Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Effects of Management Treatments on Regeneration of a Geographically Disjunct, Relictual Hybrid Aspen (Populus xsmithii) Population in the Central Great Plains, USA.

Identifieur interne : 000F34 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000F33; suivant : 000F35

Effects of Management Treatments on Regeneration of a Geographically Disjunct, Relictual Hybrid Aspen (Populus xsmithii) Population in the Central Great Plains, USA.

Auteurs : James M. Robertson [États-Unis] ; Alex R. Cahlander-Mooers [États-Unis] ; Mark D. Dixon [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:30159704

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Populus xsmithii is an uncommon hybrid of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata). Like its parents, Populus xsmithii is an early successional member of boreal forest communities, dependent on disturbance events that clear areas of competitive stems and spur an increase in clonal suckering. In recent years, aspen dieback has been noted across much of the western United States, a condition characterized by mortality of older stems and a lack of recruitment of suckers to maturity. In the Niobrara River Valley of Cherry County, Nebraska, USA, a disjunct population of Pleistocene relict Populus xsmithii has been targeted for management via clearing of competitive conifer species and establishment of fenced refugia to protect suckers from herbivory. The stands currently contain abundant suckers, which occur in three types of sites: the fenced refugia created by managers, the open habitat cleared of other species in the stands, and the woodpiles left by said clearing. This study assessed the growth and vigor of these aspen suckers over a nine-month period (summer 2013-spring 2014) and compared the effects of different site treatments. We found that aspen suckers in the open areas were significantly shorter, had smaller basal diameter, and had higher damage scores than those in the two protected site types (fenced and woodpile). Because this population is on the margin of the distribution for aspen, evaluating the effectiveness of management techniques will provide valuable information for those who seek to ensure the survival of this aspen population and others.

DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1092-8
PubMed: 30159704


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Effects of Management Treatments on Regeneration of a Geographically Disjunct, Relictual Hybrid Aspen (Populus xsmithii) Population in the Central Great Plains, USA.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Robertson, James M" sort="Robertson, James M" uniqKey="Robertson J" first="James M" last="Robertson">James M. Robertson</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57069</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Eco-Asset Midwest, Sioux Falls, SD, 57103, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Eco-Asset Midwest, Sioux Falls, SD, 57103</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57103</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" sort="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" uniqKey="Cahlander Mooers A" first="Alex R" last="Cahlander-Mooers">Alex R. Cahlander-Mooers</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57069</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Westwood Surveying and Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 55344, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Westwood Surveying and Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 55344</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>55344</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dixon, Mark D" sort="Dixon, Mark D" uniqKey="Dixon M" first="Mark D" last="Dixon">Mark D. Dixon</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA. Mark.Dixon@usd.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57069</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2018">2018</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:30159704</idno>
<idno type="pmid">30159704</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00267-018-1092-8</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000C84</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000C84</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000C84</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000C84</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000C84</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Effects of Management Treatments on Regeneration of a Geographically Disjunct, Relictual Hybrid Aspen (Populus xsmithii) Population in the Central Great Plains, USA.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Robertson, James M" sort="Robertson, James M" uniqKey="Robertson J" first="James M" last="Robertson">James M. Robertson</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57069</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Eco-Asset Midwest, Sioux Falls, SD, 57103, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Eco-Asset Midwest, Sioux Falls, SD, 57103</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57103</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" sort="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" uniqKey="Cahlander Mooers A" first="Alex R" last="Cahlander-Mooers">Alex R. Cahlander-Mooers</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57069</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Westwood Surveying and Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 55344, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Westwood Surveying and Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 55344</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>55344</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dixon, Mark D" sort="Dixon, Mark D" uniqKey="Dixon M" first="Mark D" last="Dixon">Mark D. Dixon</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA. Mark.Dixon@usd.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>57069</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Environmental management</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-1009</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2018" type="published">2018</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources (methods)</term>
<term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term>
<term>Environmental Monitoring (MeSH)</term>
<term>Herbivory (MeSH)</term>
<term>Nebraska (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Stems (growth & development)</term>
<term>Population Dynamics (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (growth & development)</term>
<term>Seasons (MeSH)</term>
<term>Tracheophyta (growth & development)</term>
<term>Trees (growth & development)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Arbres (croissance et développement)</term>
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles (méthodes)</term>
<term>Dynamique des populations (MeSH)</term>
<term>Herbivorie (MeSH)</term>
<term>Nébraska (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (croissance et développement)</term>
<term>Saisons (MeSH)</term>
<term>Surveillance de l'environnement (MeSH)</term>
<term>Tiges de plante (croissance et développement)</term>
<term>Tracheobionta (croissance et développement)</term>
<term>Écosystème (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Nebraska</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Arbres</term>
<term>Populus</term>
<term>Tiges de plante</term>
<term>Tracheobionta</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en">
<term>Plant Stems</term>
<term>Populus</term>
<term>Tracheophyta</term>
<term>Trees</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Conservation des ressources naturelles</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Ecosystem</term>
<term>Environmental Monitoring</term>
<term>Herbivory</term>
<term>Population Dynamics</term>
<term>Seasons</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Dynamique des populations</term>
<term>Herbivorie</term>
<term>Nébraska</term>
<term>Saisons</term>
<term>Surveillance de l'environnement</term>
<term>Écosystème</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Populus xsmithii is an uncommon hybrid of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata). Like its parents, Populus xsmithii is an early successional member of boreal forest communities, dependent on disturbance events that clear areas of competitive stems and spur an increase in clonal suckering. In recent years, aspen dieback has been noted across much of the western United States, a condition characterized by mortality of older stems and a lack of recruitment of suckers to maturity. In the Niobrara River Valley of Cherry County, Nebraska, USA, a disjunct population of Pleistocene relict Populus xsmithii has been targeted for management via clearing of competitive conifer species and establishment of fenced refugia to protect suckers from herbivory. The stands currently contain abundant suckers, which occur in three types of sites: the fenced refugia created by managers, the open habitat cleared of other species in the stands, and the woodpiles left by said clearing. This study assessed the growth and vigor of these aspen suckers over a nine-month period (summer 2013-spring 2014) and compared the effects of different site treatments. We found that aspen suckers in the open areas were significantly shorter, had smaller basal diameter, and had higher damage scores than those in the two protected site types (fenced and woodpile). Because this population is on the margin of the distribution for aspen, evaluating the effectiveness of management techniques will provide valuable information for those who seek to ensure the survival of this aspen population and others.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">30159704</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>05</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1009</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>62</Volume>
<Issue>5</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Environmental management</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Environ Manage</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Effects of Management Treatments on Regeneration of a Geographically Disjunct, Relictual Hybrid Aspen (Populus xsmithii) Population in the Central Great Plains, USA.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>906-914</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00267-018-1092-8</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Populus xsmithii is an uncommon hybrid of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata). Like its parents, Populus xsmithii is an early successional member of boreal forest communities, dependent on disturbance events that clear areas of competitive stems and spur an increase in clonal suckering. In recent years, aspen dieback has been noted across much of the western United States, a condition characterized by mortality of older stems and a lack of recruitment of suckers to maturity. In the Niobrara River Valley of Cherry County, Nebraska, USA, a disjunct population of Pleistocene relict Populus xsmithii has been targeted for management via clearing of competitive conifer species and establishment of fenced refugia to protect suckers from herbivory. The stands currently contain abundant suckers, which occur in three types of sites: the fenced refugia created by managers, the open habitat cleared of other species in the stands, and the woodpiles left by said clearing. This study assessed the growth and vigor of these aspen suckers over a nine-month period (summer 2013-spring 2014) and compared the effects of different site treatments. We found that aspen suckers in the open areas were significantly shorter, had smaller basal diameter, and had higher damage scores than those in the two protected site types (fenced and woodpile). Because this population is on the margin of the distribution for aspen, evaluating the effectiveness of management techniques will provide valuable information for those who seek to ensure the survival of this aspen population and others.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Robertson</LastName>
<ForeName>James M</ForeName>
<Initials>JM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Eco-Asset Midwest, Sioux Falls, SD, 57103, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Cahlander-Mooers</LastName>
<ForeName>Alex R</ForeName>
<Initials>AR</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Westwood Surveying and Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 55344, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Dixon</LastName>
<ForeName>Mark D</ForeName>
<Initials>MD</Initials>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-5655</Identifier>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA. Mark.Dixon@usd.edu.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Environ Manage</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>7703893</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0364-152X</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="N">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004784" MajorTopicYN="N">Environmental Monitoring</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D060434" MajorTopicYN="N">Herbivory</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D009329" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Nebraska</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D018547" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Stems</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011157" MajorTopicYN="N">Population Dynamics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D012621" MajorTopicYN="N">Seasons</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D064028" MajorTopicYN="N">Tracheophyta</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecological restoration</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Forest management</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Niobrara River</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Populus xsmithii</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Relict populations</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Vegetative reproduction</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>6</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30159704</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00267-018-1092-8</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s00267-018-1092-8</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Mol Ecol. 2005 Sep;14(10):2969-80</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16101767</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 3;109(1):233-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22167807</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1980 Jul;46(1):18-21</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28310620</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Am J Bot. 2017 Dec;104(12):1878-1890</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29247028</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Robertson, James M" sort="Robertson, James M" uniqKey="Robertson J" first="James M" last="Robertson">James M. Robertson</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" sort="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" uniqKey="Cahlander Mooers A" first="Alex R" last="Cahlander-Mooers">Alex R. Cahlander-Mooers</name>
<name sortKey="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" sort="Cahlander Mooers, Alex R" uniqKey="Cahlander Mooers A" first="Alex R" last="Cahlander-Mooers">Alex R. Cahlander-Mooers</name>
<name sortKey="Dixon, Mark D" sort="Dixon, Mark D" uniqKey="Dixon M" first="Mark D" last="Dixon">Mark D. Dixon</name>
<name sortKey="Robertson, James M" sort="Robertson, James M" uniqKey="Robertson J" first="James M" last="Robertson">James M. Robertson</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F34 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000F34 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:30159704
   |texte=   Effects of Management Treatments on Regeneration of a Geographically Disjunct, Relictual Hybrid Aspen (Populus xsmithii) Population in the Central Great Plains, USA.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:30159704" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020