the laboratory</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Dalbert</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>143</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Justice in social relations</title></host><title>Thinking about justice and dealings with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Schneider</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>344</last><first>313</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Olweus</name></json:item></author><host><volume>86</volume><pages><last>875</last><first>852</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Stability of agressive reaction patterns in males: A review</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Rawlings</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Freeman</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Poster presented at the 7th ISSID Meeting in Warsawa</title></host><title>Development of the Paranoia/Suspiciousness Questionnaire</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>A theory of justice</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H.T. Reis</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>61</last><first>25</first></pages><author></author><title>The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives</title></host><title>The multidimensionality of justice</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Revised manual for the defining issues test: An objective test of moral judgment development</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Rime</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Philippot</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Boca</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Mesquita</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>European review of social psychology</title></host><serie><author></author><title>European review of social psychology</title></serie><title>Long-lasting cognitive and social consequences of emotion: Social sharing and rumination</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Blaming the victim</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>C. Sabbagh</name></json:item><json:item><name>Y Dar</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Resh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>57</volume><pages><last>261</last><first>244</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Psychology Quarterly</title></host><title>The structure of social justice judgments: A facet approach</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Experiencing emotion: A cross-cultural study</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Skizze eines Forschungsvorhabens</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Gerechtigkeitspsychologische Kovariate</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Montada</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>44</last><first>32</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie</title></host><title>Determinanten erlebter Gerechtigkeit</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Schwenkmezger</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Hodapp</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><author></author><title>Trierer Psychologische Berichte</title></host><title>Das State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI): Itemmetrische und faktorenanalytische Befunde und Untersuchungen zur Konstruktvalidität</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Schwinger</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Winterhoff-spurk</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>143</last><first>125</first></pages><author></author><title>Diagnostica</title></host><title>Gleichheits- vs. Leistungsprinzip. Rasch-skalen zur messung dispositioneller einstellungen zu zwei prinzipien distributiver gerechtikeit</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>State-trait anger expression inventory. Research Edition</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Social Justice in human relations: Consequences of justice and injustice</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Procedural justice: A psychological analysis</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Tobey-Klass</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>771</last><first>757</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Bulletin</title></host><title>Psychological effects of immoral actions: The experimental evidence</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Törestad</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>26</last><first>9</first></pages><author></author><title>Aggressive Behavior</title></host><title>What is anger provoking? A psychophysical study of perceived causes of anger</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.Y. Törnblom</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>236</last><first>175</first></pages><author></author><title>Justice: Interdisciplinary perspectives</title></host><title>The social psychology of distributive justice</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T.R. Tyler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>67</last><first>51</first></pages><author></author><title>Law and Society Review</title></host><title>The role of perceived injustice in defendant's evaluations of their courtroom experience</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T.R. Tyler</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Research on negotiation in organizations</title></host><serie><author></author><title>Research on negotiation in organizations</title></serie><title>Procedural justice in organizations</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Why people obey the law</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T.R. Tyler</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. McGraw</name></json:item></author><host><volume>42</volume><pages><last>128</last><first>115</first></pages><issue>2</issue><author></author><title>Journal of Social Issues</title></host><title>Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Assertiveness-training-program ATP</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Social Justice in human relations: Societal and psychological origins of justice</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bewertungen der Gerechtigkeit in unterschiedlichen kontexten: Personale determinanten erlebter verteilungsund Verfahrensgerechtigkeit</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. Walster</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Berscheid</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.G. Walster</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>176</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>New directions in equity research</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K.F. Widaman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>26</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Applied Psychological Measurement</title></host><title>Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><volume>Vol. 2</volume><pages><last>299</last><first>267</first></pages><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></serie><host><volume>21</volume><pii><json:string>S0191-8869(00)X0013-X</json:string></pii><pages><last>20</last><first>3</first></pages><issn><json:string>0191-8869</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1996</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1996</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1</json:string></doi><id>534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71</id><score>2.0331812</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1996</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Manfred</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><note type="biography">The author was bestowed the 1995 Young Scientist Award of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences (ISSID) for the research presented in this article.</note><affiliation>The author was bestowed the 1995 Young Scientist Award of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences (ISSID) for the research presented in this article.</affiliation><affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Personality and Individual Differences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">PAID</title><idno type="pISSN">0191-8869</idno><idno type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0013-X</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1996"></date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="3">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="20">20</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1</idno><idno type="PII">0191-8869(96)00028-1</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1996</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI) is proposed as a new construct. A self-report questionnaire with four indicators was developed for measuring SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger following injustice, intrusiveness of thoughts about unjust events, punitivity towards the victimizer). In Study I, structural equation modelling and the general rationale of multitrait-multimethod analysis were used to establish the convergent and discriminant validity if this questionnaire vis à vis measures for Trait Anger, Anger In, Anger Out and Frustration Tolerance as related constructs. In study II, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to unjust treatment in the laboratory several weeks after SBI was measured. In study III, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to a natural disadvantage that occurred to a person several weeks after SBI was measured. In Study IV, SBI was found to moderate the effect of perceived procedural unfairness in the workplace on self-reported sickness at work and self-reported absence from work. For justice-sensitive employees, the effect of perceived procedural unfairness had a stronger effect on this criterion than for justice-insensitive employees.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1996">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>PAID</jid><aid>96000281</aid><ce:pii>0191-8869(96)00028-1</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1996"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Manfred</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Schmitt</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="FN1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:footnote id="FN1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:note-para>The author was bestowed the 1995 Young Scientist Award of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences (ISSID) for the research presented in this article.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="6" month="12" year="1995"></ce:date-received><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI) is proposed as a new construct. A self-report questionnaire with four indicators was developed for measuring SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger following injustice, intrusiveness of thoughts about unjust events, punitivity towards the victimizer). In Study I, structural equation modelling and the general rationale of multitrait-multimethod analysis were used to establish the convergent and discriminant validity if this questionnaire <ce:italic>vis à vis</ce:italic> measures for Trait Anger, Anger In, Anger Out and Frustration Tolerance as related constructs. In study II, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to unjust treatment in the laboratory several weeks after SBI was measured. In study III, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to a natural disadvantage that occurred to a person several weeks after SBI was measured. In Study IV, SBI was found to moderate the effect of perceived procedural unfairness in the workplace on self-reported sickness at work and self-reported absence from work. For justice-sensitive employees, the effect of perceived procedural unfairness had a stronger effect on this criterion than for justice-insensitive employees.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Manfred</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>Fachbereich I—Psychologie, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany</affiliation><description>The author was bestowed the 1995 Young Scientist Award of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences (ISSID) for the research presented in this article.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1996</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI) is proposed as a new construct. A self-report questionnaire with four indicators was developed for measuring SBI (frequency of perceived injustice, intensity of anger following injustice, intrusiveness of thoughts about unjust events, punitivity towards the victimizer). In Study I, structural equation modelling and the general rationale of multitrait-multimethod analysis were used to establish the convergent and discriminant validity if this questionnaire vis à vis measures for Trait Anger, Anger In, Anger Out and Frustration Tolerance as related constructs. In study II, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to unjust treatment in the laboratory several weeks after SBI was measured. In study III, SBI predicted cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to a natural disadvantage that occurred to a person several weeks after SBI was measured. In Study IV, SBI was found to moderate the effect of perceived procedural unfairness in the workplace on self-reported sickness at work and self-reported absence from work. For justice-sensitive employees, the effect of perceived procedural unfairness had a stronger effect on this criterion than for justice-insensitive employees.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>PAID</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199607</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0191-8869</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0191-8869(00)X0013-X</identifier><part><date>199607</date><detail type="volume"><number>21</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>1</start><end>163</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>3</start><end>20</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1</identifier><identifier type="PII">0191-8869(96)00028-1</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001678 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001678 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:534214FD2B9B133704DA97EA3024AFAE6864EA71
|texte= Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |