Serveur d'exploration sur l'esturgeon

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Costs and benefits of a cleaning mutualism

Identifieur interne : 001289 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 001288; suivant : 001290

Costs and benefits of a cleaning mutualism

Auteurs : K. L. Cheney [Royaume-Uni] ; I. M. Côté [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:8A7B7CB5D342A47F4500C34319D0D1F247BE1355

Abstract

Mutualisms can be thought of as ‘biological markets’ in which species trade resources, which can be manipulated by one or both participants. However, temporal and geographical variation in the outcome of mutualisms generates dynamic mosaics of co‐evolved interactions, therefore, outcomes of mutualistic interactions may be difficult to interpret with a ‘snapshot’ quantification of costs and benefits. Cleaning interactions are often used as classic examples of mutualism but assessing benefits to clients has been difficult. In this study we examined the outcome of the interaction between Caribbean cleaning gobies (Elacatinus evelynae) and longfin damselfish (Stegastes diencaeus), by comparing interactions at a number of locations. Previously we have shown that longfin damselfish benefit from cleaning interactions by a significant but small reduction in ectoparasite loads and we suggested that the costs of travelling and seeking cleaners by territorial damselfish may limit the net benefit of cleaning to the client (Cheney & Côté, 2001). Here, we investigate how the relationship alters between geographical locations and in one site, over 3 consecutive years, under varying environmental conditions to elucidate key components affecting cleaning symbioses.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216f.x

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:8A7B7CB5D342A47F4500C34319D0D1F247BE1355

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Costs and benefits of a cleaning mutualism</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cheney, K L" sort="Cheney, K L" uniqKey="Cheney K" first="K. L." last="Cheney">K. L. Cheney</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cote, I M" sort="Cote, I M" uniqKey="Cote I" first="I. M." last="Côté">I. M. Côté</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8A7B7CB5D342A47F4500C34319D0D1F247BE1355</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216f.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8A7B7CB5D342A47F4500C34319D0D1F247BE1355/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001086</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001086</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001084</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A64</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A64</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-1112:2003:Cheney K:costs:and:benefits</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001289</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Costs and benefits of a cleaning mutualism</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cheney, K L" sort="Cheney, K L" uniqKey="Cheney K" first="K. L." last="Cheney">K. L. Cheney</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>(*Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Norwich NR4 7TJ</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cote, I M" sort="Cote, I M" uniqKey="Cote I" first="I. M." last="Côté">I. M. Côté</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>(*Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Norwich NR4 7TJ</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="228">228</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="228">228</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">8A7B7CB5D342A47F4500C34319D0D1F247BE1355</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216f.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">JFB216F</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Mutualisms can be thought of as ‘biological markets’ in which species trade resources, which can be manipulated by one or both participants. However, temporal and geographical variation in the outcome of mutualisms generates dynamic mosaics of co‐evolved interactions, therefore, outcomes of mutualistic interactions may be difficult to interpret with a ‘snapshot’ quantification of costs and benefits. Cleaning interactions are often used as classic examples of mutualism but assessing benefits to clients has been difficult. In this study we examined the outcome of the interaction between Caribbean cleaning gobies (Elacatinus evelynae) and longfin damselfish (Stegastes diencaeus), by comparing interactions at a number of locations. Previously we have shown that longfin damselfish benefit from cleaning interactions by a significant but small reduction in ectoparasite loads and we suggested that the costs of travelling and seeking cleaners by territorial damselfish may limit the net benefit of cleaning to the client (Cheney & Côté, 2001). Here, we investigate how the relationship alters between geographical locations and in one site, over 3 consecutive years, under varying environmental conditions to elucidate key components affecting cleaning symbioses.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001289 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001289 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Eau
   |area=    EsturgeonV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:8A7B7CB5D342A47F4500C34319D0D1F247BE1355
   |texte=   Costs and benefits of a cleaning mutualism
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Sat Mar 25 15:37:54 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 14:18:49 2024