On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment
Identifieur interne : 001531 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001530; suivant : 001532On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment
Auteurs : Wilhelm Hofmann ; Tobias Gschwendner ; Manfred SchmittSource :
- European Journal of Personality [ 0890-2070 ] ; 2005-01.
Abstract
A moderated process model is presented that attempts to explain the consistency between implicit and explicit indicators as a function of awareness, i.e. the degree to which persons become aware of their implicit attitude, and adjustment, i.e. the degree to which they adjust for the explicit response. In two experiments on attitudes of West Germans toward East Germans and Turks, a number of dispositional moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment were tested. Concerning moderators affecting awareness, no reliable first‐order effects were found for Private Self‐Consciousness or Attitudinal Self‐Knowledge. However, Attitude Importance generated the expected effect. Concerning moderators influencing adjustment, consistent effects were obtained for Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions. Social Desirability and Self‐Monitoring did not moderate the implicit–explicit relationship in the expected direction. Some evidence was found for a second‐order moderator effect between awareness and adjustment, suggesting that adjustment effects may be more pronounced under conditions of high awareness. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/per.537
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title><author><name sortKey="Hofmann, Wilhelm" sort="Hofmann, Wilhelm" uniqKey="Hofmann W" first="Wilhelm" last="Hofmann">Wilhelm Hofmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gschwendner, Tobias" sort="Gschwendner, Tobias" uniqKey="Gschwendner T" first="Tobias" last="Gschwendner">Tobias Gschwendner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/per.537</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001531</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001531</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title><author><name sortKey="Hofmann, Wilhelm" sort="Hofmann, Wilhelm" uniqKey="Hofmann W" first="Wilhelm" last="Hofmann">Wilhelm Hofmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gschwendner, Tobias" sort="Gschwendner, Tobias" uniqKey="Gschwendner T" first="Tobias" last="Gschwendner">Tobias Gschwendner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Manfred" sort="Schmitt, Manfred" uniqKey="Schmitt M" first="Manfred" last="Schmitt">Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="sub">Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-01">2005-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="25">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="49">49</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></series><idno type="istex">265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/per.537</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER537</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0890-2070</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A moderated process model is presented that attempts to explain the consistency between implicit and explicit indicators as a function of awareness, i.e. the degree to which persons become aware of their implicit attitude, and adjustment, i.e. the degree to which they adjust for the explicit response. In two experiments on attitudes of West Germans toward East Germans and Turks, a number of dispositional moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment were tested. Concerning moderators affecting awareness, no reliable first‐order effects were found for Private Self‐Consciousness or Attitudinal Self‐Knowledge. However, Attitude Importance generated the expected effect. Concerning moderators influencing adjustment, consistent effects were obtained for Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions. Social Desirability and Self‐Monitoring did not moderate the implicit–explicit relationship in the expected direction. Some evidence was found for a second‐order moderator effect between awareness and adjustment, suggesting that adjustment effects may be more pronounced under conditions of high awareness. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Wilhelm Hofmann</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Trier, Germany</json:string><json:string>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Tobias Gschwendner</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Manfred Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>PER537</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>A moderated process model is presented that attempts to explain the consistency between implicit and explicit indicators as a function of awareness, i.e. the degree to which persons become aware of their implicit attitude, and adjustment, i.e. the degree to which they adjust for the explicit response. In two experiments on attitudes of West Germans toward East Germans and Turks, a number of dispositional moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment were tested. Concerning moderators affecting awareness, no reliable first‐order effects were found for Private Self‐Consciousness or Attitudinal Self‐Knowledge. However, Attitude Importance generated the expected effect. Concerning moderators influencing adjustment, consistent effects were obtained for Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions. Social Desirability and Self‐Monitoring did not moderate the implicit–explicit relationship in the expected direction. Some evidence was found for a second‐order moderator effect between awareness and adjustment, suggesting that adjustment effects may be more pronounced under conditions of high awareness. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.884</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>468 x 703 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1153</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10177</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>67071</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>25</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>157</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. B. Asendorpf</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Banse</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Mücke</name></json:item></author><host><volume>83</volume><pages><last>393</last><first>380</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self‐concept: The case of shy behavior</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Implicit and explicit aggressiveness and the prediction of aggressive behavior</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Banse</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Gawronski</name></json:item></author><host><volume>49</volume><pages><last>13</last><first>4</first></pages><author></author><title>Diagnostica</title></host><title>Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierung [The scale Motivation to Act Without Prejudice: Psychometric properties and validity]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Banse</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Seise</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Zerbes</name></json:item></author><host><volume>48</volume><pages><last>160</last><first>145</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie</title></host><title>Implicit attitudes toward homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. J. Bem</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>62</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></host><title>Self‐perception theory</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Exploring the structure of strength‐related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. K. Bosson</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. B. Swann</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. W. Pennebaker</name></json:item></author><host><volume>79</volume><pages><last>643</last><first>631</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self‐esteem: The blind man and the elephant revisited?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Brigham</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>1967</last><first>1933</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Social Psychology</title></host><title>College students' racial attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Carver, C., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self‐regulation: A control‐theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. P. Crowne</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Marlowe</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>354</last><first>349</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Consulting Psychology</title></host><title>A new scale of Social Desirability independent of psychopathology</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. G. Devine</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>18</last><first>5</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. F. Dovidio</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Kawakami</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. R. Beach</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><last>197</last><first>175</first></pages><author></author><title>Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes</title></host><title>Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of intergroup bias</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. F. Dovidio</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Kawakami</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. L. Gaertner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>82</volume><pages><last>68</last><first>62</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. C. Dunton</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item></author><host><volume>23</volume><pages><last>326</last><first>316</first></pages><author></author><title>Personaltiy and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>An individual difference measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Egloff</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. C. Schmukle</name></json:item></author><host><volume>35</volume><pages><last>1706</last><first>1697</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Individual Differences</title></host><title>Does Social Desirability moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit anxiety measures?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. R. Jackson</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. C. Dunton</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. J. Williams</name></json:item></author><host><volume>69</volume><pages><last>1027</last><first>1013</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. A. Olson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>54</volume><pages><last>327</last><first>297</first></pages><author></author><title>Annual Review of Psychology</title></host><title>Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Towels‐Schwen</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>116</last><first>97</first></pages><author></author><title>Dual‐process theories in social psychology</title></host><title>The MODE Model of attitude–behavior processes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Fenigstein</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. F. Scheier</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. H. Buss</name></json:item></author><host><volume>43</volume><pages><last>527</last><first>522</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology</title></host><title>Public and Private Self‐Consciousness: Assessment and theory</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Filipp, S.‐H., & Freudenberg, E. (1989). Der Fragebogen zur Erfassung dispositioneller Selbstaufmerksamkeit (SAM‐Fragebogen) [A Scale for assessing dispositional self‐consciousness (SAM‐Scale)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Gawronski</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Strack</name></json:item></author><host><volume>40</volume><pages><last>542</last><first>535</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</title></host><title>On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency. Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. X. Gibbons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>51</volume><pages><last>542</last><first>517</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality</title></host><title>Self‐attention and self‐report: The ‘veridicality’ hypothesis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. G. Greenwald</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. R. Banaji</name></json:item></author><host><volume>102</volume><pages><last>27</last><first>4</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self‐esteem, and stereotypes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. G. Greenwald</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. R. Banaji</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. A. Rudman</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. D. Farnham</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. A. Nosek</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. S. Mellott</name></json:item></author><host><volume>109</volume><pages><last>25</last><first>3</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self‐esteem, and self‐concept</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. G. Greenwald</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. E. McGhee</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. L. K. Schwartz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>74</volume><pages><last>1480</last><first>1464</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. G. Greenwald</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. A. Nosek</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. R. Banaji</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>216</last><first>197</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Understanding and using the implicit association test: An improved scoring algorithm</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. G. Hull</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. S. Levy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>37</volume><pages><last>768</last><first>756</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The organizational functions of the self: An alternative to the Duval and Wicklund model of self‐awareness</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. G. Hull</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. B. Slone</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. B. Meteyer</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. R. Matthews</name></json:item></author><host><volume>83</volume><pages><last>424</last><first>406</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The nonconsciousness of self‐consciousness</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Kammer, D., & Nowack, W. (1983). Self‐monitoring: Construction and validation of a German two‐factor scale (Bielefelder Arbeiten zur Sozialpsychologie, Nr. 104). Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. T. Kenrick</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. C. Funder</name></json:item></author><host><volume>43</volume><pages><last>34</last><first>23</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>Profiting from controversy</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Krahé</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Reimer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>451</last><first>427</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychologische Methoden und soziale Prozesse</title></host><title>Indirekte Vorurteilsmessung: Die Beurteilung von Straftaten als Indikator vorurteilshafter Einstellungen [The indirect measurement of prejudice: Judgment of criminal offence as an indicator for prejudiced attitudes]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. A. Krosnick</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. E. Petty</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>487</last><first>455</first></pages><author></author><title>Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences</title></host><title>Attitude strength: An overview</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>U. Kühnen</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Schiessl</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Bauer</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Paulig</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Poehlmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Schmidthals</name></json:item></author><host><volume>48</volume><pages><last>144</last><first>135</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Sozialpsychologie</title></host><title>How robust is the IAT? Measuring and manipulating implicit attitudes of East‐ and West‐Germans</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Merz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>152</last><first>142</first></pages><author></author><title>Diagnostica</title></host><title>SAF: Fragebogen zur Messung von dispositioneller Selbstaufmerksamkeit [SAF: Scale for the assessment of dispositional self‐consciousness]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Mierke</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. C. Klauer</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>1192</last><first>1180</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Method‐specific variance in the implicit association test</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. J. Monteith</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. I. Voils</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Ashburn‐Nardo</name></json:item></author><host><volume>19</volume><pages><last>417</last><first>395</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Cognition</title></host><title>Taking a look underground: Detecting, interpreting, and reacting to implicit racial biases</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. B. Moskowitz</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. M. Gollwitzer</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Wasel</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Schaal</name></json:item></author><host><volume>77</volume><pages><last>184</last><first>167</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. Neumann</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Seibt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>620</last><first>609</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>The structure of prejudice: Associative strength as a determinant of stereotype endorsement</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R. E. Nisbett</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. D. Wilson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>84</volume><pages><last>259</last><first>231</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Privately expressed attitudes mediate the relationship between public and implicit attitudes</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. A. Nosek</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. R. Banaji</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>56</last><first>49</first></pages><author></author><title>Natura Automatyzmow</title></host><title>(At least) two factors moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. A. Nosek</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. R. Banaji</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. G. Greenwald</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><last>115</last><first>101</first></pages><author></author><title>Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice</title></host><title>Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. A. Olson</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>11</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Basic and Applied Social Psychology</title></host><title>Trait inferences as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. A. Olson</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>356</last><first>334</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Reducing the influence of extra‐personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. F. Pettigrew</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. W. Meertens</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>75</last><first>57</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Blatant and subtle prejudice in Western Europe</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>E. A. Plant</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. G. Devine</name></json:item></author><host><volume>75</volume><pages><last>832</last><first>811</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. B. Pryor</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. X. Gibbons</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. A. Wicklund</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>527</last><first>513</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality</title></host><title>Self‐focused attention and self‐report validity</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Gesamtes Erhebungsinstrumentarium</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Snyder</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>537</last><first>526</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>The self‐monitoring of expressive behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Stöber</name></json:item></author><host><volume>45</volume><pages><last>177</last><first>173</first></pages><author></author><title>Diagnostica</title></host><title>Die Soziale‐Erwünschtheits‐Skala‐17 (SES‐17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The Social Desirability scale (SES‐17): Scale development and initial findings on reliability and validity]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Strack</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Deutsch</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Review</title></host><title>Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. A. Teachman</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. R. Woody</name></json:item></author><host><volume>112</volume><pages><last>109</last><first>100</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Abnormal Psychology</title></host><title>Automatic processing in spider phobia: Implicit fear associations over the course of treatment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>U. Wagner</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. van Dick</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Zick</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>79</last><first>59</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie</title></host><title>Sozialpsychologische Analysen und Erklärungen von Fremdenfeindlichkeit in Deutschland [A social psychological analysis and explanation of hostility toward foreigners in Germany]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. M. Wegner</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. A. Bargh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>496</last><first>446</first></pages><author></author><title>The handbook of social psychology</title></host><title>Control and automaticity in social life</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. D. Wilson</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Lindsey</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Y. Schooler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>107</volume><pages><last>126</last><first>101</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Review</title></host><title>A model of dual attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Wood</name></json:item></author><host><volume>42</volume><pages><last>810</last><first>798</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Retrieval of attitude‐relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. P. Zanna</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. H. Fazio</name></json:item></author><host><volume>2</volume><pages><last>301</last><first>283</first></pages><author></author><title>Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario symposium</title></host><title>The attitude–behavior relation: Moving toward a third generation of research</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>19</volume><publisherId><json:string>PER</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>25</total><last>49</last><first>25</first></pages><issn><json:string>0890-2070</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-0984</json:string></eissn><title>European Journal of Personality</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/per.537</json:string></doi><id>265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1</id><score>1.374114</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></availability><date>2005</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>German Research Foundation (DFG) - No. Schm 1092/5‐1;</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Wilhelm</forename><surname>Hofmann</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Tobias</forename><surname>Gschwendner</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Manfred</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">European Journal of Personality</title><title level="j" type="sub">Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Eur. J. Pers.</title><idno type="pISSN">0890-2070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0984</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="25">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="49">49</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/per.537</idno><idno type="ArticleID">PER537</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2005</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>A moderated process model is presented that attempts to explain the consistency between implicit and explicit indicators as a function of awareness, i.e. the degree to which persons become aware of their implicit attitude, and adjustment, i.e. the degree to which they adjust for the explicit response. In two experiments on attitudes of West Germans toward East Germans and Turks, a number of dispositional moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment were tested. Concerning moderators affecting awareness, no reliable first‐order effects were found for Private Self‐Consciousness or Attitudinal Self‐Knowledge. However, Attitude Importance generated the expected effect. Concerning moderators influencing adjustment, consistent effects were obtained for Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions. Social Desirability and Self‐Monitoring did not moderate the implicit–explicit relationship in the expected direction. Some evidence was found for a second‐order moderator effect between awareness and adjustment, suggesting that adjustment effects may be more pronounced under conditions of high awareness. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-12-23">Received</change><change when="2004-06-28">Registration</change><change when="2005-01">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</doi><issn type="print">0890-2070</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-0984</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PER"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY">European Journal of Personality</title><title type="subtitle">Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology</title><title type="short">Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/per.v19:1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="19">19</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-01">January 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/per.537</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PER537"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="25"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2003-12-23"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2004-06-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2004-11-19"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-11-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-02-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">25</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">49</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PER.PER537.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="59"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Implicit–explicit moderation</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Wilhelm</givenNames><familyName>Hofmann</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email normalForm="hofm1302@uni-trier.de">hofm1302@uni‐trier.de</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Tobias</givenNames><familyName>Gschwendner</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Manfred</givenNames><familyName>Schmitt</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Trier, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="DE" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>German Research Foundation (DFG)</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>Schm 1092/5‐1</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>A moderated process model is presented that attempts to explain the consistency between implicit and explicit indicators as a function of awareness, i.e. the degree to which persons become aware of their implicit attitude, and adjustment, i.e. the degree to which they adjust for the explicit response. In two experiments on attitudes of West Germans toward East Germans and Turks, a number of dispositional moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment were tested. Concerning moderators affecting awareness, no reliable first‐order effects were found for Private Self‐Consciousness or Attitudinal Self‐Knowledge. However, Attitude Importance generated the expected effect. Concerning moderators influencing adjustment, consistent effects were obtained for Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions. Social Desirability and Self‐Monitoring did not moderate the implicit–explicit relationship in the expected direction. Some evidence was found for a second‐order moderator effect between awareness and adjustment, suggesting that adjustment effects may be more pronounced under conditions of high awareness. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implicit–explicit moderation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Wilhelm</namePart><namePart type="family">Hofmann</namePart><affiliation>University of Trier, Germany</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tobias</namePart><namePart type="family">Gschwendner</namePart><affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Manfred</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>University of Koblenz‐Landau, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-01</dateIssued><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12-23</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2004-06-28</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="references">59</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">A moderated process model is presented that attempts to explain the consistency between implicit and explicit indicators as a function of awareness, i.e. the degree to which persons become aware of their implicit attitude, and adjustment, i.e. the degree to which they adjust for the explicit response. In two experiments on attitudes of West Germans toward East Germans and Turks, a number of dispositional moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment were tested. Concerning moderators affecting awareness, no reliable first‐order effects were found for Private Self‐Consciousness or Attitudinal Self‐Knowledge. However, Attitude Importance generated the expected effect. Concerning moderators influencing adjustment, consistent effects were obtained for Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions. Social Desirability and Self‐Monitoring did not moderate the implicit–explicit relationship in the expected direction. Some evidence was found for a second‐order moderator effect between awareness and adjustment, suggesting that adjustment effects may be more pronounced under conditions of high awareness. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><note type="funding">German Research Foundation (DFG) - No. Schm 1092/5‐1; </note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Personality</title><subTitle>Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Eur. J. Pers.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0890-2070</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0984</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PER</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>19</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>25</start><end>49</end><total>25</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/per.537</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PER537</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001531 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001531 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:265D1B71EEB1B2935D3A67E208E83C90C83DC1E1
|texte= On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |