An apparent trade-off between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence against herbivores in willow trees.
Identifieur interne : 001345 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001344; suivant : 001346An apparent trade-off between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence against herbivores in willow trees.
Auteurs : Kinuyo Yoneya ; Masayoshi Uefune ; Junji TakabayashiSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , analysis : Volatile Organic Compounds.
- immunology : Salix.
- parasitology : Salix.
- physiology : Choice Behavior, Coleoptera, Herbivory, Oviposition.
- Animals, Female, Principal Component Analysis, Signal Transduction.
Abstract
Signal-based induced indirect defence refers to herbivore-induced production of plant volatiles that attract carnivorous natural enemies of herbivores. Relationships between direct and indirect defence strategies were studied using tritrophic systems consisting of six sympatric willow species, willow leaf beetles (Plagiodera versicolora), and their natural predators, ladybeetles (Aiolocaria hexaspilota). Relative preferences of ladybeetles for prey-infested willow plant volatiles, indicating levels of signal-based induced indirect defence, were positively correlated with the vulnerability of willow species to leaf beetles, assigned as relative levels of direct defence. This correlation suggested a possible trade-off among the species, in terms of resource limitation between direct defence and signal-based induced indirect defence. However, analyses of volatiles from infested and uninfested plants showed that the specificity of infested volatile blends (an important factor determining the costs of signal-based induced indirect defence) did not affect the attractiveness of infested plant volatiles. Thus, the suggested trade-off in resource limitation was unlikely. Rather, principal coordinates analysis showed that this 'apparent trade-off' between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence was partially explained by differential preferences of ladybeetles to infested plant volatiles of the six willow species. We also showed that relative preferences of ladybeetles for prey-infested willow plant volatiles were positively correlated with oviposition preferences of leaf beetles and with the distributions of leaf beetles in the field. These correlations suggest that ladybeetles use the specificity of infested willow plant volatiles to find suitable prey patches.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051505
PubMed: 23251559
PubMed Central: PMC3520792
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23251559Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An apparent trade-off between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence against herbivores in willow trees.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Yoneya, Kinuyo" sort="Yoneya, Kinuyo" uniqKey="Yoneya K" first="Kinuyo" last="Yoneya">Kinuyo Yoneya</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Uefune, Masayoshi" sort="Uefune, Masayoshi" uniqKey="Uefune M" first="Masayoshi" last="Uefune">Masayoshi Uefune</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Takabayashi, Junji" sort="Takabayashi, Junji" uniqKey="Takabayashi J" first="Junji" last="Takabayashi">Junji Takabayashi</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:23251559</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23251559</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0051505</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC3520792</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001345</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001345</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">An apparent trade-off between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence against herbivores in willow trees.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Yoneya, Kinuyo" sort="Yoneya, Kinuyo" uniqKey="Yoneya K" first="Kinuyo" last="Yoneya">Kinuyo Yoneya</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Uefune, Masayoshi" sort="Uefune, Masayoshi" uniqKey="Uefune M" first="Masayoshi" last="Uefune">Masayoshi Uefune</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Takabayashi, Junji" sort="Takabayashi, Junji" uniqKey="Takabayashi J" first="Junji" last="Takabayashi">Junji Takabayashi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals (MeSH)</term>
<term>Choice Behavior (physiology)</term>
<term>Coleoptera (physiology)</term>
<term>Female (MeSH)</term>
<term>Herbivory (physiology)</term>
<term>Oviposition (physiology)</term>
<term>Principal Component Analysis (MeSH)</term>
<term>Salix (immunology)</term>
<term>Salix (parasitology)</term>
<term>Signal Transduction (MeSH)</term>
<term>Volatile Organic Compounds (analysis)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>Volatile Organic Compounds</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="immunology" xml:lang="en"><term>Salix</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="parasitology" xml:lang="en"><term>Salix</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Choice Behavior</term>
<term>Coleoptera</term>
<term>Herbivory</term>
<term>Oviposition</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Principal Component Analysis</term>
<term>Signal Transduction</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Signal-based induced indirect defence refers to herbivore-induced production of plant volatiles that attract carnivorous natural enemies of herbivores. Relationships between direct and indirect defence strategies were studied using tritrophic systems consisting of six sympatric willow species, willow leaf beetles (Plagiodera versicolora), and their natural predators, ladybeetles (Aiolocaria hexaspilota). Relative preferences of ladybeetles for prey-infested willow plant volatiles, indicating levels of signal-based induced indirect defence, were positively correlated with the vulnerability of willow species to leaf beetles, assigned as relative levels of direct defence. This correlation suggested a possible trade-off among the species, in terms of resource limitation between direct defence and signal-based induced indirect defence. However, analyses of volatiles from infested and uninfested plants showed that the specificity of infested volatile blends (an important factor determining the costs of signal-based induced indirect defence) did not affect the attractiveness of infested plant volatiles. Thus, the suggested trade-off in resource limitation was unlikely. Rather, principal coordinates analysis showed that this 'apparent trade-off' between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence was partially explained by differential preferences of ladybeetles to infested plant volatiles of the six willow species. We also showed that relative preferences of ladybeetles for prey-infested willow plant volatiles were positively correlated with oviposition preferences of leaf beetles and with the distributions of leaf beetles in the field. These correlations suggest that ladybeetles use the specificity of infested willow plant volatiles to find suitable prey patches.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23251559</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>7</Volume>
<Issue>12</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2012</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An apparent trade-off between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence against herbivores in willow trees.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>e51505</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0051505</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Signal-based induced indirect defence refers to herbivore-induced production of plant volatiles that attract carnivorous natural enemies of herbivores. Relationships between direct and indirect defence strategies were studied using tritrophic systems consisting of six sympatric willow species, willow leaf beetles (Plagiodera versicolora), and their natural predators, ladybeetles (Aiolocaria hexaspilota). Relative preferences of ladybeetles for prey-infested willow plant volatiles, indicating levels of signal-based induced indirect defence, were positively correlated with the vulnerability of willow species to leaf beetles, assigned as relative levels of direct defence. This correlation suggested a possible trade-off among the species, in terms of resource limitation between direct defence and signal-based induced indirect defence. However, analyses of volatiles from infested and uninfested plants showed that the specificity of infested volatile blends (an important factor determining the costs of signal-based induced indirect defence) did not affect the attractiveness of infested plant volatiles. Thus, the suggested trade-off in resource limitation was unlikely. Rather, principal coordinates analysis showed that this 'apparent trade-off' between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence was partially explained by differential preferences of ladybeetles to infested plant volatiles of the six willow species. We also showed that relative preferences of ladybeetles for prey-infested willow plant volatiles were positively correlated with oviposition preferences of leaf beetles and with the distributions of leaf beetles in the field. These correlations suggest that ladybeetles use the specificity of infested willow plant volatiles to find suitable prey patches.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yoneya</LastName>
<ForeName>Kinuyo</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Uefune</LastName>
<ForeName>Masayoshi</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Takabayashi</LastName>
<ForeName>Junji</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D055549">Volatile Organic Compounds</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002755" MajorTopicYN="N">Choice Behavior</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001517" MajorTopicYN="N">Coleoptera</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D060434" MajorTopicYN="N">Herbivory</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010058" MajorTopicYN="N">Oviposition</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025341" MajorTopicYN="N">Principal Component Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032108" MajorTopicYN="N">Salix</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000276" MajorTopicYN="Y">immunology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000469" MajorTopicYN="Y">parasitology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015398" MajorTopicYN="Y">Signal Transduction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055549" MajorTopicYN="N">Volatile Organic Compounds</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23251559</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0051505</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-12-19828</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3520792</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 May;50(5):911-23</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19246460</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Am Nat. 2004 Apr;163(4):E64-75</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15122510</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1994 Jun;20(6):1281-328</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24242341</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28;101(52):18246-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15604150</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Am Nat. 1998 Jan;151(1):20-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18811421</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Ann Bot. 2002 May;89(5):503-12</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12099523</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Sep;8(9):326-32</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21236183</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2003 Jan;134(2):210-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12647162</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12161</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20808961</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/WillowV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001345 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001345 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= WillowV1 |flux= Main |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:23251559 |texte= An apparent trade-off between direct and signal-based induced indirect defence against herbivores in willow trees. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23251559" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a WillowV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. | ![]() |