Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)
Identifieur interne : 001002 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001001; suivant : 001003Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)
Auteurs : Lászl Rákosy ; Markus Heiser ; Cosmin-Ovidiu Manci ; Thomas SchmittSource :
- Insect Conservation and Diversity [ 1752-458X ] ; 2013-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Abstract. 1. While the biogeographical structuring of Europe as a whole is already relatively well understood, patterns at the more regional scale are still poorly explored. Especially the influence of differing ecological demands among species groups on regional distribution patterns is mostly unresolved. Therefore, we compare the distributions of strictly terrestrial butterflies with those of semi‐aquatic dragonflies.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00197.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title><author><name sortKey="Rakosy, Laszl" sort="Rakosy, Laszl" uniqKey="Rakosy L" first="Lászl" last="Rákosy">Lászl Rákosy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heiser, Markus" sort="Heiser, Markus" uniqKey="Heiser M" first="Markus" last="Heiser">Markus Heiser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manci, Cosmin Vidiu" sort="Manci, Cosmin Vidiu" uniqKey="Manci C" first="Cosmin-Ovidiu" last="Manci">Cosmin-Ovidiu Manci</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Str. Acad. Remus Radulet, Timisoara, Romania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Thomas" sort="Schmitt, Thomas" uniqKey="Schmitt T" first="Thomas" last="Schmitt">Thomas Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00197.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001002</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001002</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title><author><name sortKey="Rakosy, Laszl" sort="Rakosy, Laszl" uniqKey="Rakosy L" first="Lászl" last="Rákosy">Lászl Rákosy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heiser, Markus" sort="Heiser, Markus" uniqKey="Heiser M" first="Markus" last="Heiser">Markus Heiser</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manci, Cosmin Vidiu" sort="Manci, Cosmin Vidiu" uniqKey="Manci C" first="Cosmin-Ovidiu" last="Manci">Cosmin-Ovidiu Manci</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Str. Acad. Remus Radulet, Timisoara, Romania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Thomas" sort="Schmitt, Thomas" uniqKey="Schmitt T" first="Thomas" last="Schmitt">Thomas Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Insect Conservation and Diversity</title><idno type="ISSN">1752-458X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-4598</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-03">2013-03</date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="145">145</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="154">154</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1752-458X</idno></series><idno type="istex">84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00197.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ICAD197</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1752-458X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Faunal elements</term><term>faunal regions</term><term>regional biogeographical patterns</term><term>species richness</term><term>water‐energy hypothesis</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract. 1. While the biogeographical structuring of Europe as a whole is already relatively well understood, patterns at the more regional scale are still poorly explored. Especially the influence of differing ecological demands among species groups on regional distribution patterns is mostly unresolved. Therefore, we compare the distributions of strictly terrestrial butterflies with those of semi‐aquatic dragonflies.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>LÁSZLÓ RÁKOSY</name><affiliations><json:string>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>MARKUS HEISER</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>COSMIN‐OVIDIU MANCI</name><affiliations><json:string>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</json:string><json:string>Str. Acad. Remus Radulet, Timisoara, Romania</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>THOMAS SCHMITT</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Faunal elements</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>faunal regions</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>regional biogeographical patterns</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>species richness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>water‐energy hypothesis</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>ICAD197</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>5.672</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 793.701 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>424</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5423</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35815</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>56</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title><refBibs><json:item><host><author></author><title>Asher, J., Warren, M., Fox, R., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G. & Jeffcoate, S. (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Bink, F.A. (1992) Ecologische Atlas van de Dagvlinders van Noordwest‐Europa. Schuyt & Co. Uitgevers en Importeurs, Haarlem, The Netherlands.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Brosius, F. (2006) SPSS, Version 14. mitp, REDLINE GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Corbet, P.S. (2004) Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, Colchester, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Dengler</name></json:item></author><host><volume>36</volume><pages><last>744</last><first>728</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of Biogeography</title></host><title>Which function describes the species–area relationship best? Review and empirical evaluation</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.L.H. Dennis</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>280</last><first>250</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology of Butterflies in Europe</title></host><title>Faunal structures, phylogeography and historical inference</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.L.H. Dennis</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.G. Shreeve</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.R. Williams</name></json:item></author><host><volume>18</volume><pages><last>40</last><first>27</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>Taxonomic differentiation in species richness gradients among European butterflies (Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea): contribution of macroevolutionary dynamics</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>R.L.H. Dennis</name></json:item><json:item><name>W.R. Williams</name></json:item><json:item><name>T.G. Shreeve</name></json:item></author><host><volume>101</volume><pages><last>49</last><first>1</first></pages><author></author><title>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></host><title>A multivariate approach to the determination of faunal structures among European butterfly species (Lepidoptera:Rhopalocera)</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Dijkstra, K.D.B. & Lewington, R. (2006) Field Guide to the Dragonflies of Britain and Europe. British Wildlife Publishing, London, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Ebert, G. & Rennwald, E. (1991) Die Schmetterlinge Baden‐Württembergs. Band 1 und 2. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Fattorini</name></json:item></author><host><volume>20</volume><pages><last>1180</last><first>1169</first></pages><author></author><title>Conservation Biology</title></host><title>Detecting biodiversity hotspots by species area relationships: a case study of Mediterranean beetles</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>S. Fattorini</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>2538</last><first>2531</first></pages><author></author><title>Biodiversity and Conservation</title></host><title>To fit or not to fit? Poorly fitting procedure produces inconsistent results when a species–area relationship is used to locate hotspots</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Gómez</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.H. Lunt</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>188</last><first>155</first></pages><author></author><title>Phylogeography of Southern European Refugia</title></host><title>Refugia within refugia: patterns of phylogeographic concordance in the Iberian Peninsula</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>F. Guilhaumon</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Gimenez</name></json:item><json:item><name>K.J. Gaston</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Mouillot</name></json:item></author><host><volume>105</volume><pages><last>15463</last><first>15458</first></pages><author></author><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</title></host><title>Taxonomic and regional uncertainty in species–area relationships and the identification of richness hotspots</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.A. Hawkins</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Field</name></json:item><json:item><name>H.V. Cornell</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.J. Currie</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.‐F. Guégan</name></json:item><json:item><name>D.M. Kaufman</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.T. Kerr</name></json:item><json:item><name>G.G. Mittelbach</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Oberdorff</name></json:item><json:item><name>E.M. O′Brien</name></json:item><json:item><name>E.E. Porter</name></json:item><json:item><name>J.R.G. Turner</name></json:item></author><host><volume>84</volume><pages><last>3117</last><first>3105</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecology</title></host><title>Energy, water, and broad‐scale geographic patterns of species richness</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>B.A. Hawkins</name></json:item><json:item><name>E.E. Porter</name></json:item></author><host><volume>28</volume><pages><last>686</last><first>678</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecological Entomolgy</title></host><title>Water‐energy balance and the geographic pattern of species richness of western Palearctic butterflies</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Heiser</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>99</volume><pages><last>195</last><first>177</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></host><title>Do different dispersal capacities influence the biogeography of the western Palearctic dragonflies (Odonata)?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>G.M. Hewitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>68</volume><pages><last>112</last><first>87</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></host><title>Post‐glacial re‐colonization of European biota</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Johnson, R.J. (1980) Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Geography. Longman, London, UK.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. Kipping</name></json:item></author><host><volume>16</volume><pages><last>538</last><first>527</first></pages><author></author><title>Mauritiana</title></host><title>Ein Beitrag zur Libellenfauna (Odonata) Rumäniens</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Kudrna, O., Harpke, A., Lux, K., Pennersdorfer, J., Schweiger, O., Settele, J. & Wiemers, M. (2011) Distribution Atlas of Butterflies in Europe. Gesellschaft für Schmetterlingsschutz, Halle, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>de Lattin, G. (1967) Grundriss der Zoogeographie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Martens, A. (1996) Die Federlibellen Europas. Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg & Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Nie, N.N., Hull, C.H., Jenkins, J.G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D.H. (1975) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. McGraw‐Hill Book Company, New York, New York.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Rákosy, L. (1997) Entomofauna Parcurilor Nationale Retezat si Valea Cernei. Sociatatea Lepidopterologica Romana, Cluj‐Napoca, Romania.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Rákosy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>3</volume><pages><last>42</last><first>35</first></pages><author></author><title>Entomologica Romanica</title></host><title>Hipparchia volgensis delattini Kudrna 1975 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) in der Fauna Rumäniens</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Rákosy, L. (2006) Die Noctuiden Rumäniens. Stapfia, Linz, Austria.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Rákosy</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>1045</last><first>1040</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecological Indicators</title></host><title>Are butterflies and moths suitable ecological indicator systems for restoration measures of semi‐natural calcareous grassland habitats?</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Rákosy</name></json:item><json:item><name>Z. Varga</name></json:item></author><host><volume>56</volume><pages><last>58</last><first>48</first></pages><author></author><title>Beiträge zur Entomologie</title></host><title>Der pannonische Raum und seine östlichen Interferenzen aus einer lepidopterologischen Perspektive</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Rákosy</name></json:item><json:item><name>C. Wieser</name></json:item></author><host><volume>190/110</volume><pages><last>115</last><first>7</first></pages><author></author><title>Carinthia II</title></host><title>Das Macin Gebirge (Rumänien, Nord‐Dobrudscha). Ein durch hohe Biodiversität gekennzeichnetes Refugium reliktärer Arten. Fauna und Flora, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schmetterlinge und der Vergetationsverhältnisse</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>W. Reinig</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>378</last><first>364</first></pages><author></author><title>Syllegomena Biologica, Festschrift für O. Kleinschmidt</title></host><title>Chorologische Voraussetzungen für die Analyse von Formenkreisen</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>4</volume><pages><first>11</first></pages><author></author><title>Frontiers in Zoology</title></host><title>Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>6</volume><pages><first>9</first></pages><author></author><title>Frontiers in Zoology</title></host><title>Biogeographical and evolutionary importance of the European high mountain systems</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Rákosy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>13</volume><pages><last>862</last><first>855</first></pages><author></author><title>Diversity and Distributions</title></host><title>Changes of traditional agrarian landscapes and their conservation implications: a case study of butterflies in Romania</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>Z. Varga</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>166</last><first>143</first></pages><author></author><title>Vývoj prírody Slovenska</title></host><title>Biogeography of the butterflies and larger moths of the Carpathian Basin and the Balkan Peninsula</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>A. Schuldt</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Assmann</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>714</last><first>705</first></pages><author></author><title>Ecography</title></host><title>Environmental and historical effects on richness and endemism patterns of carabids beetles in the western Palearctic</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. Shimodaira</name></json:item></author><host><volume>51</volume><pages><last>508</last><first>492</first></pages><author></author><title>Systematic Biology</title></host><title>An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Speta, E. & Rákosy, L. (2010) Wildpflanzen Siebenbürgens. Plöchl, Freistadt, Austria.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J.R. Stewart</name></json:item><json:item><name>A.M. Lister</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. Barnes</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Dalén</name></json:item></author><host><volume>277</volume><pages><last>671</last><first>661</first></pages><author></author><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society B</title></host><title>Refugia revisited: individualistic responses of species in space and time</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Suzuki, R. & Shimodaira, H. (2006) PVCLUST: Hierarchical Clustering with P‐values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling. R package, Version 1.2‐0.</title></host></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Tolman, T. & Lewington, R. (1998) Die Tagfalter Europas und Nordwestafrikas. Franckh‐Kosmos Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Ujvárosi</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Bálint</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>N. Mészáros</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Ujvárosi</name></json:item><json:item><name>O. Popescu</name></json:item></author><host><volume>29</volume><pages><last>1088</last><first>1075</first></pages><author></author><title>Journal of the North American Benthological Society</title></host><title>Divergence and speciation in the Carpathians area: patterns of morphological and genetic diversity of the crane fly Pedicia acculta (Diptera: Pediciidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>L. Ujvárosi</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Starý</name></json:item></author><host><volume>7</volume><pages><last>50</last><first>45</first></pages><author></author><title>Entomologica Romanica</title></host><title>A new Pedicia (Crunobia) from Romania and other species new to the country′s fauna (Diptera: Pediciidae)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Z. Varga</name></json:item></author><host><volume>11</volume><pages><last>40</last><first>5</first></pages><author></author><title>Acta Entomologica Jugoslaviae</title></host><title>Geographische Isolation und Subspeziation bei den Hochgebirgslepidopteren der Balkanhalbinsel</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Z. Varga</name></json:item></author><host><volume>14</volume><pages><last>285</last><first>223</first></pages><author></author><title>Acta Biologica Debrecina</title></host><title>Das Prinzip der areal‐analytischen Methode in der Zoogeographie und die Faunenelement‐Einteilung der europäischen Tagschmetterlinge (Lepidoptera: Diurna)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Z. Varga</name></json:item><json:item><name>L. Rákosy</name></json:item></author><host><volume>12</volume><pages><last>29</last><first>15</first></pages><author></author><title>Entomologica Romanica</title></host><title>Biodiversität der Karstgebiete im Karpatenbecken am Beispiel der Gross‐Schmetterlingsfauna der Turzii‐Schlucht bzw. des Agteleker Karstgebietes</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>Z. Varga</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item></author><host><volume>93</volume><pages><last>430</last><first>415</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></host><title>Types of oreal and oreotundral disjunction in the western Palearctic</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Wenzel</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Schmitt</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Weitzel</name></json:item><json:item><name>A. Seitz</name></json:item></author><host><volume>128</volume><pages><last>552</last><first>542</first></pages><author></author><title>Biological Conservation</title></host><title>The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: a conservation problem</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N. & Smith, G.M. (2007) Analysing Ecological Data. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.</title></host></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>6</volume><publisherId><json:string>ICAD</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>10</total><last>154</last><first>145</first></pages><issn><json:string>1752-458X</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1752-4598</json:string></eissn><title>Insect Conservation and Diversity</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1752-4598</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>entomology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00197.x</json:string></doi><id>84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB</id><score>1.0480052</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2012 The Authors. Insect Conservation and Diversity © 2012 The Royal Entomological Society</p></availability><date>2013</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">LÁSZLÓ</forename><surname>RÁKOSY</surname></persName><affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">MARKUS</forename><surname>HEISER</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">COSMIN‐OVIDIU</forename><surname>MANCI</surname></persName><affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</affiliation><affiliation>Str. Acad. Remus Radulet, Timisoara, Romania</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">THOMAS</forename><surname>SCHMITT</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Insect Conservation and Diversity</title><idno type="pISSN">1752-458X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1752-4598</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-4598</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-03"></date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="145">145</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="154">154</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00197.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ICAD197</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2013</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Abstract. 1. While the biogeographical structuring of Europe as a whole is already relatively well understood, patterns at the more regional scale are still poorly explored. Especially the influence of differing ecological demands among species groups on regional distribution patterns is mostly unresolved. Therefore, we compare the distributions of strictly terrestrial butterflies with those of semi‐aquatic dragonflies.</p></abstract><abstract><p>2. We analysed a regionalised distribution of the 196 butterfly and 68 dragonfly taxa of Romania with cluster analyses and principal component analyses, and worked out the different faunal regions and faunal elements for this country.</p></abstract><abstract><p>3. We obtained a clear regional structuring for the butterflies (e.g. Transylvanian Basin, Carpathians, SE Romania, W/SW Romania), but only a vertical structuring in the dragonflies from the Danube lowlands to the elevations of the Carpathians.</p></abstract><abstract><p>4. This structure implies a recent distribution trigger based on ecological and climatic constraints in dragonflies with water and energy availability being of high importance.</p></abstract><abstract><p>5. The more ancient biogeographical pattern in butterflies reflects the different biogeographical elements of Europe and the connections of the Carpathian regions to the Balkan Peninsula and the Eastern European steppes, with energy being of considerably higher importance for butterfly occurrences than water availability.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Faunal elements</term></item><item><term>faunal regions</term></item><item><term>regional biogeographical patterns</term></item><item><term>species richness</term></item><item><term>water‐energy hypothesis</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2013-03">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-4598</doi><issn type="print">1752-458X</issn><issn type="electronic">1752-4598</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ICAD"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY">Insect Conservation and Diversity</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/icad.2013.6.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="6">6</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-03">March 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00197.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ICAD197"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1"><i>Original Articles</i></title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2012 The Authors. Insect Conservation and Diversity © 2012 The Royal Entomological Society</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.0 mode:FullText" date="2013-03-12"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-03-12" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-03-23"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-03-23"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="145">145</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="154">154</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Thomas Schmitt, Biogeographie, Fachbereich VI, Gebäude N, Raum 303, Universität Trier, D‐54286 Trier, Germany. E‐mail: <email normalForm="thsh@uni-trier.de">thsh@uni-trier.de</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ICAD.ICAD197.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted 1 February 2012 First published online 23 March 2012 Editor: Calvin Dytham Associate editor: Phil DeVries</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>László Rákosy</i> et al.</title><title type="short"><i>Ecological constraints versus biogeographical patterns</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>LÁSZLÓ</givenNames><familyName>RÁKOSY</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>MARKUS</givenNames><familyName>HEISER</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1 #a3"><personName><givenNames>COSMIN‐OVIDIU</givenNames><familyName>MANCI</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>THOMAS</givenNames><familyName>SCHMITT</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation>Str. Acad. Remus Radulet, Timisoara, Romania</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Faunal elements</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">faunal regions</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">regional biogeographical patterns</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">species richness</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">water‐energy hypothesis</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Appendix S1.</b> Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of butterflies.</p><p><b>Appendix S2.</b> Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of dragonflies.</p><p>Please note: Neither the Editors nor Wiley‐Blackwell are responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:1752458X:media:icad197:icad197_sm_AppendixS1-S2"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract. </b> 1. While the biogeographical structuring of Europe as a whole is already relatively well understood, patterns at the more regional scale are still poorly explored. Especially the influence of differing ecological demands among species groups on regional distribution patterns is mostly unresolved. Therefore, we compare the distributions of strictly terrestrial butterflies with those of semi‐aquatic dragonflies.</p><p>2. We analysed a regionalised distribution of the 196 butterfly and 68 dragonfly taxa of Romania with cluster analyses and principal component analyses, and worked out the different faunal regions and faunal elements for this country.</p><p>3. We obtained a clear regional structuring for the butterflies (e.g. Transylvanian Basin, Carpathians, SE Romania, W/SW Romania), but only a vertical structuring in the dragonflies from the Danube lowlands to the elevations of the Carpathians.</p><p>4. This structure implies a recent distribution trigger based on ecological and climatic constraints in dragonflies with water and energy availability being of high importance.</p><p>5. The more ancient biogeographical pattern in butterflies reflects the different biogeographical elements of Europe and the connections of the Carpathian regions to the Balkan Peninsula and the Eastern European steppes, with energy being of considerably higher importance for butterfly occurrences than water availability.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Ecological constraints versus biogeographical patterns</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">LÁSZLÓ</namePart><namePart type="family">RÁKOSY</namePart><affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">MARKUS</namePart><namePart type="family">HEISER</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">COSMIN‐OVIDIU</namePart><namePart type="family">MANCI</namePart><affiliation>Department Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University Babes‐Bolyai, Cluj, Romania</affiliation><affiliation>Str. Acad. Remus Radulet, Timisoara, Romania</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">THOMAS</namePart><namePart type="family">SCHMITT</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biogeography, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Trier, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03</dateIssued><edition>Accepted 1 February 2012 First published online 23 March 2012 Editor: Calvin Dytham Associate editor: Phil DeVries</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">8</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract. 1. While the biogeographical structuring of Europe as a whole is already relatively well understood, patterns at the more regional scale are still poorly explored. Especially the influence of differing ecological demands among species groups on regional distribution patterns is mostly unresolved. Therefore, we compare the distributions of strictly terrestrial butterflies with those of semi‐aquatic dragonflies.</abstract><abstract>2. We analysed a regionalised distribution of the 196 butterfly and 68 dragonfly taxa of Romania with cluster analyses and principal component analyses, and worked out the different faunal regions and faunal elements for this country.</abstract><abstract>3. We obtained a clear regional structuring for the butterflies (e.g. Transylvanian Basin, Carpathians, SE Romania, W/SW Romania), but only a vertical structuring in the dragonflies from the Danube lowlands to the elevations of the Carpathians.</abstract><abstract>4. This structure implies a recent distribution trigger based on ecological and climatic constraints in dragonflies with water and energy availability being of high importance.</abstract><abstract>5. The more ancient biogeographical pattern in butterflies reflects the different biogeographical elements of Europe and the connections of the Carpathian regions to the Balkan Peninsula and the Eastern European steppes, with energy being of considerably higher importance for butterfly occurrences than water availability.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Faunal elements</topic><topic>faunal regions</topic><topic>regional biogeographical patterns</topic><topic>species richness</topic><topic>water‐energy hypothesis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Insect Conservation and Diversity</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><note type="content"> Appendix S1. Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of butterflies. Appendix S2. Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of dragonflies. Please note: Neither the Editors nor Wiley‐Blackwell are responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of butterflies. Appendix S2. Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of dragonflies. Please note: Neither the Editors nor Wiley‐Blackwell are responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Appendix S1. Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of butterflies. Appendix S2. Literature used for thepresence–absence dataset of dragonflies. Please note: Neither the Editors nor Wiley‐Blackwell are responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">1752-458X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1752-4598</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1752-4598</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ICAD</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>6</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>145</start><end>154</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00197.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ICAD197</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 The Authors. Insect Conservation and Diversity © 2012 The Royal Entomological Society</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001002 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001002 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:84BABD998A4E2951E1E020B1C05689DA5B01E6BB
|texte= Strong divergences in regional distributions in Romania: recent ecological constraints in dragonflies (Odonata) versus ancient biogeographical patterns in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopolocera)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |