Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives
Identifieur interne : 001452 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001451; suivant : 001453Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives
Auteurs : J. Christopher Cohrs ; Jürgen Maes ; Barbara Moschner ; Sven KielmannSource :
- Political Psychology [ 0162-895X ] ; 2007-08.
English descriptors
Abstract
Following several political‐psychological approaches, the present research analyzed whether orientations toward human rights are a function of right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), basic human values in the sense of Schwartz (1992), and political ideology. Three dimensions of human rights attitudes (endorsement, restriction, and enforcement) were differentiated from human rights knowledge and behavior. In a time‐lagged Internet survey (N = 479), using structural equation modeling, RWA, universalism and power values, and political ideology (measured at Time 1) differentially predicted dimensions of human rights attitudes (measured at Time 2 five months later). RWA and universalism values also predicted self‐reported human rights behavior, with the effects mediated through human rights endorsement. Human rights knowledge also predicted behavior. The psychological roots of positive and negative orientations toward human rights, consequences for human rights education, and the particular role of military enforcement of human rights are discussed.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title><author><name sortKey="Cohrs, J Christopher" sort="Cohrs, J Christopher" uniqKey="Cohrs J" first="J. Christopher" last="Cohrs">J. Christopher Cohrs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Maes, Jurgen" sort="Maes, Jurgen" uniqKey="Maes J" first="Jürgen" last="Maes">Jürgen Maes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of the German Armed Forces Munich</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moschner, Barbara" sort="Moschner, Barbara" uniqKey="Moschner B" first="Barbara" last="Moschner">Barbara Moschner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kielmann, Sven" sort="Kielmann, Sven" uniqKey="Kielmann S" first="Sven" last="Kielmann">Sven Kielmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Leipzig, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001452</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001452</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title><author><name sortKey="Cohrs, J Christopher" sort="Cohrs, J Christopher" uniqKey="Cohrs J" first="J. Christopher" last="Cohrs">J. Christopher Cohrs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Maes, Jurgen" sort="Maes, Jurgen" uniqKey="Maes J" first="Jürgen" last="Maes">Jürgen Maes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of the German Armed Forces Munich</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Moschner, Barbara" sort="Moschner, Barbara" uniqKey="Moschner B" first="Barbara" last="Moschner">Barbara Moschner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kielmann, Sven" sort="Kielmann, Sven" uniqKey="Kielmann S" first="Sven" last="Kielmann">Sven Kielmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Leipzig, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Political Psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0162-895X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9221</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-08">2007-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="441">441</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="469">469</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0162-895X</idno></series><idno type="istex">2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">POPS581</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0162-895X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>human rights</term><term>military intervention</term><term>political attitudes</term><term>political behavior</term><term>values</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Following several political‐psychological approaches, the present research analyzed whether orientations toward human rights are a function of right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), basic human values in the sense of Schwartz (1992), and political ideology. Three dimensions of human rights attitudes (endorsement, restriction, and enforcement) were differentiated from human rights knowledge and behavior. In a time‐lagged Internet survey (N = 479), using structural equation modeling, RWA, universalism and power values, and political ideology (measured at Time 1) differentially predicted dimensions of human rights attitudes (measured at Time 2 five months later). RWA and universalism values also predicted self‐reported human rights behavior, with the effects mediated through human rights endorsement. Human rights knowledge also predicted behavior. The psychological roots of positive and negative orientations toward human rights, consequences for human rights education, and the particular role of military enforcement of human rights are discussed.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>J. Christopher Cohrs</name><affiliations><json:string>Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jürgen Maes</name><affiliations><json:string>University of the German Armed Forces Munich</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Barbara Moschner</name><affiliations><json:string>Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sven Kielmann</name><affiliations><json:string>Leipzig, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>human rights</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>political attitudes</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>political behavior</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>values</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>military intervention</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>POPS581</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Following several political‐psychological approaches, the present research analyzed whether orientations toward human rights are a function of right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), basic human values in the sense of Schwartz (1992), and political ideology. Three dimensions of human rights attitudes (endorsement, restriction, and enforcement) were differentiated from human rights knowledge and behavior. In a time‐lagged Internet survey (N = 479), using structural equation modeling, RWA, universalism and power values, and political ideology (measured at Time 1) differentially predicted dimensions of human rights attitudes (measured at Time 2 five months later). RWA and universalism values also predicted self‐reported human rights behavior, with the effects mediated through human rights endorsement. Human rights knowledge also predicted behavior. The psychological roots of positive and negative orientations toward human rights, consequences for human rights education, and the particular role of military enforcement of human rights are discussed.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.704</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>432 x 648 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1091</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>11507</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>73996</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>30</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>142</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Adorno, T., Frenkel‐Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right‐wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. Understanding right‐wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Altemeyer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>92</last><first>47</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></host><title>The other “authoritarian personality</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>USA PATRIOT Act</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos 5 [Computer software]. Chicago: SmallWaters.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. L. Bandalos</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>102</last><first>78</first></pages><author></author><title>Structural Equation Modeling</title></host><title>The effects of item parceling on goodness‐of‐fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>K. A. Bollen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>15</volume><pages><last>384</last><first>375</first></pages><author></author><title>Sociological Methods and Research</title></host><title>Outliers and improper solutions: A confirmatory factor analysis example</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. W. Browne</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Cudeck</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>162</last><first>136</first></pages><author></author><title>Testing structural equation models</title></host><title>Alternative ways of assessing model fit</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Clémence</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Devos</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Doise</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>98</last><first>89</first></pages><author></author><title>Swiss Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Social representations of human rights violations: Further evidence</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. L. Cohen</name></json:item></author><host><volume>85</volume><pages><last>822</last><first>808</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cohrs, J. C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2002). Befragung zum 11. September 2001 und den Folgen: Bericht über die zweite Erhebungsphase [Survey about September 11, 2001, and the consequences: Report on the second wave of assessment] (Reports from the research group “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral,” No. 149). Trier: University of Trier, Faculty I—Psychology.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Cohrs</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Kielmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moschner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>276</last><first>263</first></pages><author></author><title>Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy</title></host><title>Effects of right‐wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Cohrs, J. C., Kielmann, S., Moschner, B., & Maes, J. (2002). Befragung zum 11. September 2001 und den Folgen: Grundideen, Operationalisierungen und deskriptive Ergebnisse der ersten Erhebungsphase [Survey about September 11, 2001, and the consequences: Basic ideas, operationalizations, and descriptive results of the first wave of assessment] (Reports from the research group “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral,” No. 148). Trier: University of Trier, Faculty I—Psychology.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Cohrs</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moschner</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. O. Kielmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>27</volume><pages><last>117</last><first>105</first></pages><author></author><title>Psicología Política</title></host><title>Patterns of justification of the United States’“War against Terrorism</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Cohrs</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moschner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>157</last><first>141</first></pages><author></author><title>Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology</title></host><title>Antiwar knowledge and generalized political attitudes as determinants of attitude toward the Kosovo War</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Cohrs</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moschner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>33</volume><pages><last>24</last><first>13</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie</title></host><title>Zur kognitiven Konstruktion von (Un‐)Gerechtigkeit militärischer Gewalt: Die moralische Beurteilung des Kosovo‐Kriegs [Cognitive construal of the (un‐)justness of military intervention: Moral evaluation of the Kosovo War]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Cohrs</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moschner</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Kielmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>312</last><first>293</first></pages><author></author><title>Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology</title></host><title>Personal values and attitudes toward war</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. C. Cohrs</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. Moschner</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Maes</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Kielmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>31</volume><pages><last>1434</last><first>1425</first></pages><author></author><title>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</title></host><title>The motivational bases of right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. von Collani</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. Blank</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>324</last><first>307</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie</title></host><title>Determinanten politischer Parteienpräferenzen—Persönlichkeitsmerkmale, soziale Überzeugungen und politische Parteienpräferenzen: Eine Internetbefragung zur Bundestagswahl 2002 [Predictors of preferences for different political parties—Personality traits, social beliefs, and political party preferences: An Internet survey within the context of the 2002 German parliamentary elections]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. M. Crowson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>14</volume><pages><last>253</last><first>235</first></pages><author></author><title>Ethics and Behavior</title></host><title>Human rights attitudes: Dimensionality and psychological correlates</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Diaz‐Veizades</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. F. Widaman</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. D. Little</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. W. Gibbs</name></json:item></author><host><volume>135</volume><pages><last>328</last><first>313</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>The measurement and structure of human rights attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Doise</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Spini</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Clémence</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>29</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Human rights studied as social representations in a cross‐national context</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Doise</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Spini</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. C. Jesuino</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. H. Ng</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Emler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>53</volume><pages><last>251</last><first>240</first></pages><author></author><title>Swiss Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Values and perceived conflicts in the social representations of human rights: Feasibility of a cross‐national study</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Doise</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Staerklé</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Clémence</name></json:item><json:item><name>F. Savory</name></json:item></author><host><volume>57</volume><pages><last>100</last><first>86</first></pages><author></author><title>Swiss Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Human rights and Genevan youth: A developmental study of social representations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Duckitt</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>113</last><first>41</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></host><title>A dual‐process cognitive‐motivational theory of ideology and prejudice</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Duriez</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Van Hiel</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Kossowska</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>320</last><first>299</first></pages><author></author><title>Political Psychology</title></host><title>Authoritarianism and social dominance in western and eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Eckes</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Six‐Materna</name></json:item></author><host><volume>30</volume><pages><last>228</last><first>211</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie</title></host><title>Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des ambivalenten Sexismus [Hostility and benevolence: A scale measuring ambivalent sexism]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Feldman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>24</volume><pages><last>74</last><first>41</first></pages><author></author><title>Political Psychology</title></host><title>Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Feldman</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>508</last><first>477</first></pages><author></author><title>Oxford handbook of political psychology</title></host><title>Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Fetchenhauer</name></json:item><json:item><name>H.‐W. Bierhoff</name></json:item></author><host><volume>17</volume><pages><last>92</last><first>75</first></pages><author></author><title>Social Justice Research</title></host><title>Attitudes toward a military enforcement of human rights</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. D. Gosling</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Vazire</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Srivastava</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. P. John</name></json:item></author><host><volume>59</volume><pages><last>104</last><first>93</first></pages><author></author><title>American Psychologist</title></host><title>Should we trust web‐based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Harff</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8</volume><pages><last>20</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Political Psychology</title></host><title>Empathy for victims of massive human rights violations and support for government intervention: A comparative study of American and Australian attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L.‐T. Hu</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. M. Bentler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>453</last><first>424</first></pages><author></author><title>Psychological Methods</title></host><title>Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Kaase</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Bürklin</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>ZUMA‐Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente, Version 5.00 [ZUMA Information System. Electronic handbook assessment instruments in the social sciences]</title></host><title>Demokratie‐Skala [Democracy Scale]</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nded.). New York: Guilford.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. D. Little</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. A. Cunningham</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Shahar</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. F. Widaman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>173</last><first>151</first></pages><author></author><title>Structural Equation Modeling</title></host><title>To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. R. Maio</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. M. Olson</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. M. Bernard</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. A. Luke</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>308</last><first>283</first></pages><author></author><title>Handbook of social psychology</title></host><title>Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behavior</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Y. Matsuda</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Harsel</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Furusawa</name></json:item><json:item><name>H.‐S. Kim</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Quarles</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>421</last><first>405</first></pages><author></author><title>International Journal of Intercultural Relations</title></host><title>Democratic values and mutual perceptions of human rights in four Pacific Rim nations</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. McFarland</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Mathews</name></json:item></author><host><volume>26</volume><pages><last>385</last><first>365</first></pages><author></author><title>Political Psychology</title></host><title>Who cares about human rights?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. M. Moghaddam</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Vuksanovic</name></json:item></author><host><volume>25</volume><pages><last>474</last><first>455</first></pages><author></author><title>International Journal of Psychology</title></host><title>Attitudes and behavior toward human rights across different contexts: The role of right‐wing authoritarianism, political ideology, and religiosity</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. L. Nelson</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. W. Milburn</name></json:item></author><host><volume>5</volume><pages><last>168</last><first>149</first></pages><author></author><title>Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology</title></host><title>Relationships between problem‐solving competencies and militaristic attitudes: Implications for peace education</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Universal Declaration of Human Rights</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Petzel</name></json:item><json:item><name>U. Wagner</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Nicolai</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. V. Dick</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>258</last><first>251</first></pages><author></author><title>Gruppendynamik</title></host><title>Ein kurzes Instrument zur Messung der Autoritarismus‐Neigung [A short instrument to measure authoritarian tendency]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Pratto</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>263</last><first>191</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></host><title>The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Pratto</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Sidanius</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. M. Stallworth</name></json:item><json:item><name>B. F. Malle</name></json:item></author><host><volume>67</volume><pages><last>763</last><first>741</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Pratto</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. M. Stallworth</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Conway‐Lanz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>1875</last><first>1853</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Applied Social Psychology</title></host><title>Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. F. Schneider</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>249</last><first>239</first></pages><author></author><title>Gruppendynamik</title></host><title>Erfahrungen mit deutschsprachigen Versionen der Right‐Wing Authoritarianism Scale von Altemeyer [Experiences with German versions of the Right Wing Authoritarianism Scale by Altemeyer</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. H. Schwartz</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>65</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Advances in experimental social psychology</title></host><title>Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. H. Schwartz</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>55</last><first>21</first></pages><author></author><title>Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations]</title></host><title>Basic human values: Their content and structure across cultures</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. H. Schwartz</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>95</last><first>56</first></pages><author></author><title>Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations]</title></host><title>Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. H. Schwartz</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Boehnke</name></json:item></author><host><volume>38</volume><pages><last>255</last><first>230</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Research in Personality</title></host><title>Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. H. Schwartz</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Melech</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Lehmann</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. Burgess</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Harris</name></json:item><json:item><name>V. Owens</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>542</last><first>519</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology</title></host><title>Extending the cross‐cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B. Six</name></json:item><json:item><name>U. Wolfradt</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Zick</name></json:item></author><host><volume>9</volume><pages><last>40</last><first>23</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie</title></host><title>Autoritarismus und Soziale Dominanzorientierung als generalisierte Einstellungen [Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as generalized attitudes]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G. Sommer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>61</last><first>39</first></pages><author></author><title>Menschenrechte und Frieden: Aktuelle Beiträge und Debatten [Human rights and peace: Current contributions and debates]</title></host><title>Die Menschenrechts‐Charta der Vereinten Nationen—Kenntnisse, Einstellungen sowie Präsentation in deutschen Printmedien [The charta of human rights of the United Nations—Knowledge, attitudes, and presentation in the German press]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Sparks</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. Durkin</name></json:item></author><host><volume>52</volume><pages><last>936</last><first>931</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</title></host><title>Moral reasoning and political orientation: The context sensitivity of individual rights and democratic principles</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Spini</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Doise</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>622</last><first>603</first></pages><author></author><title>European Journal of Social Psychology</title></host><title>Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. Spini</name></json:item><json:item><name>W. Doise</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>48</last><first>21</first></pages><author></author><title>The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries</title></host><title>Universal rights and duties as normative social representations</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Stellmacher, J. (2004). Autoritarismus als Gruppenphänomen: Zur situationsabhängigen Aktivierung autoritärer Prädispositionen [Authoritarianism as a group phenomenon: On the situational activation of authoritarian predispositions]. Marburg: Tectum.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Stellmacher</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Petzel</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Sommer</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>118</last><first>93</first></pages><author></author><title>Jugendgewalt und Rechtsextremismus [Juvenile violence and right‐wing extremism]</title></host><title>Autoritarismus und Einstellung zu Menschenrechten im Ost‐West‐Vergleich [Authoritarianism and attitude toward human rights in East and West]</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>The indivisibility of human rights violations</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Stellmacher</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Sommer</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Brähler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>292</last><first>267</first></pages><author></author><title>Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology</title></host><title>The cognitive representation of human rights: Knowledge, importance, and commitment</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Stellmacher</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. Sommer</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Imbeck</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. H. Witte</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>166</last><first>143</first></pages><author></author><title>Sozialpsychologie politischer Prozesse [Social psychology of political processes]</title></host><title>Psychologische Ansätze zu einer positiven Menschenrechtserziehung: Determinanten der Einsatzbereitschaft für die Einhaltung von Menschenrechten [Psychological approaches to a positive human rights education: Determinants of readiness for active support of human rights]</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Verba</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Burns</name></json:item><json:item><name>K. L. Schlozman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>59</volume><pages><last>1072</last><first>1051</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Politics</title></host><title>Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>28</volume><publisherId><json:string>POPS</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>29</total><last>469</last><first>441</first></pages><issn><json:string>0162-895X</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-9221</json:string></eissn><title>Political Psychology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9221</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, social</json:string><json:string>political science</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>social psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x</json:string></doi><id>2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02</id><score>0.11258867</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">J. Christopher</forename><surname>Cohrs</surname></persName><affiliation>Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Jürgen</forename><surname>Maes</surname></persName><affiliation>University of the German Armed Forces Munich</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Barbara</forename><surname>Moschner</surname></persName><affiliation>Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Sven</forename><surname>Kielmann</surname></persName><affiliation>Leipzig, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Political Psychology</title><idno type="pISSN">0162-895X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9221</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9221</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-08"></date><biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="441">441</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="469">469</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">POPS581</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Following several political‐psychological approaches, the present research analyzed whether orientations toward human rights are a function of right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), basic human values in the sense of Schwartz (1992), and political ideology. Three dimensions of human rights attitudes (endorsement, restriction, and enforcement) were differentiated from human rights knowledge and behavior. In a time‐lagged Internet survey (N = 479), using structural equation modeling, RWA, universalism and power values, and political ideology (measured at Time 1) differentially predicted dimensions of human rights attitudes (measured at Time 2 five months later). RWA and universalism values also predicted self‐reported human rights behavior, with the effects mediated through human rights endorsement. Human rights knowledge also predicted behavior. The psychological roots of positive and negative orientations toward human rights, consequences for human rights education, and the particular role of military enforcement of human rights are discussed.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>human rights</term></item><item><term>political attitudes</term></item><item><term>political behavior</term></item><item><term>values</term></item><item><term>military intervention</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-08">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9221</doi><issn type="print">0162-895X</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-9221</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="POPS"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY">Political Psychology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/pops.2007.28.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="28">28</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-08">August 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="POPS581"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="29"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-29"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="441">441</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="469">469</numbering></numberingGroup><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:POPS.POPS581.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="69"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="12705"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title><title type="shortAuthors">Cohrs et al.</title><title type="short">Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>J. Christopher</givenNames><familyName>Cohrs</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Jürgen</givenNames><familyName>Maes</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Barbara</givenNames><familyName>Moschner</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Sven</givenNames><familyName>Kielmann</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>University of the German Armed Forces Munich</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Leipzig, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">human rights</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">political attitudes</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">political behavior</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">values</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">military intervention</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Following several political‐psychological approaches, the present research analyzed whether orientations toward human rights are a function of right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), basic human values in the sense of <link href="#b53">Schwartz (1992</link>), and political ideology. Three dimensions of human rights attitudes (endorsement, restriction, and enforcement) were differentiated from human rights knowledge and behavior. In a time‐lagged Internet survey (<i>N</i> <i>=</i> 479), using structural equation modeling, RWA, universalism and power values, and political ideology (measured at Time 1) differentially predicted dimensions of human rights attitudes (measured at Time 2 five months later). RWA and universalism values also predicted self‐reported human rights behavior, with the effects mediated through human rights endorsement. Human rights knowledge also predicted behavior. The psychological roots of positive and negative orientations toward human rights, consequences for human rights education, and the particular role of military enforcement of human rights are discussed.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J. Christopher</namePart><namePart type="family">Cohrs</namePart><affiliation>Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jürgen</namePart><namePart type="family">Maes</namePart><affiliation>University of the German Armed Forces Munich</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Barbara</namePart><namePart type="family">Moschner</namePart><affiliation>Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sven</namePart><namePart type="family">Kielmann</namePart><affiliation>Leipzig, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-08</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="references">69</extent><extent unit="words">12705</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Following several political‐psychological approaches, the present research analyzed whether orientations toward human rights are a function of right‐wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), basic human values in the sense of Schwartz (1992), and political ideology. Three dimensions of human rights attitudes (endorsement, restriction, and enforcement) were differentiated from human rights knowledge and behavior. In a time‐lagged Internet survey (N = 479), using structural equation modeling, RWA, universalism and power values, and political ideology (measured at Time 1) differentially predicted dimensions of human rights attitudes (measured at Time 2 five months later). RWA and universalism values also predicted self‐reported human rights behavior, with the effects mediated through human rights endorsement. Human rights knowledge also predicted behavior. The psychological roots of positive and negative orientations toward human rights, consequences for human rights education, and the particular role of military enforcement of human rights are discussed.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>human rights</topic><topic>political attitudes</topic><topic>political behavior</topic><topic>values</topic><topic>military intervention</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Political Psychology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0162-895X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-9221</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9221</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">POPS</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>28</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>441</start><end>469</end><total>29</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">POPS581</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001452 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001452 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:2F45A7609612902693708AA52BAC113B93E51A02
|texte= Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |