Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes
Identifieur interne : 000259 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000258; suivant : 000260Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes
Auteurs : Rick M. Rideout ; George A. Rose ; Margaret P M. BurtonSource :
- Fish and Fisheries [ 1467-2960 ] ; 2005-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
It is often assumed that iteroparous fishes spawn annually once reaching sexual maturity, but this is not always the case. This paper reviews available information on skipped spawning in female teleost fishes. All instances of non‐annual spawning are described as one of three types (retaining, reabsorbing, resting), depending on where in the normal spawning cycle development has been interrupted. Retaining ripe eggs is caused by conditions experienced during the spawning season (fish density, mate availability, pollution), whereas failure to start vitellogenesis (resting) or the breakdown of all oocytes that enter into vitellogenesis (reabsorbing) is caused by factors experienced prior to the spawning season (primarily temperature and poor nutrition). It is speculated that the relative shortage of data on non‐annual spawning may be because of difficulties in identifying non‐reproductive individuals. In an attempt to rectify this situation, the criteria needed to identify females undergoing the three forms of spawning omission are presented in terms of external appearance of gonads, gonad indices, and histological analysis. The energy saved by not spawning in a poor year may lead to increased survival and the probability of spawning in subsequent years. As the cumulative number of progeny gained by surviving to spawn in multiple subsequent years outweighs the number of progeny lost by not spawning in a given single year, occasional omission of spawning may constitute an adaptive trait in long‐lived iteroparous fishes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title><author><name sortKey="Rideout, Rick M" sort="Rideout, Rick M" uniqKey="Rideout R" first="Rick M" last="Rideout">Rick M. Rideout</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rose, George A" sort="Rose, George A" uniqKey="Rose G" first="George A" last="Rose">George A. Rose</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burton, Margaret P M" sort="Burton, Margaret P M" uniqKey="Burton M" first="Margaret P M" last="Burton">Margaret P M. Burton</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000259</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title><author><name sortKey="Rideout, Rick M" sort="Rideout, Rick M" uniqKey="Rideout R" first="Rick M" last="Rideout">Rick M. Rideout</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rose, George A" sort="Rose, George A" uniqKey="Rose G" first="George A" last="Rose">George A. Rose</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burton, Margaret P M" sort="Burton, Margaret P M" uniqKey="Burton M" first="Margaret P M" last="Burton">Margaret P M. Burton</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Fish and Fisheries</title><idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-2979</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-03">2005-03</date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="50">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="72">72</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno></series><idno type="istex">E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAF174</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>non‐reproductive</term><term>recruitment</term><term>reproductive potential</term><term>spawning omission</term><term>spawning potential</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">It is often assumed that iteroparous fishes spawn annually once reaching sexual maturity, but this is not always the case. This paper reviews available information on skipped spawning in female teleost fishes. All instances of non‐annual spawning are described as one of three types (retaining, reabsorbing, resting), depending on where in the normal spawning cycle development has been interrupted. Retaining ripe eggs is caused by conditions experienced during the spawning season (fish density, mate availability, pollution), whereas failure to start vitellogenesis (resting) or the breakdown of all oocytes that enter into vitellogenesis (reabsorbing) is caused by factors experienced prior to the spawning season (primarily temperature and poor nutrition). It is speculated that the relative shortage of data on non‐annual spawning may be because of difficulties in identifying non‐reproductive individuals. In an attempt to rectify this situation, the criteria needed to identify females undergoing the three forms of spawning omission are presented in terms of external appearance of gonads, gonad indices, and histological analysis. The energy saved by not spawning in a poor year may lead to increased survival and the probability of spawning in subsequent years. As the cumulative number of progeny gained by surviving to spawn in multiple subsequent years outweighs the number of progeny lost by not spawning in a given single year, occasional omission of spawning may constitute an adaptive trait in long‐lived iteroparous fishes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Rick M Rideout</name><affiliations><json:string>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>George A Rose</name><affiliations><json:string>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Margaret P M Burton</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>non‐reproductive</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>recruitment</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>reproductive potential</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>spawning omission</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>spawning potential</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>It is often assumed that iteroparous fishes spawn annually once reaching sexual maturity, but this is not always the case. This paper reviews available information on skipped spawning in female teleost fishes. All instances of non‐annual spawning are described as one of three types (retaining, reabsorbing, resting), depending on where in the normal spawning cycle development has been interrupted. Retaining ripe eggs is caused by conditions experienced during the spawning season (fish density, mate availability, pollution), whereas failure to start vitellogenesis (resting) or the breakdown of all oocytes that enter into vitellogenesis (reabsorbing) is caused by factors experienced prior to the spawning season (primarily temperature and poor nutrition). It is speculated that the relative shortage of data on non‐annual spawning may be because of difficulties in identifying non‐reproductive individuals. In an attempt to rectify this situation, the criteria needed to identify females undergoing the three forms of spawning omission are presented in terms of external appearance of gonads, gonad indices, and histological analysis. The energy saved by not spawning in a poor year may lead to increased survival and the probability of spawning in subsequent years. As the cumulative number of progeny gained by surviving to spawn in multiple subsequent years outweighs the number of progeny lost by not spawning in a given single year, occasional omission of spawning may constitute an adaptive trait in long‐lived iteroparous fishes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.236</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1542</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>11077</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>70152</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>23</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>228</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>6</volume><pages><total>23</total><last>72</last><first>50</first></pages><issn><json:string>1467-2960</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-2979</json:string></eissn><title>Fish and Fisheries</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2005</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2005</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x</json:string></doi><id>E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2005</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Rick M</forename><surname>Rideout</surname></persName><affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">George A</forename><surname>Rose</surname></persName><affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Margaret P M</forename><surname>Burton</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Fish and Fisheries</title><idno type="pISSN">1467-2960</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-2979</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2005-03"></date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="50">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="72">72</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAF174</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2005</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>It is often assumed that iteroparous fishes spawn annually once reaching sexual maturity, but this is not always the case. This paper reviews available information on skipped spawning in female teleost fishes. All instances of non‐annual spawning are described as one of three types (retaining, reabsorbing, resting), depending on where in the normal spawning cycle development has been interrupted. Retaining ripe eggs is caused by conditions experienced during the spawning season (fish density, mate availability, pollution), whereas failure to start vitellogenesis (resting) or the breakdown of all oocytes that enter into vitellogenesis (reabsorbing) is caused by factors experienced prior to the spawning season (primarily temperature and poor nutrition). It is speculated that the relative shortage of data on non‐annual spawning may be because of difficulties in identifying non‐reproductive individuals. In an attempt to rectify this situation, the criteria needed to identify females undergoing the three forms of spawning omission are presented in terms of external appearance of gonads, gonad indices, and histological analysis. The energy saved by not spawning in a poor year may lead to increased survival and the probability of spawning in subsequent years. As the cumulative number of progeny gained by surviving to spawn in multiple subsequent years outweighs the number of progeny lost by not spawning in a given single year, occasional omission of spawning may constitute an adaptive trait in long‐lived iteroparous fishes.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>non‐reproductive</term></item><item><term>recruitment</term></item><item><term>reproductive potential</term></item><item><term>spawning omission</term></item><item><term>spawning potential</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2005-03">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</doi><issn type="print">1467-2960</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-2979</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="FAF"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="FISH FISHERIES">Fish and Fisheries</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/faf.2005.6.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="6">6</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2005-03">March 2005</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="FAF174"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="23"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">REVIEWS</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-04-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-04-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="50">50</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="72">72</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Rick M Rideout, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, PO Box 5667, St John's, Newfoundland A1C 5X1, Canada
Tel.: +1 709 772 6975
Fax: +1 709 772 4105
E‐mail: <email normalForm="rideoutr@dfo-mpo.gc.ca">rideoutr@dfo‐mpo.gc.ca</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:FAF.FAF174.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 5 Oct 2004 Accepted 9 Mar 2005</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>R M Rideout</i> et al.</title><title type="short">Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Rick M</givenNames><familyName>Rideout</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>George A</givenNames><familyName>Rose</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Margaret P M</givenNames><familyName>Burton</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">non‐reproductive</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">recruitment</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">reproductive potential</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">spawning omission</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">spawning potential</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>It is often assumed that iteroparous fishes spawn annually once reaching sexual maturity, but this is not always the case. This paper reviews available information on skipped spawning in female teleost fishes. All instances of non‐annual spawning are described as one of three types (<i>retaining</i>, <i>reabsorbing</i>, <i>resting</i>), depending on where in the normal spawning cycle development has been interrupted. <i>Retaining</i> ripe eggs is caused by conditions experienced during the spawning season (fish density, mate availability, pollution), whereas failure to start vitellogenesis (<i>resting</i>) or the breakdown of all oocytes that enter into vitellogenesis (<i>reabsorbing</i>) is caused by factors experienced prior to the spawning season (primarily temperature and poor nutrition). It is speculated that the relative shortage of data on non‐annual spawning may be because of difficulties in identifying non‐reproductive individuals. In an attempt to rectify this situation, the criteria needed to identify females undergoing the three forms of spawning omission are presented in terms of external appearance of gonads, gonad indices, and histological analysis. The energy saved by not spawning in a poor year may lead to increased survival and the probability of spawning in subsequent years. As the cumulative number of progeny gained by surviving to spawn in multiple subsequent years outweighs the number of progeny lost by not spawning in a given single year, occasional omission of spawning may constitute an adaptive trait in long‐lived iteroparous fishes.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rick M</namePart><namePart type="family">Rideout</namePart><affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">George A</namePart><namePart type="family">Rose</namePart><affiliation>Fisheries Conservation Group, Fisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Margaret P M</namePart><namePart type="family">Burton</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article">reviewArticle</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-03</dateIssued><edition>Received 5 Oct 2004 Accepted 9 Mar 2005</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2005</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">It is often assumed that iteroparous fishes spawn annually once reaching sexual maturity, but this is not always the case. This paper reviews available information on skipped spawning in female teleost fishes. All instances of non‐annual spawning are described as one of three types (retaining, reabsorbing, resting), depending on where in the normal spawning cycle development has been interrupted. Retaining ripe eggs is caused by conditions experienced during the spawning season (fish density, mate availability, pollution), whereas failure to start vitellogenesis (resting) or the breakdown of all oocytes that enter into vitellogenesis (reabsorbing) is caused by factors experienced prior to the spawning season (primarily temperature and poor nutrition). It is speculated that the relative shortage of data on non‐annual spawning may be because of difficulties in identifying non‐reproductive individuals. In an attempt to rectify this situation, the criteria needed to identify females undergoing the three forms of spawning omission are presented in terms of external appearance of gonads, gonad indices, and histological analysis. The energy saved by not spawning in a poor year may lead to increased survival and the probability of spawning in subsequent years. As the cumulative number of progeny gained by surviving to spawn in multiple subsequent years outweighs the number of progeny lost by not spawning in a given single year, occasional omission of spawning may constitute an adaptive trait in long‐lived iteroparous fishes.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>non‐reproductive</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>reproductive potential</topic><topic>spawning omission</topic><topic>spawning potential</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Fish and Fisheries</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">1467-2960</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-2979</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-2979</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">FAF</identifier><part><date>2005</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>6</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>50</start><end>72</end><total>23</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">FAF174</identifier><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Eau/explor/LotaV3/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000259 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000259 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Eau
|area= LotaV3
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E458B6BF1575CAB30E605CE634F811A330ECDC8A
|texte= Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |