The effects of habitat‐ and diet‐based cues on association preferences in the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Identifieur interne : 001220 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 001219; suivant : 001221The effects of habitat‐ and diet‐based cues on association preferences in the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Auteurs : A. J. W. Ward [Royaume-Uni] ; J. Krause [Royaume-Uni] ; P. J. B. Hart [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Journal of Fish Biology [ 0022-1112 ] ; 2003-12.
Abstract
A number of recent papers have investigated the potential of familiarity to organize the distributions of free‐ranging animals. It is not clear, however, to which extent individual recognition or a more general recognition of a group odour is responsible for familiarity preferences. First, we tested the sensory basis of the recognition of familiars in three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). When allowed to choose between a familiar and an unfamiliar stimulus shoal on the basis of both visual and chemical communication, visual communication only and chemical communication only, the preference of focal fish for familiars was shown to be dependent on the presence of chemical cues. We subsequently investigated the mechanisms underlying such association preferences, specifically the effects of recent habitat and diet on preferences. Experimental fish were divided into four treatment groups consisting of two environment treatments (saline and freshwater) and two diet treatments (Daphnia spp. and chironimid larvae). Focal fish subsequently showed significant association preferences for groups of unfamiliar fish that had undergone the same environment or diet treatment as themselves, suggesting self‐referent matching. These data indicate that individual recognition is not a pre‐requisite for the expression of familiarity preferences.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216ao.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001148
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001146
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000995
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9BBE4A469AEA1B96B0C04A4B62D8B78B9BDFA068Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effects of habitat‐ and diet‐based cues on association preferences in the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title><author><name sortKey="Ward, A J W" sort="Ward, A J W" uniqKey="Ward A" first="A. J. W." last="Ward">A. J. W. Ward</name></author><author><name sortKey="Krause, J" sort="Krause, J" uniqKey="Krause J" first="J." last="Krause">J. Krause</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hart, P J B" sort="Hart, P J B" uniqKey="Hart P" first="P. J. B." last="Hart">P. J. B. Hart</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9BBE4A469AEA1B96B0C04A4B62D8B78B9BDFA068</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216ao.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9BBE4A469AEA1B96B0C04A4B62D8B78B9BDFA068/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001148</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001148</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001146</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000995</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000995</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-1112:2003:Ward A:the:effects:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001220</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The effects of habitat‐ and diet‐based cues on association preferences in the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title><author><name sortKey="Ward, A J W" sort="Ward, A J W" uniqKey="Ward A" first="A. J. W." last="Ward">A. J. W. Ward</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>(1Department of Biology, University of Leicester</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of Leicester</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Krause, J" sort="Krause, J" uniqKey="Krause J" first="J." last="Krause">J. Krause</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>2School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Leeds</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Leeds</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Yorkshire-et-Humber</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hart, P J B" sort="Hart, P J B" uniqKey="Hart P" first="P. J. B." last="Hart">P. J. B. Hart</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>(1Department of Biology, University of Leicester</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of Leicester</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="244">244</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="244">244</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></series><idno type="istex">9BBE4A469AEA1B96B0C04A4B62D8B78B9BDFA068</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216ao.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB216AO</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A number of recent papers have investigated the potential of familiarity to organize the distributions of free‐ranging animals. It is not clear, however, to which extent individual recognition or a more general recognition of a group odour is responsible for familiarity preferences. First, we tested the sensory basis of the recognition of familiars in three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). When allowed to choose between a familiar and an unfamiliar stimulus shoal on the basis of both visual and chemical communication, visual communication only and chemical communication only, the preference of focal fish for familiars was shown to be dependent on the presence of chemical cues. We subsequently investigated the mechanisms underlying such association preferences, specifically the effects of recent habitat and diet on preferences. Experimental fish were divided into four treatment groups consisting of two environment treatments (saline and freshwater) and two diet treatments (Daphnia spp. and chironimid larvae). Focal fish subsequently showed significant association preferences for groups of unfamiliar fish that had undergone the same environment or diet treatment as themselves, suggesting self‐referent matching. These data indicate that individual recognition is not a pre‐requisite for the expression of familiarity preferences.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001220 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001220 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9BBE4A469AEA1B96B0C04A4B62D8B78B9BDFA068
|texte= The effects of habitat‐ and diet‐based cues on association preferences in the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |