The relationships of placoderm fishes
Identifieur interne : 001523 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001522; suivant : 001524The relationships of placoderm fishes
Auteurs : G. C. YoungSource :
- Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society [ 0024-4082 ] ; 1986-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Aspects of placoderm morphology are considered in the light of current competing hypotheses of placoderm relationship. It is suggested that the macromeric dermal skeleton in the skull roof, cheek and shoulder girdle resulted from a single morphogenetic change, and that lack of correspondence with the osteichthyan bone pattern indicates independent development. The presence of a high scapular process in some placoderms shows that resemblances within the group to the reduced scapulocoracoid of osteichthyans is a parallelism, whilst its different relation to the prepectoral dermal spinal element in placoderms and acanthodians shows that these spines are not homologous. The pelvic claspers of ptyctodontids were carried on a cartilaginous basipterygium, and as far as is known differ from corresponding structures in chondrichthyans only in their macromeric rather than micromeric dermal investment. The placoderm eyestalk has similar morphological relations to that of elasmobranchs, and is either a synapomorphy of these groups or a gnathostome symplesiomorphy. Extrinsic eye muscle arrangement in placoderms may have been primitive in the anterior insertion of the internal rectus, and posterior insertion of the superior oblique. The persistence of an ethmo‐otic fissure is primitive for gnathostomes, although the precerebral fontanelle of chondrichthyans may be a remnant of this feature. In a reinterpretation of the rhenanid Jagorina the ‘antorbital cartilage’ and ‘palatoquadrate’ of earlier descriptions are determined as the palatoquadrate and meckelian cartilage respectively. The placoderm epihyal retained its connection with the ceratohyal, and the separate opercular cartilage supporting the dermal operculum against the braincase is a placoderm autapomorphy. Character analysis with reference to four competing schemes of placoderm interrelationships suggests that the suborbital plate, stenobasal fin, parasphenoid, eyestalk and opercular cartilage were primitively present, but that dermal laminae supporting the braincase and toothplates developed within the group. The existence of a dental lamina and serial tooth replacement is uncertain. It is concluded that placoderms are either the sister‐group of all other gnathostomes, or of chondrichthyans alone. A sister‐group relationship with osteichthyans is rejected.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The relationships of placoderm fishes</title><author><name sortKey="Young, G C" sort="Young, G C" uniqKey="Young G" first="G. C." last="Young">G. C. Young</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Continental Geology, Bureau of Mineral Resources, P.O. Box 378, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia 2601</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26</idno><date when="1986" year="1986">1986</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001523</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001523</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The relationships of placoderm fishes</title><author><name sortKey="Young, G C" sort="Young, G C" uniqKey="Young G" first="G. C." last="Young">G. C. Young</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Continental Geology, Bureau of Mineral Resources, P.O. Box 378, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia 2601</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><idno type="ISSN">0024-4082</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-3642</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1986-09">1986-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">88</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="57">57</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0024-4082</idno></series><idno type="istex">C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ZOJ1</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0024-4082</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Placoderms</term><term>gnathostomes</term><term>interrelationships</term><term>morphology</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Aspects of placoderm morphology are considered in the light of current competing hypotheses of placoderm relationship. It is suggested that the macromeric dermal skeleton in the skull roof, cheek and shoulder girdle resulted from a single morphogenetic change, and that lack of correspondence with the osteichthyan bone pattern indicates independent development. The presence of a high scapular process in some placoderms shows that resemblances within the group to the reduced scapulocoracoid of osteichthyans is a parallelism, whilst its different relation to the prepectoral dermal spinal element in placoderms and acanthodians shows that these spines are not homologous. The pelvic claspers of ptyctodontids were carried on a cartilaginous basipterygium, and as far as is known differ from corresponding structures in chondrichthyans only in their macromeric rather than micromeric dermal investment. The placoderm eyestalk has similar morphological relations to that of elasmobranchs, and is either a synapomorphy of these groups or a gnathostome symplesiomorphy. Extrinsic eye muscle arrangement in placoderms may have been primitive in the anterior insertion of the internal rectus, and posterior insertion of the superior oblique. The persistence of an ethmo‐otic fissure is primitive for gnathostomes, although the precerebral fontanelle of chondrichthyans may be a remnant of this feature. In a reinterpretation of the rhenanid Jagorina the ‘antorbital cartilage’ and ‘palatoquadrate’ of earlier descriptions are determined as the palatoquadrate and meckelian cartilage respectively. The placoderm epihyal retained its connection with the ceratohyal, and the separate opercular cartilage supporting the dermal operculum against the braincase is a placoderm autapomorphy. Character analysis with reference to four competing schemes of placoderm interrelationships suggests that the suborbital plate, stenobasal fin, parasphenoid, eyestalk and opercular cartilage were primitively present, but that dermal laminae supporting the braincase and toothplates developed within the group. The existence of a dental lamina and serial tooth replacement is uncertain. It is concluded that placoderms are either the sister‐group of all other gnathostomes, or of chondrichthyans alone. A sister‐group relationship with osteichthyans is rejected.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>G. C. YOUNG F.L.S.</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Continental Geology, Bureau of Mineral Resources, P.O. Box 378, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia 2601</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Placoderms</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gnathostomes</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>morphology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>interrelationships</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>ZOJ1</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Aspects of placoderm morphology are considered in the light of current competing hypotheses of placoderm relationship. It is suggested that the macromeric dermal skeleton in the skull roof, cheek and shoulder girdle resulted from a single morphogenetic change, and that lack of correspondence with the osteichthyan bone pattern indicates independent development. The presence of a high scapular process in some placoderms shows that resemblances within the group to the reduced scapulocoracoid of osteichthyans is a parallelism, whilst its different relation to the prepectoral dermal spinal element in placoderms and acanthodians shows that these spines are not homologous. The pelvic claspers of ptyctodontids were carried on a cartilaginous basipterygium, and as far as is known differ from corresponding structures in chondrichthyans only in their macromeric rather than micromeric dermal investment. The placoderm eyestalk has similar morphological relations to that of elasmobranchs, and is either a synapomorphy of these groups or a gnathostome symplesiomorphy. Extrinsic eye muscle arrangement in placoderms may have been primitive in the anterior insertion of the internal rectus, and posterior insertion of the superior oblique. The persistence of an ethmo‐otic fissure is primitive for gnathostomes, although the precerebral fontanelle of chondrichthyans may be a remnant of this feature. In a reinterpretation of the rhenanid Jagorina the ‘antorbital cartilage’ and ‘palatoquadrate’ of earlier descriptions are determined as the palatoquadrate and meckelian cartilage respectively. The placoderm epihyal retained its connection with the ceratohyal, and the separate opercular cartilage supporting the dermal operculum against the braincase is a placoderm autapomorphy. Character analysis with reference to four competing schemes of placoderm interrelationships suggests that the suborbital plate, stenobasal fin, parasphenoid, eyestalk and opercular cartilage were primitively present, but that dermal laminae supporting the braincase and toothplates developed within the group. The existence of a dental lamina and serial tooth replacement is uncertain. It is concluded that placoderms are either the sister‐group of all other gnathostomes, or of chondrichthyans alone. A sister‐group relationship with osteichthyans is rejected.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>504 x 719.759 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>2342</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>23648</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>150420</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>57</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>324</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The relationships of placoderm fishes</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>88</volume><publisherId><json:string>ZOJ</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>57</total><last>57</last><first>1</first></pages><issn><json:string>0024-4082</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1096-3642</json:string></eissn><title>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>zoology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>evolutionary biology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>1986</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1986</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x</json:string></doi><id>C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26</id><score>0.0071515446</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The relationships of placoderm fishes</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>1986</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The relationships of placoderm fishes</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">G. C.</forename><surname>YOUNG</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">F.L.S.</roleName><affiliation>Division of Continental Geology, Bureau of Mineral Resources, P.O. Box 378, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia 2601</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title><idno type="pISSN">0024-4082</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-3642</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1986-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">88</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="57">57</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ZOJ1</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1986</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Aspects of placoderm morphology are considered in the light of current competing hypotheses of placoderm relationship. It is suggested that the macromeric dermal skeleton in the skull roof, cheek and shoulder girdle resulted from a single morphogenetic change, and that lack of correspondence with the osteichthyan bone pattern indicates independent development. The presence of a high scapular process in some placoderms shows that resemblances within the group to the reduced scapulocoracoid of osteichthyans is a parallelism, whilst its different relation to the prepectoral dermal spinal element in placoderms and acanthodians shows that these spines are not homologous. The pelvic claspers of ptyctodontids were carried on a cartilaginous basipterygium, and as far as is known differ from corresponding structures in chondrichthyans only in their macromeric rather than micromeric dermal investment. The placoderm eyestalk has similar morphological relations to that of elasmobranchs, and is either a synapomorphy of these groups or a gnathostome symplesiomorphy. Extrinsic eye muscle arrangement in placoderms may have been primitive in the anterior insertion of the internal rectus, and posterior insertion of the superior oblique. The persistence of an ethmo‐otic fissure is primitive for gnathostomes, although the precerebral fontanelle of chondrichthyans may be a remnant of this feature. In a reinterpretation of the rhenanid Jagorina the ‘antorbital cartilage’ and ‘palatoquadrate’ of earlier descriptions are determined as the palatoquadrate and meckelian cartilage respectively. The placoderm epihyal retained its connection with the ceratohyal, and the separate opercular cartilage supporting the dermal operculum against the braincase is a placoderm autapomorphy. Character analysis with reference to four competing schemes of placoderm interrelationships suggests that the suborbital plate, stenobasal fin, parasphenoid, eyestalk and opercular cartilage were primitively present, but that dermal laminae supporting the braincase and toothplates developed within the group. The existence of a dental lamina and serial tooth replacement is uncertain. It is concluded that placoderms are either the sister‐group of all other gnathostomes, or of chondrichthyans alone. A sister‐group relationship with osteichthyans is rejected.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Placoderms</term></item><item><term>gnathostomes</term></item><item><term>morphology</term></item><item><term>interrelationships</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1986-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</doi><issn type="print">0024-4082</issn><issn type="electronic">1096-3642</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ZOJ"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY">Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/zoj.1986.88.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="88">88</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1986-09">September 1986</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0000100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ZOJ1"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="57"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-05-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-05-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.3 mode:FullText" date="2011-09-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1">1</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="57">57</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ZOJ.ZOJ1.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Received March 1985, accepted for publication July 1985</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="132"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The relationships of placoderm fishes</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>G. C.</givenNames><familyName>YOUNG</familyName><degrees>F.L.S.</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="AU"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Continental Geology, Bureau of Mineral Resources, P.O. Box 378, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia 2601</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Placoderms</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">gnathostomes</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">morphology</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">interrelationships</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Aspects of placoderm morphology are considered in the light of current competing hypotheses of placoderm relationship. It is suggested that the macromeric dermal skeleton in the skull roof, cheek and shoulder girdle resulted from a single morphogenetic change, and that lack of correspondence with the osteichthyan bone pattern indicates independent development. The presence of a high scapular process in some placoderms shows that resemblances within the group to the reduced scapulocoracoid of osteichthyans is a parallelism, whilst its different relation to the prepectoral dermal spinal element in placoderms and acanthodians shows that these spines are not homologous. The pelvic claspers of ptyctodontids were carried on a cartilaginous basipterygium, and as far as is known differ from corresponding structures in chondrichthyans only in their macromeric rather than micromeric dermal investment. The placoderm eyestalk has similar morphological relations to that of elasmobranchs, and is either a synapomorphy of these groups or a gnathostome symplesiomorphy. Extrinsic eye muscle arrangement in placoderms may have been primitive in the anterior insertion of the internal rectus, and posterior insertion of the superior oblique. The persistence of an ethmo‐otic fissure is primitive for gnathostomes, although the precerebral fontanelle of chondrichthyans may be a remnant of this feature. In a reinterpretation of the rhenanid <i>Jagorina</i> the ‘antorbital cartilage’ and ‘palatoquadrate’ of earlier descriptions are determined as the palatoquadrate and meckelian cartilage respectively. The placoderm epihyal retained its connection with the ceratohyal, and the separate opercular cartilage supporting the dermal operculum against the braincase is a placoderm autapomorphy. Character analysis with reference to four competing schemes of placoderm interrelationships suggests that the suborbital plate, stenobasal fin, parasphenoid, eyestalk and opercular cartilage were primitively present, but that dermal laminae supporting the braincase and toothplates developed within the group. The existence of a dental lamina and serial tooth replacement is uncertain. It is concluded that placoderms are either the sister‐group of all other gnathostomes, or of chondrichthyans alone. A sister‐group relationship with osteichthyans is rejected.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The relationships of placoderm fishes</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The relationships of placoderm fishes</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G. C.</namePart><namePart type="family">YOUNG</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">F.L.S.</namePart><affiliation>Division of Continental Geology, Bureau of Mineral Resources, P.O. Box 378, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia 2601</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1986-09</dateIssued><edition>Received March 1985, accepted for publication July 1985</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1986</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">132</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Aspects of placoderm morphology are considered in the light of current competing hypotheses of placoderm relationship. It is suggested that the macromeric dermal skeleton in the skull roof, cheek and shoulder girdle resulted from a single morphogenetic change, and that lack of correspondence with the osteichthyan bone pattern indicates independent development. The presence of a high scapular process in some placoderms shows that resemblances within the group to the reduced scapulocoracoid of osteichthyans is a parallelism, whilst its different relation to the prepectoral dermal spinal element in placoderms and acanthodians shows that these spines are not homologous. The pelvic claspers of ptyctodontids were carried on a cartilaginous basipterygium, and as far as is known differ from corresponding structures in chondrichthyans only in their macromeric rather than micromeric dermal investment. The placoderm eyestalk has similar morphological relations to that of elasmobranchs, and is either a synapomorphy of these groups or a gnathostome symplesiomorphy. Extrinsic eye muscle arrangement in placoderms may have been primitive in the anterior insertion of the internal rectus, and posterior insertion of the superior oblique. The persistence of an ethmo‐otic fissure is primitive for gnathostomes, although the precerebral fontanelle of chondrichthyans may be a remnant of this feature. In a reinterpretation of the rhenanid Jagorina the ‘antorbital cartilage’ and ‘palatoquadrate’ of earlier descriptions are determined as the palatoquadrate and meckelian cartilage respectively. The placoderm epihyal retained its connection with the ceratohyal, and the separate opercular cartilage supporting the dermal operculum against the braincase is a placoderm autapomorphy. Character analysis with reference to four competing schemes of placoderm interrelationships suggests that the suborbital plate, stenobasal fin, parasphenoid, eyestalk and opercular cartilage were primitively present, but that dermal laminae supporting the braincase and toothplates developed within the group. The existence of a dental lamina and serial tooth replacement is uncertain. It is concluded that placoderms are either the sister‐group of all other gnathostomes, or of chondrichthyans alone. A sister‐group relationship with osteichthyans is rejected.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Placoderms</topic><topic>gnathostomes</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>interrelationships</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0024-4082</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1096-3642</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1096-3642</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ZOJ</identifier><part><date>1986</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>88</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1</start><end>57</end><total>57</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00876.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ZOJ1</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001523 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001523 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C3AE616823CFA319B096A91F97E96DE218272C26
|texte= The relationships of placoderm fishes
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |