The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications
Identifieur interne : 000994 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000993; suivant : 000995The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications
Auteurs : Nathan Efron ; Philip B. Morgan ; Ritu JagpalSource :
- Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics [ 0275-5408 ] ; 2003-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Purpose: A study was conducted to evaluate the influence of knowledge, training and experience (clinical skills set) when assessing the severity of contact lens complications.
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00091.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title><author><name sortKey="Efron, Nathan" sort="Efron, Nathan" uniqKey="Efron N" first="Nathan" last="Efron">Nathan Efron</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Morgan, Philip B" sort="Morgan, Philip B" uniqKey="Morgan P" first="Philip B." last="Morgan">Philip B. Morgan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jagpal, Ritu" sort="Jagpal, Ritu" uniqKey="Jagpal R" first="Ritu" last="Jagpal">Ritu Jagpal</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00091.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000994</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000994</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title><author><name sortKey="Efron, Nathan" sort="Efron, Nathan" uniqKey="Efron N" first="Nathan" last="Efron">Nathan Efron</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Morgan, Philip B" sort="Morgan, Philip B" uniqKey="Morgan P" first="Philip B." last="Morgan">Philip B. Morgan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jagpal, Ritu" sort="Jagpal, Ritu" uniqKey="Jagpal R" first="Ritu" last="Jagpal">Ritu Jagpal</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics</title><idno type="ISSN">0275-5408</idno><idno type="eISSN">1475-1313</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-01">2003-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="79">79</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="85">85</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0275-5408</idno></series><idno type="istex">011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00091.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">OPO091</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0275-5408</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>accuracy</term><term>contact lens complications</term><term>experience</term><term>grading scales</term><term>knowledge</term><term>reliability</term><term>training</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose: A study was conducted to evaluate the influence of knowledge, training and experience (clinical skills set) when assessing the severity of contact lens complications.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Nathan Efron</name><affiliations><json:string>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Philip B. Morgan</name><affiliations><json:string>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ritu Jagpal</name><affiliations><json:string>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>accuracy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>contact lens complications</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>experience</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>grading scales</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>knowledge</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>reliability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>training</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>OPO091</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>3.994</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>175</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>3694</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>23472</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>25</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title><refBibs><json:item><author><json:item><name>I. L. Bailey</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. A. Bullimore</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. W. Raash</name></json:item><json:item><name>H. R. Taylor</name></json:item></author><host><volume>32</volume><pages><last>432</last><first>422</first></pages><author></author><title>Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.</title></host><title>Clinical grading and the effects of scaling</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>J. M. Bland</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. G. Altman</name></json:item></author><host><volume>8476</volume><pages><last>310</last><first>307</first></pages><author></author><title>Lancet</title></host><title>Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>Buchner, A., Faul, F. and Erdfelder, E. (1997) G•Power: A Priori, Post‐Hoc and Compromise Power Analyses for the Macintosh Version 2.1.2 (Computer Program). University of Trier, Trier, Germany.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. A. Bullimore</name></json:item><json:item><name>I. L. Bailey</name></json:item></author><host><volume>70</volume><pages><last>885</last><first>880</first></pages><author></author><title>Optom. Vis. Sci.</title></host><title>Considerations in the subjective assessment of cataract</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>T. Chong</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Simpson</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Fonn</name></json:item></author><host><volume>77</volume><pages><last>251</last><first>244</first></pages><author></author><title>Optom. Vis. Sci.</title></host><title>The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name> </name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>867</last><first>863</first></pages><author></author><title>Contact Lenses</title></host><title>CCLRU grading scales (Appendix D)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>M. Davies</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>379</last><first>378</first></pages><author></author><title>Soft Contact Lenses. Clinical and Applied Technology</title></host><title>Safety evaluation of new soft lens materials</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Efron</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>167</last><first>161</first></pages><author></author><title>Contact Lens Complications.</title></host><title>Grading scales and morphs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Efron</name></json:item></author><host><pages><last>489</last><first>487</first></pages><author></author><title>Contact Lens Practice.</title></host><title>Efron grading scales for contact lens complications (Appendix K)</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Efron</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. B. Morgan</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Contact Lens Complications CD – An Interactive Multimedia Tool</title></host><title>Efron Grading Morphs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Efron</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. B. Morgan</name></json:item></author><host><author></author><title>Contact Lens Complications CD – An Interactive Multimedia Tool</title></host><title>The Efron Grading Tutor</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Efron</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. B. Morgan</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Jagpal</name></json:item></author><host><volume>22</volume><pages><last>349</last><first>341</first></pages><author></author><title>Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.</title></host><title>Validation of computer morphs for grading contact lens complications</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>N. Efron</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. B. Morgan</name></json:item><json:item><name>S. S. Katsara</name></json:item></author><host><volume>21</volume><pages><last>29</last><first>17</first></pages><author></author><title>Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.</title></host><title>Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>P. Fieguth</name></json:item><json:item><name>T. Simpson</name></json:item></author><host><volume>43</volume><pages><last>347</last><first>340</first></pages><author></author><title>Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.</title></host><title>Automated measurement of bulbar redness</title></json:item><json:item><host><author></author><title>ISO, 5725‐1 (1994) Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results – Part 1: General Principles and Definitions. International Organisation for Standardisation, Switzerland.</title></host></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>H. A. Quigley</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Reacher</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Katz</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. Strahlman</name></json:item><json:item><name>D. Gilbert</name></json:item><json:item><name>R. Scott</name></json:item></author><host><volume>100</volume><pages><last>1807</last><first>1800</first></pages><author></author><title>Ophthalmology</title></host><title>Quantitative grading of nerve fiber layer photographs</title></json:item><json:item><author><json:item><name>D. E. Wallace</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. T. McGreal</name></json:item><json:item><name>G. O'Toole</name></json:item><json:item><name>P. Holloway</name></json:item><json:item><name>M. Wallace</name></json:item><json:item><name>E. W. McDermott</name></json:item><json:item><name>J. Blake</name></json:item></author><host><volume>82</volume><pages><last>338</last><first>336</first></pages><author></author><title>Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl.</title></host><title>The influence of experience and specialisation on the reliability of a common clinical sign</title></json:item></refBibs><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>23</volume><publisherId><json:string>OPO</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>7</total><last>85</last><first>79</first></pages><issn><json:string>0275-5408</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1475-1313</json:string></eissn><title>Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1475-1313</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>ophthalmology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>ophthalmology & optometry</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00091.x</json:string></doi><id>011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9</id><score>0.03874571</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Nathan</forename><surname>Efron</surname></persName><affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Philip B.</forename><surname>Morgan</surname></persName><affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Ritu</forename><surname>Jagpal</surname></persName><affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics</title><idno type="pISSN">0275-5408</idno><idno type="eISSN">1475-1313</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-1313</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="79">79</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="85">85</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00091.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">OPO091</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Purpose: A study was conducted to evaluate the influence of knowledge, training and experience (clinical skills set) when assessing the severity of contact lens complications.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Methods: Nine optometrists (who were in possession of a relevant clinical skills set) and nine ‘non‐optometrists’ (subjects without the clinical skills set) were each invited to grade – to the nearest 0.1 increment – an image of each of 16 contact lens complications using Efron Grading Scales for Contact Lens Complications. This procedure was repeated 2 weeks later, yielding a total data base comprising 576 individual grading estimates.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Results: The mean of the test and retest grading estimates was the same for the optometrists (2.8 ± 0.7) and the non‐optometrists (2.6 ± 0.9) (F1,15,1 = 1.3, p = 0.26); that is, non‐optometrists can grade accurately. Median grading reliability for optometrists (±0.41) was lower than (i.e. superior to) that for non‐optometrists (±0.67) (p = 0.001). Non‐optometrists tended to display a reluctance to grade by interpolation and to less reliably grade subtle clinical signs.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Conclusions: When averaged over several attempts, non‐optometrists will arrive at similar estimates of severity to optometrists when grading ocular complications of contact lens wear; however, they will do so less reliably. The relative contribution of the three attributes of the clinical skills set to grading performance is presently unclear.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>accuracy</term></item><item><term>contact lens complications</term></item><item><term>experience</term></item><item><term>grading scales</term></item><item><term>knowledge</term></item><item><term>reliability</term></item><item><term>training</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-01">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-1313</doi><issn type="print">0275-5408</issn><issn type="electronic">1475-1313</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="OPO"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="OPHTHALMIC PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS">Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/opo.2003.23.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-01">January 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0007900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00091.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="OPO091"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-01-14"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-01-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="79">79</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="85">85</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><i>Correspondence and reprint request to</i>: Prof. Nathan Efron.
E‐mail address: <email normalForm="n.efron@umist.ac.uk">n.efron@umist.ac.uk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:OPO.OPO091.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><i>Received</i>: 5 August 2002 <i>Revised form</i>: 31 October 2002 <i>Accepted</i>: 4 November 2002</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="17"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4177"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>N. Efron et al</i></title><title type="short"><i>Grading contact lens complications</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Nathan</givenNames><familyName>Efron</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Philip B.</givenNames><familyName>Morgan</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ritu</givenNames><familyName>Jagpal</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">accuracy</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">contact lens complications</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">experience</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">grading scales</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">knowledge</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">reliability</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">training</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Purpose:</b> A study was conducted to evaluate the influence of knowledge, training and experience (clinical skills set) when assessing the severity of contact lens complications.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Nine optometrists (who were in possession of a relevant clinical skills set) and nine ‘non‐optometrists’ (subjects without the clinical skills set) were each invited to grade – to the nearest 0.1 increment – an image of each of 16 contact lens complications using Efron Grading Scales for Contact Lens Complications. This procedure was repeated 2 weeks later, yielding a total data base comprising 576 individual grading estimates.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The mean of the test and retest grading estimates was the same for the optometrists (2.8 ± 0.7) and the non‐optometrists (2.6 ± 0.9) (<i>F</i><sub>1,15,1</sub> = 1.3, <i>p</i> = 0.26); that is, non‐optometrists can grade accurately. Median grading reliability for optometrists (±0.41) was lower than (i.e. superior to) that for non‐optometrists (±0.67) (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Non‐optometrists tended to display a reluctance to grade by interpolation and to less reliably grade subtle clinical signs.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> When averaged over several attempts, non‐optometrists will arrive at similar estimates of severity to optometrists when grading ocular complications of contact lens wear; however, they will do so less reliably. The relative contribution of the three attributes of the clinical skills set to grading performance is presently unclear.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Grading contact lens complications</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nathan</namePart><namePart type="family">Efron</namePart><affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Philip B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Morgan</namePart><affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ritu</namePart><namePart type="family">Jagpal</namePart><affiliation>Eurolens Research, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, Manchester, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-01</dateIssued><edition>Received: 5 August 2002 Revised form: 31 October 2002 Accepted: 4 November 2002</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="references">17</extent><extent unit="words">4177</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Purpose: A study was conducted to evaluate the influence of knowledge, training and experience (clinical skills set) when assessing the severity of contact lens complications.</abstract><abstract>Methods: Nine optometrists (who were in possession of a relevant clinical skills set) and nine ‘non‐optometrists’ (subjects without the clinical skills set) were each invited to grade – to the nearest 0.1 increment – an image of each of 16 contact lens complications using Efron Grading Scales for Contact Lens Complications. This procedure was repeated 2 weeks later, yielding a total data base comprising 576 individual grading estimates.</abstract><abstract>Results: The mean of the test and retest grading estimates was the same for the optometrists (2.8 ± 0.7) and the non‐optometrists (2.6 ± 0.9) (F1,15,1 = 1.3, p = 0.26); that is, non‐optometrists can grade accurately. Median grading reliability for optometrists (±0.41) was lower than (i.e. superior to) that for non‐optometrists (±0.67) (p = 0.001). Non‐optometrists tended to display a reluctance to grade by interpolation and to less reliably grade subtle clinical signs.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: When averaged over several attempts, non‐optometrists will arrive at similar estimates of severity to optometrists when grading ocular complications of contact lens wear; however, they will do so less reliably. The relative contribution of the three attributes of the clinical skills set to grading performance is presently unclear.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>contact lens complications</topic><topic>experience</topic><topic>grading scales</topic><topic>knowledge</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>training</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0275-5408</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1475-1313</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-1313</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">OPO</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>79</start><end>85</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00091.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">OPO091</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Rhénanie/explor/UnivTrevesV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000994 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000994 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Rhénanie
|area= UnivTrevesV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:011B6D1889FCA53FF1EED8D5BD3534A75969B9C9
|texte= The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |