Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species.
Identifieur interne : 003470 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003469; suivant : 003471Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species.
Auteurs : Sook Jung [États-Unis] ; Derick Jiwan ; Ilhyung Cho ; Taein Lee ; Albert Abbott ; Bryon Sosinski ; Dorrie MainSource :
- BMC genomics [ 1471-2164 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- ADN des plantes (génétique), Analyse de séquence d'ADN (MeSH), Arabidopsis (génétique), Chromosomes artificiels de bactérie (MeSH), Gènes de plante (MeSH), Génome végétal (MeSH), Locus de caractère quantitatif (MeSH), Medicago (génétique), Populus (génétique), Prunus (génétique), Synténie (MeSH), Séquence conservée (MeSH), Évolution moléculaire (MeSH).
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Arabidopsis (genetics), Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial (MeSH), Conserved Sequence (MeSH), DNA, Plant (genetics), Evolution, Molecular (MeSH), Genes, Plant (MeSH), Genome, Plant (MeSH), Medicago (genetics), Populus (genetics), Prunus (genetics), Quantitative Trait Loci (MeSH), Sequence Analysis, DNA (MeSH), Synteny (MeSH).
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : DNA, Plant.
- genetics : Arabidopsis, Medicago, Populus, Prunus.
- Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, Genes, Plant, Genome, Plant, Quantitative Trait Loci, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Synteny.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Fragmentary conservation of synteny has been reported between map-anchored Prunus sequences and Arabidopsis. With the availability of genome sequence for fellow rosid I members Populus and Medicago, we analyzed the synteny between Prunus and the three model genomes. Eight Prunus BAC sequences and map-anchored Prunus sequences were used in the comparison.
RESULTS
We found a well conserved synteny across the Prunus species -- peach, plum, and apricot -- and Populus using a set of homologous Prunus BACs. Conversely, we could not detect any synteny with Arabidopsis in this region. Other peach BACs also showed extensive synteny with Populus. The syntenic regions detected were up to 477 kb in Populus. Two syntenic regions between Arabidopsis and these BACs were much shorter, around 10 kb. We also found syntenic regions that are conserved between the Prunus BACs and Medicago. The array of synteny corresponded with the proposed whole genome duplication events in Populus and Medicago. Using map-anchored Prunus sequences, we detected many syntenic blocks with several gene pairs between Prunus and Populus or Arabidopsis. We observed a more complex network of synteny between Prunus-Arabidopsis, indicative of multiple genome duplication and subsequence gene loss in Arabidopsis.
CONCLUSION
Our result shows the striking microsynteny between the Prunus BACs and the genome of Populus and Medicago. In macrosynteny analysis, more distinct Prunus regions were syntenic to Populus than to Arabidopsis.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-76
PubMed: 19208249
PubMed Central: PMC2647949
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species.</title><author><name sortKey="Jung, Sook" sort="Jung, Sook" uniqKey="Jung S" first="Sook" last="Jung">Sook Jung</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. sook@bioinfo.wsu.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jiwan, Derick" sort="Jiwan, Derick" uniqKey="Jiwan D" first="Derick" last="Jiwan">Derick Jiwan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cho, Ilhyung" sort="Cho, Ilhyung" uniqKey="Cho I" first="Ilhyung" last="Cho">Ilhyung Cho</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Taein" sort="Lee, Taein" uniqKey="Lee T" first="Taein" last="Lee">Taein Lee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abbott, Albert" sort="Abbott, Albert" uniqKey="Abbott A" first="Albert" last="Abbott">Albert Abbott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sosinski, Bryon" sort="Sosinski, Bryon" uniqKey="Sosinski B" first="Bryon" last="Sosinski">Bryon Sosinski</name></author><author><name sortKey="Main, Dorrie" sort="Main, Dorrie" uniqKey="Main D" first="Dorrie" last="Main">Dorrie Main</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19208249</idno><idno type="pmid">19208249</idno><idno type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-10-76</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC2647949</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003646</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003646</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003646</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">003646</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003646</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species.</title><author><name sortKey="Jung, Sook" sort="Jung, Sook" uniqKey="Jung S" first="Sook" last="Jung">Sook Jung</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. sook@bioinfo.wsu.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jiwan, Derick" sort="Jiwan, Derick" uniqKey="Jiwan D" first="Derick" last="Jiwan">Derick Jiwan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cho, Ilhyung" sort="Cho, Ilhyung" uniqKey="Cho I" first="Ilhyung" last="Cho">Ilhyung Cho</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Taein" sort="Lee, Taein" uniqKey="Lee T" first="Taein" last="Lee">Taein Lee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abbott, Albert" sort="Abbott, Albert" uniqKey="Abbott A" first="Albert" last="Abbott">Albert Abbott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sosinski, Bryon" sort="Sosinski, Bryon" uniqKey="Sosinski B" first="Bryon" last="Sosinski">Bryon Sosinski</name></author><author><name sortKey="Main, Dorrie" sort="Main, Dorrie" uniqKey="Main D" first="Dorrie" last="Main">Dorrie Main</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">BMC genomics</title><idno type="eISSN">1471-2164</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Arabidopsis (genetics)</term><term>Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial (MeSH)</term><term>Conserved Sequence (MeSH)</term><term>DNA, Plant (genetics)</term><term>Evolution, Molecular (MeSH)</term><term>Genes, Plant (MeSH)</term><term>Genome, Plant (MeSH)</term><term>Medicago (genetics)</term><term>Populus (genetics)</term><term>Prunus (genetics)</term><term>Quantitative Trait Loci (MeSH)</term><term>Sequence Analysis, DNA (MeSH)</term><term>Synteny (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des plantes (génétique)</term><term>Analyse de séquence d'ADN (MeSH)</term><term>Arabidopsis (génétique)</term><term>Chromosomes artificiels de bactérie (MeSH)</term><term>Gènes de plante (MeSH)</term><term>Génome végétal (MeSH)</term><term>Locus de caractère quantitatif (MeSH)</term><term>Medicago (génétique)</term><term>Populus (génétique)</term><term>Prunus (génétique)</term><term>Synténie (MeSH)</term><term>Séquence conservée (MeSH)</term><term>Évolution moléculaire (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Plant</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Arabidopsis</term><term>Medicago</term><term>Populus</term><term>Prunus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="génétique" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des plantes</term><term>Arabidopsis</term><term>Medicago</term><term>Populus</term><term>Prunus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial</term><term>Conserved Sequence</term><term>Evolution, Molecular</term><term>Genes, Plant</term><term>Genome, Plant</term><term>Quantitative Trait Loci</term><term>Sequence Analysis, DNA</term><term>Synteny</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de séquence d'ADN</term><term>Chromosomes artificiels de bactérie</term><term>Gènes de plante</term><term>Génome végétal</term><term>Locus de caractère quantitatif</term><term>Synténie</term><term>Séquence conservée</term><term>Évolution moléculaire</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Fragmentary conservation of synteny has been reported between map-anchored Prunus sequences and Arabidopsis. With the availability of genome sequence for fellow rosid I members Populus and Medicago, we analyzed the synteny between Prunus and the three model genomes. Eight Prunus BAC sequences and map-anchored Prunus sequences were used in the comparison.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>We found a well conserved synteny across the Prunus species -- peach, plum, and apricot -- and Populus using a set of homologous Prunus BACs. Conversely, we could not detect any synteny with Arabidopsis in this region. Other peach BACs also showed extensive synteny with Populus. The syntenic regions detected were up to 477 kb in Populus. Two syntenic regions between Arabidopsis and these BACs were much shorter, around 10 kb. We also found syntenic regions that are conserved between the Prunus BACs and Medicago. The array of synteny corresponded with the proposed whole genome duplication events in Populus and Medicago. Using map-anchored Prunus sequences, we detected many syntenic blocks with several gene pairs between Prunus and Populus or Arabidopsis. We observed a more complex network of synteny between Prunus-Arabidopsis, indicative of multiple genome duplication and subsequence gene loss in Arabidopsis.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>Our result shows the striking microsynteny between the Prunus BACs and the genome of Populus and Medicago. In macrosynteny analysis, more distinct Prunus regions were syntenic to Populus than to Arabidopsis.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19208249</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1471-2164</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>10</Volume><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>Feb</Month><Day>10</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>BMC genomics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>BMC Genomics</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>76</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/1471-2164-10-76</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Fragmentary conservation of synteny has been reported between map-anchored Prunus sequences and Arabidopsis. With the availability of genome sequence for fellow rosid I members Populus and Medicago, we analyzed the synteny between Prunus and the three model genomes. Eight Prunus BAC sequences and map-anchored Prunus sequences were used in the comparison.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">We found a well conserved synteny across the Prunus species -- peach, plum, and apricot -- and Populus using a set of homologous Prunus BACs. Conversely, we could not detect any synteny with Arabidopsis in this region. Other peach BACs also showed extensive synteny with Populus. The syntenic regions detected were up to 477 kb in Populus. Two syntenic regions between Arabidopsis and these BACs were much shorter, around 10 kb. We also found syntenic regions that are conserved between the Prunus BACs and Medicago. The array of synteny corresponded with the proposed whole genome duplication events in Populus and Medicago. Using map-anchored Prunus sequences, we detected many syntenic blocks with several gene pairs between Prunus and Populus or Arabidopsis. We observed a more complex network of synteny between Prunus-Arabidopsis, indicative of multiple genome duplication and subsequence gene loss in Arabidopsis.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Our result shows the striking microsynteny between the Prunus BACs and the genome of Populus and Medicago. In macrosynteny analysis, more distinct Prunus regions were syntenic to Populus than to Arabidopsis.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jung</LastName><ForeName>Sook</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. sook@bioinfo.wsu.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jiwan</LastName><ForeName>Derick</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cho</LastName><ForeName>Ilhyung</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lee</LastName><ForeName>Taein</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Abbott</LastName><ForeName>Albert</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sosinski</LastName><ForeName>Bryon</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Main</LastName><ForeName>Dorrie</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>10</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>BMC Genomics</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100965258</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1471-2164</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018744">DNA, Plant</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017360" MajorTopicYN="N">Arabidopsis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D022202" MajorTopicYN="N">Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017124" MajorTopicYN="N">Conserved Sequence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018744" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Plant</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019143" MajorTopicYN="N">Evolution, Molecular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017343" MajorTopicYN="N">Genes, Plant</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018745" MajorTopicYN="Y">Genome, Plant</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D029902" MajorTopicYN="N">Medicago</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D027861" MajorTopicYN="N">Prunus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D040641" MajorTopicYN="N">Quantitative Trait Loci</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017422" MajorTopicYN="N">Sequence Analysis, DNA</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D026801" MajorTopicYN="Y">Synteny</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2008</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>03</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2009</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19208249</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">1471-2164-10-76</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-10-76</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2647949</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4;104(49):19363-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18048334</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2007 May;114(8):1357-65</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17375281</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Jan;48(1-2):21-37</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11860210</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome. 2002 Jun;45(3):520-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12033621</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Sep;35(1-2):187-95</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9291972</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant J. 2005 Nov;44(3):409-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16236151</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 2003 Mar;131(3):1018-26</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12644654</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2004 Oct;272(3):235-46</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15340836</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 15;99(21):13627-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12374856</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Plant Biol. 2005;5:15</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16102170</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Genomics. 2006;7:81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16615871</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2007 Dec;278(6):611-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17665215</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4168-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10759555</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 2006 Aug;173(4):2227-35</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16783026</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 3;95(5):1971-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9482816</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Bot. 2003 Apr;91(5):547-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12646499</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome. 2003 Apr;46(2):268-76</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12723043</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2003 Feb;13(2):137-44</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12566392</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Jun;11(6):267-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16690345</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 3;103(40):14959-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17003129</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Sep 9;5:130</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15357877</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 2006 Jun;18(6):1339-47</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16632644</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Apr;10(2):176-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17291821</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome. 2004 Feb;47(1):141-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15060611</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2005 Sep;15(9):1284-91</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16109971</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>DNA Res. 2001 Oct 31;8(5):215-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11759841</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):985-1003</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18487361</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2005 May;110(8):1419-28</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15846479</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1596-604</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16973872</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 12;20(18):3643-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15247098</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2005 Dec;274(6):644-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16273388</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2007 Aug;64(6):699-711</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17551672</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 1988 Dec;120(4):1095-103</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17246486</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 2005 Nov;171(3):1305-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16118196</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2000 Apr;10(4):516-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10779491</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Feb;114(3):549-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17119911</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Funct Integr Genomics. 2002 Nov;2(6):239-53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12444417</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Jul;105(1):127-138</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12582570</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9891-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15159547</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2006 Jul;276(1):1-12</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16703363</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Washington (État)</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Abbott, Albert" sort="Abbott, Albert" uniqKey="Abbott A" first="Albert" last="Abbott">Albert Abbott</name><name sortKey="Cho, Ilhyung" sort="Cho, Ilhyung" uniqKey="Cho I" first="Ilhyung" last="Cho">Ilhyung Cho</name><name sortKey="Jiwan, Derick" sort="Jiwan, Derick" uniqKey="Jiwan D" first="Derick" last="Jiwan">Derick Jiwan</name><name sortKey="Lee, Taein" sort="Lee, Taein" uniqKey="Lee T" first="Taein" last="Lee">Taein Lee</name><name sortKey="Main, Dorrie" sort="Main, Dorrie" uniqKey="Main D" first="Dorrie" last="Main">Dorrie Main</name><name sortKey="Sosinski, Bryon" sort="Sosinski, Bryon" uniqKey="Sosinski B" first="Bryon" last="Sosinski">Bryon Sosinski</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Washington (État)"><name sortKey="Jung, Sook" sort="Jung, Sook" uniqKey="Jung S" first="Sook" last="Jung">Sook Jung</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003470 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003470 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19208249
|texte= Synteny of Prunus and other model plant species.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19208249" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |