Serveur d'exploration sur l'esturgeon

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade

Identifieur interne : 001630 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001629; suivant : 001631

Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade

Auteurs : A. Ludwig

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D

Abstract

Sturgeons and paddlefishes (Acipenseridae) are highly endangered freshwater fishes. Their eggs (sold as caviar) are one of the most valuable wildlife products in international trade. Concerns of overharvesting and the conservation status of many of the 27 extant species of Acipenseriformes led to all species being included on the CITES Appendices in 1998. Since then international trade in all products and parts from sturgeon and paddlefish has been regulated. However, despite the controls on trade, unsustainable harvesting continues to threaten many populations. Illegal fishing and trade continues to be a threat to the management of these fish. To enforce the regulation of legal trade and prevention of illegal trade, the development of a uniform identification system for parts and derivates of Acipenseriformes has been identified as an urgent requirement. Ideally this system should be suitable for (i) identification at the species‐level of caviar and other products from Acipenseriformes; (ii) population identification; (iii) source identification (wild vs aquaculture); and (iv) determining the age of caviar because strict timeframes govern its international trade. This paper reviews the techniques currently available and their potential to be used in an identification system for Acipenseriformes species and their products in trade. A review of all available identification techniques has shown that there is not a single method that can meet all requirements (see i–iv), and it does not appear to be feasible to develop such a method in the near future therefore the most appropriate methods need to be developed for each. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of all techniques reviewed in this document, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) for the identification of species, approaches are recommended that target mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences (RFLP, nested PCR or direct sequencing). However, they show limitations for the detection of hybrids (although natural hybrids are rare, the number of artificially produced hybrids in aquaculture is increasing) and for the differentiation of the following closely related species complexes: Acipenser gueldenstaedti–Acipenser baerii–Acipenser persicus–Acipenser naccarii; Acipenser medirostris–Acipenser mikadoi; and Scaphirhynchus albus–Scaphirhynchus plathorhynchus–Scaphirhynchus suttkusi; (ii) the identification of different populations of the same species is currently not feasible because genetic data are incomplete for most populations, and stocking and release programmes, which have become more and more common, often result in a mixture of phenotypes and genotypes, thereby impeding the creation and application of such a population identification system; (iii) source identification based on genetic approaches can be excluded at present because there are no genetic differences between wild and hatchery‐raised fish. This is the result of the continuing restocking of natural populations with captive fish and vice versa. However, because rearing (i.e. environmental) conditions are different, methods focusing on differences in water quality or food seem to be more appropriate (for example differences in fatty acid composition). So far, very few studies have been conducted and therefore, source identification methods merit further exploration; and (iv) the age of a product in trade cannot be detected by DNA‐based methods and protein profiling is undoubtedly impractical due to hard‐to‐perform, labour‐and cost‐intensive methods, which are highly susceptible to protein degradation. Arising from the limits discussed above, the next steps in the development of a uniform sturgeon identification system are proposed to be the following: (i) designation of qualified reference laboratories at national levels in (re‐) exporting and importing countries. These should be approved through a standardized testing procedure, for instance a ring test on blind samples. Registered laboratories should be published and disseminated and their accreditations should be subject to certain guarantees regarding quality, economic independence and scientific rigour. Operational procedures have to be determined and standardized among reference laboratories; (ii) establishment of reference collections that are accessible to the reference laboratories containing DNA analyses results and information on the location and availability of tissue samples. This is highly recommended as an important step towards a population identification system and indispensable for a general species identification system; (iii) creation of a website access to the reference collections containing the reference database information about genetic samples, comparable to NCBI, which provides background data: sample location; population information; citation; available genetic data; location of archival storage; currently treated and distributed caviar and status of analysis. This website should also be a forum for the exchange of knowledge on and experiences with identification systems, species and population status information, relevant scientific research, etc.; and (iv) the outcome of the trade identification tests should be made available to the reference laboratories for future reference. The universal caviar labelling system could incorporate an indication of the verification of the consignment. In view of the lack of knowledge and the great need to develop a uniform identification system for Acipenseriformes with regard to the importance of the international caviar trade, further scientific guidance and appropriate research is strongly recommended. Progress should be assessed and exchanged on a regular basis.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01085.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ludwig, A" sort="Ludwig, A" uniqKey="Ludwig A" first="A." last="Ludwig">A. Ludwig</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Leibniz‐Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research 10252 Berlin, German, and IUCN/SSC Sturgeon Specialist Group</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D</idno>
<date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01085.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001630</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001630</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ludwig, A" sort="Ludwig, A" uniqKey="Ludwig A" first="A." last="Ludwig">A. Ludwig</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Leibniz‐Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research 10252 Berlin, German, and IUCN/SSC Sturgeon Specialist Group</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0175-8659</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1439-0426</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2008-06">2008-06</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="2">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="19">19</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0175-8659</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01085.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">JAI1085</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0175-8659</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Sturgeons and paddlefishes (Acipenseridae) are highly endangered freshwater fishes. Their eggs (sold as caviar) are one of the most valuable wildlife products in international trade. Concerns of overharvesting and the conservation status of many of the 27 extant species of Acipenseriformes led to all species being included on the CITES Appendices in 1998. Since then international trade in all products and parts from sturgeon and paddlefish has been regulated. However, despite the controls on trade, unsustainable harvesting continues to threaten many populations. Illegal fishing and trade continues to be a threat to the management of these fish. To enforce the regulation of legal trade and prevention of illegal trade, the development of a uniform identification system for parts and derivates of Acipenseriformes has been identified as an urgent requirement. Ideally this system should be suitable for (i) identification at the species‐level of caviar and other products from Acipenseriformes; (ii) population identification; (iii) source identification (wild vs aquaculture); and (iv) determining the age of caviar because strict timeframes govern its international trade. This paper reviews the techniques currently available and their potential to be used in an identification system for Acipenseriformes species and their products in trade. A review of all available identification techniques has shown that there is not a single method that can meet all requirements (see i–iv), and it does not appear to be feasible to develop such a method in the near future therefore the most appropriate methods need to be developed for each. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of all techniques reviewed in this document, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) for the identification of species, approaches are recommended that target mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences (RFLP, nested PCR or direct sequencing). However, they show limitations for the detection of hybrids (although natural hybrids are rare, the number of artificially produced hybrids in aquaculture is increasing) and for the differentiation of the following closely related species complexes: Acipenser gueldenstaedti–Acipenser baerii–Acipenser persicus–Acipenser naccarii; Acipenser medirostris–Acipenser mikadoi; and Scaphirhynchus albus–Scaphirhynchus plathorhynchus–Scaphirhynchus suttkusi; (ii) the identification of different populations of the same species is currently not feasible because genetic data are incomplete for most populations, and stocking and release programmes, which have become more and more common, often result in a mixture of phenotypes and genotypes, thereby impeding the creation and application of such a population identification system; (iii) source identification based on genetic approaches can be excluded at present because there are no genetic differences between wild and hatchery‐raised fish. This is the result of the continuing restocking of natural populations with captive fish and vice versa. However, because rearing (i.e. environmental) conditions are different, methods focusing on differences in water quality or food seem to be more appropriate (for example differences in fatty acid composition). So far, very few studies have been conducted and therefore, source identification methods merit further exploration; and (iv) the age of a product in trade cannot be detected by DNA‐based methods and protein profiling is undoubtedly impractical due to hard‐to‐perform, labour‐and cost‐intensive methods, which are highly susceptible to protein degradation. Arising from the limits discussed above, the next steps in the development of a uniform sturgeon identification system are proposed to be the following: (i) designation of qualified reference laboratories at national levels in (re‐) exporting and importing countries. These should be approved through a standardized testing procedure, for instance a ring test on blind samples. Registered laboratories should be published and disseminated and their accreditations should be subject to certain guarantees regarding quality, economic independence and scientific rigour. Operational procedures have to be determined and standardized among reference laboratories; (ii) establishment of reference collections that are accessible to the reference laboratories containing DNA analyses results and information on the location and availability of tissue samples. This is highly recommended as an important step towards a population identification system and indispensable for a general species identification system; (iii) creation of a website access to the reference collections containing the reference database information about genetic samples, comparable to NCBI, which provides background data: sample location; population information; citation; available genetic data; location of archival storage; currently treated and distributed caviar and status of analysis. This website should also be a forum for the exchange of knowledge on and experiences with identification systems, species and population status information, relevant scientific research, etc.; and (iv) the outcome of the trade identification tests should be made available to the reference laboratories for future reference. The universal caviar labelling system could incorporate an indication of the verification of the consignment. In view of the lack of knowledge and the great need to develop a uniform identification system for Acipenseriformes with regard to the importance of the international caviar trade, further scientific guidance and appropriate research is strongly recommended. Progress should be assessed and exchanged on a regular basis.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>A. Ludwig</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Leibniz‐Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research 10252 Berlin, German, and IUCN/SSC Sturgeon Specialist Group</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>JAI1085</json:string>
</articleId>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Sturgeons and paddlefishes (Acipenseridae) are highly endangered freshwater fishes. Their eggs (sold as caviar) are one of the most valuable wildlife products in international trade. Concerns of overharvesting and the conservation status of many of the 27 extant species of Acipenseriformes led to all species being included on the CITES Appendices in 1998. Since then international trade in all products and parts from sturgeon and paddlefish has been regulated. However, despite the controls on trade, unsustainable harvesting continues to threaten many populations. Illegal fishing and trade continues to be a threat to the management of these fish. To enforce the regulation of legal trade and prevention of illegal trade, the development of a uniform identification system for parts and derivates of Acipenseriformes has been identified as an urgent requirement. Ideally this system should be suitable for (i) identification at the species‐level of caviar and other products from Acipenseriformes; (ii) population identification; (iii) source identification (wild vs aquaculture); and (iv) determining the age of caviar because strict timeframes govern its international trade. This paper reviews the techniques currently available and their potential to be used in an identification system for Acipenseriformes species and their products in trade. A review of all available identification techniques has shown that there is not a single method that can meet all requirements (see i–iv), and it does not appear to be feasible to develop such a method in the near future therefore the most appropriate methods need to be developed for each. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of all techniques reviewed in this document, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) for the identification of species, approaches are recommended that target mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences (RFLP, nested PCR or direct sequencing). However, they show limitations for the detection of hybrids (although natural hybrids are rare, the number of artificially produced hybrids in aquaculture is increasing) and for the differentiation of the following closely related species complexes: Acipenser gueldenstaedti–Acipenser baerii–Acipenser persicus–Acipenser naccarii; Acipenser medirostris–Acipenser mikadoi; and Scaphirhynchus albus–Scaphirhynchus plathorhynchus–Scaphirhynchus suttkusi; (ii) the identification of different populations of the same species is currently not feasible because genetic data are incomplete for most populations, and stocking and release programmes, which have become more and more common, often result in a mixture of phenotypes and genotypes, thereby impeding the creation and application of such a population identification system; (iii) source identification based on genetic approaches can be excluded at present because there are no genetic differences between wild and hatchery‐raised fish. This is the result of the continuing restocking of natural populations with captive fish and vice versa. However, because rearing (i.e. environmental) conditions are different, methods focusing on differences in water quality or food seem to be more appropriate (for example differences in fatty acid composition). So far, very few studies have been conducted and therefore, source identification methods merit further exploration; and (iv) the age of a product in trade cannot be detected by DNA‐based methods and protein profiling is undoubtedly impractical due to hard‐to‐perform, labour‐and cost‐intensive methods, which are highly susceptible to protein degradation. Arising from the limits discussed above, the next steps in the development of a uniform sturgeon identification system are proposed to be the following: (i) designation of qualified reference laboratories at national levels in (re‐) exporting and importing countries. These should be approved through a standardized testing procedure, for instance a ring test on blind samples. Registered laboratories should be published and disseminated and their accreditations should be subject to certain guarantees regarding quality, economic independence and scientific rigour. Operational procedures have to be determined and standardized among reference laboratories; (ii) establishment of reference collections that are accessible to the reference laboratories containing DNA analyses results and information on the location and availability of tissue samples. This is highly recommended as an important step towards a population identification system and indispensable for a general species identification system; (iii) creation of a website access to the reference collections containing the reference database information about genetic samples, comparable to NCBI, which provides background data: sample location; population information; citation; available genetic data; location of archival storage; currently treated and distributed caviar and status of analysis. This website should also be a forum for the exchange of knowledge on and experiences with identification systems, species and population status information, relevant scientific research, etc.; and (iv) the outcome of the trade identification tests should be made available to the reference laboratories for future reference. The universal caviar labelling system could incorporate an indication of the verification of the consignment. In view of the lack of knowledge and the great need to develop a uniform identification system for Acipenseriformes with regard to the importance of the international caviar trade, further scientific guidance and appropriate research is strongly recommended. Progress should be assessed and exchanged on a regular basis.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8.5</score>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractCharCount>5711</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>12266</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>84531</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>18</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>801</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<volume>24</volume>
<publisherId>
<json:string>JAI</json:string>
</publisherId>
<pages>
<total>18</total>
<last>19</last>
<first>2</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>0175-8659</json:string>
</issn>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn>
<json:string>1439-0426</json:string>
</eissn>
<title>Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</json:string>
</doi>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>science</json:string>
<json:string>marine & freshwater biology</json:string>
<json:string>fisheries</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>applied sciences</json:string>
<json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string>
<json:string>fisheries</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2008</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01085.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D</id>
<score>0.5942303</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<p>© 2008 The Author</p>
</availability>
<date>2008</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
<author xml:id="author-1">
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Ludwig</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Leibniz‐Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research 10252 Berlin, German, and IUCN/SSC Sturgeon Specialist Group</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0175-8659</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1439-0426</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2008-06"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="2">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="19">19</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01085.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">JAI1085</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2008</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>Sturgeons and paddlefishes (Acipenseridae) are highly endangered freshwater fishes. Their eggs (sold as caviar) are one of the most valuable wildlife products in international trade. Concerns of overharvesting and the conservation status of many of the 27 extant species of Acipenseriformes led to all species being included on the CITES Appendices in 1998. Since then international trade in all products and parts from sturgeon and paddlefish has been regulated. However, despite the controls on trade, unsustainable harvesting continues to threaten many populations. Illegal fishing and trade continues to be a threat to the management of these fish. To enforce the regulation of legal trade and prevention of illegal trade, the development of a uniform identification system for parts and derivates of Acipenseriformes has been identified as an urgent requirement. Ideally this system should be suitable for (i) identification at the species‐level of caviar and other products from Acipenseriformes; (ii) population identification; (iii) source identification (wild vs aquaculture); and (iv) determining the age of caviar because strict timeframes govern its international trade. This paper reviews the techniques currently available and their potential to be used in an identification system for Acipenseriformes species and their products in trade. A review of all available identification techniques has shown that there is not a single method that can meet all requirements (see i–iv), and it does not appear to be feasible to develop such a method in the near future therefore the most appropriate methods need to be developed for each. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of all techniques reviewed in this document, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) for the identification of species, approaches are recommended that target mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences (RFLP, nested PCR or direct sequencing). However, they show limitations for the detection of hybrids (although natural hybrids are rare, the number of artificially produced hybrids in aquaculture is increasing) and for the differentiation of the following closely related species complexes: Acipenser gueldenstaedti–Acipenser baerii–Acipenser persicus–Acipenser naccarii; Acipenser medirostris–Acipenser mikadoi; and Scaphirhynchus albus–Scaphirhynchus plathorhynchus–Scaphirhynchus suttkusi; (ii) the identification of different populations of the same species is currently not feasible because genetic data are incomplete for most populations, and stocking and release programmes, which have become more and more common, often result in a mixture of phenotypes and genotypes, thereby impeding the creation and application of such a population identification system; (iii) source identification based on genetic approaches can be excluded at present because there are no genetic differences between wild and hatchery‐raised fish. This is the result of the continuing restocking of natural populations with captive fish and vice versa. However, because rearing (i.e. environmental) conditions are different, methods focusing on differences in water quality or food seem to be more appropriate (for example differences in fatty acid composition). So far, very few studies have been conducted and therefore, source identification methods merit further exploration; and (iv) the age of a product in trade cannot be detected by DNA‐based methods and protein profiling is undoubtedly impractical due to hard‐to‐perform, labour‐and cost‐intensive methods, which are highly susceptible to protein degradation. Arising from the limits discussed above, the next steps in the development of a uniform sturgeon identification system are proposed to be the following: (i) designation of qualified reference laboratories at national levels in (re‐) exporting and importing countries. These should be approved through a standardized testing procedure, for instance a ring test on blind samples. Registered laboratories should be published and disseminated and their accreditations should be subject to certain guarantees regarding quality, economic independence and scientific rigour. Operational procedures have to be determined and standardized among reference laboratories; (ii) establishment of reference collections that are accessible to the reference laboratories containing DNA analyses results and information on the location and availability of tissue samples. This is highly recommended as an important step towards a population identification system and indispensable for a general species identification system; (iii) creation of a website access to the reference collections containing the reference database information about genetic samples, comparable to NCBI, which provides background data: sample location; population information; citation; available genetic data; location of archival storage; currently treated and distributed caviar and status of analysis. This website should also be a forum for the exchange of knowledge on and experiences with identification systems, species and population status information, relevant scientific research, etc.; and (iv) the outcome of the trade identification tests should be made available to the reference laboratories for future reference. The universal caviar labelling system could incorporate an indication of the verification of the consignment. In view of the lack of knowledge and the great need to develop a uniform identification system for Acipenseriformes with regard to the importance of the international caviar trade, further scientific guidance and appropriate research is strongly recommended. Progress should be assessed and exchanged on a regular basis.</p>
</abstract>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2008-06">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</doi>
<issn type="print">0175-8659</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1439-0426</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="JAI"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY">Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="06000">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jai.2008.24.issue-s1</doi>
<titleGroup>
<title type="specialIssueTitle">Proceedings of the 2nd Status Workshop on Identification of Acipenseriformes Species in Trade</title>
</titleGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering>
<numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2008-06">June 2008</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01085.x</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="JAI1085"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="18"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2008 The Author</copyright>
<eventGroup>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2008-04-14"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-04-14"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-28"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="2">2</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="19">19</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>
<b>Author’s address:</b>
Arne Ludwig, Leibniz‐Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred‐Kowalke‐Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
E‐mail:
<email normalForm="ludwig@izw-berlin.de">ludwig@izw‐berlin.de</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<objectNameGroup>
<objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName>
</objectNameGroup>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JAI.JAI1085.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<unparsedEditorialHistory>Received: August 1, 2007 Accepted: September 6, 2007</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="8"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">A. Ludwig</title>
<title type="short">Trade control</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" noteRef="#fn1">
<personName>
<givenNames>A.</givenNames>
<familyName>Ludwig</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1">
<unparsedAffiliation>Leibniz‐Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research 10252 Berlin, German, and IUCN/SSC Sturgeon Specialist Group</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<supportingInformation>
<p>Glossary</p>
<p>Abbreviations</p>
<p>Please note: Blackwell Publishing are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.</p>
<supportingInfoItem>
<mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:01758659:media:jai1085:JAI_1085_sm_AbbreviationsandglossarySUPPLMATERIAL"></mediaResource>
<caption>Supporting info item</caption>
</supportingInfoItem>
</supportingInformation>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">Summary</title>
<p>Sturgeons and paddlefishes (Acipenseridae) are highly endangered freshwater fishes. Their eggs (sold as caviar) are one of the most valuable wildlife products in international trade. Concerns of overharvesting and the conservation status of many of the 27 extant species of Acipenseriformes led to all species being included on the CITES Appendices in 1998. Since then international trade in all products and parts from sturgeon and paddlefish has been regulated. However, despite the controls on trade, unsustainable harvesting continues to threaten many populations. Illegal fishing and trade continues to be a threat to the management of these fish. To enforce the regulation of legal trade and prevention of illegal trade, the development of a uniform identification system for parts and derivates of Acipenseriformes has been identified as an urgent requirement. Ideally this system should be suitable for (i) identification at the species‐level of caviar and other products from Acipenseriformes; (ii) population identification; (iii) source identification (wild vs aquaculture); and (iv) determining the age of caviar because strict timeframes govern its international trade. This paper reviews the techniques currently available and their potential to be used in an identification system for Acipenseriformes species and their products in trade. A review of all available identification techniques has shown that there is not a single method that can meet all requirements (see i–iv), and it does not appear to be feasible to develop such a method in the near future therefore the most appropriate methods need to be developed for each. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of all techniques reviewed in this document, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) for the identification of species, approaches are recommended that target mitochondrial
<i>cytochrome b</i>
sequences (RFLP, nested PCR or direct sequencing). However, they show limitations for the detection of hybrids (although natural hybrids are rare, the number of artificially produced hybrids in aquaculture is increasing) and for the differentiation of the following closely related species complexes:
<i>Acipenser gueldenstaedti</i>
<i>Acipenser baerii</i>
<i>Acipenser persicus</i>
<i>Acipenser naccarii</i>
;
<i>Acipenser medirostris</i>
<i>Acipenser mikadoi</i>
; and
<i>Scaphirhynchus albus</i>
<i>Scaphirhynchus plathorhynchus</i>
<i>Scaphirhynchus suttkusi</i>
; (ii) the identification of different populations of the same species is currently not feasible because genetic data are incomplete for most populations, and stocking and release programmes, which have become more and more common, often result in a mixture of phenotypes and genotypes, thereby impeding the creation and application of such a population identification system; (iii) source identification based on genetic approaches can be excluded at present because there are no genetic differences between wild and hatchery‐raised fish. This is the result of the continuing restocking of natural populations with captive fish and vice versa
<i>.</i>
However, because rearing (i.e. environmental) conditions are different, methods focusing on differences in water quality or food seem to be more appropriate (for example differences in fatty acid composition). So far, very few studies have been conducted and therefore, source identification methods merit further exploration; and (iv) the age of a product in trade cannot be detected by DNA‐based methods and protein profiling is undoubtedly impractical due to hard‐to‐perform, labour‐and cost‐intensive methods, which are highly susceptible to protein degradation. Arising from the limits discussed above, the next steps in the development of a uniform sturgeon identification system are proposed to be the following: (i) designation of qualified reference laboratories at national levels in (re‐) exporting and importing countries. These should be approved through a standardized testing procedure, for instance a ring test on blind samples. Registered laboratories should be published and disseminated and their accreditations should be subject to certain guarantees regarding quality, economic independence and scientific rigour. Operational procedures have to be determined and standardized among reference laboratories; (ii) establishment of reference collections that are accessible to the reference laboratories containing DNA analyses results and information on the location and availability of tissue samples. This is highly recommended as an important step towards a population identification system and indispensable for a general species identification system; (iii) creation of a website access to the reference collections containing the reference database information about genetic samples, comparable to NCBI, which provides background data: sample location; population information; citation; available genetic data; location of archival storage; currently treated and distributed caviar and status of analysis. This website should also be a forum for the exchange of knowledge on and experiences with identification systems, species and population status information, relevant scientific research, etc.; and (iv) the outcome of the trade identification tests should be made available to the reference laboratories for future reference. The universal caviar labelling system could incorporate an indication of the verification of the consignment. In view of the lack of knowledge and the great need to develop a uniform identification system for Acipenseriformes with regard to the importance of the international caviar trade, further scientific guidance and appropriate research is strongly recommended. Progress should be assessed and exchanged on a regular basis.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
<noteGroup>
<note xml:id="fn1">
<label>*</label>
<p> In cooperation with IUCN Species Programme and on behalf of the IUCN sturgeon specialist group.</p>
</note>
<note xml:id="fn2" numbered="no">
<p>The author have not declared any conflict of interests.</p>
</note>
</noteGroup>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en">
<title>Trade control</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">A.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ludwig</namePart>
<affiliation>Leibniz‐Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research 10252 Berlin, German, and IUCN/SSC Sturgeon Specialist Group</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-06</dateIssued>
<edition>Received: August 1, 2007 Accepted: September 6, 2007</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
<extent unit="figures">8</extent>
<extent unit="tables">8</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Sturgeons and paddlefishes (Acipenseridae) are highly endangered freshwater fishes. Their eggs (sold as caviar) are one of the most valuable wildlife products in international trade. Concerns of overharvesting and the conservation status of many of the 27 extant species of Acipenseriformes led to all species being included on the CITES Appendices in 1998. Since then international trade in all products and parts from sturgeon and paddlefish has been regulated. However, despite the controls on trade, unsustainable harvesting continues to threaten many populations. Illegal fishing and trade continues to be a threat to the management of these fish. To enforce the regulation of legal trade and prevention of illegal trade, the development of a uniform identification system for parts and derivates of Acipenseriformes has been identified as an urgent requirement. Ideally this system should be suitable for (i) identification at the species‐level of caviar and other products from Acipenseriformes; (ii) population identification; (iii) source identification (wild vs aquaculture); and (iv) determining the age of caviar because strict timeframes govern its international trade. This paper reviews the techniques currently available and their potential to be used in an identification system for Acipenseriformes species and their products in trade. A review of all available identification techniques has shown that there is not a single method that can meet all requirements (see i–iv), and it does not appear to be feasible to develop such a method in the near future therefore the most appropriate methods need to be developed for each. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of all techniques reviewed in this document, the following conclusions can be drawn: (i) for the identification of species, approaches are recommended that target mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences (RFLP, nested PCR or direct sequencing). However, they show limitations for the detection of hybrids (although natural hybrids are rare, the number of artificially produced hybrids in aquaculture is increasing) and for the differentiation of the following closely related species complexes: Acipenser gueldenstaedti–Acipenser baerii–Acipenser persicus–Acipenser naccarii; Acipenser medirostris–Acipenser mikadoi; and Scaphirhynchus albus–Scaphirhynchus plathorhynchus–Scaphirhynchus suttkusi; (ii) the identification of different populations of the same species is currently not feasible because genetic data are incomplete for most populations, and stocking and release programmes, which have become more and more common, often result in a mixture of phenotypes and genotypes, thereby impeding the creation and application of such a population identification system; (iii) source identification based on genetic approaches can be excluded at present because there are no genetic differences between wild and hatchery‐raised fish. This is the result of the continuing restocking of natural populations with captive fish and vice versa. However, because rearing (i.e. environmental) conditions are different, methods focusing on differences in water quality or food seem to be more appropriate (for example differences in fatty acid composition). So far, very few studies have been conducted and therefore, source identification methods merit further exploration; and (iv) the age of a product in trade cannot be detected by DNA‐based methods and protein profiling is undoubtedly impractical due to hard‐to‐perform, labour‐and cost‐intensive methods, which are highly susceptible to protein degradation. Arising from the limits discussed above, the next steps in the development of a uniform sturgeon identification system are proposed to be the following: (i) designation of qualified reference laboratories at national levels in (re‐) exporting and importing countries. These should be approved through a standardized testing procedure, for instance a ring test on blind samples. Registered laboratories should be published and disseminated and their accreditations should be subject to certain guarantees regarding quality, economic independence and scientific rigour. Operational procedures have to be determined and standardized among reference laboratories; (ii) establishment of reference collections that are accessible to the reference laboratories containing DNA analyses results and information on the location and availability of tissue samples. This is highly recommended as an important step towards a population identification system and indispensable for a general species identification system; (iii) creation of a website access to the reference collections containing the reference database information about genetic samples, comparable to NCBI, which provides background data: sample location; population information; citation; available genetic data; location of archival storage; currently treated and distributed caviar and status of analysis. This website should also be a forum for the exchange of knowledge on and experiences with identification systems, species and population status information, relevant scientific research, etc.; and (iv) the outcome of the trade identification tests should be made available to the reference laboratories for future reference. The universal caviar labelling system could incorporate an indication of the verification of the consignment. In view of the lack of knowledge and the great need to develop a uniform identification system for Acipenseriformes with regard to the importance of the international caviar trade, further scientific guidance and appropriate research is strongly recommended. Progress should be assessed and exchanged on a regular basis.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Journal of Applied Ichthyology</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<note type="content"> Glossary Abbreviations Please note: Blackwell Publishing are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Glossary Abbreviations Please note: Blackwell Publishing are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Glossary Abbreviations Please note: Blackwell Publishing are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - </note>
<identifier type="ISSN">0175-8659</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1439-0426</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1439-0426</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">JAI</identifier>
<part>
<date>2008</date>
<detail type="title">
<title>Proceedings of the 2nd Status Workshop on Identification of Acipenseriformes Species in Trade</title>
</detail>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>24</number>
</detail>
<detail type="supplement">
<caption>Suppl. no.</caption>
<number>s1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>2</start>
<end>19</end>
<total>18</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01085.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">JAI1085</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2008 The Author</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001630 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001630 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Eau
   |area=    EsturgeonV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:4D53AA17360CC9BB2B93D787F4E979619110520D
   |texte=   Identification of Acipenseriformes species in trade
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Sat Mar 25 15:37:54 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 14:18:49 2024