Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus: impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior.
Identifieur interne : 004909 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 004908; suivant : 004910Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus: impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior.
Auteurs : Nathan P. Havill ; Kenneth F. RaffaSource :
- Oecologia [ 1432-1939 ] ; 1999.
Abstract
We examined the effects of various wounding treatments and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus (Salicales: Salicaceae) against herbivory by the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Second-instar larvae grew and consumed less on leaves from induced than non-induced trees. Likewise, larvae preferred leaf disks from non-induced trees. Among induction treatments, gypsy moth feeding had the strongest and most consistent effect in behavioral choice tests. Mechanical wounding of leaves and mechanical wounding plus application of gypsy moth regurgitant had intermediate effects, while application of jasmonic acid had the weakest overall effect. Under no-choice conditions, there were no consistent trends across clones in the ability of various treatments to elicit plant responses affecting the herbivore. Levels of constitutive and inducible resistance to herbivory varied significantly among 12 Populus clones. Larvae grew up to 30-fold more, and consumed up to 250-fold more on the most suitable than the least suitable clone. Prior feeding by gypsy moths reduced larval feeding up to 71.4% on the most highly inducible clone, but it had little or no effect for the least inducible clones. There was no evidence for a relationship between levels of inducible and constitutive resistance, or between inducible resistance and phylogenetic relatedness among clones. We discuss implications for the ecology and evolution of plant-insect interactions and the management of insect pests.
DOI: 10.1007/s004420050861
PubMed: 28308092
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:28308092Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus: impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior.</title><author><name sortKey="Havill, Nathan P" sort="Havill, Nathan P" uniqKey="Havill N" first="Nathan P" last="Havill">Nathan P. Havill</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA e-mail: raffa@entomology.wisc.edu, Fax: +1-608-2623322, , , , , , US.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raffa, Kenneth F" sort="Raffa, Kenneth F" uniqKey="Raffa K" first="Kenneth F" last="Raffa">Kenneth F. Raffa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA e-mail: raffa@entomology.wisc.edu, Fax: +1-608-2623322, , , , , , US.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1999">1999</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:28308092</idno><idno type="pmid">28308092</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s004420050861</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">004909</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004909</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus: impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior.</title><author><name sortKey="Havill, Nathan P" sort="Havill, Nathan P" uniqKey="Havill N" first="Nathan P" last="Havill">Nathan P. Havill</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA e-mail: raffa@entomology.wisc.edu, Fax: +1-608-2623322, , , , , , US.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raffa, Kenneth F" sort="Raffa, Kenneth F" uniqKey="Raffa K" first="Kenneth F" last="Raffa">Kenneth F. Raffa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA e-mail: raffa@entomology.wisc.edu, Fax: +1-608-2623322, , , , , , US.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oecologia</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1939</idno><imprint><date when="1999" type="published">1999</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We examined the effects of various wounding treatments and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus (Salicales: Salicaceae) against herbivory by the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Second-instar larvae grew and consumed less on leaves from induced than non-induced trees. Likewise, larvae preferred leaf disks from non-induced trees. Among induction treatments, gypsy moth feeding had the strongest and most consistent effect in behavioral choice tests. Mechanical wounding of leaves and mechanical wounding plus application of gypsy moth regurgitant had intermediate effects, while application of jasmonic acid had the weakest overall effect. Under no-choice conditions, there were no consistent trends across clones in the ability of various treatments to elicit plant responses affecting the herbivore. Levels of constitutive and inducible resistance to herbivory varied significantly among 12 Populus clones. Larvae grew up to 30-fold more, and consumed up to 250-fold more on the most suitable than the least suitable clone. Prior feeding by gypsy moths reduced larval feeding up to 71.4% on the most highly inducible clone, but it had little or no effect for the least inducible clones. There was no evidence for a relationship between levels of inducible and constitutive resistance, or between inducible resistance and phylogenetic relatedness among clones. We discuss implications for the ecology and evolution of plant-insect interactions and the management of insect pests.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">28308092</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1939</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>120</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>1999</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Oecologia</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oecologia</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus: impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>295-303</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s004420050861</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>We examined the effects of various wounding treatments and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus (Salicales: Salicaceae) against herbivory by the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Second-instar larvae grew and consumed less on leaves from induced than non-induced trees. Likewise, larvae preferred leaf disks from non-induced trees. Among induction treatments, gypsy moth feeding had the strongest and most consistent effect in behavioral choice tests. Mechanical wounding of leaves and mechanical wounding plus application of gypsy moth regurgitant had intermediate effects, while application of jasmonic acid had the weakest overall effect. Under no-choice conditions, there were no consistent trends across clones in the ability of various treatments to elicit plant responses affecting the herbivore. Levels of constitutive and inducible resistance to herbivory varied significantly among 12 Populus clones. Larvae grew up to 30-fold more, and consumed up to 250-fold more on the most suitable than the least suitable clone. Prior feeding by gypsy moths reduced larval feeding up to 71.4% on the most highly inducible clone, but it had little or no effect for the least inducible clones. There was no evidence for a relationship between levels of inducible and constitutive resistance, or between inducible resistance and phylogenetic relatedness among clones. We discuss implications for the ecology and evolution of plant-insect interactions and the management of insect pests.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Havill</LastName><ForeName>Nathan P</ForeName><Initials>NP</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA e-mail: raffa@entomology.wisc.edu, Fax: +1-608-2623322, , , , , , US.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Raffa</LastName><ForeName>Kenneth F</ForeName><Initials>KF</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA e-mail: raffa@entomology.wisc.edu, Fax: +1-608-2623322, , , , , , US.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Oecologia</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0150372</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0029-8549</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Genotypic variation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Herbivory</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Key words Induced resistance</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Lymantria dispar</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1999</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1999</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28308092</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s004420050861</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s004420050861</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004909 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004909 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:28308092
|texte= Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus: impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:28308092" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |