Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change
Identifieur interne : 001556 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001555; suivant : 001557Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change
Auteurs : I. Barber ; P. A. SvenssonSource :
- Journal of Fish Biology [ 0022-1112 ] ; 2003-12.
Abstract
Many parasites rely on the predation of one host by another to be transmitted. Such parasites are expected to have evolved strategies of host manipulation that alter the susceptibility of current hosts to predation by suitable predators, and many examples of altered behaviour exist. For many parasites, however, a period of growth and development in each host is essential before they are ready to be transmitted. If changes in host behaviour are truly parasite adaptations, rather than side‐effects of infection, then host behaviour change should only be predicted when the parasite is infective to the next host. This study documents the behaviour of individual three spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus over a 16‐week period following experimental infection with the common cestode parasite Schistocephalus solidus, which requires infected fish to be ingested by birds before it can attain sexual maturity. In addition to regularly monitoring shelter use and escape response behaviour of infected fish, we also used non‐invasive morphometric techniques to estimate parasite size, and thus were able to link behaviour changes to the growth of the parasite in individual fish. The behaviour of experimentally infected sticklebacks deviated significantly from that of controls (sham‐exposed) fish when the parasites they harboured approached an estimated weight of 100 mg. The results are discussed in the light of a further study, examining the relationship between parasite size and ultimate fecundity in the bird host.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216as.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title><author><name sortKey="Barber, I" sort="Barber, I" uniqKey="Barber I" first="I." last="Barber">I. Barber</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, P A" sort="Svensson, P A" uniqKey="Svensson P" first="P. A." last="Svensson">P. A. Svensson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216as.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001556</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001556</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title><author><name sortKey="Barber, I" sort="Barber, I" uniqKey="Barber I" first="I." last="Barber">I. Barber</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, P A" sort="Svensson, P A" uniqKey="Svensson P" first="P. A." last="Svensson">P. A. Svensson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="246">246</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="246">246</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></series><idno type="istex">68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216as.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB216AS</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Many parasites rely on the predation of one host by another to be transmitted. Such parasites are expected to have evolved strategies of host manipulation that alter the susceptibility of current hosts to predation by suitable predators, and many examples of altered behaviour exist. For many parasites, however, a period of growth and development in each host is essential before they are ready to be transmitted. If changes in host behaviour are truly parasite adaptations, rather than side‐effects of infection, then host behaviour change should only be predicted when the parasite is infective to the next host. This study documents the behaviour of individual three spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus over a 16‐week period following experimental infection with the common cestode parasite Schistocephalus solidus, which requires infected fish to be ingested by birds before it can attain sexual maturity. In addition to regularly monitoring shelter use and escape response behaviour of infected fish, we also used non‐invasive morphometric techniques to estimate parasite size, and thus were able to link behaviour changes to the growth of the parasite in individual fish. The behaviour of experimentally infected sticklebacks deviated significantly from that of controls (sham‐exposed) fish when the parasites they harboured approached an estimated weight of 100 mg. The results are discussed in the light of a further study, examining the relationship between parasite size and ultimate fecundity in the bird host.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>I. Barber</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>P. A. Svensson</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JFB216AS</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>abstract</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Many parasites rely on the predation of one host by another to be transmitted. Such parasites are expected to have evolved strategies of host manipulation that alter the susceptibility of current hosts to predation by suitable predators, and many examples of altered behaviour exist. For many parasites, however, a period of growth and development in each host is essential before they are ready to be transmitted. If changes in host behaviour are truly parasite adaptations, rather than side‐effects of infection, then host behaviour change should only be predicted when the parasite is infective to the next host. This study documents the behaviour of individual three spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus over a 16‐week period following experimental infection with the common cestode parasite Schistocephalus solidus, which requires infected fish to be ingested by birds before it can attain sexual maturity. In addition to regularly monitoring shelter use and escape response behaviour of infected fish, we also used non‐invasive morphometric techniques to estimate parasite size, and thus were able to link behaviour changes to the growth of the parasite in individual fish. The behaviour of experimentally infected sticklebacks deviated significantly from that of controls (sham‐exposed) fish when the parasites they harboured approached an estimated weight of 100 mg. The results are discussed in the light of a further study, examining the relationship between parasite size and ultimate fecundity in the bird host.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.236</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>488 x 703 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1529</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>17483</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>110276</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>34</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>228</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title><genre><json:string>abstract</json:string></genre><host><volume>63</volume><publisherId><json:string>JFB</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>1</total><last>246</last><first>246</first></pages><issn><json:string>0022-1112</json:string></issn><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1095-8649</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Fish Biology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>marine & freshwater biology</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216as.x</json:string></doi><id>68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3</id><score>0.03242224</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Barber</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">P. A.</forename><surname>Svensson</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="246">246</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="246">246</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216as.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB216AS</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Many parasites rely on the predation of one host by another to be transmitted. Such parasites are expected to have evolved strategies of host manipulation that alter the susceptibility of current hosts to predation by suitable predators, and many examples of altered behaviour exist. For many parasites, however, a period of growth and development in each host is essential before they are ready to be transmitted. If changes in host behaviour are truly parasite adaptations, rather than side‐effects of infection, then host behaviour change should only be predicted when the parasite is infective to the next host. This study documents the behaviour of individual three spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus over a 16‐week period following experimental infection with the common cestode parasite Schistocephalus solidus, which requires infected fish to be ingested by birds before it can attain sexual maturity. In addition to regularly monitoring shelter use and escape response behaviour of infected fish, we also used non‐invasive morphometric techniques to estimate parasite size, and thus were able to link behaviour changes to the growth of the parasite in individual fish. The behaviour of experimentally infected sticklebacks deviated significantly from that of controls (sham‐exposed) fish when the parasites they harboured approached an estimated weight of 100 mg. The results are discussed in the light of a further study, examining the relationship between parasite size and ultimate fecundity in the bird host.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-12">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-02-8">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</doi><issn type="print">0022-1112</issn><issn type="electronic">1095-8649</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JFB"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY">Journal of Fish Biology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12000"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jfb.2003.63.issue-s1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="63">63</numbering><numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-12">December 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="abstract" position="0024600" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216as.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JFB216AS"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Abstracts of Posters not published in the Supplement</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-12-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-12-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-02-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="246">246</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="246">246</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JFB.JFB216as.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title><title type="shortAuthors"><sc>Paper Abstracts</sc></title><title type="short"><sc>Paper Abstracts</sc></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a7"><personName><givenNames>I.</givenNames><familyName>Barber</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a7"><personName><givenNames>P. A.</givenNames><familyName>Svensson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a7"><unparsedAffiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Many parasites rely on the predation of one host by another to be transmitted. Such parasites are expected to have evolved strategies of host manipulation that alter the susceptibility of current hosts to predation by suitable predators, and many examples of altered behaviour exist. For many parasites, however, a period of growth and development in each host is essential before they are ready to be transmitted. If changes in host behaviour are truly parasite adaptations, rather than side‐effects of infection, then host behaviour change should only be predicted when the parasite is infective to the next host. This study documents the behaviour of individual three spined sticklebacks <i>Gasterosteus aculeatus</i> over a 16‐week period following experimental infection with the common cestode parasite <i>Schistocephalus solidus</i>, which requires infected fish to be ingested by birds before it can attain sexual maturity. In addition to regularly monitoring shelter use and escape response behaviour of infected fish, we also used non‐invasive morphometric techniques to estimate parasite size, and thus were able to link behaviour changes to the growth of the parasite in individual fish. The behaviour of experimentally infected sticklebacks deviated significantly from that of controls (sham‐exposed) fish when the parasites they harboured approached an estimated weight of 100 mg. The results are discussed in the light of a further study, examining the relationship between parasite size and ultimate fecundity in the bird host.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Paper Abstracts</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Barber</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P. A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Svensson</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, Wales, U.K.).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="abstract" displayLabel="abstract"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Many parasites rely on the predation of one host by another to be transmitted. Such parasites are expected to have evolved strategies of host manipulation that alter the susceptibility of current hosts to predation by suitable predators, and many examples of altered behaviour exist. For many parasites, however, a period of growth and development in each host is essential before they are ready to be transmitted. If changes in host behaviour are truly parasite adaptations, rather than side‐effects of infection, then host behaviour change should only be predicted when the parasite is infective to the next host. This study documents the behaviour of individual three spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus over a 16‐week period following experimental infection with the common cestode parasite Schistocephalus solidus, which requires infected fish to be ingested by birds before it can attain sexual maturity. In addition to regularly monitoring shelter use and escape response behaviour of infected fish, we also used non‐invasive morphometric techniques to estimate parasite size, and thus were able to link behaviour changes to the growth of the parasite in individual fish. The behaviour of experimentally infected sticklebacks deviated significantly from that of controls (sham‐exposed) fish when the parasites they harboured approached an estimated weight of 100 mg. The results are discussed in the light of a further study, examining the relationship between parasite size and ultimate fecundity in the bird host.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Fish Biology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0022-1112</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1095-8649</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JFB</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>63</number></detail><detail type="supplement"><caption>Suppl. no.</caption><number>s1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>246</start><end>246</end><total>1</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.216as.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JFB216AS</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001556 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001556 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:68C73321259BACEEC3F724CB22303D1DCEA669D3
|texte= Synchrony between parasite development and host behaviour change
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |