Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb
Identifieur interne : 001717 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001716; suivant : 001718Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb
Auteurs : James L. EdwardsSource :
- Integrative and Comparative Biology [ 1540-7063 ] ; 1989.
Abstract
SYNOPSIS. The evolution of the tetrapod limb is examined from two perspectives: structural and functional. Rosen et al. (1981) argued that lungfishes are the sister group of tetrapods, with limb characteristics comprising an important subset of their evidence. A re-analysis of the limb characters advocated by Rosen et al. does not support their contention, but instead suggests that rhipidistian fishes of the family Osteolepidae are the closest relatives of the tetrapods. In order to understand the probable selective pressures leading to evolution of the tetrapod limb, a functional analysis of the fins of antennariid anglerfishes was performed. Antennariids use their limb-like fins to traverse underwater substrates. The analysis reveals a large number of functional and morphological convergences between antennariid fins and tetrapod limbs. It is suggested that tetrapod limbs were evolved for underwater transport rather than for locomotion on dry land.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/icb/29.1.235
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Edwards, James L" sort="Edwards, James L" uniqKey="Edwards J" first="James L." last="Edwards">James L. Edwards</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biological Research Resources Program, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. 20550</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D</idno><date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/icb/29.1.235</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001717</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001717</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Edwards, James L" sort="Edwards, James L" uniqKey="Edwards J" first="James L." last="Edwards">James L. Edwards</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biological Research Resources Program, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. 20550</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Integrative and Comparative Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">1540-7063</idno><idno type="eISSN">1557-7023</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1989">1989</date><biblScope unit="volume">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="235">235</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="254">254</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1540-7063</idno></series><idno type="istex">AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/icb/29.1.235</idno><idno type="ArticleID">29.1.235</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1540-7063</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">SYNOPSIS. The evolution of the tetrapod limb is examined from two perspectives: structural and functional. Rosen et al. (1981) argued that lungfishes are the sister group of tetrapods, with limb characteristics comprising an important subset of their evidence. A re-analysis of the limb characters advocated by Rosen et al. does not support their contention, but instead suggests that rhipidistian fishes of the family Osteolepidae are the closest relatives of the tetrapods. In order to understand the probable selective pressures leading to evolution of the tetrapod limb, a functional analysis of the fins of antennariid anglerfishes was performed. Antennariids use their limb-like fins to traverse underwater substrates. The analysis reveals a large number of functional and morphological convergences between antennariid fins and tetrapod limbs. It is suggested that tetrapod limbs were evolved for underwater transport rather than for locomotion on dry land.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>JAMES L. EDWARDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Biological Research Resources Program, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. 20550</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><value>Articles</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>29.1.235</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>SYNOPSIS. The evolution of the tetrapod limb is examined from two perspectives: structural and functional. Rosen et al. (1981) argued that lungfishes are the sister group of tetrapods, with limb characteristics comprising an important subset of their evidence. A re-analysis of the limb characters advocated by Rosen et al. does not support their contention, but instead suggests that rhipidistian fishes of the family Osteolepidae are the closest relatives of the tetrapods. In order to understand the probable selective pressures leading to evolution of the tetrapod limb, a functional analysis of the fins of antennariid anglerfishes was performed. Antennariids use their limb-like fins to traverse underwater substrates. The analysis reveals a large number of functional and morphological convergences between antennariid fins and tetrapod limbs. It is suggested that tetrapod limbs were evolved for underwater transport rather than for locomotion on dry land.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.692</score><pdfVersion>1.5</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.44 x 841.68 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>1</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>964</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8482</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>51778</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>141</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>29</volume><publisherId><json:string>icb</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>254</last><first>235</first></pages><issn><json:string>1540-7063</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1557-7023</json:string></eissn><title>Integrative and Comparative Biology</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>zoology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>evolutionary biology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1989</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/icb/29.1.235</json:string></doi><id>AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D</id><score>0.06655827</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><availability><p>© 1989 by the American Society of Zoologists</p></availability><date>1989</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>1From the Symposium on Vertebrate Functional Morphology: A Tribute to Milton Hildebrand presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Zoologists, 27–30 December 1986, at Nashville, Tennessee.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">JAMES L.</forename><surname>EDWARDS</surname></persName><affiliation>Biological Research Resources Program, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. 20550</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Integrative and Comparative Biology</title><idno type="pISSN">1540-7063</idno><idno type="eISSN">1557-7023</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1989"></date><biblScope unit="volume">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="235">235</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="254">254</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/icb/29.1.235</idno><idno type="ArticleID">29.1.235</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1989</date></creation><abstract><p>SYNOPSIS. The evolution of the tetrapod limb is examined from two perspectives: structural and functional. Rosen et al. (1981) argued that lungfishes are the sister group of tetrapods, with limb characteristics comprising an important subset of their evidence. A re-analysis of the limb characters advocated by Rosen et al. does not support their contention, but instead suggests that rhipidistian fishes of the family Osteolepidae are the closest relatives of the tetrapods. In order to understand the probable selective pressures leading to evolution of the tetrapod limb, a functional analysis of the fins of antennariid anglerfishes was performed. Antennariids use their limb-like fins to traverse underwater substrates. The analysis reveals a large number of functional and morphological convergences between antennariid fins and tetrapod limbs. It is suggested that tetrapod limbs were evolved for underwater transport rather than for locomotion on dry land.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><item><term>Articles</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1989">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-12-22">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">icbiol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">icb</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">icbiol</journal-id><journal-title>Integrative and Comparative Biology</journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">1557-7023</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">1540-7063</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">29.1.235</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icb/29.1.235</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>EDWARDS</surname><given-names>JAMES L.</given-names></name></contrib><aff><institution>Biological Research Resources Program, National Science Foundation</institution> <addr-line>Washington, DC. 20550</addr-line></aff></contrib-group><author-notes><fn id="fn1"><p><sup>1</sup>From the Symposium on <italic>Vertebrate Functional Morphology: A Tribute to Milton Hildebrand</italic> presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Zoologists, 27–30 December 1986, at Nashville, Tennessee.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><year>1989</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>235</fpage><lpage>254</lpage><copyright-statement>© 1989 by the American Society of Zoologists</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1989</copyright-year><abstract><p>SYNOPSIS. The evolution of the tetrapod limb is examined from two perspectives: structural and functional. Rosen <italic>et al</italic>. (1981) argued that lungfishes are the sister group of tetrapods, with limb characteristics comprising an important subset of their evidence. A re-analysis of the limb characters advocated by Rosen <italic>et al</italic>. does not support their contention, but instead suggests that rhipidistian fishes of the family Osteolepidae are the closest relatives of the tetrapods. In order to understand the probable selective pressures leading to evolution of the tetrapod limb, a functional analysis of the fins of antennariid anglerfishes was performed. Antennariids use their limb-like fins to traverse underwater substrates. The analysis reveals a large number of functional and morphological convergences between antennariid fins and tetrapod limbs. It is suggested that tetrapod limbs were evolved for underwater transport rather than for locomotion on dry land.</p></abstract></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb1</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">JAMES L.</namePart><namePart type="family">EDWARDS</namePart><affiliation>Biological Research Resources Program, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. 20550</affiliation></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><subject><topic>Articles</topic></subject><originInfo><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1989</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1989</copyrightDate></originInfo><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>SYNOPSIS. The evolution of the tetrapod limb is examined from two perspectives: structural and functional. Rosen et al. (1981) argued that lungfishes are the sister group of tetrapods, with limb characteristics comprising an important subset of their evidence. A re-analysis of the limb characters advocated by Rosen et al. does not support their contention, but instead suggests that rhipidistian fishes of the family Osteolepidae are the closest relatives of the tetrapods. In order to understand the probable selective pressures leading to evolution of the tetrapod limb, a functional analysis of the fins of antennariid anglerfishes was performed. Antennariids use their limb-like fins to traverse underwater substrates. The analysis reveals a large number of functional and morphological convergences between antennariid fins and tetrapod limbs. It is suggested that tetrapod limbs were evolved for underwater transport rather than for locomotion on dry land.</abstract><note type="footnotes">1From the Symposium on Vertebrate Functional Morphology: A Tribute to Milton Hildebrand presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Zoologists, 27–30 December 1986, at Nashville, Tennessee.</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Integrative and Comparative Biology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1540-7063</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1557-7023</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">icb</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">icbiol</identifier><part><date>1989</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>29</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>235</start><end>254</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/icb/29.1.235</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">29.1.235</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 1989 by the American Society of Zoologists</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><annexes><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D/annexes/pdf</uri></json:item></annexes><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001717 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001717 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:AAE604DA65AACD80C2B8CC45F3C3E7C8A14BCC5D
|texte= Two Perspectives on the Evolution of the Tetrapod Limb
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |