Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2.
Identifieur interne : 003479 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 003478; suivant : 003480Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2.
Auteurs : Andrew Holmes ; Anubhav Vinayak ; Cherise Benton ; Aaron Esbenshade ; Carlisle Heinselman ; Daniel Frankland ; Samatha Kulkarni ; Adrienne Kurtanich ; Jonathan CaguiatSource :
- Current microbiology [ 1432-0991 ] ; 2009.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- DNA, Bacterial (genetics), Drug Resistance, Bacterial (MeSH), Enterobacter (classification), Enterobacter (drug effects), Enterobacter (genetics), Enterobacter (isolation & purification), Metals, Heavy (pharmacology), Molecular Sequence Data (MeSH), Phylogeny (MeSH), RNA, Ribosomal, 16S (MeSH), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (classification), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (drug effects), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (genetics), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (isolation & purification), Water Microbiology (MeSH).
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : DNA, Bacterial.
- classification : Enterobacter, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
- drug effects : Enterobacter, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
- genetics : Enterobacter, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
- isolation & purification : Enterobacter, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
- chemical , pharmacology : Metals, Heavy.
- Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Water Microbiology.
Abstract
The Y-12 plant in Oak Ridge, TN, which manufactured nuclear weapons during World War II and the Cold War, contaminated East Fork Poplar Creek with heavy metals. The multimetal resistant bacterial strain, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Oak Ridge strain O2 (S. maltophilia O2), was isolated from East Fork Poplar Creek. Sequence analysis of 16s rDNA suggested that our working strain of S. maltophilia O2 was a strain of Enterobacter. Phylogenetic tree analysis and biochemical tests confirmed that it belonged to an Enterobacter species. This new strain was named Enterobacter sp. YSU. Using a modified R3A growth medium, R3A-Tris, the Hg(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Cu(II), Au(III), Cr(VI), Ag(I), As(III), and Se(IV) MICs for a confirmed strain of S. maltophilia O2 were 0.24, 0.33, 5, 5, 0.25, 7, 0.03, 14, and 40 mM, respectively, compared to 0.07, 0.24, 0.8, 3, 0.05, 0.4, 0.08, 14, and 40 mM, respectively, for Enterobacter sp. YSU. Although S. maltophilia O2 was generally more metal resistant than Enterobacter sp. YSU, in comparison to Escherichia coli strain HB101, Enterobacter sp. YSU was resistant to Hg(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Au(III), Ag(I), As(III), and Se(IV). By studying metal resistances in these two strains, it may be possible to understand what makes one microorganism more metal resistant than another microorganism. This work also provided benchmark MICs that can be used to evaluate the metal resistance properties of other bacterial isolates from East Fork Poplar Creek and other metal contaminated sites.
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-009-9471-2
PubMed: 19688378
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19688378Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Holmes, Andrew" sort="Holmes, Andrew" uniqKey="Holmes A" first="Andrew" last="Holmes">Andrew Holmes</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vinayak, Anubhav" sort="Vinayak, Anubhav" uniqKey="Vinayak A" first="Anubhav" last="Vinayak">Anubhav Vinayak</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Benton, Cherise" sort="Benton, Cherise" uniqKey="Benton C" first="Cherise" last="Benton">Cherise Benton</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Esbenshade, Aaron" sort="Esbenshade, Aaron" uniqKey="Esbenshade A" first="Aaron" last="Esbenshade">Aaron Esbenshade</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Heinselman, Carlisle" sort="Heinselman, Carlisle" uniqKey="Heinselman C" first="Carlisle" last="Heinselman">Carlisle Heinselman</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frankland, Daniel" sort="Frankland, Daniel" uniqKey="Frankland D" first="Daniel" last="Frankland">Daniel Frankland</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kulkarni, Samatha" sort="Kulkarni, Samatha" uniqKey="Kulkarni S" first="Samatha" last="Kulkarni">Samatha Kulkarni</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kurtanich, Adrienne" sort="Kurtanich, Adrienne" uniqKey="Kurtanich A" first="Adrienne" last="Kurtanich">Adrienne Kurtanich</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Caguiat, Jonathan" sort="Caguiat, Jonathan" uniqKey="Caguiat J" first="Jonathan" last="Caguiat">Jonathan Caguiat</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19688378</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19688378</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00284-009-9471-2</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">003479</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003479</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Holmes, Andrew" sort="Holmes, Andrew" uniqKey="Holmes A" first="Andrew" last="Holmes">Andrew Holmes</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vinayak, Anubhav" sort="Vinayak, Anubhav" uniqKey="Vinayak A" first="Anubhav" last="Vinayak">Anubhav Vinayak</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Benton, Cherise" sort="Benton, Cherise" uniqKey="Benton C" first="Cherise" last="Benton">Cherise Benton</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Esbenshade, Aaron" sort="Esbenshade, Aaron" uniqKey="Esbenshade A" first="Aaron" last="Esbenshade">Aaron Esbenshade</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Heinselman, Carlisle" sort="Heinselman, Carlisle" uniqKey="Heinselman C" first="Carlisle" last="Heinselman">Carlisle Heinselman</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frankland, Daniel" sort="Frankland, Daniel" uniqKey="Frankland D" first="Daniel" last="Frankland">Daniel Frankland</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kulkarni, Samatha" sort="Kulkarni, Samatha" uniqKey="Kulkarni S" first="Samatha" last="Kulkarni">Samatha Kulkarni</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kurtanich, Adrienne" sort="Kurtanich, Adrienne" uniqKey="Kurtanich A" first="Adrienne" last="Kurtanich">Adrienne Kurtanich</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Caguiat, Jonathan" sort="Caguiat, Jonathan" uniqKey="Caguiat J" first="Jonathan" last="Caguiat">Jonathan Caguiat</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Current microbiology</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-0991</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Bacterial (genetics)</term>
<term>Drug Resistance, Bacterial (MeSH)</term>
<term>Enterobacter (classification)</term>
<term>Enterobacter (drug effects)</term>
<term>Enterobacter (genetics)</term>
<term>Enterobacter (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Metals, Heavy (pharmacology)</term>
<term>Molecular Sequence Data (MeSH)</term>
<term>Phylogeny (MeSH)</term>
<term>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S (MeSH)</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (classification)</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (drug effects)</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (genetics)</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Water Microbiology (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Bacterial</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Enterobacter</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="drug effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Enterobacter</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Enterobacter</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en"><term>Enterobacter</term>
<term>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="pharmacology" xml:lang="en"><term>Metals, Heavy</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</term>
<term>Molecular Sequence Data</term>
<term>Phylogeny</term>
<term>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</term>
<term>Water Microbiology</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The Y-12 plant in Oak Ridge, TN, which manufactured nuclear weapons during World War II and the Cold War, contaminated East Fork Poplar Creek with heavy metals. The multimetal resistant bacterial strain, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Oak Ridge strain O2 (S. maltophilia O2), was isolated from East Fork Poplar Creek. Sequence analysis of 16s rDNA suggested that our working strain of S. maltophilia O2 was a strain of Enterobacter. Phylogenetic tree analysis and biochemical tests confirmed that it belonged to an Enterobacter species. This new strain was named Enterobacter sp. YSU. Using a modified R3A growth medium, R3A-Tris, the Hg(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Cu(II), Au(III), Cr(VI), Ag(I), As(III), and Se(IV) MICs for a confirmed strain of S. maltophilia O2 were 0.24, 0.33, 5, 5, 0.25, 7, 0.03, 14, and 40 mM, respectively, compared to 0.07, 0.24, 0.8, 3, 0.05, 0.4, 0.08, 14, and 40 mM, respectively, for Enterobacter sp. YSU. Although S. maltophilia O2 was generally more metal resistant than Enterobacter sp. YSU, in comparison to Escherichia coli strain HB101, Enterobacter sp. YSU was resistant to Hg(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Au(III), Ag(I), As(III), and Se(IV). By studying metal resistances in these two strains, it may be possible to understand what makes one microorganism more metal resistant than another microorganism. This work also provided benchmark MICs that can be used to evaluate the metal resistance properties of other bacterial isolates from East Fork Poplar Creek and other metal contaminated sites.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19688378</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>07</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-0991</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>59</Volume>
<Issue>5</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Nov</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Current microbiology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Curr Microbiol</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>526-31</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00284-009-9471-2</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>The Y-12 plant in Oak Ridge, TN, which manufactured nuclear weapons during World War II and the Cold War, contaminated East Fork Poplar Creek with heavy metals. The multimetal resistant bacterial strain, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Oak Ridge strain O2 (S. maltophilia O2), was isolated from East Fork Poplar Creek. Sequence analysis of 16s rDNA suggested that our working strain of S. maltophilia O2 was a strain of Enterobacter. Phylogenetic tree analysis and biochemical tests confirmed that it belonged to an Enterobacter species. This new strain was named Enterobacter sp. YSU. Using a modified R3A growth medium, R3A-Tris, the Hg(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Cu(II), Au(III), Cr(VI), Ag(I), As(III), and Se(IV) MICs for a confirmed strain of S. maltophilia O2 were 0.24, 0.33, 5, 5, 0.25, 7, 0.03, 14, and 40 mM, respectively, compared to 0.07, 0.24, 0.8, 3, 0.05, 0.4, 0.08, 14, and 40 mM, respectively, for Enterobacter sp. YSU. Although S. maltophilia O2 was generally more metal resistant than Enterobacter sp. YSU, in comparison to Escherichia coli strain HB101, Enterobacter sp. YSU was resistant to Hg(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Au(III), Ag(I), As(III), and Se(IV). By studying metal resistances in these two strains, it may be possible to understand what makes one microorganism more metal resistant than another microorganism. This work also provided benchmark MICs that can be used to evaluate the metal resistance properties of other bacterial isolates from East Fork Poplar Creek and other metal contaminated sites.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Holmes</LastName>
<ForeName>Andrew</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vinayak</LastName>
<ForeName>Anubhav</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Benton</LastName>
<ForeName>Cherise</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Esbenshade</LastName>
<ForeName>Aaron</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Heinselman</LastName>
<ForeName>Carlisle</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Frankland</LastName>
<ForeName>Daniel</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kulkarni</LastName>
<ForeName>Samatha</ForeName>
<Initials>S</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kurtanich</LastName>
<ForeName>Adrienne</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Caguiat</LastName>
<ForeName>Jonathan</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Curr Microbiol</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>7808448</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0343-8651</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D004269">DNA, Bacterial</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D019216">Metals, Heavy</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D012336">RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004269" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Bacterial</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D024881" MajorTopicYN="Y">Drug Resistance, Bacterial</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004754" MajorTopicYN="N">Enterobacter</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="Y">drug effects</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="N">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019216" MajorTopicYN="N">Metals, Heavy</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="Y">pharmacology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008969" MajorTopicYN="N">Molecular Sequence Data</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="N">Phylogeny</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012336" MajorTopicYN="N">RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020615" MajorTopicYN="N">Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="Y">drug effects</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="N">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014871" MajorTopicYN="Y">Water Microbiology</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19688378</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00284-009-9471-2</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2008 Feb 06;3(2):e1539</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18253487</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Health Phys. 1996 Oct;71(4):457-69</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8830747</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3447015</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005 Jun;20(3):191-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15836522</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Feb;57(2):199-203</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16352734</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):46-76</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3881471</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Anim Biotechnol. 2006;17(2):125-35</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17127524</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Can J Microbiol. 2000 Feb;46(2):133-42</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10721481</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):139-45</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11136762</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;5(10):944-53</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14510848</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Basic Microbiol. 2007 Dec;47(6):453-67</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18072246</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jan;49(1):1-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3883894</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genome Biol. 2008 Apr 17;9(4):R74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18419807</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Environ Sci (China). 2007;19(9):1114-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17966518</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Genet Mol Res. 2007 Sep 05;6(3):510-21</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17985304</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):11030-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15258291</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17488738</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7984417</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):57-80</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9457429</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jul;55(7):1665-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16347962</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Microbiology. 2007 Jun;153(Pt 6):1781-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17526835</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9254694</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):13429-34</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8917608</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003479 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003479 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= PoplarV1 |flux= Main |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:19688378 |texte= Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19688378" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. | ![]() |