Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations
Identifieur interne : 000741 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000740; suivant : 000742Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations
Auteurs : Sandra Hamel ; Jean-Michel Gaillard ; Nigel Gilles Yoccoz ; Anne Loison ; Christophe Bonenfant ; Sébastien DescampsSource :
- Ecology Letters [ 1461-023X ] ; 2010-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 915–935
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01478.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title><author><name sortKey="Hamel, Sandra" sort="Hamel, Sandra" uniqKey="Hamel S" first="Sandra" last="Hamel">Sandra Hamel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: sandra.hamel@uit.no</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gaillard, Jean Ichel" sort="Gaillard, Jean Ichel" uniqKey="Gaillard J" first="Jean-Michel" last="Gaillard">Jean-Michel Gaillard</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yoccoz, Nigel Gilles" sort="Yoccoz, Nigel Gilles" uniqKey="Yoccoz N" first="Nigel Gilles" last="Yoccoz">Nigel Gilles Yoccoz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loison, Anne" sort="Loison, Anne" uniqKey="Loison A" first="Anne" last="Loison">Anne Loison</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS, UMR 5553 “Ecologie Alpine”, F‐73370, Le Bourget du Lac, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bonenfant, Christophe" sort="Bonenfant, Christophe" uniqKey="Bonenfant C" first="Christophe" last="Bonenfant">Christophe Bonenfant</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Descamps, Sebastien" sort="Descamps, Sebastien" uniqKey="Descamps S" first="Sébastien" last="Descamps">Sébastien Descamps</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of Carleton, Ottawa K1A 0H3, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01478.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000741</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000741</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title><author><name sortKey="Hamel, Sandra" sort="Hamel, Sandra" uniqKey="Hamel S" first="Sandra" last="Hamel">Sandra Hamel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: sandra.hamel@uit.no</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gaillard, Jean Ichel" sort="Gaillard, Jean Ichel" uniqKey="Gaillard J" first="Jean-Michel" last="Gaillard">Jean-Michel Gaillard</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yoccoz, Nigel Gilles" sort="Yoccoz, Nigel Gilles" uniqKey="Yoccoz N" first="Nigel Gilles" last="Yoccoz">Nigel Gilles Yoccoz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Loison, Anne" sort="Loison, Anne" uniqKey="Loison A" first="Anne" last="Loison">Anne Loison</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS, UMR 5553 “Ecologie Alpine”, F‐73370, Le Bourget du Lac, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bonenfant, Christophe" sort="Bonenfant, Christophe" uniqKey="Bonenfant C" first="Christophe" last="Bonenfant">Christophe Bonenfant</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Descamps, Sebastien" sort="Descamps, Sebastien" uniqKey="Descamps S" first="Sébastien" last="Descamps">Sébastien Descamps</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of Carleton, Ottawa K1A 0H3, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Ecology Letters</title><idno type="ISSN">1461-023X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1461-0248</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07">2010-07</date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="915">915</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="935">935</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1461-023X</idno></series><idno type="istex">FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01478.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ELE1478</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1461-023X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Environmental canalization</term><term>investment</term><term>mammals</term><term>reproductive tactics</term><term>resource acquisition</term><term>resource allocation</term><term>rodents</term><term>ungulates</term><term>van Noordwijk and de Jong’s model</term><term>variable environment</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 915–935</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Sandra Hamel</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</json:string><json:string>E-mail: sandra.hamel@uit.no</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jean‐Michel Gaillard</name><affiliations><json:string>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Nigel Gilles Yoccoz</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Anne Loison</name><affiliations><json:string>Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS, UMR 5553 “Ecologie Alpine”, F‐73370, Le Bourget du Lac, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christophe Bonenfant</name><affiliations><json:string>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sébastien Descamps</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biology, University of Carleton, Ottawa K1A 0H3, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Environmental canalization</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>investment</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mammals</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>reproductive tactics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resource acquisition</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resource allocation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>rodents</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ungulates</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>van Noordwijk and de Jong’s model</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>variable environment</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>ELE1478</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>5.06</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>34</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>9736</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>69569</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>21</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>5</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>13</volume><publisherId><json:string>ELE</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>21</total><last>935</last><first>915</first></pages><issn><json:string>1461-023X</json:string></issn><issue>7</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1461-0248</json:string></eissn><title>Ecology Letters</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1461-0248</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>natural sciences</json:string><json:string>biology</json:string><json:string>ecology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01478.x</json:string></doi><id>FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933</id><score>0.061335307</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS</p></availability><date>2010</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Sandra</forename><surname>Hamel</surname></persName><email>sandra.hamel@uit.no</email><affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Jean‐Michel</forename><surname>Gaillard</surname></persName><affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Nigel Gilles</forename><surname>Yoccoz</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">Anne</forename><surname>Loison</surname></persName><affiliation>Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS, UMR 5553 “Ecologie Alpine”, F‐73370, Le Bourget du Lac, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-5"><persName><forename type="first">Christophe</forename><surname>Bonenfant</surname></persName><affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-6"><persName><forename type="first">Sébastien</forename><surname>Descamps</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biology, University of Carleton, Ottawa K1A 0H3, Canada</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ecology Letters</title><idno type="pISSN">1461-023X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1461-0248</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1461-0248</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-07"></date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="915">915</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="935">935</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01478.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ELE1478</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2010</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 915–935</p></abstract><abstract><p>Fitness costs of reproduction play a key role in understanding the evolution of reproductive tactics. Nevertheless, the detection and the intensity of costs of reproduction vary according to which life‐history traits and species are studied. We propose an evolutionary model demonstrating that the chance of detecting a cost of reproduction should be lower when the fitness component studied has a low rather than high variance. Consequently, the fitness component that is affected the most by costs of reproduction should vary with life speed. Since long‐lived species have developed a strategy that avoids jeopardizing their survival and short‐lived species favour current reproduction, variance in survival is smaller and variance in reproduction higher in long‐lived vs. short‐lived species. We review empirical studies of costs of reproduction in free‐ranging mammals, comparing evidence of costs reported among species and focal traits. In support of our model, more studies reported evidence of reproductive costs of reproduction in ungulates than in rodents, whereas survival costs of reproduction were more frequent in rodents than in ungulates. The life‐history model we propose is expected to apply to any species, and hence provides a better understanding of life‐history variation, which should be relevant to all evolutionary ecologists.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Environmental canalization</term></item><item><term>investment</term></item><item><term>mammals</term></item><item><term>reproductive tactics</term></item><item><term>resource acquisition</term></item><item><term>resource allocation</term></item><item><term>rodents</term></item><item><term>ungulates</term></item><item><term>van Noordwijk and de Jong’s model</term></item><item><term>variable environment</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2010-07">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1461-0248</doi><issn type="print">1461-023X</issn><issn type="electronic">1461-0248</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ELE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ECOLOGY LETTERS">Ecology Letters</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07007"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ele.2010.13.issue-7</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="7">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-07">July 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="13" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01478.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ELE1478"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="21"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Reviews and Syntheses</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-05-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-06-14"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.9 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-06-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="915">915</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="935">935</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><i> Correspondence: E‐mail: </i><email>sandra.hamel@uit.no</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ELE.ELE1478.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Editor, Gabriele Sorci Manuscript received 18 January 2010 First decision 13 February 2010 Manuscript accepted 20 March 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title><title type="shortAuthors">S. Hamel <i>et al.</i></title><title type="short">Fitness costs of reproduction in mammals</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Sandra</givenNames><familyName>Hamel</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Jean‐Michel</givenNames><familyName>Gaillard</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Nigel Gilles</givenNames><familyName>Yoccoz</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Anne</givenNames><familyName>Loison</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Christophe</givenNames><familyName>Bonenfant</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Sébastien</givenNames><familyName>Descamps</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NO"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="FR"><unparsedAffiliation>Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS, UMR 5553 “Ecologie Alpine”, F‐73370, Le Bourget du Lac, France</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biology, University of Carleton, Ottawa K1A 0H3, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Environmental canalization</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">investment</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mammals</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">reproductive tactics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">resource acquisition</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">resource allocation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">rodents</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">ungulates</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">van Noordwijk and de Jong’s model</keyword><keyword xml:id="k10">variable environment</keyword></keywordGroup><supportingInformation><p><b>Appendix S1</b> How should costs of reproduction be measured?</p><p><b>Appendix S2</b> Other costs of reproduction.</p><p><b>Appendix S3</b> References listed in Tables 1 and 2.</p><p>As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer‐reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:1461023X:media:ele1478:ELE_1478_sm_appendixS1"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:1461023X:media:ele1478:ELE_1478_sm_appendixS2"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="supporting info item" href="urn-x:wiley:1461023X:media:ele1478:ELE_1478_sm_appendixS3"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting info item</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><section xml:id="sec-sum-1"><p> <i>Ecology Letters</i> (2010) 13: 915–935</p></section><section xml:id="abs1-1"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Fitness costs of reproduction play a key role in understanding the evolution of reproductive tactics. Nevertheless, the detection and the intensity of costs of reproduction vary according to which life‐history traits and species are studied. We propose an evolutionary model demonstrating that the chance of detecting a cost of reproduction should be lower when the fitness component studied has a low rather than high variance. Consequently, the fitness component that is affected the most by costs of reproduction should vary with life speed. Since long‐lived species have developed a strategy that avoids jeopardizing their survival and short‐lived species favour current reproduction, variance in survival is smaller and variance in reproduction higher in long‐lived vs. short‐lived species. We review empirical studies of costs of reproduction in free‐ranging mammals, comparing evidence of costs reported among species and focal traits. In support of our model, more studies reported evidence of reproductive costs of reproduction in ungulates than in rodents, whereas survival costs of reproduction were more frequent in rodents than in ungulates. The life‐history model we propose is expected to apply to any species, and hence provides a better understanding of life‐history variation, which should be relevant to all evolutionary ecologists.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Fitness costs of reproduction in mammals</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sandra</namePart><namePart type="family">Hamel</namePart><affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: sandra.hamel@uit.no</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jean‐Michel</namePart><namePart type="family">Gaillard</namePart><affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nigel Gilles</namePart><namePart type="family">Yoccoz</namePart><affiliation>Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anne</namePart><namePart type="family">Loison</namePart><affiliation>Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS, UMR 5553 “Ecologie Alpine”, F‐73370, Le Bourget du Lac, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christophe</namePart><namePart type="family">Bonenfant</namePart><affiliation>Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1; CNRS, UMR 5558 “Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive”, F‐69622, Villeurbanne, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sébastien</namePart><namePart type="family">Descamps</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biology, University of Carleton, Ottawa K1A 0H3, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-07</dateIssued><edition>Editor, Gabriele Sorci Manuscript received 18 January 2010 First decision 13 February 2010 Manuscript accepted 20 March 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 915–935</abstract><abstract>Fitness costs of reproduction play a key role in understanding the evolution of reproductive tactics. Nevertheless, the detection and the intensity of costs of reproduction vary according to which life‐history traits and species are studied. We propose an evolutionary model demonstrating that the chance of detecting a cost of reproduction should be lower when the fitness component studied has a low rather than high variance. Consequently, the fitness component that is affected the most by costs of reproduction should vary with life speed. Since long‐lived species have developed a strategy that avoids jeopardizing their survival and short‐lived species favour current reproduction, variance in survival is smaller and variance in reproduction higher in long‐lived vs. short‐lived species. We review empirical studies of costs of reproduction in free‐ranging mammals, comparing evidence of costs reported among species and focal traits. In support of our model, more studies reported evidence of reproductive costs of reproduction in ungulates than in rodents, whereas survival costs of reproduction were more frequent in rodents than in ungulates. The life‐history model we propose is expected to apply to any species, and hence provides a better understanding of life‐history variation, which should be relevant to all evolutionary ecologists.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Environmental canalization</topic><topic>investment</topic><topic>mammals</topic><topic>reproductive tactics</topic><topic>resource acquisition</topic><topic>resource allocation</topic><topic>rodents</topic><topic>ungulates</topic><topic>van Noordwijk and de Jong’s model</topic><topic>variable environment</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Ecology Letters</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><note type="content"> Appendix S1 How should costs of reproduction be measured? Appendix S2 Other costs of reproduction. Appendix S3 References listed in Tables 1 and 2. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer‐reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Appendix S1 How should costs of reproduction be measured? Appendix S2 Other costs of reproduction. Appendix S3 References listed in Tables 1 and 2. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer‐reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Appendix S1 How should costs of reproduction be measured? Appendix S2 Other costs of reproduction. Appendix S3 References listed in Tables 1 and 2. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer‐reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Appendix S1 How should costs of reproduction be measured? Appendix S2 Other costs of reproduction. Appendix S3 References listed in Tables 1 and 2. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer‐reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.Supporting Info Item: Supporting info item - Supporting info item - Supporting info item - </note><identifier type="ISSN">1461-023X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1461-0248</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1461-0248</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ELE</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>915</start><end>935</end><total>21</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01478.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ELE1478</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/RenardV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000741 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000741 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= RenardV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FFE974316AB50D8D5CD871C9A1DCACFC19CEB933
|texte= Fitness costs of reproduction depend on life speed: empirical evidence from mammalian populations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |