Domestication and absolute ownership of fish in the English common law
Identifieur interne : 001326 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 001325; suivant : 001327Domestication and absolute ownership of fish in the English common law
Auteurs : B. P. Walrut [Australie]Source :
- Journal of Fish Biology [ 0022-1112 ] ; 2004-12.
Abstract
The English common law has, for the purpose of describing the rights of ownership of animals, divided them into two classes, those the subject of absolute ownership and those the subject of a limited property right. In this system, fish have long been regarded as the subject of a limited property right, one dependent on possession. The principles underlying those concepts follow the Roman law concepts applicable to the proprietorship of animals and adopted in much of Europe. Those principles were further developed and adapted over many centuries in England, but more significantly in the common law countries outside of England, over the last century. They are principles that have a limited relationship to domestication. Drawing on the recent decisions outside of England it is possible to refashion the commonly presented tests as to the absolute ownership of animals. Based on those decisions, it may be asserted, that a person may absolutely own an animal that is a member of a population of animals that have had a long association with humans, or are exploited by a community in a recognized manner, other than by hunting. When applied to fish, particularly those from stock enhancement, sea ranching and aquaculture escapes, those principles raise a number of questions. Does the aquaculturist remain the owner of the fish that have escaped? Is it possible to retain ownership of stock enhancements and sea ranched fish? In some cases they may also raise an issue as to the liability for those fish at large.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.559aa.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001328
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9560586BC37870B97A7A354742EFD79A03916D78Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Domestication and absolute ownership of fish in the English common law</title><author><name sortKey="Walrut, B P" sort="Walrut, B P" uniqKey="Walrut B" first="B. P." last="Walrut">B. P. Walrut</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>(143 Wright Street, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia).</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>(143 Wright Street, Adelaide, SA 5000</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9560586BC37870B97A7A354742EFD79A03916D78</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.559aa.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9560586BC37870B97A7A354742EFD79A03916D78/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001328</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001328</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001326</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Domestication and absolute ownership of fish in the English common law</title><author><name sortKey="Walrut, B P" sort="Walrut, B P" uniqKey="Walrut B" first="B. P." last="Walrut">B. P. Walrut</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>(143 Wright Street, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia).</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>(143 Wright Street, Adelaide, SA 5000</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-12">2004-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">65</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="325">325</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="325">325</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></series><idno type="istex">9560586BC37870B97A7A354742EFD79A03916D78</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.559aa.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB559AA</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The English common law has, for the purpose of describing the rights of ownership of animals, divided them into two classes, those the subject of absolute ownership and those the subject of a limited property right. In this system, fish have long been regarded as the subject of a limited property right, one dependent on possession. The principles underlying those concepts follow the Roman law concepts applicable to the proprietorship of animals and adopted in much of Europe. Those principles were further developed and adapted over many centuries in England, but more significantly in the common law countries outside of England, over the last century. They are principles that have a limited relationship to domestication. Drawing on the recent decisions outside of England it is possible to refashion the commonly presented tests as to the absolute ownership of animals. Based on those decisions, it may be asserted, that a person may absolutely own an animal that is a member of a population of animals that have had a long association with humans, or are exploited by a community in a recognized manner, other than by hunting. When applied to fish, particularly those from stock enhancement, sea ranching and aquaculture escapes, those principles raise a number of questions. Does the aquaculturist remain the owner of the fish that have escaped? Is it possible to retain ownership of stock enhancements and sea ranched fish? In some cases they may also raise an issue as to the liability for those fish at large.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001326 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001326 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9560586BC37870B97A7A354742EFD79A03916D78
|texte= Domestication and absolute ownership of fish in the English common law
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |