Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach
Identifieur interne : 001771 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001770; suivant : 001772Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach
Auteurs : P. Antony Jesu Prabhu ; J. W. Schrama ; S. J. KaushikSource :
- Aquaculture Nutrition [ 1353-5773 ] ; 2013-06.
Abstract
A meta‐analysis of available data on dose response to dietary phosphorus (P) in fish from over 70 feeding trials reported in 64 published studies covering over 40 species of fish was performed. Broken‐line regression was used to model the data sets. The meta‐analysis showed that estimated minimal dietary P level varies with the response criterion and that estimates should preferably be expressed in terms of available P than in terms of total P. Estimates based on whole‐body P concentration (4.7 g available P kg−1 dry matter, DM) or vertebral P (5.2 g available P kg−1 DM) were greater than that for maximizing somatic weight gain (WG) (3.5 g available P kg−1 DM) or plasma P concentration (2.8 g available P kg−1 DM). P content of fish varies linearly with body mass (3.6 g kg−1 live weight). Use of ingredients rich in P or of diets with high basal P content or high levels of water P concentration can affect the estimations. Among the different response criteria tested, WG was found to be the most reliable and whole‐body P concentration to be the most stringent criterion to estimate P requirement of a given fish species. Expressing available P requirement as g P per unit DM or digestible energy (DE) in the diet was equally effective, but expressing in terms of g P intake per kg BW0.8 per day would be more precise.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/anu.12042
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title><author><name sortKey="Antony Jesu Prabhu, P" sort="Antony Jesu Prabhu, P" uniqKey="Antony Jesu Prabhu P" first="P." last="Antony Jesu Prabhu">P. Antony Jesu Prabhu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schrama, J W" sort="Schrama, J W" uniqKey="Schrama J" first="J. W." last="Schrama">J. W. Schrama</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kaushik, S J" sort="Kaushik, S J" uniqKey="Kaushik S" first="S. J." last="Kaushik">S. J. Kaushik</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: kaushik@st-pee.inra.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/anu.12042</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001771</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001771</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title><author><name sortKey="Antony Jesu Prabhu, P" sort="Antony Jesu Prabhu, P" uniqKey="Antony Jesu Prabhu P" first="P." last="Antony Jesu Prabhu">P. Antony Jesu Prabhu</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schrama, J W" sort="Schrama, J W" uniqKey="Schrama J" first="J. W." last="Schrama">J. W. Schrama</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kaushik, S J" sort="Kaushik, S J" uniqKey="Kaushik S" first="S. J." last="Kaushik">S. J. Kaushik</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: kaushik@st-pee.inra.fr</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Aquaculture Nutrition</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Aquacult Nutr</title><idno type="ISSN">1353-5773</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2095</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-06">2013-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="233">233</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="249">249</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1353-5773</idno></series><idno type="istex">DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/anu.12042</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ANU12042</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1353-5773</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">A meta‐analysis of available data on dose response to dietary phosphorus (P) in fish from over 70 feeding trials reported in 64 published studies covering over 40 species of fish was performed. Broken‐line regression was used to model the data sets. The meta‐analysis showed that estimated minimal dietary P level varies with the response criterion and that estimates should preferably be expressed in terms of available P than in terms of total P. Estimates based on whole‐body P concentration (4.7 g available P kg−1 dry matter, DM) or vertebral P (5.2 g available P kg−1 DM) were greater than that for maximizing somatic weight gain (WG) (3.5 g available P kg−1 DM) or plasma P concentration (2.8 g available P kg−1 DM). P content of fish varies linearly with body mass (3.6 g kg−1 live weight). Use of ingredients rich in P or of diets with high basal P content or high levels of water P concentration can affect the estimations. Among the different response criteria tested, WG was found to be the most reliable and whole‐body P concentration to be the most stringent criterion to estimate P requirement of a given fish species. Expressing available P requirement as g P per unit DM or digestible energy (DE) in the diet was equally effective, but expressing in terms of g P intake per kg BW0.8 per day would be more precise.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>P. Antony Jesu Prabhu</name><affiliations><json:string>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</json:string><json:string>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J.W. Schrama</name><affiliations><json:string>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>S.J. Kaushik</name><affiliations><json:string>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</json:string><json:string>E-mail: kaushik@st-pee.inra.fr</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>absolute P intake</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>available P</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>broken‐line regression</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>response criteria</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>weight gain</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>whole‐body P</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>ANU12042</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>A meta‐analysis of available data on dose response to dietary phosphorus (P) in fish from over 70 feeding trials reported in 64 published studies covering over 40 species of fish was performed. Broken‐line regression was used to model the data sets. The meta‐analysis showed that estimated minimal dietary P level varies with the response criterion and that estimates should preferably be expressed in terms of available P than in terms of total P. Estimates based on whole‐body P concentration (4.7 g available P kg−1 dry matter, DM) or vertebral P (5.2 g available P kg−1 DM) were greater than that for maximizing somatic weight gain (WG) (3.5 g available P kg−1 DM) or plasma P concentration (2.8 g available P kg−1 DM). P content of fish varies linearly with body mass (3.6 g kg−1 live weight). Use of ingredients rich in P or of diets with high basal P content or high levels of water P concentration can affect the estimations. Among the different response criteria tested, WG was found to be the most reliable and whole‐body P concentration to be the most stringent criterion to estimate P requirement of a given fish species. Expressing available P requirement as g P per unit DM or digestible energy (DE) in the diet was equally effective, but expressing in terms of g P intake per kg BW0.8 per day would be more precise.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.712</score><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 805.039 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1330</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9985</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>63734</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>17</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>226</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>19</volume><publisherId><json:string>ANU</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>17</total><last>249</last><first>233</first></pages><issn><json:string>1353-5773</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><subject><json:item><value>Review Article</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1365-2095</json:string></eissn><title>Aquaculture Nutrition</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2095</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/anu.12042</json:string></doi><id>DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A</id><score>0.023063844</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><p>Copyright © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</p></availability><date>2013-01-04</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>INRA</note><note>INRA‐WUR Aquaculture platform</note><note>ARRAINA: Advanced Research Initiatives for Nutrition & Aquaculture - No. KBBE‐2011‐288925;</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">P.</forename><surname>Antony Jesu Prabhu</surname></persName><affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</affiliation><affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">J.W.</forename><surname>Schrama</surname></persName><affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">S.J.</forename><surname>Kaushik</surname></persName><email>kaushik@st-pee.inra.fr</email><affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Aquaculture Nutrition</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Aquacult Nutr</title><idno type="pISSN">1353-5773</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2095</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2095</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2013-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="233">233</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="249">249</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/anu.12042</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ANU12042</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2013-01-04</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>A meta‐analysis of available data on dose response to dietary phosphorus (P) in fish from over 70 feeding trials reported in 64 published studies covering over 40 species of fish was performed. Broken‐line regression was used to model the data sets. The meta‐analysis showed that estimated minimal dietary P level varies with the response criterion and that estimates should preferably be expressed in terms of available P than in terms of total P. Estimates based on whole‐body P concentration (4.7 g available P kg−1 dry matter, DM) or vertebral P (5.2 g available P kg−1 DM) were greater than that for maximizing somatic weight gain (WG) (3.5 g available P kg−1 DM) or plasma P concentration (2.8 g available P kg−1 DM). P content of fish varies linearly with body mass (3.6 g kg−1 live weight). Use of ingredients rich in P or of diets with high basal P content or high levels of water P concentration can affect the estimations. Among the different response criteria tested, WG was found to be the most reliable and whole‐body P concentration to be the most stringent criterion to estimate P requirement of a given fish species. Expressing available P requirement as g P per unit DM or digestible energy (DE) in the diet was equally effective, but expressing in terms of g P intake per kg BW0.8 per day would be more precise.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>absolute P intake</term></item><item><term>available P</term></item><item><term>broken‐line regression</term></item><item><term>response criteria</term></item><item><term>weight gain</term></item><item><term>whole‐body P</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Review Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2012-08-07">Received</change><change when="2012-12-27">Registration</change><change when="2013-01-04">Created</change><change when="2013-06">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="anu12042" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2095</doi><issn type="print">1353-5773</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2095</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ANU"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="AQUACULTURE NUTRITION" type="main">Aquaculture Nutrition</title><title type="short">Aquacult Nutr</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="30"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/anu.2013.19.issue-3</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="19">19</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-06">June 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="10" status="forIssue" type="reviewArticle"><doi>10.1111/anu.12042</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ANU12042"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="17" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Review Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Review</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-08-07" type="manuscriptReceived"></event><event date="2012-12-27" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-01-04" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-03-06"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-03-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-04-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">233</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">249</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Correspondence: S. J. Kaushik, INRA, UR 1067, Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, F‐64310 Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France. E‐mail: <email>kaushik@st-pee.inra.fr</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ANU.ANU12042.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title><title type="shortAuthors">P. Antony Jesu Prabhu <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#anu12042-aff-0001 #anu12042-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="anu12042-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>P.</givenNames> <familyName>Antony Jesu Prabhu</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#anu12042-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="anu12042-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>J.W.</givenNames> <familyName>Schrama</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#anu12042-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="anu12042-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>S.J.</givenNames> <familyName>Kaushik</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="FR" type="organization" xml:id="anu12042-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA)</orgDiv> <orgName>UR 1067</orgName> <orgName>Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA</orgName> <address><city>Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle</city> <country>France</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="NL" type="organization" xml:id="anu12042-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group</orgDiv> <orgName>Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS)</orgName> <orgName>Wageningen University</orgName> <address><city>Wageningen</city> <country>The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="anu12042-kwd-0001">absolute <fc>P</fc> intake</keyword><keyword xml:id="anu12042-kwd-0002">available <fc>P</fc></keyword><keyword xml:id="anu12042-kwd-0003">broken‐line regression</keyword><keyword xml:id="anu12042-kwd-0004">response criteria</keyword><keyword xml:id="anu12042-kwd-0005">weight gain</keyword><keyword xml:id="anu12042-kwd-0006">whole‐body <fc>P</fc></keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>INRA</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>INRA‐WUR Aquaculture platform</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>ARRAINA: Advanced Research Initiatives for Nutrition & Aquaculture</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>KBBE‐2011‐288925</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="anu12042-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>A meta‐analysis of available data on dose response to dietary phosphorus (<fc>P</fc>) in fish from over 70 feeding trials reported in 64 published studies covering over 40 species of fish was performed. Broken‐line regression was used to model the data sets. The meta‐analysis showed that estimated minimal dietary <fc>P</fc> level varies with the response criterion and that estimates should preferably be expressed in terms of available <fc>P</fc> than in terms of total <fc>P</fc>. Estimates based on whole‐body <fc>P</fc> concentration (4.7 g available <fc>P</fc> kg<sup>−1</sup> dry matter, <fc>DM</fc>) or vertebral <fc>P</fc> (5.2 g available <fc>P</fc> kg<sup>−1</sup> <fc>DM</fc>) were greater than that for maximizing somatic weight gain (<fc>WG</fc>) (3.5 g available <fc>P</fc> kg<sup>−1</sup> <fc>DM</fc>) or plasma P concentration (2.8 g available <fc>P</fc> kg<sup>−1</sup> <fc>DM</fc>). P content of fish varies linearly with body mass (3.6 g kg<sup>−1</sup> live weight). Use of ingredients rich in <fc>P</fc> or of diets with high basal <fc>P</fc> content or high levels of water <fc>P</fc> concentration can affect the estimations. Among the different response criteria tested, <fc>WG</fc> was found to be the most reliable and whole‐body <fc>P</fc> concentration to be the most stringent criterion to estimate <fc>P</fc> requirement of a given fish species. Expressing available <fc>P</fc> requirement as g <fc>P</fc> per unit <fc>DM</fc> or digestible energy (<fc>DE</fc>) in the diet was equally effective, but expressing in terms of g <fc>P</fc> intake per kg <fc>BW</fc><sup>0.8</sup> per day would be more precise.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Antony Jesu Prabhu</namePart><affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</affiliation><affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Schrama</namePart><affiliation>Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">S.J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Kaushik</namePart><affiliation>Nutrition, Metabolism and Aquaculture (NuMeA), UR 1067, Pole d'Hydrobiologie INRA, Saint‐Pee‐sur‐Nivelle, France</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: kaushik@st-pee.inra.fr</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-01-04</dateCreated><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08-07</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-12-27</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>A meta‐analysis of available data on dose response to dietary phosphorus (P) in fish from over 70 feeding trials reported in 64 published studies covering over 40 species of fish was performed. Broken‐line regression was used to model the data sets. The meta‐analysis showed that estimated minimal dietary P level varies with the response criterion and that estimates should preferably be expressed in terms of available P than in terms of total P. Estimates based on whole‐body P concentration (4.7 g available P kg−1 dry matter, DM) or vertebral P (5.2 g available P kg−1 DM) were greater than that for maximizing somatic weight gain (WG) (3.5 g available P kg−1 DM) or plasma P concentration (2.8 g available P kg−1 DM). P content of fish varies linearly with body mass (3.6 g kg−1 live weight). Use of ingredients rich in P or of diets with high basal P content or high levels of water P concentration can affect the estimations. Among the different response criteria tested, WG was found to be the most reliable and whole‐body P concentration to be the most stringent criterion to estimate P requirement of a given fish species. Expressing available P requirement as g P per unit DM or digestible energy (DE) in the diet was equally effective, but expressing in terms of g P intake per kg BW0.8 per day would be more precise.</abstract><note type="funding">INRA</note><note type="funding">INRA‐WUR Aquaculture platform</note><note type="funding">ARRAINA: Advanced Research Initiatives for Nutrition & Aquaculture - No. KBBE‐2011‐288925; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>absolute P intake</topic><topic>available P</topic><topic>broken‐line regression</topic><topic>response criteria</topic><topic>weight gain</topic><topic>whole‐body P</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Aquaculture Nutrition</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Aquacult Nutr</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Review Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1353-5773</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2095</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2095</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ANU</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>19</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>233</start><end>249</end><total>17</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/anu.12042</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ANU12042</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001771 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001771 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DE5C8573AFCD5F1BC4DC0D8B366A11368228EF8A
|texte= Quantifying dietary phosphorus requirement of fish – a meta‐analytic approach
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |