Development of genomic resources for Citrus clementina: characterization of three deep-coverage BAC libraries and analysis of 46,000 BAC end sequences.
Identifieur interne : 003794 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 003793; suivant : 003795Development of genomic resources for Citrus clementina: characterization of three deep-coverage BAC libraries and analysis of 46,000 BAC end sequences.
Auteurs : Javier Terol [Espagne] ; M Angel Naranjo ; Patrick Ollitrault ; Manuel TalonSource :
- BMC genomics [ 1471-2164 ] ; 2008.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : DNA, Plant.
- genetics : Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial, Citrus.
- Gene Library, Genome, Plant.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Citrus species constitute one of the major tree fruit crops of the subtropical regions with great economic importance. However, their peculiar reproductive characteristics, low genetic diversity and the long-term nature of tree breeding mostly impair citrus variety improvement. In woody plants, genomic science holds promise of improvements and in the Citrus genera the development of genomic tools may be crucial for further crop improvements. In this work we report the characterization of three BAC libraries from Clementine (Citrus clementina), one of the most relevant citrus fresh fruit market cultivars, and the analyses of 46.000 BAC end sequences. Clementine is a diploid plant with an estimated haploid genome size of 367 Mb and 2n = 18 chromosomes, which makes feasible the use of genomics tools to boost genetic improvement.
RESULTS
Three genomic BAC libraries of Citrus clementina were constructed through EcoRI, MboI and HindIII digestions and 56,000 clones, representing an estimated genomic coverage of 19.5 haploid genome-equivalents, were picked. BAC end sequencing (BES) of 28,000 clones produced 28.1 Mb of genomic sequence that allowed the identification of the repetitive fraction (12.5% of the genome) and estimation of gene content (31,000 genes) of this species. BES analyses identified 3,800 SSRs and 6,617 putative SNPs. Comparative genomic studies showed that citrus gene homology and microsyntheny with Populus trichocarpa was rather higher than with Arabidopsis thaliana, a species phylogenetically closer to citrus.
CONCLUSION
In this work, we report the characterization of three BAC libraries from C. clementina, and a new set of genomic resources that may be useful for isolation of genes underlying economically important traits, physical mapping and eventually crop improvement in Citrus species. In addition, BAC end sequencing has provided a first insight on the basic structure and organization of the citrus genome and has yielded valuable molecular markers for genetic mapping and cloning of genes of agricultural interest. Paired end sequences also may be very helpful for whole-genome sequencing programs.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-423
PubMed: 18801166
PubMed Central: PMC2561056
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Main, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003794
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:18801166Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Development of genomic resources for Citrus clementina: characterization of three deep-coverage BAC libraries and analysis of 46,000 BAC end sequences.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Terol, Javier" sort="Terol, Javier" uniqKey="Terol J" first="Javier" last="Terol">Javier Terol</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Carretera Moncada, Náquera, Km. 4,5 Moncada, Valencia, E46113, Spain. terol_javalc@gva.es</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Carretera Moncada, Náquera, Km. 4,5 Moncada, Valencia, E46113</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Naranjo, M Angel" sort="Naranjo, M Angel" uniqKey="Naranjo M" first="M Angel" last="Naranjo">M Angel Naranjo</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ollitrault, Patrick" sort="Ollitrault, Patrick" uniqKey="Ollitrault P" first="Patrick" last="Ollitrault">Patrick Ollitrault</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Talon, Manuel" sort="Talon, Manuel" uniqKey="Talon M" first="Manuel" last="Talon">Manuel Talon</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:18801166</idno>
<idno type="pmid">18801166</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-9-423</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC2561056</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003794</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003794</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003794</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">003794</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Development of genomic resources for Citrus clementina: characterization of three deep-coverage BAC libraries and analysis of 46,000 BAC end sequences.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Terol, Javier" sort="Terol, Javier" uniqKey="Terol J" first="Javier" last="Terol">Javier Terol</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Carretera Moncada, Náquera, Km. 4,5 Moncada, Valencia, E46113, Spain. terol_javalc@gva.es</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Carretera Moncada, Náquera, Km. 4,5 Moncada, Valencia, E46113</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Naranjo, M Angel" sort="Naranjo, M Angel" uniqKey="Naranjo M" first="M Angel" last="Naranjo">M Angel Naranjo</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ollitrault, Patrick" sort="Ollitrault, Patrick" uniqKey="Ollitrault P" first="Patrick" last="Ollitrault">Patrick Ollitrault</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Talon, Manuel" sort="Talon, Manuel" uniqKey="Talon M" first="Manuel" last="Talon">Manuel Talon</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">BMC genomics</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1471-2164</idno>
<imprint><date when="2008" type="published">2008</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial (genetics)</term>
<term>Citrus (genetics)</term>
<term>DNA, Plant (genetics)</term>
<term>Gene Library (MeSH)</term>
<term>Genome, Plant (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des plantes (génétique)</term>
<term>Banque de gènes (MeSH)</term>
<term>Chromosomes artificiels de bactérie (génétique)</term>
<term>Citrus (génétique)</term>
<term>Génome végétal (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Plant</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial</term>
<term>Citrus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="génétique" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des plantes</term>
<term>Chromosomes artificiels de bactérie</term>
<term>Citrus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Gene Library</term>
<term>Genome, Plant</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Banque de gènes</term>
<term>Génome végétal</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>
</p>
<p>Citrus species constitute one of the major tree fruit crops of the subtropical regions with great economic importance. However, their peculiar reproductive characteristics, low genetic diversity and the long-term nature of tree breeding mostly impair citrus variety improvement. In woody plants, genomic science holds promise of improvements and in the Citrus genera the development of genomic tools may be crucial for further crop improvements. In this work we report the characterization of three BAC libraries from Clementine (Citrus clementina), one of the most relevant citrus fresh fruit market cultivars, and the analyses of 46.000 BAC end sequences. Clementine is a diploid plant with an estimated haploid genome size of 367 Mb and 2n = 18 chromosomes, which makes feasible the use of genomics tools to boost genetic improvement.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b>
</p>
<p>Three genomic BAC libraries of Citrus clementina were constructed through EcoRI, MboI and HindIII digestions and 56,000 clones, representing an estimated genomic coverage of 19.5 haploid genome-equivalents, were picked. BAC end sequencing (BES) of 28,000 clones produced 28.1 Mb of genomic sequence that allowed the identification of the repetitive fraction (12.5% of the genome) and estimation of gene content (31,000 genes) of this species. BES analyses identified 3,800 SSRs and 6,617 putative SNPs. Comparative genomic studies showed that citrus gene homology and microsyntheny with Populus trichocarpa was rather higher than with Arabidopsis thaliana, a species phylogenetically closer to citrus.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>
</p>
<p>In this work, we report the characterization of three BAC libraries from C. clementina, and a new set of genomic resources that may be useful for isolation of genes underlying economically important traits, physical mapping and eventually crop improvement in Citrus species. In addition, BAC end sequencing has provided a first insight on the basic structure and organization of the citrus genome and has yielded valuable molecular markers for genetic mapping and cloning of genes of agricultural interest. Paired end sequences also may be very helpful for whole-genome sequencing programs.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">18801166</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1471-2164</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>9</Volume>
<PubDate><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>Sep</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>BMC genomics</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>BMC Genomics</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Development of genomic resources for Citrus clementina: characterization of three deep-coverage BAC libraries and analysis of 46,000 BAC end sequences.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>423</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/1471-2164-9-423</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Citrus species constitute one of the major tree fruit crops of the subtropical regions with great economic importance. However, their peculiar reproductive characteristics, low genetic diversity and the long-term nature of tree breeding mostly impair citrus variety improvement. In woody plants, genomic science holds promise of improvements and in the Citrus genera the development of genomic tools may be crucial for further crop improvements. In this work we report the characterization of three BAC libraries from Clementine (Citrus clementina), one of the most relevant citrus fresh fruit market cultivars, and the analyses of 46.000 BAC end sequences. Clementine is a diploid plant with an estimated haploid genome size of 367 Mb and 2n = 18 chromosomes, which makes feasible the use of genomics tools to boost genetic improvement.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Three genomic BAC libraries of Citrus clementina were constructed through EcoRI, MboI and HindIII digestions and 56,000 clones, representing an estimated genomic coverage of 19.5 haploid genome-equivalents, were picked. BAC end sequencing (BES) of 28,000 clones produced 28.1 Mb of genomic sequence that allowed the identification of the repetitive fraction (12.5% of the genome) and estimation of gene content (31,000 genes) of this species. BES analyses identified 3,800 SSRs and 6,617 putative SNPs. Comparative genomic studies showed that citrus gene homology and microsyntheny with Populus trichocarpa was rather higher than with Arabidopsis thaliana, a species phylogenetically closer to citrus.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">In this work, we report the characterization of three BAC libraries from C. clementina, and a new set of genomic resources that may be useful for isolation of genes underlying economically important traits, physical mapping and eventually crop improvement in Citrus species. In addition, BAC end sequencing has provided a first insight on the basic structure and organization of the citrus genome and has yielded valuable molecular markers for genetic mapping and cloning of genes of agricultural interest. Paired end sequences also may be very helpful for whole-genome sequencing programs.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Terol</LastName>
<ForeName>Javier</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centro de Genómica, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Carretera Moncada, Náquera, Km. 4,5 Moncada, Valencia, E46113, Spain. terol_javalc@gva.es</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Naranjo</LastName>
<ForeName>M Angel</ForeName>
<Initials>MA</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ollitrault</LastName>
<ForeName>Patrick</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Talon</LastName>
<ForeName>Manuel</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>BMC Genomics</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>100965258</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1471-2164</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D018744">DNA, Plant</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D022202" MajorTopicYN="N">Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002957" MajorTopicYN="N">Citrus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018744" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Plant</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015723" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Library</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018745" MajorTopicYN="Y">Genome, Plant</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18801166</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">1471-2164-9-423</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-9-423</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2561056</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):229-33</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12519988</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Planta. 2007 Sep;226(4):989-1005</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17541628</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2004 Feb;14(2):319-26</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14718376</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2006 May;112(7):1248-57</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16474971</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Mar;106(5):826-36</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12647056</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Jul;113(2):239-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16791690</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genetics. 2006 Apr;172(4):2541-55</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16489220</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>BMC Genomics. 2007;8:31</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17254327</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Genet. 1997 Jan;15(1):57-61</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8988169</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):462-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16093699</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 2002 Dec;130(4):1686-96</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12481051</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):186-94</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9521922</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Apr;5(2):94-100</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11856602</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Apr;114(6):1081-90</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17287974</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Nov;105(6-7):1058-1066</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12582934</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome. 2007 Sep;50(9):871-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17893728</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Exp Bot. 2007;58(6):1407-20</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17317673</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2006 Apr;33(4):345-53</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16625833</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2006 May;112(8):1519-31</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16699791</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genetics. 2001 Nov;159(3):1231-42</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11729165</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Aug;111(3):456-66</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15942755</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2005 Feb;57(3):375-91</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15830128</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16081474</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genetics. 2006 May;173(1):151-61</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16547112</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome. 2001 Aug;44(4):572-81</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11550890</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genomics. 2004 Dec;84(6):941-51</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15533711</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2007;2(12):e1326</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18094749</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:29</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17562019</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2004 May;108(8):1627-34</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15235775</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Cells. 2006 Dec 31;22(3):300-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17202858</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2005 Aug 11;436(7052):793-800</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16100779</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2231712</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Mol Evol. 1998 Jan;46(1):45-53</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9419224</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Genet. 1999 Dec;23(4):452-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10581034</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1596-604</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16973872</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2002 Oct;12(10):1611-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12368254</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genomics. 2007 May;89(5):630-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17270394</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Methods Mol Biol. 2004;256:1-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15024155</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Sep;107(5):931-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12830387</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Cell Rep. 2003 Aug;22(1):59-63</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12835994</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2211-20</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11674868</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Nov;62(4-5):513-27</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16897468</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2006 May;275(5):479-91</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16501995</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2007 Apr;277(4):365-77</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17216224</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):796-815</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11130711</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Jun 28;54(13):4888-95</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16787044</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 2004 Dec;14(12):2439-47</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15574823</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Dec;108(1):121-30</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12937896</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>BMC Plant Biol. 2006;6:21</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17010212</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Oct 31;55(22):9047-53</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17910511</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>BMC Genomics. 2006;7:174</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16824208</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:528361</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18509486</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2006 Jul;276(1):1-12</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16703363</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome Res. 1999 Sep;9(9):868-77</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10508846</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 2002 Mar;14(3):537-45</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11910002</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome. 2001 Jun;44(3):382-93</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11444697</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):463-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17721507</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003794 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003794 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= PoplarV1 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:18801166 |texte= Development of genomic resources for Citrus clementina: characterization of three deep-coverage BAC libraries and analysis of 46,000 BAC end sequences. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:18801166" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. | ![]() |