The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System
Identifieur interne : 001384 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001383; suivant : 001385The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System
Auteurs : Sebastian Heilmann ; Nicole Schulte-KulkmannSource :
- Governance [ 0952-1895 ] ; 2011-10.
Abstract
This article examines the contribution of policy diffusion to create a regulatory system against money laundering in China. A two‐level analysis of transnational interactions and domestic law making shows how Communist Party prerogatives shape the insertion of multilateral norms into the legal system. In a contentious process of local accommodation, transnationally engaged technocratic bodies, turf‐conscious bureaucracies, and powerful party organs struggle to reconcile the goals of promoting global economic expansion, gaining international recognition, and absorbing innovative regulatory tools while preserving tight domestic control. In effect, Chinese policymakers try to utilize policy diffusion as a mechanism for negotiating and promoting the nation's global rise. Yet, when it comes to implementation, global regulatory standards are weakened or even neutralized through discretionary enforcement. The depth and robustness of normative assimilation therefore remain uncertain.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title><author><name sortKey="Heilmann, Sebastian" sort="Heilmann, Sebastian" uniqKey="Heilmann S" first="Sebastian" last="Heilmann">Sebastian Heilmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schulte Ulkmann, Nicole" sort="Schulte Ulkmann, Nicole" uniqKey="Schulte Ulkmann N" first="Nicole" last="Schulte-Kulkmann">Nicole Schulte-Kulkmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001384</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001384</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title><author><name sortKey="Heilmann, Sebastian" sort="Heilmann, Sebastian" uniqKey="Heilmann S" first="Sebastian" last="Heilmann">Sebastian Heilmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schulte Ulkmann, Nicole" sort="Schulte Ulkmann, Nicole" uniqKey="Schulte Ulkmann N" first="Nicole" last="Schulte-Kulkmann">Nicole Schulte-Kulkmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Governance</title><idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-0491</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-10">2011-10</date><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="639">639</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="664">664</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno></series><idno type="istex">BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GOVE1543</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article examines the contribution of policy diffusion to create a regulatory system against money laundering in China. A two‐level analysis of transnational interactions and domestic law making shows how Communist Party prerogatives shape the insertion of multilateral norms into the legal system. In a contentious process of local accommodation, transnationally engaged technocratic bodies, turf‐conscious bureaucracies, and powerful party organs struggle to reconcile the goals of promoting global economic expansion, gaining international recognition, and absorbing innovative regulatory tools while preserving tight domestic control. In effect, Chinese policymakers try to utilize policy diffusion as a mechanism for negotiating and promoting the nation's global rise. Yet, when it comes to implementation, global regulatory standards are weakened or even neutralized through discretionary enforcement. The depth and robustness of normative assimilation therefore remain uncertain.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>SEBASTIAN HEILMANN</name><affiliations><json:string>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>NICOLE SCHULTE‐KULKMANN</name><affiliations><json:string>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>GOVE1543</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This article examines the contribution of policy diffusion to create a regulatory system against money laundering in China. A two‐level analysis of transnational interactions and domestic law making shows how Communist Party prerogatives shape the insertion of multilateral norms into the legal system. In a contentious process of local accommodation, transnationally engaged technocratic bodies, turf‐conscious bureaucracies, and powerful party organs struggle to reconcile the goals of promoting global economic expansion, gaining international recognition, and absorbing innovative regulatory tools while preserving tight domestic control. In effect, Chinese policymakers try to utilize policy diffusion as a mechanism for negotiating and promoting the nation's global rise. Yet, when it comes to implementation, global regulatory standards are weakened or even neutralized through discretionary enforcement. The depth and robustness of normative assimilation therefore remain uncertain.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.56</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>432 x 648 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>990</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10300</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>68436</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>26</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>130</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>Amitav. Acharya</name></json:item></author><host><volume>58</volume><pages><last>275</last><first>239</first></pages><author></author><title>International Organization</title></host><title>“How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Jinrong jigou kehu shenfen shibie ziliao ji jiaoyi jilu baocun guanli banfa”[Administrative Measures on the Safekeeping of Customer Identification Materials and of Transaction Records by Financial Institutions]</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>CAMLMAC (China AML Monitoring and Analysis Centre, Zhongguo fanxiqian jiance fenxi zhongxin). 2007. 2006 nian zhongxin guoji jiaoliu dashiji [Chronicle of International Exchanges of the Centre in the Year 2006]. Beijing: CAMLMAC.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“China Is Admitted into AML Group</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Carlson, Allen. 2005. Unifying China, Integrating with the World. Securing Chinese Sovereignty in the Reform Era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Zhonggong Zhongyang Guanyu Yinfa, Jianli Jianquan Jiaoyu, Zhidu, Jiancha Bingchongde Yanzhi He Yufang Fubai Tixi Shishi Gangyao'de Tongzhi”[Circular of the CCP Central Committee on Communicating the ‘Implementation Program for the Establishment of an Effective System for Corruption Prosecution and Prevention Which Equally Strengthens Training Measures, Institutions and Supervision’]</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Jianchabu fuzeren jiu woguo pizhun ‘Lianheguo fanfubai gongyue' da jizhe wen”[Leading Functionary of the Ministry of Disciplinary Supervision Answers Journalists’ Questions Concerning China's Ratification of the UN Convention against Corruption]</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Jujiao Dangde shiliuda yilai quanguo jijianjiancha fagui zhidujianshe”[Focus: The Establishment of a National Legal System for Disciplinary Supervision Since the 16th Party Congress]</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Yong Deng</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>China Rising: Power and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy</title></host><title>“Better Than Power. ‘International Status’ in Chinese Foreign Policy</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Diehl, Paul F., ed.1997. The Politics of Global Governance: International Organizations in an Interdependent World. Boulder, CO: Rienner.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Dimitrov, Martin. 2009. Piracy and the State: The Politics of Intellectual Property Rights in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>David P. Dolowitz</name></json:item><json:item><name>David Marsh</name></json:item></author><host><volume>44</volume><pages><last>357</last><first>343</first></pages><author></author><title>Political Studies</title></host><title>“Who Learns What from Whom. A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Zhonghua renmin gongheguo xingfa xiuzheng'an (liu)”[Draft of the 6th Revision to the Criminal Law of the PRC]</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Zachary Elkins</name></json:item><json:item><name>Andrew T. Guzman</name></json:item><json:item><name>Beth A. Simmons</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>846</last><first>811</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>International Organization</title></host><title>“Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>European Union. 2003. A Maturing Partnership. Shared Interests and Challenges in EU‐China Relations. Updating of Commission communications of 1998 and 2001 on EU‐China relations [COM(2003) 533 final]. >http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/external_relations/relations_with_third_countries/asia/r14207_en.htm>. (June 21, 2010).</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Financial Action Task Force (FATF). 2005. Annual Report 2004–2005. Paris: FATF.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Financial Action Task Force (FATF). 2007. First Mutual Evaluation Report on AML and Combating the Financing of Terrorism—People's Republic of China. Paris: FATF.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Gilmore, William C. 2004. Dirty Money. The Evolution of International Measures to Counter Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Bonnie Glaser</name></json:item><json:item><name>Phillip Saunders</name></json:item></author><host><volume>171</volume><pages><last>616</last><first>597</first></pages><author></author><title>China Quarterly</title></host><title>“Chinese Civil Foreign Policy Research Institutes. Evolving Roles and Increasing Influence</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Jian'an. Guo</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Crime and Its Control in the People's Republic of China</title></host><title>“Situation of and Countermeasures against Money Laundering Crime in China</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>He, Ping. 2004. The Fight against Money Laundering: A Comparative Perspective. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Heilmann, Sebastian. 2004. Das politische System der VR China [The Political System of the PRC]. Wiesbaden: VS.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Heilmann, Sebastian, and Nicole Schulte‐Kulkmann. 2010. Policy Learning unter nicht‐demokratischen Bedingungen. Die Anpassung des chinesischen Geldwäschebekämpfungssystems an internationale Standards[Policy Learning under Non‐Democratic Conditions: The Adjustment of China's AML System to International Standards]. Unpublished manuscript.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Katharina Holzinger</name></json:item><json:item><name>Helge Joergens</name></json:item><json:item><name>Christoph Knill</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Transfer, Diffusion Und Konvergenz Von Politiken [The Transfer, Diffusion, and Convergence of Policies]</title></host><title>“Transfer, Diffusion Und Konvergenz: Konzepte Und Kausalmechanismen”[Transfer, Diffusion, and Convergence: Concepts and Causal Mechanisms]</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 1. Official A of a German financial regulatory agency, Bonn, March 12, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 2. Official B of a German financial regulatory agency, Bonn, March 18, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 3. Official of a British financial regulatory agency, London, May 28, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 4. FATF official A, Paris, July 9, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 5. FATF official B, Paris, July 15, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 6. Chinese legal scholar, Shanghai, October 5 , 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 7. Chinese legal scholar and policy advisor, Shanghai, October 6, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 8. Former leading official of a Chinese financial regulatory agency, Shanghai, October 9, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 9. Official of a Chinese financial regulatory agency, Beijing, October 13, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 10. Chinese financial journalist, Beijing, October 14, 2008.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Interview 11. Official of the Press and Information Office of the German Federal Government, Berlin, May 13, 2009.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Jacobson, Harold K., and Michel Oksenberg. 1990. China's Participation in the IMF, the World Bank, and GATT. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Helge. Joergens</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Governance for Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function</title></host><title>“Governance by Diffusion. Implementing Global Norms through Cross‐National Imitation and Learning</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2008. Social States. China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Kraemer, Gregor. 2008. Die Bekaempfung Von Geldwaesche und Terrorismusfinanzierung. Die Taetigkeit der FATF als internationaler standardsetter [Fighting Money‐Laundering and Terrorist Financing of Terrorism: The Activity of FATF as International Standard‐Setter]. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Kremer, Carsten. 2004. Die FATF und der internationale Kampf Gegen die Geldwaesche [The FATF and the International Fight against Money Laundering]. Trier: REGEM. REGEM Analysis No. 10 (May 2004).</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Andrea Lenschow</name></json:item><json:item><name>Duncan Liefferink</name></json:item><json:item><name>Sietske Veenman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>816</last><first>797</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of European Public Policy</title></host><title>“When the Birds Sing: A Framework for Analysing Domestic Factors Behind Policy Convergence</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lieberthal, Kenneth G., and David M. Lampton, ed.1992. Bureaucracy, Politics and Decision‐Making in Post‐Mao China. Berkeley, CA: University of California.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lieberthal, Kenneth G., and Michel Oksenberg. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Lü, Xiaobo. 2000. Cadres and Corruption: The Organizational Involution of the Chinese Communist Party. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Andrew. Mertha</name></json:item></author><host><volume>200</volume><pages><last>1012</last><first>995</first></pages><author></author><title>China Quarterly</title></host><title>‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Thomas G. Moore</name></json:item><json:item><name>Dixia Yang</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978–2000</title></host><title>“Empowered and Restrained. Chinese Foreign Policy in the Age of Economic Interdependence</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Naughton, Barry, and Dali L. Yang, ed.2004. Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post‐Deng Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Alexandra. Orlova</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>233</last><first>210</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>Journal of Money Laundering Control</title></host><title>“Russia's Anti‐Money Laundering Regime: Law Enforcement Tool or Instrument of Domestic Control?</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“China's AML Legislation and Its Impact on Financial Institutions</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>People's Bank of China (PBoC). 2006. Zhongguo fanxiqian baogao 2005 [AML Annual Report 2005]. Beijing: Financial Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Margaret M. Pearson</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>China Joins the World. Progress and Prospects</title></host><title>“China's Integration into the International Trade and Investment Regime</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Margaret M. Pearson</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>New Directions in the Study of China's Foreign Policy</title></host><title>“China in Geneva: Lessons from China's Early Years in the World Trade Organization</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Pitman Potter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>191</volume><pages><last>715</last><first>699</first></pages><author></author><title>China Quarterly</title></host><title>“China and the International Legal System: Challenges of Participation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Claudio M. Radaelli</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>943</last><first>924</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of European Public Policy</title></host><title>“Diffusion without Convergence: How Political Context Shapes the Adoption of Regulatory Impact Assessment</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“U.S. Relations with the PRC (2008): Country Reports on Terrorism 2007</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Thomas. Risse‐Kappen</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non‐State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions</title></host><title>“Bringing Transnational Relations Back In</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Rosenau, James N., and Ernst‐Otto Czempiel, ed.1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Nicole Schulte‐Kulkmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>233</last><first>221</first></pages><author></author><title>Zeitschrift fuer Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft</title></host><title>“Geldwaesche und Geldwaeschebekaempfung in der Volksrepublik China: Ein Ueberblick”[Money Laundering and AML in the PRC: An Overview]</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Party Resurrects Rule Book for Cadres</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Senger, Harro von. 1994. Einführung in das Chinesische Recht [Introduction to Chinese Law]. Munich: C.H. Beck.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.C. Sharman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>52</volume><pages><last>656</last><first>635</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>International Studies Quarterly</title></host><title>“Power and Discourse in Policy Diffusion: Anti‐Money Laundering in Developing States</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Shear, David B. 2009. U.S.‐China Relations. Maximizing the Effectiveness of the Strategic and Economic Dialogue. Statement before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia, the Pacific and the Global Environment. Washington, DC, October 9, 2009. >http://www.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2009/09/129103.htm>. (June 21, 2010).</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Shirk, Susan L. 2007. China. Fragile Superpower. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Beth A. Simmons</name></json:item><json:item><name>Frank Dobbin</name></json:item><json:item><name>Geoffrey Garrett</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>810</last><first>781</first></pages><issue>4</issue><author></author><title>International Organization</title></host><title>“Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Jun Tang</name></json:item><json:item><name>Lishan Ai</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>225</last><first>215</first></pages><issue>3</issue><author></author><title>Journal of Money Laundering Control</title></host><title>“Combating Money Laundering in Transition Countries: The Inherent Limitations and Practical Issues</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Yanghang fanxiqian zhongxin zhuren: Fangdi chanye xiqian mingmu zhangdan”[Director of the Central Bank AML Centre: Money Laundering Flourishes in the Real Estate Sector]</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Kurt. Weyland</name></json:item></author><host><volume>60</volume><pages><last>314</last><first>281</first></pages><author></author><title>World Politics</title></host><title>“Toward a New Theory of Institutional Change</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Wilkinson, Rorden, and Steve Hughes, ed.2002. Global Governance. Critical Perspectives. London, New York: Routledge.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Fanxiqianfa jiang yanguan guanyuan zhanghu”[AML Law Will Establish Tight Controls over Government Officials' Accounts]</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Song Yang</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>380</last><first>370</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice</title></host><title>“Money Laundering in China. A Policy Analysis</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Fanxiqianfa cao'an quxiao dui she'an gongzhi renyuan zhanghu jiance de guiding”[Stipulations for Monitoring Accounts of Officials Subject to Judicial Proceedings Eliminated from Draft AML Law]</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Fanxiqian cao'an jiang shouci jinxing shenyi”[Draft of the AML Law Discussed for the First Time]</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>“Jinyibu jianquan woguo fanxiqian zhidu”[Go a Step Further in Perfecting Our Nation's System of AML]</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Zweig, David. 2002. Internationalizing China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.</title></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>24</volume><publisherId><json:string>GOVE</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>26</total><last>664</last><first>639</first></pages><issn><json:string>0952-1895</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1468-0491</json:string></eissn><title>Governance</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0491</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>public administration</json:string><json:string>political science</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>social sciences</json:string><json:string>political science & public administration</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.x</json:string></doi><id>BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB</id><score>1.2836301</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">SEBASTIAN</forename><surname>HEILMANN</surname></persName><affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">NICOLE</forename><surname>SCHULTE‐KULKMANN</surname></persName><affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Governance</title><idno type="pISSN">0952-1895</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-0491</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0491</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-10"></date><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="639">639</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="664">664</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">GOVE1543</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines the contribution of policy diffusion to create a regulatory system against money laundering in China. A two‐level analysis of transnational interactions and domestic law making shows how Communist Party prerogatives shape the insertion of multilateral norms into the legal system. In a contentious process of local accommodation, transnationally engaged technocratic bodies, turf‐conscious bureaucracies, and powerful party organs struggle to reconcile the goals of promoting global economic expansion, gaining international recognition, and absorbing innovative regulatory tools while preserving tight domestic control. In effect, Chinese policymakers try to utilize policy diffusion as a mechanism for negotiating and promoting the nation's global rise. Yet, when it comes to implementation, global regulatory standards are weakened or even neutralized through discretionary enforcement. The depth and robustness of normative assimilation therefore remain uncertain.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-10">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0491</doi><issn type="print">0952-1895</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-0491</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="GOVE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="GOVERNANCE">Governance</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10104"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/gove.2011.24.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-10">October 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="GOVE1543"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="26"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.10 mode:FullText" date="2011-09-20"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-09-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-09-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="639">639</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="664">664</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GOVE.GOVE1543.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="78"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="11596"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title><title type="shortAuthors">SEBASTIAN HEILMANN AND NICOLE SCHULTE‐KULKMANN</title><title type="short">LIMITS OF POLICY DIFFUSION</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>SEBASTIAN</givenNames><familyName>HEILMANN</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>NICOLE</givenNames><familyName>SCHULTE‐KULKMANN</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CN"><unparsedAffiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines the contribution of policy diffusion to create a regulatory system against money laundering in China. A two‐level analysis of transnational interactions and domestic law making shows how Communist Party prerogatives shape the insertion of multilateral norms into the legal system. In a contentious process of local accommodation, transnationally engaged technocratic bodies, turf‐conscious bureaucracies, and powerful party organs struggle to reconcile the goals of promoting global economic expansion, gaining international recognition, and absorbing innovative regulatory tools while preserving tight domestic control. In effect, Chinese policymakers try to utilize policy diffusion as a mechanism for negotiating and promoting the nation's global rise. Yet, when it comes to implementation, global regulatory standards are weakened or even neutralized through discretionary enforcement. The depth and robustness of normative assimilation therefore remain uncertain.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>LIMITS OF POLICY DIFFUSION</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">SEBASTIAN</namePart><namePart type="family">HEILMANN</namePart><affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">NICOLE</namePart><namePart type="family">SCHULTE‐KULKMANN</namePart><affiliation>Trier University, Research Group on the Political Economy of China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">78</extent><extent unit="words">11596</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This article examines the contribution of policy diffusion to create a regulatory system against money laundering in China. A two‐level analysis of transnational interactions and domestic law making shows how Communist Party prerogatives shape the insertion of multilateral norms into the legal system. In a contentious process of local accommodation, transnationally engaged technocratic bodies, turf‐conscious bureaucracies, and powerful party organs struggle to reconcile the goals of promoting global economic expansion, gaining international recognition, and absorbing innovative regulatory tools while preserving tight domestic control. In effect, Chinese policymakers try to utilize policy diffusion as a mechanism for negotiating and promoting the nation's global rise. Yet, when it comes to implementation, global regulatory standards are weakened or even neutralized through discretionary enforcement. The depth and robustness of normative assimilation therefore remain uncertain.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Governance</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0952-1895</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-0491</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0491</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">GOVE</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>639</start><end>664</end><total>26</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">GOVE1543</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001384 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001384 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BD4711FEFB861226FDC76997864DC2278D5B3CCB
|texte= The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti‐Money Laundering into China's Legal System
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |