Preference of intake of different tree leaves preserved with drying and ensiling by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii).
Identifieur interne : 000049 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000048; suivant : 000050Preference of intake of different tree leaves preserved with drying and ensiling by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii).
Auteurs : Marcin Przybyło ; Sylwia Kazek ; Alina Kloska ; Jan B. Py ; Paweł G RkaSource :
- Zoo biology [ 1098-2361 ] ; 2020.
Abstract
It is recommended that browse should be an important part of diets for browsing and intermediate feeding type ruminants. However, provision of browse in winter time is problematic for many zoos located in the temperate climate. Drying or freezing of branches are commonly practiced solutions to this problem, but ensiling of tree leaves could also be an attractive option. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of drying and ensiling of different tree leaves on preference of their intake by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii), an intermediate feeding type ruminant. A study was conducted on five nyala fed a standard diet (meadow hay, dehydrated chopped lucerne and limited concentrates) before and during the study. Preference of intake of five feeds was tested: dried maple (A. platanoides), oak (Q. robur), willow (S. alba), and ensiled maple and lime (T. cordata) leaves. Each day two tested feeds were offered to each animal. After 4 h of presentation, feed refusals were weighed and preference ratio for each tested feed and animal was calculated. Then, preferences were ranked using a pairwise comparison chart. Dried maple and oak leaves were preferred more than other leaves whereas ensiled lime leaves were the least preferred. On the other hand, ensiled and dried maple leaves were equally preferred. Results of this study showed that palatability of ensiled tree leaves should not be a concern when feeding nyala, and likely also other browsing or intermediate feeding type ruminants, but palatability of silage may depend on the species of tree.
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21570
PubMed: 32931639
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:32931639Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Preference of intake of different tree leaves preserved with drying and ensiling by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii).</title><author><name sortKey="Przybylo, Marcin" sort="Przybylo, Marcin" uniqKey="Przybylo M" first="Marcin" last="Przybyło">Marcin Przybyło</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kazek, Sylwia" sort="Kazek, Sylwia" uniqKey="Kazek S" first="Sylwia" last="Kazek">Sylwia Kazek</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kloska, Alina" sort="Kloska, Alina" uniqKey="Kloska A" first="Alina" last="Kloska">Alina Kloska</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Silesian Zoological Garden, Chorzów, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Py, Jan B" sort="Py, Jan B" uniqKey="Py J" first="Jan B" last="Py">Jan B. Py</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="G Rka, Pawel" sort="G Rka, Pawel" uniqKey="G Rka P" first="Paweł" last="G Rka">Paweł G Rka</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:32931639</idno><idno type="pmid">32931639</idno><idno type="doi">10.1002/zoo.21570</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000049</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000049</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Preference of intake of different tree leaves preserved with drying and ensiling by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii).</title><author><name sortKey="Przybylo, Marcin" sort="Przybylo, Marcin" uniqKey="Przybylo M" first="Marcin" last="Przybyło">Marcin Przybyło</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kazek, Sylwia" sort="Kazek, Sylwia" uniqKey="Kazek S" first="Sylwia" last="Kazek">Sylwia Kazek</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kloska, Alina" sort="Kloska, Alina" uniqKey="Kloska A" first="Alina" last="Kloska">Alina Kloska</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Silesian Zoological Garden, Chorzów, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Py, Jan B" sort="Py, Jan B" uniqKey="Py J" first="Jan B" last="Py">Jan B. Py</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="G Rka, Pawel" sort="G Rka, Pawel" uniqKey="G Rka P" first="Paweł" last="G Rka">Paweł G Rka</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Zoo biology</title><idno type="eISSN">1098-2361</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">It is recommended that browse should be an important part of diets for browsing and intermediate feeding type ruminants. However, provision of browse in winter time is problematic for many zoos located in the temperate climate. Drying or freezing of branches are commonly practiced solutions to this problem, but ensiling of tree leaves could also be an attractive option. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of drying and ensiling of different tree leaves on preference of their intake by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii), an intermediate feeding type ruminant. A study was conducted on five nyala fed a standard diet (meadow hay, dehydrated chopped lucerne and limited concentrates) before and during the study. Preference of intake of five feeds was tested: dried maple (A. platanoides), oak (Q. robur), willow (S. alba), and ensiled maple and lime (T. cordata) leaves. Each day two tested feeds were offered to each animal. After 4 h of presentation, feed refusals were weighed and preference ratio for each tested feed and animal was calculated. Then, preferences were ranked using a pairwise comparison chart. Dried maple and oak leaves were preferred more than other leaves whereas ensiled lime leaves were the least preferred. On the other hand, ensiled and dried maple leaves were equally preferred. Results of this study showed that palatability of ensiled tree leaves should not be a concern when feeding nyala, and likely also other browsing or intermediate feeding type ruminants, but palatability of silage may depend on the species of tree.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">32931639</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1098-2361</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><PubDate><Year>2020</Year><Month>Sep</Month><Day>15</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Zoo biology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Zoo Biol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Preference of intake of different tree leaves preserved with drying and ensiling by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii).</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1002/zoo.21570</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>It is recommended that browse should be an important part of diets for browsing and intermediate feeding type ruminants. However, provision of browse in winter time is problematic for many zoos located in the temperate climate. Drying or freezing of branches are commonly practiced solutions to this problem, but ensiling of tree leaves could also be an attractive option. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of drying and ensiling of different tree leaves on preference of their intake by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii), an intermediate feeding type ruminant. A study was conducted on five nyala fed a standard diet (meadow hay, dehydrated chopped lucerne and limited concentrates) before and during the study. Preference of intake of five feeds was tested: dried maple (A. platanoides), oak (Q. robur), willow (S. alba), and ensiled maple and lime (T. cordata) leaves. Each day two tested feeds were offered to each animal. After 4 h of presentation, feed refusals were weighed and preference ratio for each tested feed and animal was calculated. Then, preferences were ranked using a pairwise comparison chart. Dried maple and oak leaves were preferred more than other leaves whereas ensiled lime leaves were the least preferred. On the other hand, ensiled and dried maple leaves were equally preferred. Results of this study showed that palatability of ensiled tree leaves should not be a concern when feeding nyala, and likely also other browsing or intermediate feeding type ruminants, but palatability of silage may depend on the species of tree.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Przybyło</LastName><ForeName>Marcin</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kazek</LastName><ForeName>Sylwia</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kloska</LastName><ForeName>Alina</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Silesian Zoological Garden, Chorzów, Poland.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pyś</LastName><ForeName>Jan B</ForeName><Initials>JB</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Górka</LastName><ForeName>Paweł</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>15</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Zoo Biol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8807837</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0733-3188</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">browse</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">palatability</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ruminant</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">silage</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">zoo</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2020</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>04</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2020</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>17</Hour><Minute>15</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2020</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32931639</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1002/zoo.21570</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Title>REFERENCES</Title><Reference><Citation>Clauss, M., & Dierenfeld, E. S. (2008). The nutrition of browsers. In M. E. Fowler, & R. F. Miller (Eds.), Fowlers zoo and wild animal medicine: current therapy (Vol. 6, pp. 444-454). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3414</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Clauss, M., Kaiser, T., & Hummel, J. (2008). The morphophysiological adaptations of browsing and grazing mammals. In I. J. Gordon, & H. H. T. Prins (Eds.), The ecology of browsing and grazing: ecological studies (Vol. 195, pp. 47-88). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3413</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Clauss, M., Kienzle, E., & Hatt, J. M. (2003). Feeding practice in captive wild ruminants: Peculiarities in the nutrition of browsers/concentrate selectors and intermediate feeders. A review. In A. Fidgett, M. Clauss, U. Ganslosser, J. M. Hatt, & J. Nijboer (Eds.), Zoo animal nutrition (Vol. 2, pp. 27-52). Fürth, Germany: Filander Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3515</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Clauss, M., Lechner-Doll, M., Flach, E. J., Tack, C., & Hatt, J. M. (2001). The comparative use of four marker systems for the estimation of digestibility, and low food intake, in a group of captive giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). Zoo Biology, 20, 315-329. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-352610.1002/zoo.1031</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Depauw, S., Boeykens, A., & Van Houcke, J. (2019). Willow silage: What works and what doesn't? Proceedings of 10th European Zoo Nutrition Conference, Marwell Zoo, Winchester.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Depauw, S., Janssens, G. P. J., Stevens, J. M. G., & Bosch, G. (2019). Browse preference in bonobos. Proceedings of 10th European Zoo Nutrition Conference, Marwell Zoo, Winchester.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fowler, M. E. (1978). Peracute mortality in captive giraffe. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 173, 1088-1093.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gagnon, M., & Chew, A. E. (2000). Dietary preferences in extant African Bovidae. Journal of Mammalogy, 81, 490-511. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0490:DPIEAB>2.0.CO;2</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ginane, C., Baumont, R., & Favreau-Peigné, A. (2011). Perception and hedonic value of basic tastes in domestic ruminants. Physiology and Behavior, 104, 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.07.011</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Górka, P., Przybyło, M., Kański, J., & Kloska, A. (2016). Effect of pelleted cereal-based feed used in the diet on feed intake, eating behaviour, rumination and nutrient digestibility in antelope sitatunga (Tragelaphus spekii). Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 25, 125-133. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/65572/2016</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gussek, I., Große-Brinkhaus, C., Hummel, J., & Südekum, K.-H. (2016). Chemical composition and fermentation characteristics of feedstuffs for giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) in German zoos. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 25, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/65573/2016</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hatt, J. M., & Clauss, M. (2006). Browse silage in zoo animal nutrition: feeding enrichment of browsers during winter. In A. Fidgett, M. Clauss, K. Eulenberger, J.-M. Hatt, I. Hume, G. P. J. Janssens, & J. Nijboer (Eds.), Zoo animal nutrition (Vol. 2, pp. 8-9). Fürth, Germany: Filander. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3526</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hatt, J. M., Schaub, D., Wanner, M., Wettstein, H. R., Flach, E. J., Tack, C., … Clauss, M. (2005). Energy and fibre intake in a group of captive giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) offered increasing amounts of browse. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. A, Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine, 52, 485-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2005.00769</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hummel, J., & Clauss, M. (2006). Feeding, EAZA husbandry and management guidelines for Giraffa camelopardalis (pp. 29-61). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Burger's Zoo. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3558</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hummel, J., Nogge, G., Clauss, M., Nørgaard, C., Johanson, K., Nijboer, J., & Pfeffer, E. (2006). Energy supply of the okapi in captivity: Fermentation characteristics of feedstuffs. Zoo Biology, 25, 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20101</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mbatha, K. R., & Bakare, A. G. (2018). Browse silage as potential feed for captive wild ungulates in Southern Africa: A review. Animal Nutrition, 4, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.12.003</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Miller-Cushon, E. K., Montoro, C., Ipharraguerre, I. R., & Bach, A. (2014). Dietary preference in dairy calves for feed ingredients high in energy and protein. Journal of Dairy Science, 97, 1634-1644. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7199</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nijboer, J., Clauss, M., & Nobel, J. J. L. (2003). Browse silage: the solution for browsers in wintertime? In A. Fidgett, M. Clauss, K. Eulenberger, J.-M. Hatt, I. Hume, G. P. J. Janssens, & J. Nijboer (Eds.), Zoo animal nutrition (Vol. 3, pp. 6-7). Fürth, Germany: Filander. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3525</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Provenza, F. D., Pfister, J. A., & Cheney, C. D. (1992). Mechanisms of learning in diet selection with reference to phytotoxicosis in herbivores. Journal of Range Management, 45, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/4002523</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Przybyło, M., Kanski, J., Lasek, O., Kloska, A., & Górka, P. (2018). Effect of processing method of cereals on feed intake, eating behavior, rumination and nutrient digestibility in nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii). Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 27, 219-228. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/94489/2018</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Seiffert, S. (2019). Ten years of browse provision at ZSL London Zoo and ZSL Whipsnade Zoo: What have we learned and where are we going? Proceedings of 10th European Zoo Nutrition Conference, Marwell Zoo, Winchester.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Van Herk, E., Verheij, M., Fens, A., Bionda, T., Idoe, A., & Bosch, G. (2019). The effects of frozen storage on the chemical composition, fermentability and palatability of temperate browse in zoos. Proceedings of 10th European Zoo Nutrition Conference, Marwell Zoo, Winchester.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Warren, L., Liptovszky, M., Ellis, C., & White, G. (2019). Determining nitrogen (protein) content of varying species of browse and herbage fed to western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla)(Pongo pygmaeus) and bornean orangutans at Twycross Zoo. Proceedings of 10th European Zoo Nutrition Conference, Marwell Zoo, Winchester.</Citation></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/WillowV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000049 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000049 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= WillowV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:32931639
|texte= Preference of intake of different tree leaves preserved with drying and ensiling by nyala antelope (Tragelaphus angasii).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:32931639" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a WillowV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |