Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005).

Identifieur interne : 003F36 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 003F35; suivant : 003F37

Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005).

Auteurs : Björn M. Hausen

Source :

RBID : pubmed:16242084

English descriptors

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propolis, the bee glue, is increasingly used in biocosmetics and for the self-treatment of various diseases.

OBJECTIVE

Patients reacting to propolis were requested to participate in further testing with the breakdown constituents of the bee glue.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients agreed to be tested with 18 constituents, including four caffeates (the typical allergens of propolis) derived from the sticky exudates of poplar buds.

RESULTS

Seven patients did not react to the propolis constituents tested. In the remaining 20 patients, the four caffeates produced strong reactions. Phenylethyl caffeate, which produced positive reactions in 20 patients, was the leading contact allergen. Benzyl caffeate elicited strong responses in 18 patients, and 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate produced reactions in 17 patients. Geranyl caffeate produced positive reactions in 11 patients. The flavonoid tectochrysin gave positive results in 2 patients; ferulic acid, coumaric acid, and methyl cinnamate produced weak responses.

CONCLUSIONS

In middle Europe, the caffeates are the responsible allergens in propolis allergy. Patients from other countries, where poplar trees do not grow, become allergic to other propolis constituents but not to the caffeates.


PubMed: 16242084

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:16242084

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005).</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hausen, Bjorn M" sort="Hausen, Bjorn M" uniqKey="Hausen B" first="Björn M" last="Hausen">Björn M. Hausen</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Dermatology Center, Elbeklinikum Buxtehude, Germany.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:16242084</idno>
<idno type="pmid">16242084</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003F36</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003F36</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005).</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hausen, Bjorn M" sort="Hausen, Bjorn M" uniqKey="Hausen B" first="Björn M" last="Hausen">Björn M. Hausen</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Dermatology Center, Elbeklinikum Buxtehude, Germany.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1710-3568</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2005" type="published">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult (MeSH)</term>
<term>Aged (MeSH)</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over (MeSH)</term>
<term>Antigens, Plant (adverse effects)</term>
<term>Cinnamates (adverse effects)</term>
<term>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact (diagnosis)</term>
<term>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact (etiology)</term>
<term>Europe (MeSH)</term>
<term>Female (MeSH)</term>
<term>Flavonoids (adverse effects)</term>
<term>Humans (MeSH)</term>
<term>Male (MeSH)</term>
<term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term>
<term>Patch Tests (MeSH)</term>
<term>Propolis (chemistry)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en">
<term>Antigens, Plant</term>
<term>Cinnamates</term>
<term>Flavonoids</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en">
<term>Propolis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Europe</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patch Tests</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>BACKGROUND</b>
</p>
<p>Propolis, the bee glue, is increasingly used in biocosmetics and for the self-treatment of various diseases.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>OBJECTIVE</b>
</p>
<p>Patients reacting to propolis were requested to participate in further testing with the breakdown constituents of the bee glue.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>METHODS</b>
</p>
<p>Twenty-seven patients agreed to be tested with 18 constituents, including four caffeates (the typical allergens of propolis) derived from the sticky exudates of poplar buds.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>RESULTS</b>
</p>
<p>Seven patients did not react to the propolis constituents tested. In the remaining 20 patients, the four caffeates produced strong reactions. Phenylethyl caffeate, which produced positive reactions in 20 patients, was the leading contact allergen. Benzyl caffeate elicited strong responses in 18 patients, and 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate produced reactions in 17 patients. Geranyl caffeate produced positive reactions in 11 patients. The flavonoid tectochrysin gave positive results in 2 patients; ferulic acid, coumaric acid, and methyl cinnamate produced weak responses.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>CONCLUSIONS</b>
</p>
<p>In middle Europe, the caffeates are the responsible allergens in propolis allergy. Patients from other countries, where poplar trees do not grow, become allergic to other propolis constituents but not to the caffeates.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">16242084</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">1710-3568</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>16</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2005</Year>
<Month>Sep</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Dermatitis</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005).</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>127-9</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Propolis, the bee glue, is increasingly used in biocosmetics and for the self-treatment of various diseases.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Patients reacting to propolis were requested to participate in further testing with the breakdown constituents of the bee glue.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Twenty-seven patients agreed to be tested with 18 constituents, including four caffeates (the typical allergens of propolis) derived from the sticky exudates of poplar buds.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Seven patients did not react to the propolis constituents tested. In the remaining 20 patients, the four caffeates produced strong reactions. Phenylethyl caffeate, which produced positive reactions in 20 patients, was the leading contact allergen. Benzyl caffeate elicited strong responses in 18 patients, and 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate produced reactions in 17 patients. Geranyl caffeate produced positive reactions in 11 patients. The flavonoid tectochrysin gave positive results in 2 patients; ferulic acid, coumaric acid, and methyl cinnamate produced weak responses.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">In middle Europe, the caffeates are the responsible allergens in propolis allergy. Patients from other countries, where poplar trees do not grow, become allergic to other propolis constituents but not to the caffeates.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Hausen</LastName>
<ForeName>Björn M</ForeName>
<Initials>BM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Dermatology Center, Elbeklinikum Buxtehude, Germany.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Dermatitis</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101207335</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1710-3568</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D052179">Antigens, Plant</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D002934">Cinnamates</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D005419">Flavonoids</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>9009-62-5</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D011429">Propolis</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>9UBO28W2AK</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="C402729">tectochrysin</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D052179" MajorTopicYN="N">Antigens, Plant</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D002934" MajorTopicYN="N">Cinnamates</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D017449" MajorTopicYN="N">Dermatitis, Allergic Contact</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnosis</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="Y">etiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005060" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Europe</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005419" MajorTopicYN="N">Flavonoids</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010328" MajorTopicYN="N">Patch Tests</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011429" MajorTopicYN="N">Propolis</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="Y">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2005</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2006</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2005</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16242084</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F36 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003F36 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:16242084
   |texte=   Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005).
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:16242084" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020