Analysis of codon usage between different poplar species.
Identifieur interne : 003B21 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 003B20; suivant : 003B22Analysis of codon usage between different poplar species.
Auteurs : Meng Zhou ; Chunfa Tong ; Jisen ShiSource :
- Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao [ 1673-8527 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : Codon.
- chemical , metabolism : Codon.
- classification : Populus.
- genetics : Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Populus, Transgenes.
- Genes, Plant, Plants, Genetically Modified, Species Specificity.
Abstract
Codon usage is the selective and nonrandom use of synonymous codons to encode amino acids in genes for proteins. The analysis of codon usage may improve the understanding of codon preferences between different species and allow to rebuild the codons of exogenous genes to increase the expression efficiency of exogenous genes. Here, codon DNA sequence (CDS) of four poplar species, including Populus tremuloides Michx., P. tomentosa Carr., P. deltoides Marsh., and P. trichocarpa Torr. & Gray., is used to analyze the relative frequency of synonymous codon (RFSC). High-frequency codons are selected by high-frequency (HF) codon analysis. The results indicate that the codon usage is common for all four poplar species and the codon preference is quite similar among the four poplar species. However, CCT encoding for Pro, and ACT coding for Thr are the preferred codons in P. tremuloides and P. tomentosa, whereas CCA coding for Pro, and ACA coding for Thr are preferred in P. deltoides and P. trichocarpa. The codons such as TGC coding for Cys, TTC coding for Phe, and AAG coding for Lys, are preferred in the poplar species except P. trichocarpa. GAG coding for Glu is preferred only in P. deltoides, while the other three poplar species prefer to use GAA. The commonness of preferred codon allows exogenous gene designed by the preferred codon of one of the different poplar species to be used in other poplar species.
DOI: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60061-7
PubMed: 17601615
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17601615Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Analysis of codon usage between different poplar species.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Zhou, Meng" sort="Zhou, Meng" uniqKey="Zhou M" first="Meng" last="Zhou">Meng Zhou</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The Key Laboratory of Forestry Genetics and Engineering of State Forestry Administration and Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Foestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tong, Chunfa" sort="Tong, Chunfa" uniqKey="Tong C" first="Chunfa" last="Tong">Chunfa Tong</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shi, Jisen" sort="Shi, Jisen" uniqKey="Shi J" first="Jisen" last="Shi">Jisen Shi</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17601615</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17601615</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60061-7</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003B21</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003B21</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Analysis of codon usage between different poplar species.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Zhou, Meng" sort="Zhou, Meng" uniqKey="Zhou M" first="Meng" last="Zhou">Meng Zhou</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>The Key Laboratory of Forestry Genetics and Engineering of State Forestry Administration and Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Foestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tong, Chunfa" sort="Tong, Chunfa" uniqKey="Tong C" first="Chunfa" last="Tong">Chunfa Tong</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Shi, Jisen" sort="Shi, Jisen" uniqKey="Shi J" first="Jisen" last="Shi">Jisen Shi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1673-8527</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Codon (genetics)</term>
<term>Codon (metabolism)</term>
<term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant (genetics)</term>
<term>Genes, Plant (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plants, Genetically Modified (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (classification)</term>
<term>Populus (genetics)</term>
<term>Species Specificity (MeSH)</term>
<term>Transgenes (genetics)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Codon</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en"><term>Codon</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</term>
<term>Populus</term>
<term>Transgenes</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Genes, Plant</term>
<term>Plants, Genetically Modified</term>
<term>Species Specificity</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Codon usage is the selective and nonrandom use of synonymous codons to encode amino acids in genes for proteins. The analysis of codon usage may improve the understanding of codon preferences between different species and allow to rebuild the codons of exogenous genes to increase the expression efficiency of exogenous genes. Here, codon DNA sequence (CDS) of four poplar species, including Populus tremuloides Michx., P. tomentosa Carr., P. deltoides Marsh., and P. trichocarpa Torr. & Gray., is used to analyze the relative frequency of synonymous codon (RFSC). High-frequency codons are selected by high-frequency (HF) codon analysis. The results indicate that the codon usage is common for all four poplar species and the codon preference is quite similar among the four poplar species. However, CCT encoding for Pro, and ACT coding for Thr are the preferred codons in P. tremuloides and P. tomentosa, whereas CCA coding for Pro, and ACA coding for Thr are preferred in P. deltoides and P. trichocarpa. The codons such as TGC coding for Cys, TTC coding for Phe, and AAG coding for Lys, are preferred in the poplar species except P. trichocarpa. GAG coding for Glu is preferred only in P. deltoides, while the other three poplar species prefer to use GAA. The commonness of preferred codon allows exogenous gene designed by the preferred codon of one of the different poplar species to be used in other poplar species.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17601615</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1673-8527</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>34</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Genet Genomics</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Analysis of codon usage between different poplar species.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>555-61</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Codon usage is the selective and nonrandom use of synonymous codons to encode amino acids in genes for proteins. The analysis of codon usage may improve the understanding of codon preferences between different species and allow to rebuild the codons of exogenous genes to increase the expression efficiency of exogenous genes. Here, codon DNA sequence (CDS) of four poplar species, including Populus tremuloides Michx., P. tomentosa Carr., P. deltoides Marsh., and P. trichocarpa Torr. & Gray., is used to analyze the relative frequency of synonymous codon (RFSC). High-frequency codons are selected by high-frequency (HF) codon analysis. The results indicate that the codon usage is common for all four poplar species and the codon preference is quite similar among the four poplar species. However, CCT encoding for Pro, and ACT coding for Thr are the preferred codons in P. tremuloides and P. tomentosa, whereas CCA coding for Pro, and ACA coding for Thr are preferred in P. deltoides and P. trichocarpa. The codons such as TGC coding for Cys, TTC coding for Phe, and AAG coding for Lys, are preferred in the poplar species except P. trichocarpa. GAG coding for Glu is preferred only in P. deltoides, while the other three poplar species prefer to use GAA. The commonness of preferred codon allows exogenous gene designed by the preferred codon of one of the different poplar species to be used in other poplar species.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhou</LastName>
<ForeName>Meng</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The Key Laboratory of Forestry Genetics and Engineering of State Forestry Administration and Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Foestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tong</LastName>
<ForeName>Chunfa</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Shi</LastName>
<ForeName>Jisen</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>China</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Genet Genomics</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101304616</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1673-8527</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D003062">Codon</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003062" MajorTopicYN="N">Codon</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018506" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017343" MajorTopicYN="N">Genes, Plant</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D030821" MajorTopicYN="N">Plants, Genetically Modified</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="Y">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013045" MajorTopicYN="N">Species Specificity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019076" MajorTopicYN="N">Transgenes</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2006</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2006</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17601615</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S1673-8527(07)60061-7</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60061-7</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B21 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003B21 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= PoplarV1 |flux= Main |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:17601615 |texte= Analysis of codon usage between different poplar species. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17601615" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. | ![]() |