Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions
Identifieur interne : 000861 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 000860; suivant : 000862Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions
Auteurs : David W. Roscoe ; Scott G. HinchSource :
- Fish and Fisheries [ 1467-2960 ] ; 2010-03.
English descriptors
Abstract
Fishways and other passage facilities frequently prevent or delay the passage of fishes, highlighting the need for effectiveness monitoring. We reviewed the scientific literature from 1960 to 2008 reporting on effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities to assess what taxa and life‐stages have been studied, the questions that are asked during evaluation, and how these varied over time or by geographic region. We identified 96 peer‐reviewed articles of which 68% focused on passage by adult fishes. Salmoniformes was the most studied order (58% of studies). The focus of fishway evaluations did not change over the years, but varied significantly by geographic region. Studies from the tropics had a broader taxonomic scope than studies from temperate locations. Exogenous mechanisms of passage failure, such as environmental, structural and behavioural factors, were studied in 90% of studies from North America but only ∼50% of studies from Europe, South America and Australia. Endogenous (i.e. physiological) mechanisms affecting passage success were not often assessed anywhere, though they were a powerful means of evaluating mechanisms of failure. Few studies monitored migration after fish had left a facility. To improve effectiveness monitoring of passage facilities, we suggest that both endogenous and exogenous mechanisms need to be studied in an integrated fashion to understand passage failure and to inform design or operational changes that could improve passage efficiency. In addition post‐departure monitoring is required to more completely assess the fitness consequences of passage.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2009.00333.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001163
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001161
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000372
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A1C59B5C8FA627C83DD6500EF382A626FAD09938Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions</title>
<author><name sortKey="Roscoe, David W" sort="Roscoe, David W" uniqKey="Roscoe D" first="David W" last="Roscoe">David W. Roscoe</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hinch, Scott G" sort="Hinch, Scott G" uniqKey="Hinch S" first="Scott G" last="Hinch">Scott G. Hinch</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A1C59B5C8FA627C83DD6500EF382A626FAD09938</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-2979.2009.00333.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A1C59B5C8FA627C83DD6500EF382A626FAD09938/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001163</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001163</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001161</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000372</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000372</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1467-2960:2010:Roscoe D:effectiveness:monitoring:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000861</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions</title>
<author><name sortKey="Roscoe, David W" sort="Roscoe, David W" uniqKey="Roscoe D" first="David W" last="Roscoe">David W. Roscoe</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">V6T 1Z4</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hinch, Scott G" sort="Hinch, Scott G" uniqKey="Hinch S" first="Scott G" last="Hinch">Scott G. Hinch</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">V6T 1Z4</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Fish and Fisheries</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-2979</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-03">2010-03</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="12">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="33">33</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">A1C59B5C8FA627C83DD6500EF382A626FAD09938</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-2979.2009.00333.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">FAF333</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1467-2960</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Effectiveness monitoring</term>
<term>fishway</term>
<term>fitness</term>
<term>meta‐analysis</term>
<term>migration</term>
<term>passage efficiency</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Fishways and other passage facilities frequently prevent or delay the passage of fishes, highlighting the need for effectiveness monitoring. We reviewed the scientific literature from 1960 to 2008 reporting on effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities to assess what taxa and life‐stages have been studied, the questions that are asked during evaluation, and how these varied over time or by geographic region. We identified 96 peer‐reviewed articles of which 68% focused on passage by adult fishes. Salmoniformes was the most studied order (58% of studies). The focus of fishway evaluations did not change over the years, but varied significantly by geographic region. Studies from the tropics had a broader taxonomic scope than studies from temperate locations. Exogenous mechanisms of passage failure, such as environmental, structural and behavioural factors, were studied in 90% of studies from North America but only ∼50% of studies from Europe, South America and Australia. Endogenous (i.e. physiological) mechanisms affecting passage success were not often assessed anywhere, though they were a powerful means of evaluating mechanisms of failure. Few studies monitored migration after fish had left a facility. To improve effectiveness monitoring of passage facilities, we suggest that both endogenous and exogenous mechanisms need to be studied in an integrated fashion to understand passage failure and to inform design or operational changes that could improve passage efficiency. In addition post‐departure monitoring is required to more completely assess the fitness consequences of passage.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000861 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 000861 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Eau |area= EsturgeonV1 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:A1C59B5C8FA627C83DD6500EF382A626FAD09938 |texte= Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. | ![]() |