Field note: comparative efficacy of a woody evapotranspiration landfill cover following the removal of aboveground biomass.
Identifieur interne : 001F90 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 001F89; suivant : 001F91Field note: comparative efficacy of a woody evapotranspiration landfill cover following the removal of aboveground biomass.
Auteurs : William Schnabel ; Jens Munk ; Amanda ByrdSource :
- International journal of phytoremediation [ 1522-6514 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , metabolism : Soil Pollutants.
- growth & development : Populus.
- metabolism : Populus.
- methods : Environmental Restoration and Remediation.
- Biodegradation, Environmental, Plant Transpiration, Seasons, Waste Disposal Facilities.
Abstract
Woody vegetation cultivated for moisture management on evapotranspiration (ET) landfill covers could potentially serve a secondary function as a biomass crop. However, research is required to evaluate the extent to which trees could be harvested from ET covers without significantly impacting their moisture management function. This study investigated the drainage through a six-year-old, primarily poplar/cottonwood ET test cover for a period of one year following the harvest of all woody biomass exceeding a height of 30 cm above ground surface. Results were compared to previously reported drainage observed during the years leading up to the coppice event. In the first year following coppice, the ET cover was found to be 93% effective at redirecting moisture during the spring/summer season, and 95% effective during the subsequent fall/winter season. This was slightly lower than the 95% and 100% efficacy observed in the spring/summer and fall/winter seasons, respectively, during the final measured year prior to coppice. However, the post-coppice efficacy was higher than the efficacy observed during the first three years following establishment of the cover. While additional longer-term studies are recommended, this project demonstrated that woody ET covers could potentially produce harvestable biomass while still effectively managing aerial moisture.
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2013.862210
PubMed: 25254294
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25254294Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Field note: comparative efficacy of a woody evapotranspiration landfill cover following the removal of aboveground biomass.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Schnabel, William" sort="Schnabel, William" uniqKey="Schnabel W" first="William" last="Schnabel">William Schnabel</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>a University of Alaska Fairbanks, Water and Environmental Research Center , Fairbanks , Alaska , USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Munk, Jens" sort="Munk, Jens" uniqKey="Munk J" first="Jens" last="Munk">Jens Munk</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Byrd, Amanda" sort="Byrd, Amanda" uniqKey="Byrd A" first="Amanda" last="Byrd">Amanda Byrd</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25254294</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25254294</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2013.862210</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001F90</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001F90</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Field note: comparative efficacy of a woody evapotranspiration landfill cover following the removal of aboveground biomass.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Schnabel, William" sort="Schnabel, William" uniqKey="Schnabel W" first="William" last="Schnabel">William Schnabel</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>a University of Alaska Fairbanks, Water and Environmental Research Center , Fairbanks , Alaska , USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Munk, Jens" sort="Munk, Jens" uniqKey="Munk J" first="Jens" last="Munk">Jens Munk</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Byrd, Amanda" sort="Byrd, Amanda" uniqKey="Byrd A" first="Amanda" last="Byrd">Amanda Byrd</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">International journal of phytoremediation</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1522-6514</idno>
<imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodegradation, Environmental (MeSH)</term>
<term>Environmental Restoration and Remediation (methods)</term>
<term>Plant Transpiration (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (growth & development)</term>
<term>Populus (metabolism)</term>
<term>Seasons (MeSH)</term>
<term>Soil Pollutants (metabolism)</term>
<term>Waste Disposal Facilities (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en"><term>Soil Pollutants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="metabolism" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Environmental Restoration and Remediation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodegradation, Environmental</term>
<term>Plant Transpiration</term>
<term>Seasons</term>
<term>Waste Disposal Facilities</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Woody vegetation cultivated for moisture management on evapotranspiration (ET) landfill covers could potentially serve a secondary function as a biomass crop. However, research is required to evaluate the extent to which trees could be harvested from ET covers without significantly impacting their moisture management function. This study investigated the drainage through a six-year-old, primarily poplar/cottonwood ET test cover for a period of one year following the harvest of all woody biomass exceeding a height of 30 cm above ground surface. Results were compared to previously reported drainage observed during the years leading up to the coppice event. In the first year following coppice, the ET cover was found to be 93% effective at redirecting moisture during the spring/summer season, and 95% effective during the subsequent fall/winter season. This was slightly lower than the 95% and 100% efficacy observed in the spring/summer and fall/winter seasons, respectively, during the final measured year prior to coppice. However, the post-coppice efficacy was higher than the efficacy observed during the first three years following establishment of the cover. While additional longer-term studies are recommended, this project demonstrated that woody ET covers could potentially produce harvestable biomass while still effectively managing aerial moisture. </div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25254294</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1522-6514</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>17</Volume>
<Issue>1-6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2015</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>International journal of phytoremediation</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Int J Phytoremediation</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Field note: comparative efficacy of a woody evapotranspiration landfill cover following the removal of aboveground biomass.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>159-64</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1080/15226514.2013.862210</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Woody vegetation cultivated for moisture management on evapotranspiration (ET) landfill covers could potentially serve a secondary function as a biomass crop. However, research is required to evaluate the extent to which trees could be harvested from ET covers without significantly impacting their moisture management function. This study investigated the drainage through a six-year-old, primarily poplar/cottonwood ET test cover for a period of one year following the harvest of all woody biomass exceeding a height of 30 cm above ground surface. Results were compared to previously reported drainage observed during the years leading up to the coppice event. In the first year following coppice, the ET cover was found to be 93% effective at redirecting moisture during the spring/summer season, and 95% effective during the subsequent fall/winter season. This was slightly lower than the 95% and 100% efficacy observed in the spring/summer and fall/winter seasons, respectively, during the final measured year prior to coppice. However, the post-coppice efficacy was higher than the efficacy observed during the first three years following establishment of the cover. While additional longer-term studies are recommended, this project demonstrated that woody ET covers could potentially produce harvestable biomass while still effectively managing aerial moisture. </AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schnabel</LastName>
<ForeName>William</ForeName>
<Initials>W</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>a University of Alaska Fairbanks, Water and Environmental Research Center , Fairbanks , Alaska , USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Munk</LastName>
<ForeName>Jens</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Byrd</LastName>
<ForeName>Amanda</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Int J Phytoremediation</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101136878</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1522-6514</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D012989">Soil Pollutants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001673" MajorTopicYN="N">Biodegradation, Environmental</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D052918" MajorTopicYN="N">Environmental Restoration and Remediation</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018526" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Transpiration</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="N">growth & development</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012621" MajorTopicYN="N">Seasons</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012989" MajorTopicYN="N">Soil Pollutants</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D064091" MajorTopicYN="N">Waste Disposal Facilities</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ET cover</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">alternative cover</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">biomass energy</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">lysimetry</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">water balance cover</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25254294</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1080/15226514.2013.862210</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F90 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001F90 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Bois |area= PoplarV1 |flux= Main |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:25254294 |texte= Field note: comparative efficacy of a woody evapotranspiration landfill cover following the removal of aboveground biomass. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25254294" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |