Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Identifieur interne : 001567 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001566; suivant : 001568Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Auteurs : C. A. Walling ; N. Dawnay ; A. J. N. Kazem ; R. Hickling ; J. WrightSource :
- Journal of Fish Biology [ 0022-1112 ] ; 2003-12.
Abstract
We investigated the trade‐off between conflict and cooperation, using predator inspection behaviour in sticklebacks as a model system. Male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) compete for territories during the breeding season and it has been demonstrated that the level of aggression between territorial neighbours declines with time, a phenomenon known as the dear enemy effect. In this experiment we examine whether this increase in familiarity between territorial neighbours can facilitate an increase in cooperation during predator inspection events. This was analyzed using male sticklebacks from four pond populations, two with and two without predatory rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss). Males were each exposed to five different treatments: (1) the presentation of a live rainbow trout when alone; (2) with a newly revealed territorial neighbour; (3) with this neighbour after two days of familiarization; (4) with another unfamiliar neighbour (termed a ‘floater’); and (5) a second solitary trial (to provide controls at the start and end of the experiment). As predicted, fish from predator‐sympatric populations showed higher levels of predator inspection and lower rates of misdirected territorial aggression towards the predator throughout. However, familiarity between neighbouring males did not facilitate an increase in predator inspection behaviour. Instead, predator inspection behaviour decreased throughout treatments involving the presence of any sort of neighbouring male. Familiarity between neighbours did not influence their ability to cooperatively inspect, but only the nature of any aggressive territorial behaviours, all of which detracted equally from individual inspection effort.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216an.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title><author><name sortKey="Walling, C A" sort="Walling, C A" uniqKey="Walling C" first="C. A." last="Walling">C. A. Walling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>(1Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dawnay, N" sort="Dawnay, N" uniqKey="Dawnay N" first="N." last="Dawnay">N. Dawnay</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kazem, A J N" sort="Kazem, A J N" uniqKey="Kazem A" first="A. J. N." last="Kazem">A. J. N. Kazem</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hickling, R" sort="Hickling, R" uniqKey="Hickling R" first="R." last="Hickling">R. Hickling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wright, J" sort="Wright, J" uniqKey="Wright J" first="J." last="Wright">J. Wright</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216an.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001567</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001567</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title><author><name sortKey="Walling, C A" sort="Walling, C A" uniqKey="Walling C" first="C. A." last="Walling">C. A. Walling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>(1Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dawnay, N" sort="Dawnay, N" uniqKey="Dawnay N" first="N." last="Dawnay">N. Dawnay</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kazem, A J N" sort="Kazem, A J N" uniqKey="Kazem A" first="A. J. N." last="Kazem">A. J. N. Kazem</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hickling, R" sort="Hickling, R" uniqKey="Hickling R" first="R." last="Hickling">R. Hickling</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wright, J" sort="Wright, J" uniqKey="Wright J" first="J." last="Wright">J. Wright</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="243">243</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="244">244</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></series><idno type="istex">C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216an.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB216AN</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We investigated the trade‐off between conflict and cooperation, using predator inspection behaviour in sticklebacks as a model system. Male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) compete for territories during the breeding season and it has been demonstrated that the level of aggression between territorial neighbours declines with time, a phenomenon known as the dear enemy effect. In this experiment we examine whether this increase in familiarity between territorial neighbours can facilitate an increase in cooperation during predator inspection events. This was analyzed using male sticklebacks from four pond populations, two with and two without predatory rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss). Males were each exposed to five different treatments: (1) the presentation of a live rainbow trout when alone; (2) with a newly revealed territorial neighbour; (3) with this neighbour after two days of familiarization; (4) with another unfamiliar neighbour (termed a ‘floater’); and (5) a second solitary trial (to provide controls at the start and end of the experiment). As predicted, fish from predator‐sympatric populations showed higher levels of predator inspection and lower rates of misdirected territorial aggression towards the predator throughout. However, familiarity between neighbouring males did not facilitate an increase in predator inspection behaviour. Instead, predator inspection behaviour decreased throughout treatments involving the presence of any sort of neighbouring male. Familiarity between neighbours did not influence their ability to cooperatively inspect, but only the nature of any aggressive territorial behaviours, all of which detracted equally from individual inspection effort.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>C. A. Walling</name><affiliations><json:string>(1Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>N. Dawnay</name><affiliations><json:string>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. J. N. Kazem</name><affiliations><json:string>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R. Hickling</name><affiliations><json:string>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. Wright</name><affiliations><json:string>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JFB216AN</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>abstract</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>We investigated the trade‐off between conflict and cooperation, using predator inspection behaviour in sticklebacks as a model system. Male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) compete for territories during the breeding season and it has been demonstrated that the level of aggression between territorial neighbours declines with time, a phenomenon known as the dear enemy effect. In this experiment we examine whether this increase in familiarity between territorial neighbours can facilitate an increase in cooperation during predator inspection events. This was analyzed using male sticklebacks from four pond populations, two with and two without predatory rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss). Males were each exposed to five different treatments: (1) the presentation of a live rainbow trout when alone; (2) with a newly revealed territorial neighbour; (3) with this neighbour after two days of familiarization; (4) with another unfamiliar neighbour (termed a ‘floater’); and (5) a second solitary trial (to provide controls at the start and end of the experiment). As predicted, fish from predator‐sympatric populations showed higher levels of predator inspection and lower rates of misdirected territorial aggression towards the predator throughout. However, familiarity between neighbouring males did not facilitate an increase in predator inspection behaviour. Instead, predator inspection behaviour decreased throughout treatments involving the presence of any sort of neighbouring male. Familiarity between neighbours did not influence their ability to cooperatively inspect, but only the nature of any aggressive territorial behaviours, all of which detracted equally from individual inspection effort.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.356</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>488 x 703 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1728</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>17483</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>110276</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>34</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>238</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title><genre><json:string>abstract</json:string></genre><host><volume>63</volume><publisherId><json:string>JFB</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>2</total><last>244</last><first>243</first></pages><issn><json:string>0022-1112</json:string></issn><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1095-8649</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Fish Biology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>marine & freshwater biology</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216an.x</json:string></doi><id>C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56</id><score>0.03242224</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">C. A.</forename><surname>Walling</surname></persName><affiliation>(1Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.;</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">N.</forename><surname>Dawnay</surname></persName><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">A. J. N.</forename><surname>Kazem</surname></persName><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">R.</forename><surname>Hickling</surname></persName><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-5"><persName><forename type="first">J.</forename><surname>Wright</surname></persName><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="243">243</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="244">244</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216an.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB216AN</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>We investigated the trade‐off between conflict and cooperation, using predator inspection behaviour in sticklebacks as a model system. Male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) compete for territories during the breeding season and it has been demonstrated that the level of aggression between territorial neighbours declines with time, a phenomenon known as the dear enemy effect. In this experiment we examine whether this increase in familiarity between territorial neighbours can facilitate an increase in cooperation during predator inspection events. This was analyzed using male sticklebacks from four pond populations, two with and two without predatory rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss). Males were each exposed to five different treatments: (1) the presentation of a live rainbow trout when alone; (2) with a newly revealed territorial neighbour; (3) with this neighbour after two days of familiarization; (4) with another unfamiliar neighbour (termed a ‘floater’); and (5) a second solitary trial (to provide controls at the start and end of the experiment). As predicted, fish from predator‐sympatric populations showed higher levels of predator inspection and lower rates of misdirected territorial aggression towards the predator throughout. However, familiarity between neighbouring males did not facilitate an increase in predator inspection behaviour. Instead, predator inspection behaviour decreased throughout treatments involving the presence of any sort of neighbouring male. Familiarity between neighbours did not influence their ability to cooperatively inspect, but only the nature of any aggressive territorial behaviours, all of which detracted equally from individual inspection effort.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-12">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-02-8">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</doi><issn type="print">0022-1112</issn><issn type="electronic">1095-8649</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JFB"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY">Journal of Fish Biology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12000"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jfb.2003.63.issue-s1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="63">63</numbering><numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-12">December 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="abstract" position="0024300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216an.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JFB216AN"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Abstracts of Oral Papers not published in the Supplement</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-12-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-12-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-02-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="243">243</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="244">244</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JFB.JFB216an.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (<i>Gasterosteus aculeatus</i>)</title><title type="shortAuthors"><sc>Paper Abstracts</sc></title><title type="short"><sc>Paper Abstracts</sc></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a126"><personName><givenNames>C. A.</givenNames><familyName>Walling</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a127"><personName><givenNames>N.</givenNames><familyName>Dawnay</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a127"><personName><givenNames>A. J. N.</givenNames><familyName>Kazem</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a127"><personName><givenNames>R.</givenNames><familyName>Hickling</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a127"><personName><givenNames>J.</givenNames><familyName>Wright</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a126"><unparsedAffiliation>(<sup>1</sup>Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a127"><unparsedAffiliation><sup>2</sup>School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>We investigated the trade‐off between conflict and cooperation, using predator inspection behaviour in sticklebacks as a model system. Male three‐spined sticklebacks (<i>Gasterosteus aculeatus</i>) compete for territories during the breeding season and it has been demonstrated that the level of aggression between territorial neighbours declines with time, a phenomenon known as the dear enemy effect. In this experiment we examine whether this increase in familiarity between territorial neighbours can facilitate an increase in cooperation during predator inspection events. This was analyzed using male sticklebacks from four pond populations, two with and two without predatory rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhyncus mykiss</i>). Males were each exposed to five different treatments: (1) the presentation of a live rainbow trout when alone; (2) with a newly revealed territorial neighbour; (3) with this neighbour after two days of familiarization; (4) with another unfamiliar neighbour (termed a ‘floater’); and (5) a second solitary trial (to provide controls at the start and end of the experiment). As predicted, fish from predator‐sympatric populations showed higher levels of predator inspection and lower rates of misdirected territorial aggression towards the predator throughout. However, familiarity between neighbouring males did not facilitate an increase in predator inspection behaviour. Instead, predator inspection behaviour decreased throughout treatments involving the presence of any sort of neighbouring male. Familiarity between neighbours did not influence their ability to cooperatively inspect, but only the nature of any aggressive territorial behaviours, all of which detracted equally from individual inspection effort.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Paper Abstracts</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Walling</namePart><affiliation>(1Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dawnay</namePart><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. J. N.</namePart><namePart type="family">Kazem</namePart><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hickling</namePart><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wright</namePart><affiliation>2School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, U.K.).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="abstract" displayLabel="abstract"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">We investigated the trade‐off between conflict and cooperation, using predator inspection behaviour in sticklebacks as a model system. Male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) compete for territories during the breeding season and it has been demonstrated that the level of aggression between territorial neighbours declines with time, a phenomenon known as the dear enemy effect. In this experiment we examine whether this increase in familiarity between territorial neighbours can facilitate an increase in cooperation during predator inspection events. This was analyzed using male sticklebacks from four pond populations, two with and two without predatory rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss). Males were each exposed to five different treatments: (1) the presentation of a live rainbow trout when alone; (2) with a newly revealed territorial neighbour; (3) with this neighbour after two days of familiarization; (4) with another unfamiliar neighbour (termed a ‘floater’); and (5) a second solitary trial (to provide controls at the start and end of the experiment). As predicted, fish from predator‐sympatric populations showed higher levels of predator inspection and lower rates of misdirected territorial aggression towards the predator throughout. However, familiarity between neighbouring males did not facilitate an increase in predator inspection behaviour. Instead, predator inspection behaviour decreased throughout treatments involving the presence of any sort of neighbouring male. Familiarity between neighbours did not influence their ability to cooperatively inspect, but only the nature of any aggressive territorial behaviours, all of which detracted equally from individual inspection effort.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Fish Biology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0022-1112</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1095-8649</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JFB</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>63</number></detail><detail type="supplement"><caption>Suppl. no.</caption><number>s1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>243</start><end>244</end><total>2</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216an.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JFB216AN</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001567 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001567 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C5FC50B54956C401D1859958678D8467BDB33C56
|texte= Do competing males cooperate? Familiarity and its effect on cooperation during predator inspection in male three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |