Evaluation of lethal and non-lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson).
Identifieur interne : 000468 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000467; suivant : 000469Evaluation of lethal and non-lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson).
Auteurs : J D Drennan [États-Unis] ; S E Lapatra ; C A Samson ; S. Ireland ; K F Eversman ; K D CainSource :
- Journal of fish diseases [ 0140-7775 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Animals, DNA Virus Infections (mortality), DNA Virus Infections (pathology), DNA Virus Infections (veterinary), DNA Virus Infections (virology), Fish Diseases (mortality), Fish Diseases (pathology), Fish Diseases (virology), Fisheries (methods), Fishes, Iridovirus (isolation & purification), Iridovirus (pathogenicity), Prevalence, Time Factors.
- MESH :
- isolation & purification : Iridovirus.
- methods : Fisheries.
- mortality : DNA Virus Infections, Fish Diseases.
- pathogenicity : Iridovirus.
- pathology : DNA Virus Infections, Fish Diseases.
- veterinary : DNA Virus Infections.
- virology : DNA Virus Infections, Fish Diseases.
- Animals, Fishes, Prevalence, Time Factors.
Abstract
Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non-lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non-lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non-lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post-exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non-lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non-lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non-lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x
PubMed: 17498180
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17498180Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of lethal and non-lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson).</title><author><name sortKey="Drennan, J D" sort="Drennan, J D" uniqKey="Drennan J" first="J D" last="Drennan">J D Drennan</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Idaho</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lapatra, S E" sort="Lapatra, S E" uniqKey="Lapatra S" first="S E" last="Lapatra">S E Lapatra</name></author><author><name sortKey="Samson, C A" sort="Samson, C A" uniqKey="Samson C" first="C A" last="Samson">C A Samson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ireland, S" sort="Ireland, S" uniqKey="Ireland S" first="S" last="Ireland">S. Ireland</name></author><author><name sortKey="Eversman, K F" sort="Eversman, K F" uniqKey="Eversman K" first="K F" last="Eversman">K F Eversman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cain, K D" sort="Cain, K D" uniqKey="Cain K" first="K D" last="Cain">K D Cain</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17498180</idno><idno type="pmid">17498180</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000492</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000492</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000492</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000492</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000492</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000492</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of lethal and non-lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson).</title><author><name sortKey="Drennan, J D" sort="Drennan, J D" uniqKey="Drennan J" first="J D" last="Drennan">J D Drennan</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Idaho</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lapatra, S E" sort="Lapatra, S E" uniqKey="Lapatra S" first="S E" last="Lapatra">S E Lapatra</name></author><author><name sortKey="Samson, C A" sort="Samson, C A" uniqKey="Samson C" first="C A" last="Samson">C A Samson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ireland, S" sort="Ireland, S" uniqKey="Ireland S" first="S" last="Ireland">S. Ireland</name></author><author><name sortKey="Eversman, K F" sort="Eversman, K F" uniqKey="Eversman K" first="K F" last="Eversman">K F Eversman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cain, K D" sort="Cain, K D" uniqKey="Cain K" first="K D" last="Cain">K D Cain</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of fish diseases</title><idno type="ISSN">0140-7775</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>DNA Virus Infections (mortality)</term><term>DNA Virus Infections (pathology)</term><term>DNA Virus Infections (veterinary)</term><term>DNA Virus Infections (virology)</term><term>Fish Diseases (mortality)</term><term>Fish Diseases (pathology)</term><term>Fish Diseases (virology)</term><term>Fisheries (methods)</term><term>Fishes</term><term>Iridovirus (isolation & purification)</term><term>Iridovirus (pathogenicity)</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>Iridovirus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Fisheries</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="mortality" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA Virus Infections</term><term>Fish Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathogenicity" xml:lang="en"><term>Iridovirus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA Virus Infections</term><term>Fish Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="veterinary" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA Virus Infections</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="virology" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA Virus Infections</term><term>Fish Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Fishes</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non-lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non-lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non-lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post-exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non-lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non-lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non-lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17498180</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>21</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2007</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>14</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0140-7775</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>30</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of fish diseases</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Fish Dis.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evaluation of lethal and non-lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson).</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>367-79</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Pectoral fin tissue of white sturgeon was investigated as a potential non-lethal sample source for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus (WSIV) infection. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results using fin tissue were compared with the standard lethal histopathology sampling method that utilizes head tissue. Tissues for each of the three sampling methods were collected weekly for 8 weeks from individual sturgeon undergoing an experimental cohabitation challenge with fish infected with the Abernathy isolate of WSIV. Non-lethal fin histopathological evaluation did not reveal infection during the first 3 weeks of sampling, while non-lethal PCR and the lethal method were variable. However, all three sampling methods were equally capable of identifying infection from 4 to 8 weeks post-exposure. Of the survivors tested, all were negative by PCR and the lethal method, and only one fish was identified as being positive by non-lethal fin histopathology. In another experiment, all three sampling methods were applied to asymptomatic WSIV carriers in a case study conducted at the Kootenai Tribal Sturgeon Conservation Hatchery. Results showed that both lethal and non-lethal fin histopathology were equally effective in detecting infection, but PCR was unable to identify this strain of WSIV. Depending on the virus isolate, these results suggest that non-lethal sampling of fin tissue (histopathology or PCR) is comparable with the lethal sampling method at identifying WSIV infection once infection is established, and under certain circumstances may provide an alternative to lethal sampling.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Drennan</LastName><ForeName>J D</ForeName><Initials>JD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Aquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lapatra</LastName><ForeName>S E</ForeName><Initials>SE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Samson</LastName><ForeName>C A</ForeName><Initials>CA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ireland</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Eversman</LastName><ForeName>K F</ForeName><Initials>KF</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cain</LastName><ForeName>K D</ForeName><Initials>KD</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D023362">Evaluation Studies</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Fish Dis</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9881188</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0140-7775</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004266" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA Virus Infections</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000401" MajorTopicYN="N">mortality</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000662" MajorTopicYN="Y">veterinary</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000821" MajorTopicYN="N">virology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005393" MajorTopicYN="N">Fish Diseases</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000401" MajorTopicYN="N">mortality</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000821" MajorTopicYN="Y">virology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005398" MajorTopicYN="N">Fisheries</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005399" MajorTopicYN="N">Fishes</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017994" MajorTopicYN="N">Iridovirus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000472" MajorTopicYN="N">pathogenicity</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015995" MajorTopicYN="N">Prevalence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17498180</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">JFD817</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00817.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Idaho</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Cain, K D" sort="Cain, K D" uniqKey="Cain K" first="K D" last="Cain">K D Cain</name><name sortKey="Eversman, K F" sort="Eversman, K F" uniqKey="Eversman K" first="K F" last="Eversman">K F Eversman</name><name sortKey="Ireland, S" sort="Ireland, S" uniqKey="Ireland S" first="S" last="Ireland">S. Ireland</name><name sortKey="Lapatra, S E" sort="Lapatra, S E" uniqKey="Lapatra S" first="S E" last="Lapatra">S E Lapatra</name><name sortKey="Samson, C A" sort="Samson, C A" uniqKey="Samson C" first="C A" last="Samson">C A Samson</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Idaho"><name sortKey="Drennan, J D" sort="Drennan, J D" uniqKey="Drennan J" first="J D" last="Drennan">J D Drennan</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000468 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000468 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17498180
|texte= Evaluation of lethal and non-lethal sampling methods for the detection of white sturgeon iridovirus infection in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus (Richardson).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17498180" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EsturgeonV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |