Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].
Identifieur interne : 003590 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 003589; suivant : 003591Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].
Auteurs : Leland J. Cseke ; Chung-Jui Tsai ; Alistair Rogers ; Matthew P. Nelsen ; Holly L. White ; David F. Karnosky ; Gopi K. PodilaSource :
- The New phytologist [ 1469-8137 ] ; 2009.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Carbon (metabolism), Carbon Dioxide (pharmacology), Clone Cells (MeSH), Gene Expression Profiling (MeSH), Gene Expression Regulation, Plant (drug effects), Gene Expression Regulation, Plant (radiation effects), Genes, Plant (genetics), Genetic Variation (drug effects), Genetic Variation (radiation effects), Genotype (MeSH), Light (MeSH), Nitrogen (metabolism), Organ Size (drug effects), Organ Size (radiation effects), Photosynthesis (drug effects), Photosynthesis (radiation effects), Plant Leaves (drug effects), Plant Leaves (genetics), Plant Leaves (radiation effects), Plant Stems (anatomy & histology), Plant Stems (drug effects), Plant Stems (radiation effects), Populus (drug effects), Populus (genetics), Populus (physiology), Populus (radiation effects), RNA, Messenger (genetics), RNA, Messenger (metabolism), Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (MeSH), Seasons (MeSH), Transcription, Genetic (drug effects), Transcription, Genetic (radiation effects).
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : RNA, Messenger.
- chemical , metabolism : Carbon, Nitrogen, RNA, Messenger.
- chemical , pharmacology : Carbon Dioxide.
- anatomy & histology : Plant Stems.
- drug effects : Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Genetic Variation, Organ Size, Photosynthesis, Plant Leaves, Plant Stems, Populus, Transcription, Genetic.
- genetics : Genes, Plant, Plant Leaves, Populus.
- physiology : Populus.
- radiation effects : Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Genetic Variation, Organ Size, Photosynthesis, Plant Leaves, Plant Stems, Populus, Transcription, Genetic.
- Clone Cells, Gene Expression Profiling, Genotype, Light, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Seasons.
Abstract
This study compared the leaf transcription profiles, physiological characteristics and primary metabolites of two Populus tremuloides genotypes (clones 216 and 271) known to differ in their responses to long-term elevated [CO2] (e[CO2]) at the Aspen free-air CO2 enrichment site near Rhinelander, WI, USA. The physiological responses of these clones were similar in terms of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and leaf area index under e[CO2], yet very different in terms of growth enhancement (0-10% in clone 216; 40-50% in clone 271). Although few genes responded to long-term exposure to e[CO2], the transcriptional activity of leaf e[CO2]-responsive genes was distinctly different between the clones, differentially impacting multiple pathways during both early and late growing seasons. An analysis of transcript abundance and carbon/nitrogen biochemistry suggested that the CO2-responsive clone (271) partitions carbon into pathways associated with active defense/response to stress, carbohydrate/starch biosynthesis and subsequent growth. The CO2-unresponsive clone (216) partitions carbon into pathways associated with passive defense (e.g. lignin, phenylpropanoid) and cell wall thickening. This study indicates that there is significant variation in expression patterns between different tree genotypes in response to long-term exposure to e[CO2]. Consequently, future efforts to improve productivity or other advantageous traits for carbon sequestration should include an examination of genetic variability in CO2 responsiveness.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02812.x
PubMed: 19383098
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19383098Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].</title><author><name sortKey="Cseke, Leland J" sort="Cseke, Leland J" uniqKey="Cseke L" first="Leland J" last="Cseke">Leland J. Cseke</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tsai, Chung Jui" sort="Tsai, Chung Jui" uniqKey="Tsai C" first="Chung-Jui" last="Tsai">Chung-Jui Tsai</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rogers, Alistair" sort="Rogers, Alistair" uniqKey="Rogers A" first="Alistair" last="Rogers">Alistair Rogers</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nelsen, Matthew P" sort="Nelsen, Matthew P" uniqKey="Nelsen M" first="Matthew P" last="Nelsen">Matthew P. Nelsen</name></author><author><name sortKey="White, Holly L" sort="White, Holly L" uniqKey="White H" first="Holly L" last="White">Holly L. White</name></author><author><name sortKey="Karnosky, David F" sort="Karnosky, David F" uniqKey="Karnosky D" first="David F" last="Karnosky">David F. Karnosky</name></author><author><name sortKey="Podila, Gopi K" sort="Podila, Gopi K" uniqKey="Podila G" first="Gopi K" last="Podila">Gopi K. Podila</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19383098</idno><idno type="pmid">19383098</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02812.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003590</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003590</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].</title><author><name sortKey="Cseke, Leland J" sort="Cseke, Leland J" uniqKey="Cseke L" first="Leland J" last="Cseke">Leland J. Cseke</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tsai, Chung Jui" sort="Tsai, Chung Jui" uniqKey="Tsai C" first="Chung-Jui" last="Tsai">Chung-Jui Tsai</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rogers, Alistair" sort="Rogers, Alistair" uniqKey="Rogers A" first="Alistair" last="Rogers">Alistair Rogers</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nelsen, Matthew P" sort="Nelsen, Matthew P" uniqKey="Nelsen M" first="Matthew P" last="Nelsen">Matthew P. Nelsen</name></author><author><name sortKey="White, Holly L" sort="White, Holly L" uniqKey="White H" first="Holly L" last="White">Holly L. White</name></author><author><name sortKey="Karnosky, David F" sort="Karnosky, David F" uniqKey="Karnosky D" first="David F" last="Karnosky">David F. Karnosky</name></author><author><name sortKey="Podila, Gopi K" sort="Podila, Gopi K" uniqKey="Podila G" first="Gopi K" last="Podila">Gopi K. Podila</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The New phytologist</title><idno type="eISSN">1469-8137</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Carbon (metabolism)</term><term>Carbon Dioxide (pharmacology)</term><term>Clone Cells (MeSH)</term><term>Gene Expression Profiling (MeSH)</term><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant (drug effects)</term><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant (radiation effects)</term><term>Genes, Plant (genetics)</term><term>Genetic Variation (drug effects)</term><term>Genetic Variation (radiation effects)</term><term>Genotype (MeSH)</term><term>Light (MeSH)</term><term>Nitrogen (metabolism)</term><term>Organ Size (drug effects)</term><term>Organ Size (radiation effects)</term><term>Photosynthesis (drug effects)</term><term>Photosynthesis (radiation effects)</term><term>Plant Leaves (drug effects)</term><term>Plant Leaves (genetics)</term><term>Plant Leaves (radiation effects)</term><term>Plant Stems (anatomy & histology)</term><term>Plant Stems (drug effects)</term><term>Plant Stems (radiation effects)</term><term>Populus (drug effects)</term><term>Populus (genetics)</term><term>Populus (physiology)</term><term>Populus (radiation effects)</term><term>RNA, Messenger (genetics)</term><term>RNA, Messenger (metabolism)</term><term>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (MeSH)</term><term>Seasons (MeSH)</term><term>Transcription, Genetic (drug effects)</term><term>Transcription, Genetic (radiation effects)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>RNA, Messenger</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en"><term>Carbon</term><term>Nitrogen</term><term>RNA, Messenger</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="pharmacology" xml:lang="en"><term>Carbon Dioxide</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomy & histology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plant Stems</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="drug effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</term><term>Genetic Variation</term><term>Organ Size</term><term>Photosynthesis</term><term>Plant Leaves</term><term>Plant Stems</term><term>Populus</term><term>Transcription, Genetic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Genes, Plant</term><term>Plant Leaves</term><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="radiation effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</term><term>Genetic Variation</term><term>Organ Size</term><term>Photosynthesis</term><term>Plant Leaves</term><term>Plant Stems</term><term>Populus</term><term>Transcription, Genetic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Clone Cells</term><term>Gene Expression Profiling</term><term>Genotype</term><term>Light</term><term>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</term><term>Seasons</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study compared the leaf transcription profiles, physiological characteristics and primary metabolites of two Populus tremuloides genotypes (clones 216 and 271) known to differ in their responses to long-term elevated [CO2] (e[CO2]) at the Aspen free-air CO2 enrichment site near Rhinelander, WI, USA. The physiological responses of these clones were similar in terms of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and leaf area index under e[CO2], yet very different in terms of growth enhancement (0-10% in clone 216; 40-50% in clone 271). Although few genes responded to long-term exposure to e[CO2], the transcriptional activity of leaf e[CO2]-responsive genes was distinctly different between the clones, differentially impacting multiple pathways during both early and late growing seasons. An analysis of transcript abundance and carbon/nitrogen biochemistry suggested that the CO2-responsive clone (271) partitions carbon into pathways associated with active defense/response to stress, carbohydrate/starch biosynthesis and subsequent growth. The CO2-unresponsive clone (216) partitions carbon into pathways associated with passive defense (e.g. lignin, phenylpropanoid) and cell wall thickening. This study indicates that there is significant variation in expression patterns between different tree genotypes in response to long-term exposure to e[CO2]. Consequently, future efforts to improve productivity or other advantageous traits for carbon sequestration should include an examination of genetic variability in CO2 responsiveness.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19383098</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>30</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1469-8137</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>182</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The New phytologist</Title><ISOAbbreviation>New Phytol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>891-911</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02812.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>This study compared the leaf transcription profiles, physiological characteristics and primary metabolites of two Populus tremuloides genotypes (clones 216 and 271) known to differ in their responses to long-term elevated [CO2] (e[CO2]) at the Aspen free-air CO2 enrichment site near Rhinelander, WI, USA. The physiological responses of these clones were similar in terms of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and leaf area index under e[CO2], yet very different in terms of growth enhancement (0-10% in clone 216; 40-50% in clone 271). Although few genes responded to long-term exposure to e[CO2], the transcriptional activity of leaf e[CO2]-responsive genes was distinctly different between the clones, differentially impacting multiple pathways during both early and late growing seasons. An analysis of transcript abundance and carbon/nitrogen biochemistry suggested that the CO2-responsive clone (271) partitions carbon into pathways associated with active defense/response to stress, carbohydrate/starch biosynthesis and subsequent growth. The CO2-unresponsive clone (216) partitions carbon into pathways associated with passive defense (e.g. lignin, phenylpropanoid) and cell wall thickening. This study indicates that there is significant variation in expression patterns between different tree genotypes in response to long-term exposure to e[CO2]. Consequently, future efforts to improve productivity or other advantageous traits for carbon sequestration should include an examination of genetic variability in CO2 responsiveness.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cseke</LastName><ForeName>Leland J</ForeName><Initials>LJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tsai</LastName><ForeName>Chung-Jui</ForeName><Initials>CJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rogers</LastName><ForeName>Alistair</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nelsen</LastName><ForeName>Matthew P</ForeName><Initials>MP</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>White</LastName><ForeName>Holly L</ForeName><Initials>HL</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Karnosky</LastName><ForeName>David F</ForeName><Initials>DF</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Podila</LastName><ForeName>Gopi K</ForeName><Initials>GK</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>New Phytol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9882884</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0028-646X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012333">RNA, Messenger</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>142M471B3J</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002245">Carbon Dioxide</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>7440-44-0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002244">Carbon</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>N762921K75</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D009584">Nitrogen</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002244" MajorTopicYN="N">Carbon</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002245" MajorTopicYN="N">Carbon Dioxide</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="Y">pharmacology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002999" MajorTopicYN="N">Clone Cells</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020869" MajorTopicYN="Y">Gene Expression Profiling</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018506" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="Y">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017343" MajorTopicYN="N">Genes, Plant</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014644" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Variation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005838" MajorTopicYN="N">Genotype</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008027" MajorTopicYN="N">Light</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009584" MajorTopicYN="N">Nitrogen</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009929" MajorTopicYN="N">Organ Size</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010788" MajorTopicYN="N">Photosynthesis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018515" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Leaves</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="Y">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018547" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Stems</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000033" MajorTopicYN="N">anatomy & histology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012333" MajorTopicYN="N">RNA, Messenger</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020133" MajorTopicYN="N">Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012621" MajorTopicYN="N">Seasons</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014158" MajorTopicYN="N">Transcription, Genetic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000528" MajorTopicYN="N">radiation effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19383098</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">NPH2812</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02812.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003590 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003590 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19383098
|texte= Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19383098" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |