The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models
Identifieur interne : 001126 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001125; suivant : 001127The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models
Auteurs : I. M. CôtéSource :
- Journal of Fish Biology [ 0022-1112 ] ; 2003-12.
Abstract
In aggressive mimicry, a ‘predatory’ species resembles a model that is harmless or beneficial to a third species, the ‘dupe’. Perhaps the most extraordinary case of aggressive mimicry occurs in Indo‐Pacific cleaning symbioses, where cleaner wrasses (the models) remove ectoparasites from larger fish clients. Several species of fangblennies mimic cleaners in behaviour and coloration. Instead of removing ectoparasites, however, fangblennies tear off fins, skin and scales from unsuspecting clients (the dupes). There is some debate over the extent to which cleanerfish mimics are really mimics because in some populations, the contribution of fish tissue to fangblenny diet is limited. In this study, I examine the impact of the resemblance between bluestriped fangblennies (Plagiotremus rhinorhynchus) and its putative model, the juvenile bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus), on the model's cleaning activity to test the theoretical prediction that mimics should decrease the fitness of their models. I show that the presence of a bluestripe fangblenny in the vicinity of cleaner wrasses results in significantly lower client visit rates and inspection times compared to cleaners without a fangblenny nearby, and discuss why cleaner wrasses tolerate mimics near cleaning stations.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216g.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title><author><name sortKey="Cote, I M" sort="Cote, I M" uniqKey="Cote I" first="I. M." last="Côté">I. M. Côté</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>(*Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216g.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001126</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001126</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title><author><name sortKey="Cote, I M" sort="Cote, I M" uniqKey="Cote I" first="I. M." last="Côté">I. M. Côté</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>(*Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.).</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="228">228</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="229">229</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></series><idno type="istex">A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216g.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB216G</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-1112</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In aggressive mimicry, a ‘predatory’ species resembles a model that is harmless or beneficial to a third species, the ‘dupe’. Perhaps the most extraordinary case of aggressive mimicry occurs in Indo‐Pacific cleaning symbioses, where cleaner wrasses (the models) remove ectoparasites from larger fish clients. Several species of fangblennies mimic cleaners in behaviour and coloration. Instead of removing ectoparasites, however, fangblennies tear off fins, skin and scales from unsuspecting clients (the dupes). There is some debate over the extent to which cleanerfish mimics are really mimics because in some populations, the contribution of fish tissue to fangblenny diet is limited. In this study, I examine the impact of the resemblance between bluestriped fangblennies (Plagiotremus rhinorhynchus) and its putative model, the juvenile bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus), on the model's cleaning activity to test the theoretical prediction that mimics should decrease the fitness of their models. I show that the presence of a bluestripe fangblenny in the vicinity of cleaner wrasses results in significantly lower client visit rates and inspection times compared to cleaners without a fangblenny nearby, and discuss why cleaner wrasses tolerate mimics near cleaning stations.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>I. M. Côté</name><affiliations><json:string>(*Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.).</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>JFB216G</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>abstract</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In aggressive mimicry, a ‘predatory’ species resembles a model that is harmless or beneficial to a third species, the ‘dupe’. Perhaps the most extraordinary case of aggressive mimicry occurs in Indo‐Pacific cleaning symbioses, where cleaner wrasses (the models) remove ectoparasites from larger fish clients. Several species of fangblennies mimic cleaners in behaviour and coloration. Instead of removing ectoparasites, however, fangblennies tear off fins, skin and scales from unsuspecting clients (the dupes). There is some debate over the extent to which cleanerfish mimics are really mimics because in some populations, the contribution of fish tissue to fangblenny diet is limited. In this study, I examine the impact of the resemblance between bluestriped fangblennies (Plagiotremus rhinorhynchus) and its putative model, the juvenile bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus), on the model's cleaning activity to test the theoretical prediction that mimics should decrease the fitness of their models. I show that the presence of a bluestripe fangblenny in the vicinity of cleaner wrasses results in significantly lower client visit rates and inspection times compared to cleaners without a fangblenny nearby, and discuss why cleaner wrasses tolerate mimics near cleaning stations.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.732</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>488 x 703 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1295</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>17483</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>110276</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>34</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>186</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title><genre><json:string>abstract</json:string></genre><host><volume>63</volume><publisherId><json:string>JFB</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>2</total><last>229</last><first>228</first></pages><issn><json:string>0022-1112</json:string></issn><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1095-8649</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Fish Biology</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>marine & freshwater biology</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>applied sciences</json:string><json:string>agriculture, fisheries & forestry</json:string><json:string>fisheries</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216g.x</json:string></doi><id>A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B</id><score>0.03242224</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">I. M.</forename><surname>Côté</surname></persName><affiliation>(*Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.).</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Fish Biology</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-1112</idno><idno type="eISSN">1095-8649</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope><biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="228">228</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="229">229</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216g.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JFB216G</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In aggressive mimicry, a ‘predatory’ species resembles a model that is harmless or beneficial to a third species, the ‘dupe’. Perhaps the most extraordinary case of aggressive mimicry occurs in Indo‐Pacific cleaning symbioses, where cleaner wrasses (the models) remove ectoparasites from larger fish clients. Several species of fangblennies mimic cleaners in behaviour and coloration. Instead of removing ectoparasites, however, fangblennies tear off fins, skin and scales from unsuspecting clients (the dupes). There is some debate over the extent to which cleanerfish mimics are really mimics because in some populations, the contribution of fish tissue to fangblenny diet is limited. In this study, I examine the impact of the resemblance between bluestriped fangblennies (Plagiotremus rhinorhynchus) and its putative model, the juvenile bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus), on the model's cleaning activity to test the theoretical prediction that mimics should decrease the fitness of their models. I show that the presence of a bluestripe fangblenny in the vicinity of cleaner wrasses results in significantly lower client visit rates and inspection times compared to cleaners without a fangblenny nearby, and discuss why cleaner wrasses tolerate mimics near cleaning stations.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-12">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-02-9">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</doi><issn type="print">0022-1112</issn><issn type="electronic">1095-8649</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JFB"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY">Journal of Fish Biology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12000"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jfb.2003.63.issue-s1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="63">63</numbering><numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-12">December 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="abstract" position="0022800" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216g.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JFB216G"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Abstracts of Oral Papers not published in the Supplement</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-12-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-12-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-02-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="228">228</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="229">229</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JFB.JFB216g.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title><title type="shortAuthors"><sc>Paper Abstracts</sc></title><title type="short"><sc>Paper Abstracts</sc></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a25"><personName><givenNames>I. M. </givenNames><familyName>Côté</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a25"><unparsedAffiliation>(<sup>*</sup>Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.).</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>In aggressive mimicry, a ‘predatory’ species resembles a model that is harmless or beneficial to a third species, the ‘dupe’. Perhaps the most extraordinary case of aggressive mimicry occurs in Indo‐Pacific cleaning symbioses, where cleaner wrasses (the models) remove ectoparasites from larger fish clients. Several species of fangblennies mimic cleaners in behaviour and coloration. Instead of removing ectoparasites, however, fangblennies tear off fins, skin and scales from unsuspecting clients (the dupes). There is some debate over the extent to which cleanerfish mimics are really mimics because in some populations, the contribution of fish tissue to fangblenny diet is limited. In this study, I examine the impact of the resemblance between bluestriped fangblennies (<i>Plagiotremus rhinorhynchus</i>) and its putative model, the juvenile bluestreak cleaner wrasse (<i>Labroides dimidiatus</i>), on the model's cleaning activity to test the theoretical prediction that mimics should decrease the fitness of their models. I show that the presence of a bluestripe fangblenny in the vicinity of cleaner wrasses results in significantly lower client visit rates and inspection times compared to cleaners without a fangblenny nearby, and discuss why cleaner wrasses tolerate mimics near cleaning stations.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Paper Abstracts</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I. M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Côté</namePart><affiliation>(*Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.).</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="abstract" displayLabel="abstract"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In aggressive mimicry, a ‘predatory’ species resembles a model that is harmless or beneficial to a third species, the ‘dupe’. Perhaps the most extraordinary case of aggressive mimicry occurs in Indo‐Pacific cleaning symbioses, where cleaner wrasses (the models) remove ectoparasites from larger fish clients. Several species of fangblennies mimic cleaners in behaviour and coloration. Instead of removing ectoparasites, however, fangblennies tear off fins, skin and scales from unsuspecting clients (the dupes). There is some debate over the extent to which cleanerfish mimics are really mimics because in some populations, the contribution of fish tissue to fangblenny diet is limited. In this study, I examine the impact of the resemblance between bluestriped fangblennies (Plagiotremus rhinorhynchus) and its putative model, the juvenile bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus), on the model's cleaning activity to test the theoretical prediction that mimics should decrease the fitness of their models. I show that the presence of a bluestripe fangblenny in the vicinity of cleaner wrasses results in significantly lower client visit rates and inspection times compared to cleaners without a fangblenny nearby, and discuss why cleaner wrasses tolerate mimics near cleaning stations.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Fish Biology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0022-1112</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1095-8649</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1095-8649</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JFB</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>63</number></detail><detail type="supplement"><caption>Suppl. no.</caption><number>s1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>228</start><end>229</end><total>2</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.0216g.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JFB216G</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd/Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Eau/explor/EsturgeonV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001126 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001126 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Eau
|area= EsturgeonV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A1E17AC189549D6DA472C6D277B482536B8A9D3B
|texte= The cost of cleanerfish mimics to their models
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |