Do evergreen and deciduous trees have different effects on net N mineralization in soil?
Identifieur interne : 002953 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 002952; suivant : 002954Do evergreen and deciduous trees have different effects on net N mineralization in soil?
Auteurs : Kevin E. Mueller [États-Unis] ; Sarah E. Hobbie ; Jacek Oleksyn ; Peter B. Reich ; David M. EissenstatSource :
- Ecology [ 0012-9658 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- composition chimique : Arbres, Azote, Sol.
- physiologie : Arbres, Feuilles de plante.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , chemistry : Nitrogen, Soil.
- classification : Trees.
- physiology : Plant Leaves, Trees.
Abstract
Evergreen and deciduous plants are widely expected to have different impacts on soil nitrogen (N) availability because of differences in leaf litter chemistry and ensuing effects on net N mineralization (N(min)). We evaluated this hypothesis by compiling published data on net N(min) rates beneath co-occurring stands of evergreen and deciduous trees. The compiled data included 35 sets of co-occurring stands in temperate and boreal forests. Evergreen and deciduous stands did not have consistently divergent effects on net N(min) rates; net N(min) beneath deciduous trees was higher when comparing natural stands (19 contrasts), but equivalent to evergreens in plantations (16 contrasts). We also compared net N(min) rates beneath pairs of co-occurring genera. Most pairs of genera did not differ consistently, i.e., tree species from one genus had higher net N(min) at some sites and lower net N(min) at other sites. Moreover, several common deciduous genera (Acer, Betula, Populus) and deciduous Quercus spp. did not typically have higher net N(min) rates than common evergreen genera (Pinus, Picea). There are several reasons why tree effects on net N(min) are poorly predicted by leaf habit and phylogeny. For example, the amount of N mineralized from decomposing leaves might be less than the amount of N mineralized from organic matter pools that are less affected by leaf litter traits, such as dead roots and soil organic matter. Also, effects of plant traits and plant groups on net N(min) probably depend on site-specific factors such as stand age and soil type.
DOI: 10.1890/11-1906.1
PubMed: 22834386
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Main, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002953
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22834386Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Do evergreen and deciduous trees have different effects on net N mineralization in soil?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mueller, Kevin E" sort="Mueller, Kevin E" uniqKey="Mueller K" first="Kevin E" last="Mueller">Kevin E. Mueller</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Pennsylvania State University, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Horticulture, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. kevin.e.mueller@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Pennsylvania State University, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Horticulture, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hobbie, Sarah E" sort="Hobbie, Sarah E" uniqKey="Hobbie S" first="Sarah E" last="Hobbie">Sarah E. Hobbie</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Oleksyn, Jacek" sort="Oleksyn, Jacek" uniqKey="Oleksyn J" first="Jacek" last="Oleksyn">Jacek Oleksyn</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Reich, Peter B" sort="Reich, Peter B" uniqKey="Reich P" first="Peter B" last="Reich">Peter B. Reich</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Eissenstat, David M" sort="Eissenstat, David M" uniqKey="Eissenstat D" first="David M" last="Eissenstat">David M. Eissenstat</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:22834386</idno>
<idno type="pmid">22834386</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1890/11-1906.1</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002953</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002953</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002953</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002953</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Do evergreen and deciduous trees have different effects on net N mineralization in soil?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mueller, Kevin E" sort="Mueller, Kevin E" uniqKey="Mueller K" first="Kevin E" last="Mueller">Kevin E. Mueller</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Pennsylvania State University, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Horticulture, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. kevin.e.mueller@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Pennsylvania State University, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Horticulture, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hobbie, Sarah E" sort="Hobbie, Sarah E" uniqKey="Hobbie S" first="Sarah E" last="Hobbie">Sarah E. Hobbie</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Oleksyn, Jacek" sort="Oleksyn, Jacek" uniqKey="Oleksyn J" first="Jacek" last="Oleksyn">Jacek Oleksyn</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Reich, Peter B" sort="Reich, Peter B" uniqKey="Reich P" first="Peter B" last="Reich">Peter B. Reich</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Eissenstat, David M" sort="Eissenstat, David M" uniqKey="Eissenstat D" first="David M" last="Eissenstat">David M. Eissenstat</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Ecology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0012-9658</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Nitrogen (chemistry)</term>
<term>Plant Leaves (physiology)</term>
<term>Soil (chemistry)</term>
<term>Trees (classification)</term>
<term>Trees (physiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arbres (classification)</term>
<term>Arbres (physiologie)</term>
<term>Azote (composition chimique)</term>
<term>Feuilles de plante (physiologie)</term>
<term>Sol (composition chimique)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Nitrogen</term>
<term>Soil</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Trees</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="composition chimique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arbres</term>
<term>Azote</term>
<term>Sol</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arbres</term>
<term>Feuilles de plante</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plant Leaves</term>
<term>Trees</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Evergreen and deciduous plants are widely expected to have different impacts on soil nitrogen (N) availability because of differences in leaf litter chemistry and ensuing effects on net N mineralization (N(min)). We evaluated this hypothesis by compiling published data on net N(min) rates beneath co-occurring stands of evergreen and deciduous trees. The compiled data included 35 sets of co-occurring stands in temperate and boreal forests. Evergreen and deciduous stands did not have consistently divergent effects on net N(min) rates; net N(min) beneath deciduous trees was higher when comparing natural stands (19 contrasts), but equivalent to evergreens in plantations (16 contrasts). We also compared net N(min) rates beneath pairs of co-occurring genera. Most pairs of genera did not differ consistently, i.e., tree species from one genus had higher net N(min) at some sites and lower net N(min) at other sites. Moreover, several common deciduous genera (Acer, Betula, Populus) and deciduous Quercus spp. did not typically have higher net N(min) rates than common evergreen genera (Pinus, Picea). There are several reasons why tree effects on net N(min) are poorly predicted by leaf habit and phylogeny. For example, the amount of N mineralized from decomposing leaves might be less than the amount of N mineralized from organic matter pools that are less affected by leaf litter traits, such as dead roots and soil organic matter. Also, effects of plant traits and plant groups on net N(min) probably depend on site-specific factors such as stand age and soil type.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22834386</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2019</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0012-9658</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>93</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Ecology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Ecology</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Do evergreen and deciduous trees have different effects on net N mineralization in soil?</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1463-72</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Evergreen and deciduous plants are widely expected to have different impacts on soil nitrogen (N) availability because of differences in leaf litter chemistry and ensuing effects on net N mineralization (N(min)). We evaluated this hypothesis by compiling published data on net N(min) rates beneath co-occurring stands of evergreen and deciduous trees. The compiled data included 35 sets of co-occurring stands in temperate and boreal forests. Evergreen and deciduous stands did not have consistently divergent effects on net N(min) rates; net N(min) beneath deciduous trees was higher when comparing natural stands (19 contrasts), but equivalent to evergreens in plantations (16 contrasts). We also compared net N(min) rates beneath pairs of co-occurring genera. Most pairs of genera did not differ consistently, i.e., tree species from one genus had higher net N(min) at some sites and lower net N(min) at other sites. Moreover, several common deciduous genera (Acer, Betula, Populus) and deciduous Quercus spp. did not typically have higher net N(min) rates than common evergreen genera (Pinus, Picea). There are several reasons why tree effects on net N(min) are poorly predicted by leaf habit and phylogeny. For example, the amount of N mineralized from decomposing leaves might be less than the amount of N mineralized from organic matter pools that are less affected by leaf litter traits, such as dead roots and soil organic matter. Also, effects of plant traits and plant groups on net N(min) probably depend on site-specific factors such as stand age and soil type.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mueller</LastName>
<ForeName>Kevin E</ForeName>
<Initials>KE</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Pennsylvania State University, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Horticulture, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. kevin.e.mueller@gmail.com</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hobbie</LastName>
<ForeName>Sarah E</ForeName>
<Initials>SE</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Oleksyn</LastName>
<ForeName>Jacek</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reich</LastName>
<ForeName>Peter B</ForeName>
<Initials>PB</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Eissenstat</LastName>
<ForeName>David M</ForeName>
<Initials>DM</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Ecology</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0043541</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0012-9658</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D012987">Soil</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical><RegistryNumber>N762921K75</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D009584">Nitrogen</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009584" MajorTopicYN="N">Nitrogen</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018515" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Leaves</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012987" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="Y">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22834386</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1890/11-1906.1</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002953 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002953 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= PoplarV1 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:22834386 |texte= Do evergreen and deciduous trees have different effects on net N mineralization in soil? }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22834386" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |