Comparison of sampling methods for semipelagic animals in two deep basins of Lake Saimaa
Identifieur interne : 001133 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001132; suivant : 001134Comparison of sampling methods for semipelagic animals in two deep basins of Lake Saimaa
Auteurs : P. Bagge [Finlande] ; H-M. Liimatainen [Finlande] ; P. Liljaniemi [Finlande]Source :
- Hydrobiologia [ 0018-8158 ] ; 1996-04-01.
English descriptors
Abstract
Abstract: The efficiency of different methods for sampling semipelagic animals was compared in the deep basins of Lake Paasivesi and Lake Puruvesi of the complex Lake Saimaa, Finland, during 1990–92. Certain semipelagic animals, such as Mysis relicta, amphipods and larvae of Chaoborus fiavicans, are important bioindicators of water and benthic quality. However, owing to their high mobility and vertical migrations they are difficult to sample quantitatively with traditional benthic methods. The equipment used for sampling was comprised of: 1 Vertical nets (0.56 and 0.13 m2) placed on the bottom for 5 minutes or 12 hours and hauled up vertically. 2 Plexiglass traps placed on the bottom for 12–14 hours. 3 Mysis-trawl hauled horizontally c. 250–300 metres on the bottom. 4 Ekman-grab. In 1992, parallel samples were taken with vertically hauled nets (12 h and plexiglass traps baited with fish or liver or provided with a chemical light. Large vertically hauled nets were the most efficient equipment for catching Gammaracanthus lacustris, M. relicta and larvae of Ch. flavicans whilst baited or lighted nets were less effective. Lighted plexiglass traps were most effective in catching Pallasea quadrispinosa and water mites, but baited and control traps sampled inefficiently. The trawl sampled M. relicta and P. quadrispinosa relatively well, but was less efficient in sampling other groups. The Ekman-grab was effective only for sampling Monoporeia affinis. The semipelagic community differed between the studied basins. The dominant semipelagic animals in the humic, deep L. Paasivesi were M. relicta, amphipods and larvae of Ch. flavicans whilst the number of water mites was low in the catches. In the shallower, clear-water L. Puruvesi the densities of crustaceans and Chaoborus-larvae were low whilst some water mites, such as Piona pusilla, occurred in high numbers. Nocturnal sampling was more effective, especially for M. relicta.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF00031842
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000395
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000395
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000C81
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001199
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001133
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of sampling methods for semipelagic animals in two deep basins of Lake Saimaa</title><author><name sortKey="Bagge, P" sort="Bagge, P" uniqKey="Bagge P" first="P." last="Bagge">P. Bagge</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liimatainen, H M" sort="Liimatainen, H M" uniqKey="Liimatainen H" first="H-M." last="Liimatainen">H-M. Liimatainen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liljaniemi, P" sort="Liljaniemi, P" uniqKey="Liljaniemi P" first="P." last="Liljaniemi">P. Liljaniemi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E32A3E28D7134EFB676F7B5D41B3137963407BDF</idno><date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00031842</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E32A3E28D7134EFB676F7B5D41B3137963407BDF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000395</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000395</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000C81</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000C81</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0018-8158:1996:Bagge P:comparison:of:sampling</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001199</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001133</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001133</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Comparison of sampling methods for semipelagic animals in two deep basins of Lake Saimaa</title><author><name sortKey="Bagge, P" sort="Bagge, P" uniqKey="Bagge P" first="P." last="Bagge">P. Bagge</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FIN-40351, Jyväskylä</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Jyväskylä</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Jyväskylä</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Finlande-Centrale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liimatainen, H M" sort="Liimatainen, H M" uniqKey="Liimatainen H" first="H-M." last="Liimatainen">H-M. Liimatainen</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FIN-40351, Jyväskylä</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Jyväskylä</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Jyväskylä</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Finlande-Centrale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Liljaniemi, P" sort="Liljaniemi, P" uniqKey="Liljaniemi P" first="P." last="Liljaniemi">P. Liljaniemi</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Finlande</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FIN-40351, Jyväskylä</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Jyväskylä</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Jyväskylä</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Finlande-Centrale</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Hydrobiologia</title><title level="j" type="sub">The International Journal of Aquatic Sciences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Hydrobiologia</title><idno type="ISSN">0018-8158</idno><idno type="eISSN">1573-5117</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers; http://www.wkap.nl</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1996-04-01">1996-04-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">322</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1-3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="293">293</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="300">300</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0018-8158</idno></series><idno type="istex">E32A3E28D7134EFB676F7B5D41B3137963407BDF</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF00031842</idno><idno type="ArticleID">Art47</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BF00031842</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0018-8158</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Lake Saimaa</term><term>deep basins</term><term>sampling methods</term><term>semipelagic animals</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The efficiency of different methods for sampling semipelagic animals was compared in the deep basins of Lake Paasivesi and Lake Puruvesi of the complex Lake Saimaa, Finland, during 1990–92. Certain semipelagic animals, such as Mysis relicta, amphipods and larvae of Chaoborus fiavicans, are important bioindicators of water and benthic quality. However, owing to their high mobility and vertical migrations they are difficult to sample quantitatively with traditional benthic methods. The equipment used for sampling was comprised of: 1 Vertical nets (0.56 and 0.13 m2) placed on the bottom for 5 minutes or 12 hours and hauled up vertically. 2 Plexiglass traps placed on the bottom for 12–14 hours. 3 Mysis-trawl hauled horizontally c. 250–300 metres on the bottom. 4 Ekman-grab. In 1992, parallel samples were taken with vertically hauled nets (12 h and plexiglass traps baited with fish or liver or provided with a chemical light. Large vertically hauled nets were the most efficient equipment for catching Gammaracanthus lacustris, M. relicta and larvae of Ch. flavicans whilst baited or lighted nets were less effective. Lighted plexiglass traps were most effective in catching Pallasea quadrispinosa and water mites, but baited and control traps sampled inefficiently. The trawl sampled M. relicta and P. quadrispinosa relatively well, but was less efficient in sampling other groups. The Ekman-grab was effective only for sampling Monoporeia affinis. The semipelagic community differed between the studied basins. The dominant semipelagic animals in the humic, deep L. Paasivesi were M. relicta, amphipods and larvae of Ch. flavicans whilst the number of water mites was low in the catches. In the shallower, clear-water L. Puruvesi the densities of crustaceans and Chaoborus-larvae were low whilst some water mites, such as Piona pusilla, occurred in high numbers. Nocturnal sampling was more effective, especially for M. relicta.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Finlande</li></country><region><li>Finlande-Centrale</li></region><settlement><li>Jyväskylä</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Jyväskylä</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Finlande"><region name="Finlande-Centrale"><name sortKey="Bagge, P" sort="Bagge, P" uniqKey="Bagge P" first="P." last="Bagge">P. Bagge</name></region><name sortKey="Liimatainen, H M" sort="Liimatainen, H M" uniqKey="Liimatainen H" first="H-M." last="Liimatainen">H-M. Liimatainen</name><name sortKey="Liljaniemi, P" sort="Liljaniemi, P" uniqKey="Liljaniemi P" first="P." last="Liljaniemi">P. Liljaniemi</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Eau/explor/LotaV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001133 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001133 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Eau
|area= LotaV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E32A3E28D7134EFB676F7B5D41B3137963407BDF
|texte= Comparison of sampling methods for semipelagic animals in two deep basins of Lake Saimaa
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |