Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in Quercus suber in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi infection.
Identifieur interne : 001001 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001000; suivant : 001002Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in Quercus suber in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi infection.
Auteurs : Ghazal Ebadzad [Portugal] ; Alfredo Cravador [Portugal]Source :
- SpringerPlus [ 2193-1801 ] ; 2014.
Abstract
cDNA-AFLP methodology was used to gain insight into gene fragments differentially present in the mRNA profiles of Quercus suber roots infected with zoospores of Phytophthora cinnamomi at different post challenge time points. Fifty-three transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were identified and sequenced. Six candidate genes were selected based on their expression patterns and homology to genes known to play a role in defence. They encode a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase2 (QsCAD2), a protein disulphide isomerase (QsPDI), a CC-NBS-LRR resistance protein (QsRPc), a thaumatin-like protein (QsTLP), a chitinase (QsCHI) and a 1,3-β-glucanase (QsGlu). Evaluation of the expression of these genes by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) revealed that transcript levels of QsRPc, QsCHI, QsCAD2 and QsPDI increased during the first 24 h post-inoculation, while those of thaumatin-like protein decreased. No differential expression was observed for 1,3-β-glucanase (QsGlu). Four candidate reference genes, polymerase II (QsRPII), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (QsEIF-5A), β-tubulin (QsTUB) and a medium subunit family protein of clathrin adaptor complexes (QsCACs) were assessed to determine the most stable internal references for qRT-PCR normalization in the Phytophthora-Q. suber pathosystem in root tissues. Those found to be more stable, QsRPII and QsCACs, were used as internal reference in the present work. Knowledge on the Quercus defence mechanisms against biotic stress is scarce. This study provides an insight into the gene profiling of a few important genes of Q. suber in response to P. cinnamomi infection contributing to the knowledge of the molecular interactions involving Quercus and root pathogens that can be useful in the future to understand the mechanisms underlying oak resistance to soil-borne oomycetes.
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-613
PubMed: 25392784
PubMed Central: PMC4221558
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in Quercus suber in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi infection.</title><author><name sortKey="Ebadzad, Ghazal" sort="Ebadzad, Ghazal" uniqKey="Ebadzad G" first="Ghazal" last="Ebadzad">Ghazal Ebadzad</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Portugal</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>8005-139 Faro</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cravador, Alfredo" sort="Cravador, Alfredo" uniqKey="Cravador A" first="Alfredo" last="Cravador">Alfredo Cravador</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre for Mediterranean Bioresourses and Food, FCT, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Portugal</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Mediterranean Bioresourses and Food, FCT, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>8005-139 Faro</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25392784</idno><idno type="pmid">25392784</idno><idno type="doi">10.1186/2193-1801-3-613</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC4221558</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000F41</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F41</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000F41</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000F41</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000F41</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in Quercus suber in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi infection.</title><author><name sortKey="Ebadzad, Ghazal" sort="Ebadzad, Ghazal" uniqKey="Ebadzad G" first="Ghazal" last="Ebadzad">Ghazal Ebadzad</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Portugal</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>8005-139 Faro</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cravador, Alfredo" sort="Cravador, Alfredo" uniqKey="Cravador A" first="Alfredo" last="Cravador">Alfredo Cravador</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Centre for Mediterranean Bioresourses and Food, FCT, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Portugal</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Mediterranean Bioresourses and Food, FCT, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>8005-139 Faro</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">SpringerPlus</title><idno type="ISSN">2193-1801</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">cDNA-AFLP methodology was used to gain insight into gene fragments differentially present in the mRNA profiles of Quercus suber roots infected with zoospores of Phytophthora cinnamomi at different post challenge time points. Fifty-three transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were identified and sequenced. Six candidate genes were selected based on their expression patterns and homology to genes known to play a role in defence. They encode a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase2 (QsCAD2), a protein disulphide isomerase (QsPDI), a CC-NBS-LRR resistance protein (QsRPc), a thaumatin-like protein (QsTLP), a chitinase (QsCHI) and a 1,3-β-glucanase (QsGlu). Evaluation of the expression of these genes by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) revealed that transcript levels of QsRPc, QsCHI, QsCAD2 and QsPDI increased during the first 24 h post-inoculation, while those of thaumatin-like protein decreased. No differential expression was observed for 1,3-β-glucanase (QsGlu). Four candidate reference genes, polymerase II (QsRPII), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (QsEIF-5A), β-tubulin (QsTUB) and a medium subunit family protein of clathrin adaptor complexes (QsCACs) were assessed to determine the most stable internal references for qRT-PCR normalization in the Phytophthora-Q. suber pathosystem in root tissues. Those found to be more stable, QsRPII and QsCACs, were used as internal reference in the present work. Knowledge on the Quercus defence mechanisms against biotic stress is scarce. This study provides an insight into the gene profiling of a few important genes of Q. suber in response to P. cinnamomi infection contributing to the knowledge of the molecular interactions involving Quercus and root pathogens that can be useful in the future to understand the mechanisms underlying oak resistance to soil-borne oomycetes. </div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25392784</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>01</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">2193-1801</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>3</Volume><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>SpringerPlus</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Springerplus</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in Quercus suber in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi infection.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>613</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/2193-1801-3-613</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>cDNA-AFLP methodology was used to gain insight into gene fragments differentially present in the mRNA profiles of Quercus suber roots infected with zoospores of Phytophthora cinnamomi at different post challenge time points. Fifty-three transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were identified and sequenced. Six candidate genes were selected based on their expression patterns and homology to genes known to play a role in defence. They encode a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase2 (QsCAD2), a protein disulphide isomerase (QsPDI), a CC-NBS-LRR resistance protein (QsRPc), a thaumatin-like protein (QsTLP), a chitinase (QsCHI) and a 1,3-β-glucanase (QsGlu). Evaluation of the expression of these genes by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) revealed that transcript levels of QsRPc, QsCHI, QsCAD2 and QsPDI increased during the first 24 h post-inoculation, while those of thaumatin-like protein decreased. No differential expression was observed for 1,3-β-glucanase (QsGlu). Four candidate reference genes, polymerase II (QsRPII), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (QsEIF-5A), β-tubulin (QsTUB) and a medium subunit family protein of clathrin adaptor complexes (QsCACs) were assessed to determine the most stable internal references for qRT-PCR normalization in the Phytophthora-Q. suber pathosystem in root tissues. Those found to be more stable, QsRPII and QsCACs, were used as internal reference in the present work. Knowledge on the Quercus defence mechanisms against biotic stress is scarce. This study provides an insight into the gene profiling of a few important genes of Q. suber in response to P. cinnamomi infection contributing to the knowledge of the molecular interactions involving Quercus and root pathogens that can be useful in the future to understand the mechanisms underlying oak resistance to soil-borne oomycetes. </AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ebadzad</LastName><ForeName>Ghazal</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cravador</LastName><ForeName>Alfredo</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre for Mediterranean Bioresourses and Food, FCT, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>17</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Springerplus</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101597967</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>2193-1801</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Biotic stress</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Cork oak</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Defence response</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Reference genes</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">cDNA-AFLP</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">qRT-PCR</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25392784</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/2193-1801-3-613</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">1333</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4221558</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Plant J. 1999 Aug;19(4):473-80</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10504569</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Basic Microbiol. 2008 Aug;48(4):293-301</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18720488</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Sep 18;8(9):e73354</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24058469</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2010 Mar;283(3):233-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20098998</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant J. 1999 Nov;20(3):317-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10571892</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mycorrhiza. 2007 May;17(3):185-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17216276</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Biol Chem. 1994 Dec 23;269(51):32678-84</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7798275</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 1991 Jun;3(6):619-28</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1841721</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jun;48:575-607</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15012275</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Aug;3(8):E175-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11483971</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 1996 Jul;8(7):1137-48</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8768373</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gene. 1983 Nov;25(2-3):263-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6198242</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Mar 25;16(6):2726</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3362681</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Feb;12(2):111-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21245829</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioessays. 2006 Sep;28(9):880-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16937346</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):557-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11964485</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Dec 22;8:131</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19102748</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Planta. 2011 Aug;234(2):377-90</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21505864</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biol Rep. 2009 Jul;36(6):1291-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18622758</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>EMBO J. 2001 Dec 3;20(23):6772-82</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11726513</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):323-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17108957</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cell Death Differ. 2011 Aug;18(8):1247-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21475301</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Jul 20;10:71</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19619301</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011 May 12;6(5):e19434</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21589908</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2014 Sep;27(9):891-900</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24779643</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Cell Biol. 2001 Jan 8;152(1):165-80</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11149929</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Genomics. 2005 Apr 05;6:51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15807902</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Anal Biochem. 2011 Jan 15;408(2):337-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20816740</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Jul;11(7):329-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16782394</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Planta. 2010 Jun;232(1):145-53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20379832</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Mar;110(5):980-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15714329</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jun;48:251-275</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15012264</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jul;67(7):2883-94</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11425698</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 1992 Jun;4(6):645-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1392589</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant J. 1995 Mar;7(3):367-79</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7757111</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39:285-312</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11701867</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2008 Apr;66(6):619-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18247136</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Free Radic Biol Med. 2002 May 1;32(9):841-59</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11978486</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10547847</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2013 Jul;199(2):529-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23672230</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Nov;53(5):701-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15010608</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Apr;4(2):136-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11228436</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jul 1;24(13):2616-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8692705</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 1986 May 29-Jun 4;321(6069):531-2</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3713832</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Planta. 2008 Oct;228(5):883-90</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18651170</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Genet Genomics. 2008 Aug;280(2):111-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18553106</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>EXS. 1999;87:125-35</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10906956</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMB Rep. 2009 Oct 31;42(10):673-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19874713</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 2003 Apr;15(4):809-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12671079</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Virology. 2000 Oct 10;276(1):27-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11021991</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2014 May 23;9(5):e98376</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24859293</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2013 Jul;199(2):308-10</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23782153</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1991 Jul-Aug;4(4):315-23</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1799695</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell. 1989 Apr;1(4):447-457</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12359894</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25;93(13):6808-13</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8692900</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35113</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22529976</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1194-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17776411</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biol (Mosk). 2003 Jul-Aug;37(4):573-84</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12942629</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biochimie. 1993;75(8):687-706</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8286442</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 1990 Apr;92(4):1108-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16667378</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Jun 19;8(6):e67442</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23922636</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9254694</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Curr Opin Immunol. 1991 Feb;3(1):65-70</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1711326</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biochimie. 2006 Jan;88(1):45-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16085352</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Portugal</li></country></list><tree><country name="Portugal"><noRegion><name sortKey="Ebadzad, Ghazal" sort="Ebadzad, Ghazal" uniqKey="Ebadzad G" first="Ghazal" last="Ebadzad">Ghazal Ebadzad</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Cravador, Alfredo" sort="Cravador, Alfredo" uniqKey="Cravador A" first="Alfredo" last="Cravador">Alfredo Cravador</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PhytophthoraV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001001 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001001 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PhytophthoraV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25392784
|texte= Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in Quercus suber in response to Phytophthora cinnamomi infection.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25392784" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PhytophthoraV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |