Application of Boundary Layer Displacement Thickness in Wind Erosion Protection Evaluation: Case Study of a Salix psammophila Sand Barrier.
Identifieur interne : 000521 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000520; suivant : 000522Application of Boundary Layer Displacement Thickness in Wind Erosion Protection Evaluation: Case Study of a Salix psammophila Sand Barrier.
Auteurs : Shuai Zhang ; Guo-Dong Ding ; Ming-Han Yu ; Guang-Lei Gao ; Yuan-Yuan Zhao ; Long Wang ; Yi-Zhao WangSource :
- International journal of environmental research and public health [ 1660-4601 ] ; 2019.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , analysis : Silicon Dioxide.
- geographic : China.
- growth & development : Salix.
- methods : Conservation of Natural Resources.
- Air Movements, Wind.
Abstract
Since the establishment of blown sand physics, surface roughness has been widely used in current research to indicate the ability of a surface to resist wind erosion and to evaluate the windproof effect of protective measures. However, since the calculation of surface roughness can result in different values and its applicability is poor, there are disadvantages to its use. Therefore, it is proposed that the boundary layer displacement thickness should be used rather than roughness as an indicator to solve such problems. To analyze the new indicator's accuracy and applicability when evaluating the effect of protective measures, a wind tunnel simulation experiment on a typical mechanical protection measure commonly used for sand control in China was conducted. Indicators of roughness and boundary layer displacement thickness were compared in evaluating the windproof performance of a Salix psammophila sand barrier of differing heights, side lengths, and porosities. The wind speed acceleration rate and effective protection area, which can directly reflect the protective effect of a sand barrier, were analyzed as evaluation criteria. The results show that roughness can only reflect the influence of height on the windbreak effect of sand barriers, whereas the boundary layer displacement thickness accurately showed the influence of height, side length, and porosity on the windproof effect of the sand barriers. Compared with roughness, the boundary layer displacement thickness was more strongly correlated with the effective protection area. Therefore, the boundary layer displacement thickness, rather than roughness, should be used as a new indicator when evaluating the windproof effect of protective measures.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040592
PubMed: 30781695
PubMed Central: PMC6407013
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:30781695Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Application of Boundary Layer Displacement Thickness in Wind Erosion Protection Evaluation: Case Study of a <i>Salix psammophila</i> Sand Barrier.</title><author><name sortKey="Zhang, Shuai" sort="Zhang, Shuai" uniqKey="Zhang S" first="Shuai" last="Zhang">Shuai Zhang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. xxwoshizsxx@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. xxwoshizsxx@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ding, Guo Dong" sort="Ding, Guo Dong" uniqKey="Ding G" first="Guo-Dong" last="Ding">Guo-Dong Ding</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. dingguodong@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. dingguodong@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yu, Ming Han" sort="Yu, Ming Han" uniqKey="Yu M" first="Ming-Han" last="Yu">Ming-Han Yu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. ymh_2012tai@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. ymh_2012tai@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gao, Guang Lei" sort="Gao, Guang Lei" uniqKey="Gao G" first="Guang-Lei" last="Gao">Guang-Lei Gao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. gaoguanglei@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. gaoguanglei@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhao, Yuan Yuan" sort="Zhao, Yuan Yuan" uniqKey="Zhao Y" first="Yuan-Yuan" last="Zhao">Yuan-Yuan Zhao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. yuanyuan0402@126.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. yuanyuan0402@126.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Long" sort="Wang, Long" uniqKey="Wang L" first="Long" last="Wang">Long Wang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. along@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. along@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Yi Zhao" sort="Wang, Yi Zhao" uniqKey="Wang Y" first="Yi-Zhao" last="Wang">Yi-Zhao Wang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. yizhao_wang@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. yizhao_wang@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2019">2019</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:30781695</idno><idno type="pmid">30781695</idno><idno type="doi">10.3390/ijerph16040592</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC6407013</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000521</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000521</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Application of Boundary Layer Displacement Thickness in Wind Erosion Protection Evaluation: Case Study of a <i>Salix psammophila</i> Sand Barrier.</title><author><name sortKey="Zhang, Shuai" sort="Zhang, Shuai" uniqKey="Zhang S" first="Shuai" last="Zhang">Shuai Zhang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. xxwoshizsxx@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. xxwoshizsxx@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ding, Guo Dong" sort="Ding, Guo Dong" uniqKey="Ding G" first="Guo-Dong" last="Ding">Guo-Dong Ding</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. dingguodong@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. dingguodong@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yu, Ming Han" sort="Yu, Ming Han" uniqKey="Yu M" first="Ming-Han" last="Yu">Ming-Han Yu</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. ymh_2012tai@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. ymh_2012tai@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gao, Guang Lei" sort="Gao, Guang Lei" uniqKey="Gao G" first="Guang-Lei" last="Gao">Guang-Lei Gao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. gaoguanglei@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. gaoguanglei@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zhao, Yuan Yuan" sort="Zhao, Yuan Yuan" uniqKey="Zhao Y" first="Yuan-Yuan" last="Zhao">Yuan-Yuan Zhao</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. yuanyuan0402@126.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. yuanyuan0402@126.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Long" sort="Wang, Long" uniqKey="Wang L" first="Long" last="Wang">Long Wang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. along@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. along@bjfu.edu.cn.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Yi Zhao" sort="Wang, Yi Zhao" uniqKey="Wang Y" first="Yi-Zhao" last="Wang">Yi-Zhao Wang</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. yizhao_wang@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. yizhao_wang@163.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International journal of environmental research and public health</title><idno type="eISSN">1660-4601</idno><imprint><date when="2019" type="published">2019</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Air Movements (MeSH)</term><term>China (MeSH)</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources (methods)</term><term>Salix (growth & development)</term><term>Silicon Dioxide (analysis)</term><term>Wind (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>Silicon Dioxide</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>China</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Salix</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Air Movements</term><term>Wind</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Since the establishment of blown sand physics, surface roughness has been widely used in current research to indicate the ability of a surface to resist wind erosion and to evaluate the windproof effect of protective measures. However, since the calculation of surface roughness can result in different values and its applicability is poor, there are disadvantages to its use. Therefore, it is proposed that the boundary layer displacement thickness should be used rather than roughness as an indicator to solve such problems. To analyze the new indicator's accuracy and applicability when evaluating the effect of protective measures, a wind tunnel simulation experiment on a typical mechanical protection measure commonly used for sand control in China was conducted. Indicators of roughness and boundary layer displacement thickness were compared in evaluating the windproof performance of a <i>Salix psammophila</i> sand barrier of differing heights, side lengths, and porosities. The wind speed acceleration rate and effective protection area, which can directly reflect the protective effect of a sand barrier, were analyzed as evaluation criteria. The results show that roughness can only reflect the influence of height on the windbreak effect of sand barriers, whereas the boundary layer displacement thickness accurately showed the influence of height, side length, and porosity on the windproof effect of the sand barriers. Compared with roughness, the boundary layer displacement thickness was more strongly correlated with the effective protection area. Therefore, the boundary layer displacement thickness, rather than roughness, should be used as a new indicator when evaluating the windproof effect of protective measures.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">30781695</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2019</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>09</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1660-4601</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>16</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2019</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>18</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of environmental research and public health</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Environ Res Public Health</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Application of Boundary Layer Displacement Thickness in Wind Erosion Protection Evaluation: Case Study of a <i>Salix psammophila</i> Sand Barrier.</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">E592</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3390/ijerph16040592</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Since the establishment of blown sand physics, surface roughness has been widely used in current research to indicate the ability of a surface to resist wind erosion and to evaluate the windproof effect of protective measures. However, since the calculation of surface roughness can result in different values and its applicability is poor, there are disadvantages to its use. Therefore, it is proposed that the boundary layer displacement thickness should be used rather than roughness as an indicator to solve such problems. To analyze the new indicator's accuracy and applicability when evaluating the effect of protective measures, a wind tunnel simulation experiment on a typical mechanical protection measure commonly used for sand control in China was conducted. Indicators of roughness and boundary layer displacement thickness were compared in evaluating the windproof performance of a <i>Salix psammophila</i> sand barrier of differing heights, side lengths, and porosities. The wind speed acceleration rate and effective protection area, which can directly reflect the protective effect of a sand barrier, were analyzed as evaluation criteria. The results show that roughness can only reflect the influence of height on the windbreak effect of sand barriers, whereas the boundary layer displacement thickness accurately showed the influence of height, side length, and porosity on the windproof effect of the sand barriers. Compared with roughness, the boundary layer displacement thickness was more strongly correlated with the effective protection area. Therefore, the boundary layer displacement thickness, rather than roughness, should be used as a new indicator when evaluating the windproof effect of protective measures.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhang</LastName><ForeName>Shuai</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. xxwoshizsxx@163.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. xxwoshizsxx@163.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ding</LastName><ForeName>Guo-Dong</ForeName><Initials>GD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. dingguodong@bjfu.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. dingguodong@bjfu.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yu</LastName><ForeName>Ming-Han</ForeName><Initials>MH</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-6641-4167</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. ymh_2012tai@163.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. ymh_2012tai@163.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gao</LastName><ForeName>Guang-Lei</ForeName><Initials>GL</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-0486-1532</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. gaoguanglei@bjfu.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. gaoguanglei@bjfu.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhao</LastName><ForeName>Yuan-Yuan</ForeName><Initials>YY</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. yuanyuan0402@126.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. yuanyuan0402@126.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Long</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. along@bjfu.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. along@bjfu.edu.cn.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Yi-Zhao</ForeName><Initials>YZ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Yanchi Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, (No.) 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China. yizhao_wang@163.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. yizhao_wang@163.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>No. 2016YFC0500905</GrantID><Agency>National Key Research and Development Program of China</Agency><Country>International</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2019</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>18</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Environ Res Public Health</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101238455</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1660-4601</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>7631-86-9</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012822">Silicon Dioxide</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000392" MajorTopicYN="N">Air Movements</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002681" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">China</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="N">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032108" MajorTopicYN="N">Salix</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012822" MajorTopicYN="N">Silicon Dioxide</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014919" MajorTopicYN="Y">Wind</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Salix psammophila sand barrier</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">boundary layer displacement thickness</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">effective protection area</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">roughness</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">wind speed acceleration rate</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2019</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2019</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>07</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2019</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2019</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2019</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30781695</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">ijerph16040592</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3390/ijerph16040592</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC6407013</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 06;15(10):</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30301232</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/WillowV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000521 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000521 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= WillowV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:30781695
|texte= Application of Boundary Layer Displacement Thickness in Wind Erosion Protection Evaluation: Case Study of a Salix psammophila Sand Barrier.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:30781695" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a WillowV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |