Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part III. Effluent toxicity tests.
Identifieur interne : 000543 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000542; suivant : 000544Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part III. Effluent toxicity tests.
Auteurs : F J Dwyer [États-Unis] ; D K Hardesty ; C E Henke ; C G Ingersoll ; D W Whites ; T. Augspurger ; T J Canfield ; D R Mount ; F L MayerSource :
- Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology [ 0090-4341 ] ; 2005.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , toxicity : Water Pollutants.
- chemical : Industrial Waste.
- embryology : Embryo, Nonmammalian.
- growth & development : Larva.
- methods : Toxicity Tests.
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fishes, Reproduction, Risk Assessment, Survival, Waste Disposal, Fluid.
Abstract
Toxicity tests using standard effluent test procedures described by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency were conducted with Ceriodaphnia dubia, fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), and seven threatened and endangered (listed) fish species from four families: (1) Acipenseridae: shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum); (2) Catostomidae; razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus); (3) Cyprinidae: bonytail chub (Gila elegans), Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), and spotfin chub (Cyprinella monacha); and (4) Poecillidae: Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis). We conducted 7-day survival and growth studies with embryo-larval fathead minnows and analogous exposures using the listed species. Survival and reproduction were also determined with C. dubia. Tests were conducted with carbaryl, ammonia--or a simulated effluent complex mixture of carbaryl, copper, 4-nonylphenol, pentachlorophenol and permethrin at equitoxic proportions. In addition, Cape Fear shiners and spotfin chub were tested using diazinon, copper, and chlorine. Toxicity tests were also conducted with field-collected effluents from domestic or industrial facilities. Bonytail chub and razorback suckers were tested with effluents collected in Arizona whereas effluent samples collected from North Carolina were tested with Cape Fear shiner, spotfin chub, and shortnose sturgeon. The fathead minnow 7-day effluent test was often a reliable estimator of toxic effects to the listed fishes. However, in 21 % of the tests, a listed species was more sensitive than fathead minnows. More sensitive species results varied by test so that usually no species was always more or less sensitive than fathead minnows. Only the Gila topminnow was consistently less sensitive than the fathead minnow. Listed fish species were protected 96% of the time when results for both fathead minnows and C. dubia were considered, thus reinforcing the value of standard whole-effluent toxicity tests using those two species. If the responses of specific listed species are important for management decisions, our study supports the value in developing culture and testing procedures for those species.
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-004-0104-2
PubMed: 15750777
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000543
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:15750777Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part III. Effluent toxicity tests.</title><author><name sortKey="Dwyer, F J" sort="Dwyer, F J" uniqKey="Dwyer F" first="F J" last="Dwyer">F J Dwyer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia, Missouri 65203, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia, Missouri 65203</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hardesty, D K" sort="Hardesty, D K" uniqKey="Hardesty D" first="D K" last="Hardesty">D K Hardesty</name></author><author><name sortKey="Henke, C E" sort="Henke, C E" uniqKey="Henke C" first="C E" last="Henke">C E Henke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ingersoll, C G" sort="Ingersoll, C G" uniqKey="Ingersoll C" first="C G" last="Ingersoll">C G Ingersoll</name></author><author><name sortKey="Whites, D W" sort="Whites, D W" uniqKey="Whites D" first="D W" last="Whites">D W Whites</name></author><author><name sortKey="Augspurger, T" sort="Augspurger, T" uniqKey="Augspurger T" first="T" last="Augspurger">T. Augspurger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Canfield, T J" sort="Canfield, T J" uniqKey="Canfield T" first="T J" last="Canfield">T J Canfield</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mount, D R" sort="Mount, D R" uniqKey="Mount D" first="D R" last="Mount">D R Mount</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mayer, F L" sort="Mayer, F L" uniqKey="Mayer F" first="F L" last="Mayer">F L Mayer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15750777</idno><idno type="pmid">15750777</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00244-004-0104-2</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000543</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000543</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000543</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000543</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part III. Effluent toxicity tests.</title><author><name sortKey="Dwyer, F J" sort="Dwyer, F J" uniqKey="Dwyer F" first="F J" last="Dwyer">F J Dwyer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia, Missouri 65203, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia, Missouri 65203</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hardesty, D K" sort="Hardesty, D K" uniqKey="Hardesty D" first="D K" last="Hardesty">D K Hardesty</name></author><author><name sortKey="Henke, C E" sort="Henke, C E" uniqKey="Henke C" first="C E" last="Henke">C E Henke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ingersoll, C G" sort="Ingersoll, C G" uniqKey="Ingersoll C" first="C G" last="Ingersoll">C G Ingersoll</name></author><author><name sortKey="Whites, D W" sort="Whites, D W" uniqKey="Whites D" first="D W" last="Whites">D W Whites</name></author><author><name sortKey="Augspurger, T" sort="Augspurger, T" uniqKey="Augspurger T" first="T" last="Augspurger">T. Augspurger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Canfield, T J" sort="Canfield, T J" uniqKey="Canfield T" first="T J" last="Canfield">T J Canfield</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mount, D R" sort="Mount, D R" uniqKey="Mount D" first="D R" last="Mount">D R Mount</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mayer, F L" sort="Mayer, F L" uniqKey="Mayer F" first="F L" last="Mayer">F L Mayer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><idno type="ISSN">0090-4341</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term><term>Embryo, Nonmammalian (embryology)</term><term>Fishes</term><term>Industrial Waste</term><term>Larva (growth & development)</term><term>Reproduction</term><term>Risk Assessment</term><term>Survival</term><term>Toxicity Tests (methods)</term><term>Waste Disposal, Fluid</term><term>Water Pollutants (toxicity)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="toxicity" xml:lang="en"><term>Water Pollutants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Industrial Waste</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="embryology" xml:lang="en"><term>Embryo, Nonmammalian</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Larva</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Toxicity Tests</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term><term>Fishes</term><term>Reproduction</term><term>Risk Assessment</term><term>Survival</term><term>Waste Disposal, Fluid</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Toxicity tests using standard effluent test procedures described by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency were conducted with Ceriodaphnia dubia, fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), and seven threatened and endangered (listed) fish species from four families: (1) Acipenseridae: shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum); (2) Catostomidae; razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus); (3) Cyprinidae: bonytail chub (Gila elegans), Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), and spotfin chub (Cyprinella monacha); and (4) Poecillidae: Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis). We conducted 7-day survival and growth studies with embryo-larval fathead minnows and analogous exposures using the listed species. Survival and reproduction were also determined with C. dubia. Tests were conducted with carbaryl, ammonia--or a simulated effluent complex mixture of carbaryl, copper, 4-nonylphenol, pentachlorophenol and permethrin at equitoxic proportions. In addition, Cape Fear shiners and spotfin chub were tested using diazinon, copper, and chlorine. Toxicity tests were also conducted with field-collected effluents from domestic or industrial facilities. Bonytail chub and razorback suckers were tested with effluents collected in Arizona whereas effluent samples collected from North Carolina were tested with Cape Fear shiner, spotfin chub, and shortnose sturgeon. The fathead minnow 7-day effluent test was often a reliable estimator of toxic effects to the listed fishes. However, in 21 % of the tests, a listed species was more sensitive than fathead minnows. More sensitive species results varied by test so that usually no species was always more or less sensitive than fathead minnows. Only the Gila topminnow was consistently less sensitive than the fathead minnow. Listed fish species were protected 96% of the time when results for both fathead minnows and C. dubia were considered, thus reinforcing the value of standard whole-effluent toxicity tests using those two species. If the responses of specific listed species are important for management decisions, our study supports the value in developing culture and testing procedures for those species.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">15750777</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2005</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2005</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0090-4341</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>48</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part III. Effluent toxicity tests.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>174-83</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Toxicity tests using standard effluent test procedures described by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency were conducted with Ceriodaphnia dubia, fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), and seven threatened and endangered (listed) fish species from four families: (1) Acipenseridae: shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum); (2) Catostomidae; razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus); (3) Cyprinidae: bonytail chub (Gila elegans), Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), and spotfin chub (Cyprinella monacha); and (4) Poecillidae: Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis). We conducted 7-day survival and growth studies with embryo-larval fathead minnows and analogous exposures using the listed species. Survival and reproduction were also determined with C. dubia. Tests were conducted with carbaryl, ammonia--or a simulated effluent complex mixture of carbaryl, copper, 4-nonylphenol, pentachlorophenol and permethrin at equitoxic proportions. In addition, Cape Fear shiners and spotfin chub were tested using diazinon, copper, and chlorine. Toxicity tests were also conducted with field-collected effluents from domestic or industrial facilities. Bonytail chub and razorback suckers were tested with effluents collected in Arizona whereas effluent samples collected from North Carolina were tested with Cape Fear shiner, spotfin chub, and shortnose sturgeon. The fathead minnow 7-day effluent test was often a reliable estimator of toxic effects to the listed fishes. However, in 21 % of the tests, a listed species was more sensitive than fathead minnows. More sensitive species results varied by test so that usually no species was always more or less sensitive than fathead minnows. Only the Gila topminnow was consistently less sensitive than the fathead minnow. Listed fish species were protected 96% of the time when results for both fathead minnows and C. dubia were considered, thus reinforcing the value of standard whole-effluent toxicity tests using those two species. If the responses of specific listed species are important for management decisions, our study supports the value in developing culture and testing procedures for those species.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dwyer</LastName><ForeName>F J</ForeName><Initials>FJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia, Missouri 65203, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hardesty</LastName><ForeName>D K</ForeName><Initials>DK</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Henke</LastName><ForeName>C E</ForeName><Initials>CE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ingersoll</LastName><ForeName>C G</ForeName><Initials>CG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Whites</LastName><ForeName>D W</ForeName><Initials>DW</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Augspurger</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Canfield</LastName><ForeName>T J</ForeName><Initials>TJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mount</LastName><ForeName>D R</ForeName><Initials>DR</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mayer</LastName><ForeName>F L</ForeName><Initials>FL</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2005</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>15</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0357245</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0090-4341</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007220">Industrial Waste</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014873">Water Pollutants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="Y">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004625" MajorTopicYN="N">Embryo, Nonmammalian</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000196" MajorTopicYN="N">embryology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005399" MajorTopicYN="Y">Fishes</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007220" MajorTopicYN="N">Industrial Waste</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007814" MajorTopicYN="N">Larva</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012098" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproduction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018570" MajorTopicYN="N">Risk Assessment</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013534" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018675" MajorTopicYN="N">Toxicity Tests</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014865" MajorTopicYN="N">Waste Disposal, Fluid</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014873" MajorTopicYN="N">Water Pollutants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000633" MajorTopicYN="Y">toxicity</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2004</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2004</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>21</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15750777</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00244-004-0104-2</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000543 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000543 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15750777
|texte= Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part III. Effluent toxicity tests.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15750777" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EsturgeonV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |