Spatial assessment of the economic feasibility of short rotation coppice on radioactively contaminated land in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia. I. Model description and scenario analysis.
Identifieur interne : 001D86 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001D85; suivant : 001D87Spatial assessment of the economic feasibility of short rotation coppice on radioactively contaminated land in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia. I. Model description and scenario analysis.
Auteurs : Marcel Van Der Perk Mv ; Jiske Burema ; Hildegarde Vandenhove ; François Goor ; Sergei TimofeyevSource :
- Journal of environmental management [ 0301-4797 ] ; 2004.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Bioelectric Energy Sources (economics), Biomass (MeSH), Cesium Radioisotopes (analysis), Chernobyl Nuclear Accident (MeSH), Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH), Geographic Information Systems (MeSH), Incineration (MeSH), Models, Theoretical (MeSH), Republic of Belarus (MeSH), Russia (MeSH), Salix (growth & development), Soil Pollutants, Radioactive (MeSH), Ukraine (MeSH).
- MESH :
- chemical , analysis : Cesium Radioisotopes.
- geographic : Republic of Belarus, Russia, Soil Pollutants, Radioactive, Ukraine.
- economics : Bioelectric Energy Sources.
- growth & development : Salix.
- Biomass, Chernobyl Nuclear Accident, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Geographic Information Systems, Incineration, Models, Theoretical.
Abstract
The economic feasibility of short rotation coppice (SRC) production and energy conversion in areas contaminated by Chernobyl-derived (137)Cs was evaluated taking the spatial variability of environmental conditions into account. Two sequential GIS-embedded submodels were developed for a spatial assessment, which allow for spatial variation in soil contamination, soil type, and land use. These models were applied for four SRC production and four energy conversion scenarios for the entire contaminated area of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia and for a part of the Bragin district, Belarus. It was concluded that in general medium-scale SRC production using local machines is most profitable. The areas near Chernobyl are not suitable for SRC production since the contamination levels in SRC wood exceed the intervention limit. Large scale SRC production is not profitable in areas where dry and sandy soils predominate. If the soil contamination does not exceed the intervention limit and sufficient SRC wood is available, all energy conversion scenarios are profitable.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.05.002
PubMed: 15294354
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:15294354Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Spatial assessment of the economic feasibility of short rotation coppice on radioactively contaminated land in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia. I. Model description and scenario analysis.</title><author><name sortKey="Perk Mv, Marcel Van Der" sort="Perk Mv, Marcel Van Der" uniqKey="Perk Mv M" first="Marcel Van Der" last="Perk Mv">Marcel Van Der Perk Mv</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The Netherlands Centre for Geo-ecology, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.vanderperk@geog.uu.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burema, Jiske" sort="Burema, Jiske" uniqKey="Burema J" first="Jiske" last="Burema">Jiske Burema</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vandenhove, Hildegarde" sort="Vandenhove, Hildegarde" uniqKey="Vandenhove H" first="Hildegarde" last="Vandenhove">Hildegarde Vandenhove</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goor, Francois" sort="Goor, Francois" uniqKey="Goor F" first="François" last="Goor">François Goor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Timofeyev, Sergei" sort="Timofeyev, Sergei" uniqKey="Timofeyev S" first="Sergei" last="Timofeyev">Sergei Timofeyev</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2004">2004</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15294354</idno><idno type="pmid">15294354</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.05.002</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001D86</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001D86</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Spatial assessment of the economic feasibility of short rotation coppice on radioactively contaminated land in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia. I. Model description and scenario analysis.</title><author><name sortKey="Perk Mv, Marcel Van Der" sort="Perk Mv, Marcel Van Der" uniqKey="Perk Mv M" first="Marcel Van Der" last="Perk Mv">Marcel Van Der Perk Mv</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The Netherlands Centre for Geo-ecology, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.vanderperk@geog.uu.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Burema, Jiske" sort="Burema, Jiske" uniqKey="Burema J" first="Jiske" last="Burema">Jiske Burema</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vandenhove, Hildegarde" sort="Vandenhove, Hildegarde" uniqKey="Vandenhove H" first="Hildegarde" last="Vandenhove">Hildegarde Vandenhove</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goor, Francois" sort="Goor, Francois" uniqKey="Goor F" first="François" last="Goor">François Goor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Timofeyev, Sergei" sort="Timofeyev, Sergei" uniqKey="Timofeyev S" first="Sergei" last="Timofeyev">Sergei Timofeyev</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of environmental management</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-4797</idno><imprint><date when="2004" type="published">2004</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bioelectric Energy Sources (economics)</term><term>Biomass (MeSH)</term><term>Cesium Radioisotopes (analysis)</term><term>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident (MeSH)</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH)</term><term>Geographic Information Systems (MeSH)</term><term>Incineration (MeSH)</term><term>Models, Theoretical (MeSH)</term><term>Republic of Belarus (MeSH)</term><term>Russia (MeSH)</term><term>Salix (growth & development)</term><term>Soil Pollutants, Radioactive (MeSH)</term><term>Ukraine (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>Cesium Radioisotopes</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Republic of Belarus</term><term>Russia</term><term>Soil Pollutants, Radioactive</term><term>Ukraine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Bioelectric Energy Sources</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Salix</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomass</term><term>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term><term>Geographic Information Systems</term><term>Incineration</term><term>Models, Theoretical</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The economic feasibility of short rotation coppice (SRC) production and energy conversion in areas contaminated by Chernobyl-derived (137)Cs was evaluated taking the spatial variability of environmental conditions into account. Two sequential GIS-embedded submodels were developed for a spatial assessment, which allow for spatial variation in soil contamination, soil type, and land use. These models were applied for four SRC production and four energy conversion scenarios for the entire contaminated area of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia and for a part of the Bragin district, Belarus. It was concluded that in general medium-scale SRC production using local machines is most profitable. The areas near Chernobyl are not suitable for SRC production since the contamination levels in SRC wood exceed the intervention limit. Large scale SRC production is not profitable in areas where dry and sandy soils predominate. If the soil contamination does not exceed the intervention limit and sufficient SRC wood is available, all energy conversion scenarios are profitable.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">15294354</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2004</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0301-4797</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>72</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of environmental management</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Environ Manage</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Spatial assessment of the economic feasibility of short rotation coppice on radioactively contaminated land in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia. I. Model description and scenario analysis.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>217-32</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The economic feasibility of short rotation coppice (SRC) production and energy conversion in areas contaminated by Chernobyl-derived (137)Cs was evaluated taking the spatial variability of environmental conditions into account. Two sequential GIS-embedded submodels were developed for a spatial assessment, which allow for spatial variation in soil contamination, soil type, and land use. These models were applied for four SRC production and four energy conversion scenarios for the entire contaminated area of Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia and for a part of the Bragin district, Belarus. It was concluded that in general medium-scale SRC production using local machines is most profitable. The areas near Chernobyl are not suitable for SRC production since the contamination levels in SRC wood exceed the intervention limit. Large scale SRC production is not profitable in areas where dry and sandy soils predominate. If the soil contamination does not exceed the intervention limit and sufficient SRC wood is available, all energy conversion scenarios are profitable.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Perk Mv</LastName><ForeName>Marcel van der</ForeName><Initials>Mv</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The Netherlands Centre for Geo-ecology, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.vanderperk@geog.uu.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Burema</LastName><ForeName>Jiske</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vandenhove</LastName><ForeName>Hildegarde</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Goor</LastName><ForeName>François</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Timofeyev</LastName><ForeName>Sergei</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Environ Manage</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0401664</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0301-4797</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002588">Cesium Radioisotopes</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012990">Soil Pollutants, Radioactive</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001674" MajorTopicYN="N">Bioelectric Energy Sources</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018533" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomass</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002588" MajorTopicYN="N">Cesium Radioisotopes</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D047852" MajorTopicYN="Y">Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D040362" MajorTopicYN="Y">Geographic Information Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017745" MajorTopicYN="N">Incineration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008962" MajorTopicYN="Y">Models, Theoretical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002094" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Republic of Belarus</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012426" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Russia</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032108" MajorTopicYN="N">Salix</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012990" MajorTopicYN="Y">Soil Pollutants, Radioactive</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014455" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Ukraine</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2002</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2004</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2004</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>05</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2004</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2004</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2004</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15294354</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.05.002</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0301479704000994</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/WillowV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001D86 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001D86 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= WillowV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15294354
|texte= Spatial assessment of the economic feasibility of short rotation coppice on radioactively contaminated land in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia. I. Model description and scenario analysis.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15294354" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a WillowV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |